THIS ELECTION, YOU GUYS! It is … confusing? Like, some people say that Barack Obama will win re-election, while others say that his opponent, Mitt Romney, will prevail! WHO ARE WE TO TRUST? Normally, of course, we’d turn to the literally of hundreds of people who are employed full-time by various old- and new-media outlets to report on and offer opinions about politics, because they know things. But as a survey of these sages in the Politico reveals, they’re completely at sea as well! You must click the “MORE” clicky in order to read the single greatest quote in a Politico article of all time, which reveals the utter bankruptcy of the pundit class. Then you can spend the next six days doing something productive and rewarding with your life!
Here it is, ABC News’s highly compensated reporter Jon Karl, offering an extremely clear explanation of why his job should not exist:
I think more than any other race I’ve covered this is one where both sides genuinely seem to believe they’re going to win. That’s different … Given that, it’s hard for somebody covering the race to make a call. I’m completely confused. I have no idea who’s going to win. And I usually have a sense of who’s going to win.
Oh no, reporters aren’t getting “inside scoops” from triumphalist and/or fatalist campaign staffers. There’s literally no other way to tell! Like if only there were people … surveying Americans on how they plan to vote? And those surveys could be aggregated and analyzed, somehow? In totally unrelated news, this Politico article was brought to our attention by your math and numbers boyfriend Nate Silver, whose Twitter feed is growing increasingly catty:
Anyway, allow us here at Wonkette to tell you that we have zero “insider information” but we are reasonably sure Barry will win anyway. Now, go, shoo, read a novel or watch a movie or something and then read a newspaper next Wednesday to find out who won! (Just kidding, refresh Wonkette dot com constantly for election updates, THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION DEPENDS ENTIRELY ON YOU PAYING ATTENTION TO EVERY DETAIL AT ALL TIMES.) [Politico]
{ 204 comments }
Nate Silver is my imaginary really smart boyfriend. I like when he tells me that less than 17% of people I meet today will think my ass looks fat in these jeans.
I pay $750 a year for Nate Silver's Sports Book Newsletter. I've made back $14 already with his picks!
Between the two of you, then, I'd say Nate's the playah.
CK:
You can move on this game like it's already been played!
FIVE STAR pick of the year! Every week…
If you look around the poker table and don't see the fish…
Nice tits, too! 100%
less than 17% of people I meet today will think my ass looks fat in these jeans
This is 100% an example of a situation which calls for pics.
Barb, sight unseen your ass looks *fantastic* in those jeans.
Love ya, Moses.
Right back atcha, Barb. I want those Wonkette personals to get up and running, so I can advertise that I'm looking for a Jewish version of you.
Nate Silver is the only thing between me and utter insanity. I have been so on edge since the disaster in Denver, and he is the only person who has kept me from losing it entirely. To wit:
Oct. 31: Obama’s Electoral College ‘Firewall’ Holding in Polls
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/…
(please God please God please God…)
Just out of curiosity, what would happen if you did "lose it entirely"?
You'd have to ask the good folks at the mental institution, to which I would be committed after I started running down the street screamingobscenities.More so.
I've always pictured your ass out of your jeans, but that's just me….
Joe Scarborough said his gut is saying that Nate Silver is a totally inept douchebag, because of 'math'. You can't escape that kind of science.
Gut math = wishful thinking, so yeah, very cutting edge science.
The only gut math that should matter is "Gut empty + Food = Actor212 happy"
Also, "effeminate".
Yeah, those skinny, effeminate guys never seem to be good with math and numbers and stuff. I mean, do any of them even own a computer?
Meanwhile, my gut says that Joe Scarborough is the totally inept douchebag.
Also too my eyes, ears, brain, and voicebox say that too.
My gut math failed when I tried to eat a 72 oz steak in Ft Worth.
"Gut math" is a pretty good description of Scarborough's work: "I consume a bunch of facts and then I shit out some stinky useless turd later."
I heard that The Internonator has actually made a $1000 bet with Silver that Willard will win.
At +70% odds? Only a fool WOULD'NT take the man's money.
I ignore Fuck Toad and his fellow asswipe, Mark Halperin. This keeps me from cutting a bitch.
Did you see them doing the mean girls bit to Mika over the binders thing? The sheer dickitude was palpable. You could smell the smegma through the screen.
