What exactly do you disagree with? I’m far from a troll just because I have a different opinion! When all you desire is to surround yourself with people who share your opinion, clearly indicates a diminished cognitive road block, which will inevitably stun your intelligence and capacity to engage in debate.
Every point I made was in support of democracy. Just because I feel as though democracy is on the line, citing instances that involve Trump, simply because the most egregious attempts to sidestep the Constitution fall into the Trump world.
If Biden were in this situation, I would call balls and strikes, as it pertains to him. Our two tier system of justice gives Biden a pass on most issues, where Trump gets the shot end of the stick.
The fact that your response identifies me as a troll and that i should be dismissed because you perceived my comments to be a threat fortifies my comments 100%. You will not develop any further intelligence if you continue living in a paradigm where your confirmation bias is the most valuable asset. Your thoughts and tone clearly indicate a deficiency about a whole spectrum of constructs.
Democracy does not need your help. Your tactic of labelling a large group of people as "progressive woke lefties" and then claiming they are all alike is ridiculous. That sort of thing is at the basis of racism, sexism, and other ism's
BTW, the phrase "a deficiency about a whole spectrum of constructs" shows that you're just making things up and attacking by trying to change what words mean. That is a standard right-wing tactic.
As I said before, I am capable of deciphering the differences between democrats and woke progressive lefties. The same is not true with republicans, conservatives and MAGA republicans.
The irony of your statement ‘we don’t your input on democracy’ suggests that you don’t care about anyone’s opinion unless they support your need for confirmation bias.
You inferred that I meant all democrats were lumped into the woke progressive movement. The reason I commented on this article was because its underlying premise is wrong - hard stop. There isn’t law abiding citizens in the United States who stashes $454 million dollars in their mattress. I hate to lump all billionaires into one basket, so I’ll refer to Marc Cuban’s comment where he said no billionaires have that much cash on them.
Donald Trump’s net worth is completely separate from his ability to come up with that much cash without selling major assets. Anyone who doesn’t harbor deep political views would recognize that this was a miscarriage of justice. It’s only the people who hate Trump that would make such an argument. This article, like so many others, are designed to pander to the community who have been manipulated into believing far left propaganda.
Apparently you are less capable of deciphering what words mean. The point I made was that there is a wide range of Dems and "woke progressive lefties" are one part of that range. You are trying to create a "woke progressive lefties" label so you can smear an entire group of people at the same time by implying that they are all the same. They aren't.
trump's penalty was based on the sum of his fraud gains, plus interest. Since the bond is based on the gains, it is extremely high because his fraud was massive. He shouldn't get special treatment. If he needs to sell major assets, that's his problem. There is no miscarriage of justice in applying laws and rules to trump on the same terms as they are applied to other people. Since the fraud is documented and has been adjudicated, the bond ruling does not qualify as a "miscarriage of justice" or "far left propaganda."
As for "This entire article is asthmatically incorrect," you seem to have a bad case of verbal diarrhea. While "asthmatically" can be used to describe something that is operating badly (a rusty saw), it makes no sense applied to words.
FYI, I don't hate trump. He's not worth the energy. I just despise him and his actions. I despise you somewhat less for pretending to have no bias when it's obvious you're a trumpster to the core.
I couldn’t finish what you wrote because it was clearly written before the Appellate Court overturned the decision made by the ridiculous judge and that monstrosity Letitia James.
I understand that all democrats look at republicans as MAGA republicans with very little criteria to judge the difference.
The reason this is propaganda is because the entire point was wrong. Anyone who believed the original bond was accurate, clearly believes that Trump should be punished more than anyone else in his position.
According to the latest correction in the bond required only substantiates my point. What you consider to be low hanging fruit, took a pretty dramatic turn for democracy. By identifying your low hanging fruit morphed into a more realistic bond. Obviously, the miscarriage of justice with which you had issues, simply reinforces my point. Your statements, therefore, are rendered moot. If you choose to support Letitia James, a horrific woman, who campaigned on “getting Trump” leads us to a place where she had no crime in mind, but come hell or high water, she would get him in one way or another.
It’s too bad that woke progressive lefties prioritized getting Trump by employing “you show me the person and I’ll show you the crime”, would support the initial bond of $454 million was applied as an equal application of Justice. God knows, if it were Joe Biden, you and the other lefties, would certainly protest on every major intersection in America.
You were premature in your assessment in the support of a ridiculous initial bond amounted to nothing but propaganda. There’s no way anyone but the woke progressive lefties would support this in the name of equal applied justice.
Your premature belief that the initial bond clearly indicates the difference between a democrat and a far left progressive woke ideology. This country is deep trouble as long as people support any means is justified as long as we get the desired outcome as it applies to Trump. I think you nailed my point spot on.
This platform needs a "thumbs down" for trolls like this guy.
