Discussion about this post

User's avatar
HereForDaComments's avatar

She signed a contract that said "No Judgment". If she didn't understand what that meant, she should have asked. Ignorance of the content of a signed contract is no defense.

She returned to PF from March 2 to March 4 to approach female patrons and tell them about the transgender thing. The patrons complained to staff; her membership was revoked. If she felt so threatened and emotionally WHATEVER by what happened to her in the locker room and PF, she wouldn't have returned. She did. Numerous times.

Once more: the locker rooms have bathroom stalls with doors and changing rooms with doors. This woman never had to disrobe outside.

I'm as anti-icky, secret-men-looking-at-me as the next woman. But this is not the case here.

This is merely a case of a transphobe hooking up with a transphobe law firm wannabe political figure someday, and making a penis into a molehill.

Expand full comment
Akira Bear's avatar

Hah! Run with that one. I love it. It can be a lawsuit outgrowth of hers.

Expand full comment
224 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?