The only razor I'm interested in is one with which to slit my wrists if Rommel wins.
My boyfriend Nate Silver says that Obama has a 79% chance of winning.
Please GOD…
But he's so slender and effeminate!
Nerds who laugh last, laugh best.
Boy, don't I know that….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nate_Silver#Personal…
"He is openly gay.[112] He has described himself as "half Jewish".[113]"
So sorry, ladies; and good luck, gay men. And yes, that "slender and effeminate" bullshit is just pure homophobia, with maybe a bit of antisemitism thrown in.
I have no problem with one or more of my secret boyfriends being gay. The whole secret boyfriend thing is different than, say, stalking in that I never actually expect to meet or date him.
Intelligence *is* pretty cute.
I call bullshit. Gay? No possible way.
I mean, look at all the time he spends talking about sports.
He and Rachel are reverse-dating.
His latest on the NYT website:
Oct. 31: Obama’s Electoral College ‘Firewall’ Holding in Polls
(as I said above, please God please God please God…)
I'm feeling hopeful (word choice deliberate). Intrade has Bamz at 67.5% which is significantly better than where we were a week ago. Now that Christie has decided to throw his weight (ha! I'm here all week, ladies and gents!) behind Barry, which Barry completely deserves, because BF has been HANDLING this hurricane business, I think we're good. Unless the unemployment rate ticks back up above 8% tomorrow, in which case, oh god…
Romney will never do anything to warrant getting a poison pill from the Republican establishment.
If the stupid shit he's said and done so far hasn't turned them against him, I can't imagine anything else would.
Romney isn't near the top of the stupid list for the GOP. Remember what other frickin brain surgeons they have in that party, including but not limited to Michele Bachmann and Alan West.
rommel libel!
"Well, look, at the end of the day…" Jesus I get so sick of hearing that shit.
Do you need someone to reach out and leverage a paradigm to inform the synergy of the low-hanging fruit at the end of the day?
I hate it most when my low-hanging fruit gets wrapped around the axle.
A former boss once cracked me up with, "Here we go down the rabbit hole, only to find a can of worms."
I can never reach the low-hanging fruit because the long pole in the tent forever keeps it out of reach.
But, you can use the long pole to poke the camel's nose.
Have you had to listen to a business consultant recently?
Worse. I read ad copy for a living. Going forward also too as well.
"The fact of the matter is …"
If I had a nickel every time I heard that.
"Now here's the deal…"
MAKE. IT. STOP.
One-Stop Shopping, where you can pick and choose …
I agree — it's got really bad optics, and the calculus is all wrong.
We need to be proactive instead of reactive and completely maximize our resources. Even if we do have a lot on our plate right now, we need to increase our deliverables during this cycle.
Oh, I'm sorry you feel that way.
But what could possibly incentivize us to transition to that archetype?
Clearly you need to dialogue with your associates to clarify the issue.
Every reply to this comment is an example of thinking outside the box.
In the final analysis.
This shit almost drives me as crazy as "Some people believe in science-based explanations concerning climate change, some people don't believe in science. I guess we'll never know who is right!"
When one party has a history of being grounded (for the most part) in science and reality, and the other has a history of catering to people who believe cavemen rode dinosaurs and that God sees rape as a blessing, which do you think has the better ability to make predictions about the very-near future?
Dinosaur-rape-cavemen, obviously.
That last paragraph would make a good question for an opinion poll.
If I did opinion polls, the questions would be:
"Are you an undecided voter?"
(if yes) "What the fuck is wrong with you?"
There also should be, "Are you REALLY undecided, or do you just want attention?"
I like:
(IF YES)
Can you dress yourself without help?
Madame Lulu from the Vieux Carré in N'awlins?
Yeah, gee, no reason that we should maybe ignore the people that LITERALLY believe that dragons and unicorns are real, when it comes to matters of science, at least none that I can think of.
Two words will fix this problem:
PUNDIT THUNDERDOME.
You're welcome.
PUNDERDOME.
THUNDERTIT
DUNDERDOME?
BLUNDERBUSS?
DUCK! CHENEY!
Can we do nonsensical anagrams? How about DIDNT THUMP ME?
A Pundit Batter Average in the Chyron would be goddamned amazing.
Krauthammer slits Will's throat after pulling a concealed knife taped from under his wheelchair.
