It used to be that Republicans wouldn't have to hate President Obama so much if only he had the Dad Jeans to call terrorist attacks by their rightful name, which he has never done. But that was ages ago, and now that the president, ever the appeaser, has started using the T-word for the first time ever,there's a whole new standard. Sure, the president said the slaughter at Parisian satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo's office was a "terrorist attack" and that his administration would "help bring these terrorists to justice." But that's still sort of wishy-washy in today's even more terroristical climate, don't you think? How do we know he really, truly understands the seriousness of a terrorist attack if he's only willing to call it a terrorist attack?
Please go on Fox News and explain, Sen. Lindsey Graham:
Saudi Arabia has spent over $100 billion to promote Wahhabism all over the world. This gave rise to the Taliban, al Qaeda, and ISIL. Saudi Arabia was the home of the majority of the 9/11 terrorists. But the House of Saud and the Bush family have such close ties that Prince Bandar was called 'Bandar Bush' by George H.W. Bush and there are photographs of President George W. Bush holding hands with and kissing the King of Saudi Arabia. There is only one way to solve the problem of violent jihadism. That is to invade and conquer Saudi Arabia and arrest the entire Bush clan as fellow travelers and agents for the terrorists. The Bushs and Saudi royal family should be kept in GITMO for life and Saudi Arabia carved up for our various oil companies.
you misspelled "lie holes".