Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Last Hussar's avatar

Actually, people often lived to a fair age - not as far as now, obviously, but not the comedians' "all dead by 35" trope. It depends how you calculate the average. I believe it is common to ignore infant (less than 5 years old) deaths, because childhood is so dangerous (so VACCINATE, PEOPLE). For example, Robert E Lee lived to 63, Sherman to 71, Beethoven 61. If you have all the childhood deaths, it pulls the average down. Possibly a good thing for the US health system - childhood mortality is above many Western European countries, so if that was counted your average life expectancy would be even further behind that of my socialist death panels NHS.

The thing is child mortality was huge, but the replacement rate was big too (no contraception, plus imperfect understanding of why a woman got pregnant, meant if you fancied a shag there was a good chance a kid would be on the way). This was the problem for women - pushing a parasite out of your body is dangerous.

Wonkettes may take some satisfaction in knowing the wives of rich men could be in more danger than the poor. If you were rich you had a doctor. Doctors had equipment put up the lady's va-jay-jay. Doctors didn't know about the transmission of bacteria, so they didn't sterilise equipment... Poor people had midwives - they didn't have all the flash equipment, so were less likely to transmit infection

Expand full comment
Spotts1701, Taking Bible Guns's avatar

I must've been asleep when Chris Christie got his degree in epidimiology. Else why would he be pontificating about the subject of disease?

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?