WingNutDaily editrix Jerome Corsi is still flying around on Ol’ Miffed Romney’s plane as a valued member of the press, but is he aware that his own columnist (a black man who is, er, the author of Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal – America’s Racial Obsession) is now calling for his death by firing squad as mandated in our cherished and inerrant Constitution what Jesus wrote? If anything, it just makes too much sense. Supporting the American president is treason, and Fifth Columnist Angela Lansbury stand-in Candy Crowley waved the Queen of Hearts at the foreign policy debate, so all reporters must die, because it is Free Speech Week. We are sorry if that sounds harsh, but freedom isn’t free or something, dudes.
So what is up, Erik Rush?
Well, it’s Free Speech Week, an annual celebration of Americans’ right to free speech hosted by the Media Institute. Partnering organizations include media organizations across the political spectrum. What’s ironic is the extent to which Americans’ free speech is under assault at present. While this is more evident among the non-liberal, non-secular folks among us, this oppression is just part of a design that will ultimately stifle all of our speech and liberties to varying extents. Since it is Free Speech Week, I can’t think of a more perfect time to clarify just what free speech is and, more importantly, what it is not.
We think we can guess where this is going: It is Free Speech Week, but Free Speech is not liberal speech because liberal speech stifles speech. (SO ALL REPORTERS MUST DIE.)
During my lifetime, I have seen the press become an advance force for social engineering and global socialism. The degree to which they have deceived Americans and enabled the agenda of radicals in recent decades is beyond shame. As former Democratic pollster Pat Caddell said recently, the press has become an enemy of the American people. In the matter of this president, the press largely facilitated the ascension of Barack Obama. The instances wherein they have promoted, shielded and aided him are beyond enumeration.
This goes beyond such things as MSNBC’s Chris Matthews and his man crush on Obama – I’m talking about treasonous collusion. One particularly scandalous incident occurred during the second presidential debate, when CNN moderator Candy Crowley made an interjection that appeared to have been as spontaneous as Ambassador Chris Stevens’ murder, and which led to a solid point scored for Obama. Most recently, after Mitt Romney brought up Obama’s 2009 “Apology Tour,” the press did their best to support Obama’s claim that this never happened, despite boundless reams of footage that exist chronicling the event.
Chris Matthews, Candy Crowley, Pat Caddell, Libya, Socialism. Okay. Got it. Reporters must die.
It is improbable that the framers of the Constitution anticipated a situation in which the press were entirely given over to seditious, anti-American policies. If they had, it is likely that their modus operandi would be similar to that for any faction found guilty of high crimes. Trials for treason and the requisite sentences would apply, and I would have no qualms about seeing such sentences executed, no matter how severe.
Treason and executions, yes. Understood. Reporters: are they dead yet?
Those whose speech and actions impinge upon the God-given rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence and codified in the Constitution are, by definition, excepted from protection under the First Amendment (as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment). This is a very important concept to consider, because it is based on these presumptions of protected speech and equal protection for all that progressives and socialists have engaged in their predation upon our liberties.
If these truths can be acknowledged and widely accepted as such (as opposed to progressives’ Orwellian interpretations), then the political disenfranchisement of liberals, progressives, socialists and Marxists can begin in earnest, and in the open.
A man advocating executing journalists for treason in honor of Free Speech Week for being too supportive of the American president just described other people as “Orwellian.” Good job, Rush. Super totes double-plus-good.
Go home everyone. The Internet has won. (Unless you’re a reporter, in which case, time to die.)
[WND, via RightWingWatch]





{ 236 comments }
Can we start with Jerome Corsi?
No, because he is standing up for the great American Value of accusing someone of being a secrete Muslim while engaging in random gay sex and drug use without any credible evidence. That is what the founders were thinking about when they wrote the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.
I believe you mean when the Founders wrote down the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, as dictated by Our Lord Jebus. (Wouldn't want to get that wrong, as that is a hangin' offense.)
For ballgagging and spanking? I have dibs on third.
"Mr. Romney, you have in the press corps flying with you on your campaign plane a representative from a paper that has called for the execution of American journalists. How do you respond?"
"I'm sorry, I can't make any comment on that matter until I get it thoroughly poll-tested first – after all I'm running for President, for Pete sakes!"
I thought we already started with Breitbart.
Ssssh!!
We have to save the Republic by burning it down and becoming a Dictatorship of Dummies.
Mortimer Snerd Libel!
….remember being dumb. Is "subjective"'! It is almost like being the tallest midget(little person, sorry!)
I think everybody is good with this as long as you don't abort them because that would be wrong.
Here's some free speech for you, buddy: Fuck you.