But that still gives us "ONE MAN LEAVES". Can't we lower that average a little?
Watching pundits make election predictions is like watching the Superfans make predictions about the next Bears' game.
Mike Ditka!
I'll make a prediction about the next Bears game – the defense will have to win it for them…..again.
This relentless Bears FUD makes the Baby Halas cry!
The Bears are so going to dominate Tennessee on Sunday, and anyone who says different is slightly-built and effeminate.
I'll be so glad when this is over and the Pundits can go back to sticking their heads in the sand.
Much more comfortable than up their ass, I assume
Go back to?
Re: Pegs, tongue in a Manhattan.
I heard there's going to be a very accurate poll on Tuesday, November 6.
Let's hope, what with all the voting fuckery.
This Margin of Error was brought to you by Tagg Romney's Voting Machine Ventures™ LLC
Well, NOT counting the recounts.
Oh wait — I forgot we fucking CAN'T fucking recount fucking elec-fucking-tronic votes!!!
Haha — if you think the lefties are worried about voter fraud, imagine the reaction when millions of FOX viewers, who have heard nothing over the past month other than that Romney is gaining in every state and in every demographic everywhere, find out that (the people willing, of course) their candidate has been completely refudiated. Glenn Beck is already warning is dwindling, increasingly crazy audience that this one's gonna be stolen.
Ha ha, it's funny because not only is voter fraud an extremely rare occurrence (I mean, just think about risk vs. reward for the individual, and then ask if they'd still go for it or not), but the laws we've put in place to stop them disadvantage over 21 million Americans while being able to stop the schemes of 10. Not 10 million. Just 10.
Turkeys may not be the only thing getting stuffed this November.
WRONG! A very nice Repubican email told me it will be on Wednesday, November 7 this year. So who ya gonna believe: the lamestream media or the internet?
They had one of those very accurate polls back in 2000. Turned out to be not so accurate* after all. But Dubya was appointed anyway.
___________________________________________
* I'd like to point out that Gore won the popular vote. He also won Florida if you consider butterfly ballot confusion and intent. he also won Florida if you count the actual fucking votes. My point is: The American people got it right in 2000. Five members of the Supreme Court got it wrong.
I wish I could believe that.
To be fair, Jon Karl's medium has canceled her seances temporarily due to the power outage.
I would believe her more, had she evacuated to somewhere that still had electricity.
Nothing can keep me from voting next Wednesday!
Are you going off an election guide in Arizona, in Spanish?
Actually a very kind man called me to take my vote over the phone but he said I could also vote on Wednesday.
People are so helpful these days.
BO by a fucking landslide.
You read it here first.
What he say
I'm going to endeavor to NOT judge the soundness of your prognostication by your avatar.
His avatar is a recent photo of the highest IQ inmate executed by the State of Texas this year.
Actually saw that avatar in a movie – The Mad (Billy Zane's zombie flick); the picture on the restaurant menu cover.
Just you wait till I post in the new classifieds and scoop up all the hotties with this avatar…
He will win by so much that Nate Silver will rename his blog Seven-Sixty-Five.
i am using you people as my reason to continue living til next tuesday at i hope 7 PM eastern.
well you people and alcohol.
Well Mitt always has the supreme court.5-4 worked for W.That is his only hope.Thanks Sandy!
Just look at the grin (some may say grimace) on Mitt's face, he knows the fix is in.
What we need is to have BoatOfVelociraptors digging for nefarious do wah ditty do-loops buried in the vote counting code – one for Bamz, 19 for Willard.
Is Anonymous really on the case?
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9672
How I'd love to see Rove squirm like the worm he is.
Remember that Anonymous is like the Jolly Roger – one boatload of pirates is watching Rove, clearly, while others are downloading porn or trying to take over Bahrain or something else.
A consistency audit of the registration logs vs the tallies would expose blatant anomalies. If one precinct or machine consistently under votes for an office, that should stick out like a sore thumb.
Plus, Benford's Law. When people fudge numbers, they tend to assign a uniform distribution to the first digits of multidigit numbers, whereas Benford's Law tells us that the first digits of random multidigit numbers follow a power-law distribution. It's as obvious as Mitt Romney's spray tan.
Da lies, da damnable lies, and da statistics?
