Please Nobody Tell The Yahoo! Commenters About Michelle Obama's New Portrait
Do you know who Yahoo! commenters love? Hint: It is Michelle Obama! They love her very, very much, and when they call her "Moocow" and "Squatch" and "Sasquatch" and "Mooch" and "Silver-Backed Gorilla," it is not because of racisms but is more like a ... well, okay, maybe it is a LITTLE bit racist.
Also, because the Yahoo! and also WeaselZippers and also Breitbart and also all-of-them commenters love Michelle Obama so much, please do not tell them about how she has a new official portrait, as this will doubtless send them into a frenzied elation of lurve from which it would be well nigh impossible for them to alight!
Do we love this new portrait as much as we loved her old portrait? We do not, no, not as much. It does not show her bangin' arms, for one thing, and she is maybe a little overly made up and does not look as relaxed and happy as usual. But it is fine! It is a fine new portrait!
Of course, it would be better if she didn't insist on spending TAXPAYARZ MUNEEZ on having someone (probably someone already employed to take pictures? We will never know, because we do not care) take a picture of her for a portrait, unlike all the WHITE first ladies, who obviously never did that, and also cut up hot dog's, you elitist bitch.
Bullshit. There is nobody named "james bob".
Yaknow, back when I was married, there were several Valentine's Day dinners when I "dropped" $400 to $500 (because good wine is fucking ridiculous expensive in most decent restaurants in expensive metro areas), and I wasn't even the fucking PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES at the time. And this was in the South SF Bay, not San Fran itself.
Also, too, the POTUS has a salary of $400K per year, plus expenses. And room and board/
Why the fuck shouldn't he spend a grand on a nice night out?
I'd love to know what Jamie Dimon spent on V-Day.