Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel's avatar

"I know we as a society, may not yet to the point where we can count on dispassionate prosecution for what this guy actually did, rather than for what we judge his motives might have been."

...he was clear about his motives. He has said he wanted to "eliminate temptation" by killing these women. This is the defence he has already offered.

I find this argument that we cannot consider prejudice valid as a motive very odd. We already judge murders according to motive- that's why you have murder in the first, second and third degree. It's why we understand that manslaughter is different from murder, and the horrible neologism "unlawful killing" is different from both. We understand there is a difference between negligent homicide and deliberate. Why is it that understanding a prejudice against women, or against Asians, or against Asian women is not sufficiently "dispassionate"?

Expand full comment
Daniel's avatar

"what this guy actually did"

You are deliberately ignoring a vital part of "what this guy actually did" to make this argument. "What this guy actually did" was murder members of a minority for the stated reason that they represented temptations to him. He deliberately murdered Asian women- that was "what he actually did".

Expand full comment
3472 more comments...