Pundits spend huge amounts of time huffing each other's farts, only to come to the same conclusion: "It's looking like we're going to have to wait for the election to see how this all ends up."
At 200 dollars a second, that's a lot of super PAC money in their pocket.
Translation – if I call this early and wrong, I never get to be in the "octagon of morons" again, and daddy needs his sweet, sweet coin.
It's not like being wrong has ever hurt any of them before.
If being wrong is right. . .OFF'sS whatevs.
Corporate media needs an enema.
…… & I'll gladly pay for as much Drano as it takes.
Seems the pundit class has more "inside scoops" than a proctologist during Chris Christie's colonoscopy.
Yeah. Thanks for that image. I'll be biting a cyanide capsule now.
Oh please! Obama in a landslide! This is all just desperation to make it look like they're being fair to the kindergarteners of the right, buncha candyasses…
YOU"RE LOSING! GET THE FUCK OVER IT!
Some say Romney will win; others say it's going to be Obama. Doesn't the truth lie somewhere in between?
Willard Hussein Obamaney will win
David Fucking Brooks would probably agree.
Dialectics! You must be a Marxist.
I'm looking forward to the new Boehner/Biden administration myself.
<dumbass punditry>
We need a bipartisan solution, to break up the logjam in Washington.
<\dumbass punditry>
The electoral college will vote 538-0 for Michael Bloomberg!!!
Sure, Nate Silver may say he can figure who is likely to win using polling data and numbers, but that's not very accurate compared to the traditional pundit's method of figuring out who will win the elections, what their gut tells them.
What about killing a chicken and examining the entrails?
Looking at the sky and examining the contrails is less messy.
Besides, if you want truly accurate predictions you need to go back to the original Druid tradition and examine the entrails of a human sacrificed under a sacred oak.
Most of the time the gut gives them a low rumbling gurgle and then they hit the toilet and that would be the end of it. So it comes down to reading the tea leaves (or in this case, intestinal gas), as to the best guess at the outcome. Somehow it seems fitting considering the really awful coverage of this campaign. Between trying to cover all "sides" of the issues and adding drama and ad sales for political spots the so called journalists really have done great work for their employers. Pity they didn't actually do anything for the fucking audience.
"Mitt will win because SHUT UP!!!"
Karl Rove says Romney gets at least 279 electoral college votes. At least, that's what he's paid for.
The whole lot of "pundits" will some of the first to be up against the wall come the revolution. Only CEOs and Bankers form more useless and overpaid groups of "people".
One nice thing about now living on the West Coast is that we probably won't have the traditional wait until midnight to find out who won. Though I guess that means the local bars don't get the same election-night profits they do back East.
That's really kind of weird, sick and twisted when you think about it. Most of the country is EST or PST, but the swing states are all central. The political media is all east coast, so the "narrative" is written by those politico fucks at 3 am, and the pundits play he said she said I'm outraged for the next 12 hours.
Most of Florida is Eastern.
As is all of Ohio; I think the only central time swing state is Wisconsin. And Colorado and Nevada are the only other non-EST swingers.
Wisconsin ain't swinging – not really. Neither is Iowa at this point. Only races worth watching in the CST will be McCaskill (I don't trust Missourians not to vote in rapey boy), Tammy Duckworth's stomping of Joe Walsh (for the lulz of his non-concession speech) and whether we get a miracle (Kerrey somehow winning Neb Sen or Bachmann/Ryan losing House races).
But the all important Mountain time zone, with ever so vital Colorado and Nevada (not really, but the media is foaming at the mouth in the search for something to talk about) is even an hour later than Central!
It is a strange reality – by the time polls close out here, you pretty much know what will happen, but until they call California at 8:01 PST it won't be officially "over". At least the more politically wired in types won't start the heavy drinking/stop working the polls until they close locally (always something to work on) so at least some of the bars do just fine.
Especially where you are – lots of local political movers working on stuff like referendums/bond issues and shit up in the Bay Area, which translates to lots of binge tension build up and release drinking from my limited personal experience. This can be extensive since the referendum counts are often really close and not called until late or even the next day. But as a casual sports watching equivalent, yeah, not so much.
Prop 32 passes in California and labor is pretty much fucked.
Is there ANYTHING worse than Prop 32? Deliberately misleading cynical evil BS. The direct democracy/referendum system at its finest. Oh wait- Prop 8 was worse. We have a winner.