What exactly do you disagree with? I’m far from a troll just because I have a different opinion! When all you desire is to surround yourself with people who share your opinion, clearly indicates a diminished cognitive road block, which will inevitably stun your intelligence and capacity to engage in debate.
Every point I made was in support of democracy. Just because I feel as though democracy is on the line, citing instances that involve Trump, simply because the most egregious attempts to sidestep the Constitution fall into the Trump world.
If Biden were in this situation, I would call balls and strikes, as it pertains to him. Our two tier system of justice gives Biden a pass on most issues, where Trump gets the shot end of the stick.
The fact that your response identifies me as a troll and that i should be dismissed because you perceived my comments to be a threat fortifies my comments 100%. You will not develop any further intelligence if you continue living in a paradigm where your confirmation bias is the most valuable asset. Your thoughts and tone clearly indicate a deficiency about a whole spectrum of constructs.
Democracy does not need your help. Your tactic of labelling a large group of people as "progressive woke lefties" and then claiming they are all alike is ridiculous. That sort of thing is at the basis of racism, sexism, and other ism's
BTW, the phrase "a deficiency about a whole spectrum of constructs" shows that you're just making things up and attacking by trying to change what words mean. That is a standard right-wing tactic.
As I said before, I am capable of deciphering the differences between democrats and woke progressive lefties. The same is not true with republicans, conservatives and MAGA republicans.
The irony of your statement ‘we don’t your input on democracy’ suggests that you don’t care about anyone’s opinion unless they support your need for confirmation bias.
You inferred that I meant all democrats were lumped into the woke progressive movement. The reason I commented on this article was because its underlying premise is wrong - hard stop. There isn’t law abiding citizens in the United States who stashes $454 million dollars in their mattress. I hate to lump all billionaires into one basket, so I’ll refer to Marc Cuban’s comment where he said no billionaires have that much cash on them.
Donald Trump’s net worth is completely separate from his ability to come up with that much cash without selling major assets. Anyone who doesn’t harbor deep political views would recognize that this was a miscarriage of justice. It’s only the people who hate Trump that would make such an argument. This article, like so many others, are designed to pander to the community who have been manipulated into believing far left propaganda.
This entire article is asthmatically incorrect.
Apparently you are less capable of deciphering what words mean. The point I made was that there is a wide range of Dems and "woke progressive lefties" are one part of that range. You are trying to create a "woke progressive lefties" label so you can smear an entire group of people at the same time by implying that they are all the same. They aren't.
trump's penalty was based on the sum of his fraud gains, plus interest. Since the bond is based on the gains, it is extremely high because his fraud was massive. He shouldn't get special treatment. If he needs to sell major assets, that's his problem. There is no miscarriage of justice in applying laws and rules to trump on the same terms as they are applied to other people. Since the fraud is documented and has been adjudicated, the bond ruling does not qualify as a "miscarriage of justice" or "far left propaganda."
As for "This entire article is asthmatically incorrect," you seem to have a bad case of verbal diarrhea. While "asthmatically" can be used to describe something that is operating badly (a rusty saw), it makes no sense applied to words.
FYI, I don't hate trump. He's not worth the energy. I just despise him and his actions. I despise you somewhat less for pretending to have no bias when it's obvious you're a trumpster to the core.
I couldn’t finish what you wrote because it was clearly written before the Appellate Court overturned the decision made by the ridiculous judge and that monstrosity Letitia James.
I understand that all democrats look at republicans as MAGA republicans with very little criteria to judge the difference.
The reason this is propaganda is because the entire point was wrong. Anyone who believed the original bond was accurate, clearly believes that Trump should be punished more than anyone else in his position.
According to the latest correction in the bond required only substantiates my point. What you consider to be low hanging fruit, took a pretty dramatic turn for democracy. By identifying your low hanging fruit morphed into a more realistic bond. Obviously, the miscarriage of justice with which you had issues, simply reinforces my point. Your statements, therefore, are rendered moot. If you choose to support Letitia James, a horrific woman, who campaigned on “getting Trump” leads us to a place where she had no crime in mind, but come hell or high water, she would get him in one way or another.
It’s too bad that woke progressive lefties prioritized getting Trump by employing “you show me the person and I’ll show you the crime”, would support the initial bond of $454 million was applied as an equal application of Justice. God knows, if it were Joe Biden, you and the other lefties, would certainly protest on every major intersection in America.
You were premature in your assessment in the support of a ridiculous initial bond amounted to nothing but propaganda. There’s no way anyone but the woke progressive lefties would support this in the name of equal applied justice.
Your premature belief that the initial bond clearly indicates the difference between a democrat and a far left progressive woke ideology. This country is deep trouble as long as people support any means is justified as long as we get the desired outcome as it applies to Trump. I think you nailed my point spot on.
I agree.