Donald Trump Accidentally Right About A Thing
Can we just say that it can be a little nauseating to see so many Republicans saying a lot of the right things about Syria for all the wrong reasons?
Of course, if Syria had any substantial oil reserves, the totally-serious-this-time possible presidential candidate might be singing a different tune, like that one time, so very long ago (March of this year) when he addressed CPAC and advocated re-invading Iraq so we could seize its oil and "pay ourselves back," because THAT would be such an excellent freakin' use of blood and treasure.
At least he's a consistent moron -- he said the same thing in 2011. And in 2011, he was only interested in intervening in Libya if the U.S. could -- guess what? -- "take the oil."
He's a man of ideas, you know. Ideas about oil. Oil that we should take.
Oh, Duhnald, stop plagiarizing <a href="http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2013\/09\/05\/rachel-maddow-syria-iraq-war-architects_n_3872722.html" target="_blank">Rachel Maddow</a>
I always thought it was the threat of waterboarding.