Keeping it close allows for the much needed tampering of the machines. It's the only way the oily, lying Plutocrat gets it.
My sources say you are correct.
I'm going to stake my commentor reputation on this: it's fitty-fitty, the MSM wins!
OT, but fairly comical for us geeklings:
http://www.wired.com/underwire/2012/10/hobbit-air…
Awesomeness! May the hair on your toes never fall out!
I voted last night at an early voting polling place. A bit of a wait, but not too bad. The thing that annoyed the heck out of me, however, was the collective brain fart of the people with me in line. Along the wall were taped printouts, one for each voting machine, showing that they'd been calibrated at the start of voting. A mixed group of folks around me in line freaked out that the sheets all showed that no votes had been recorded yet. They took these calibration printouts to me that all the votes for the previous days of early voting had been erased. I tried to explain, but a slew of people left the polling place worried that the Koch brothers and Diebold had been up to shenanigans in a poll in the Maryland suburbs of DC.
I am working at the polls on Tuesday… we were trained on the handicapped machine (AZ still uses paper ballots thankfully!) … It's been a very enlightening experience. I urge everyone to work at the polls, you will learn a lot.
My Mom worked the polls during most of my childhood. There would be a kids table set up over in the corner of the elementary school lunchroom that was the polling place and we'd color and draw while Mom worked. I still miss the big old mechanical voting machines. I loved the way the curtains swished behind you when you pulled the arm into position, then a big CHUNK sound when your votes were finalized as you pulled the arm back. There was a bit of drama to it. Now, I vote on a portable computer with a touch screen. Easy, but no grand noises.
The pundits who don't know anything are united in attacking Nate Silver, who does know something. I think I have seen this movie before.
The job of political pundit is risk free. If they're wrong (they are almost all the time), they will still be on the TV the next day. If Nate is wrong, they'll gloat and dance on his grave.
I'll go with the guy who has something to lose if he's wrong.
I’m completely confused. I have no idea who’s going to win. And I usually have a sense of who’s going to win.
Because Shut Up, Horse Race, that's why.
Polls go up, polls go down – you can't explain that.
I predict that nearly 100% of these pundits are probably full of shit. STATISTICS DON'T LIE, SON.
Statistics don't lie.
Guns don't kill people.
People with statistics and guns lie and kill people.
"I have no idea who’s going to win. And I usually have a sense of who’s going to win."
Translation: We have to keep perpetuating the meme that the race is really close, so that when Mitt and his voting machine owning friends steal the election, it looks believable.
In my book, nothing is worse than a pundit talking about "pundants." Makes me feel murderous every time.
Nate Silver has his light-in-the-loafers "numbers" but DIck Morris says Romney wins in a landslide. True conservatives will take Dick over a pussy any day.
Nate threw down the gauntlet–it's now put-up or shut-up time for Scarborough:
http://www.businessinsider.com/nate-silver-bets-j…
Sweet. Someone should bet Sean Assity that waterboarding session that he long ago said he'd do, just to bring that back up again.
Nate ain't taking shit from no one.
Next Wednesday's Fox News chyron:
Romney comes in second!!! – Obama comes in next to last.
But for the polls to be truly accurate, we'd need an army of "concerned citizens" to ensure those polled have a right to answer their phone.
This election comes down to this simple choice. Who would you rather have as leader of the free world? A lying corporate douchebag or a black guy?
"….lying corporate douchebag…." Redundant much?
The only true predictor of electoral results is the ratio of Romney to Obama yard signs in your neighborhood.
In that case the only winner is the lady running for state senate, because those are the only yard signs in my neighborhood. (We like her.)
Nah, who am I kidding, I live in Chicagoland. Nobody's gonna bother putting up a Romney sign.
i have the only sign in ravenswood.
and i paid for it and it ain't for romney.
False equivalency is falsely equivalent.
Kubler-Ross Grief Cycle, Stage One: Denial. Face it guys, Romney is losing.
You know – it ain't like these clowns go to pundit school and graduate with a degree in Punditry. It's the one "profession" where you can be completely wrong just about all the time, but the Sunday squawk show bookers will still have you on their speed-dials.
HEDGE-FUND MANAGER LIBEL!
Anyway Obama has already won the Halloween costume contest and the kids' polls, so it's done: http://www.cracked.com/article_20139_6-bizarre-fa…
Obama tries harder.
Think about it, ladies…
I hate the question: "If the election were held today…."
It never is…
well it is on Election Day.
Never is such a strong term.
But what worries me is the polling gap neglecting auto mechanics who ride choppers but also can recite T.S. Eliot's "Four Quartets" from memory. Why aren't we hearing about these people? Which way will they trend? Until those questions can be answered, we're all one-eyed blind men wandering in pea-soup fog, trying to describe an elephant and donkey by touch alone.
The Conservatives tell me noted genius Karl Rove who correctly predicted an Obama win has declared Romney our new president. So pack it in, Nate what with your phony baloney numbers.
Meh. Who cares about polls. The election has already been pre-stolen for our new corporate overlords.
There is an adage in journalism–a very simple one–that is just as important–if not more important–today than it's ever been: Just report the news. That's it: Just report the news. This applies to newspapers, magazines, radio stations, television stations, websites, newsletters, whatever. Just report the news. News is simply the who, what, where, when, why and how of something that happens. We literally don't need–that's right, we don't need–crazy blowhards and talking heads cluttering up journalism on radio, television and the internets and in newspapers, magazines and newsletters. That's right–we don't need them. It'd be great to see about 90 percent of opinion-writers, talking heads and columnists just disappear. That's right—90 percent of them. Journalism–and news–would be better off. We can start the housecleaning with cable television, Fox News and Politico.
No, start with David Brooks. Then go after cable television, Fox News and Politico.
In other words, Mittens bought the election, but Barry is refusing to play by the traditional rules and making a run for it anyway.
These pundits are going to flop-vomit when the first polls come in giving Florida and Virginia to Obama and Election Night ends immediately.
I thought Obama called the election on account of rain.
Curiously, the Right didn't call Nate Silver all biased when he forecast a big win for the GOP in 2010.
What the hell is Occam's Razor? Must be some nerd website.
I am so fucking tired with this "it's a toss-up" line the media keeps tossing out. No, you dumb fucking pieces of shit. It's only a toss-up if you can find a viable path to 270 for Romney … and I don't mean by moving around states in a pretend way. Is Romney winning in Ohio? No? Then it's not a goddamn toss-up.
"I'll believe Occam's Razor when Nate Silver starts shaving more than once a week."
i remind myself that even in '08 they were all saying it was still a contest.
seriously, i feel like i'm living in a parallel universe. EVERY story – EVERY GODDAMN STORY – left and right says it's too close to call (this AM on bbc: 'romney campaign smells victory' and being given serious attention).
and yet we've got nate and sandy's political fallout (non stop positive coverage for bamz and the anti-FEMA comments from romney / ryan) AND chris christie and, you know, polls.
also egg is still speaking in public.
perhaps we are at the late 2008 moment when everyone was trying to hide palin's clothes grifting and meltdowns?
Pundits: the hookworms of politics.
I am seeing looooooooong lines for early voting here in Dumfukistan (GA,). NEVER seen anything like it before in my 42 years of residence. My thought: ever notice how you really don't value something too much until someone threatens to take it away from you? I'm thinking the R's fucked up big-time trying to play fast and loose with voting rights. Trying to deprive the blah's and brownz of their right to vote may have just been the impetus needed to get them off their asses to show whitey and thing or three. That would be so sweeeeet.
The whole "Mitt positioned himself to be competitive after the first debate" was an entire invention of the Romney campaign that became a self-fulfilling prophecy when the media bought the narrative from them. Truth be told, this thing was never really close where it counted, and it's nowhere near as close at this moment as the media wants it to be.
It's completely possible and more and more likely by the day that Obama will largely replicate his electoral college win (maybe only losing one or two states he held last time) with the only real difference being that Romney may run up the score in the Deep South making the popular vote margin closer than in 2008, but still with Obama winning both the popular vote and the electoral college.
It's kind of like having an empty 55-gallon drum as your best friend. You know it's never going to betray you, fuck around on you, or stab you in the back.
…and you can turn that empty 55 gallon drum into a darn fine barbeque, so it's useful, too.
Or a house, if our robotic overlords win next Tuesday.
Why do you think he switched to politics? I bet he gets laid a hell of a lot more now than he did when he was covering baseball.
Baldwin, also, too.
Comments on this entry are closed.