Hey, don't listen to FNMA, I've got an all-you-can-hear free speech buffet going on!
FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU
ad infinitum…
"Trials for treason and the requisite sentences would apply, and I would have no qualms about seeing such sentences executed, no matter how severe."
Your move, Joe Stalin.
Which made me wonder how he'd feel if the pendulum swung the other way and things like advocating torture and warrantless searches and unjustifiable war and indefinite detention of citizens without charge and such as were to be considered treasonous.
Wupsie.
Yeah. "Kill them all", as long as I get to decide who "they" are.
prick
"Kill them all", as long as I get to decide who "they" are.
I'm pretty certain this is the GOP "chickenhawk" motto.
The instances wherein they have promoted, shielded and aided him are beyond enumeration.
Ah yes, "beyond enumeration"…2012's answer to "studies have shown".
"some people have said"
Just in case someone asks him to enumerate them. Nope! They're beyond that!
"..beyond enumeration."
That's handy.
My weight is beyond enumeration.
"beyond enumeration" = I've got nothing.
So he is saying the set is uncountably infinite.
However, the number of journalists is a finite set; the stories that any journalist can produce is a finite set. Any operation of one finite set on another yields a finite set. Therefore, the proposition is false. QED.
Proposition II: Erik Rush is an ignorant dick. Ibid. QED.
Or, it could be he is recognizing, at some level, that he is suffering from mental illness, in which case he is referring to irrational numbers, which are (quite literally) beyond enumeration. So, he believes, the press did these things pi times, or the number of times they did them is equal to the square root of two.
Conventional wisdom says…
Some speech is freer than other
Two blogs bad, four blogs good!
And would appear that Erik Rush is totally freebasing it.
meh. beaten to it by G[r]
Some girls' mothers are bigger than other girls' mothers.
See also: All speech is equal, but…
I think the framers might have just gotten back on the boat if they ever imagined Hannity.
Remember, to the Jerome Corsi's of the world "Free Speech" is short for "My Freedom to Hear Only What I Want To Hear But Say Whatever The Hell I Like". Surely you can see why so confusing.
"Free Speech" = "My Speech" and no one can criticize me for it now SHUT UP THAT'S WHY.
And if anyone dare criticize his speech he will accuse them of violating his free speech by pointing out how fucking stupid he is.
"It is improbable that the framers of the Constitution anticipated a situation in which the press were entirely given over to seditious, anti-American policies."
Um, as revolutionaries, weren't they all about that seditious-y stuff?
The term "revolutionary" does seem to infer seditiousness, now that you mention it.
Good thing none of those Conservatives wax nostalgic for any sort of major seditious events or perhaps fetishize things that commemorate them like, say, flags with stars and bars on them.
seditiious, pro-American policies are okay. (pro-real American, that is)
Also, founding grandpa Ben Franklin? Mainstream media mogul. And treasonous, too, definitely.
Yes, I cannot imagine that the Framers could possibly have believed that the press would have had an agenda and would certainly have criminalized such journalistic crimes!
Of course, I say this knowing that it is full of shit.
As I recall, Thomas Jefferson wasn't terribly fond of the whole Free-Speech thing.
An old reporter read this fart's ranting and said, "Yawn."
Wait wait wait…
the political disenfranchisement of liberals, progressives, socialists and Marxists can begin in earnest, and in the open
So, first he says the liberals have taken over the media so there is no free speech, blah blah blah. Then he says, "We must disenfranchise the liberals, socialists, etc…" Yes, disenfranchising people openly and in earnest. I'm sure that's exactly what the writers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution had in mind.
Well, if they are Socialist, and probably uppity.
You don't want to hear about all the coke and meth traces they found when they restored Independence Hall.
Yeah, but that was just Franklin, right?
WHERE IS TAILGUNNER JOE WHEN WE NEED HIM MOST????????
Seriously, this guy is begging for a new McCarthyism? Fuck.
That's quite the dog whistle for those with itchy tr|gger fingers.
Yay Liberty.
What about the Wiccan's and pagans? Will burning at the stake make a comeback? Remember, everything that's old is new again.
Y'know, it's funny, but that sounds an awful lot like it might "impinge upon the God-given rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence and codified in the Constitution."
I wonder if this gentleman might have any ideas on what to do with those whose speech and actions do such things.
This comment has been deleted by the "administrator".
This comment has been deleted by the "Central Scrutinizer."
This comment has been deleted, restored and then re-deleted by "A Random Poster"
This commenter has been deleted by Erik Rush.
Lionel must be a journalist.
No one ever said "political disenfranchisement" would be tidy.
This comment has been deleted by Diebold.
…and the Win.
Even if I don't know how they all managed to do it in italics?
That is what Diebold does, after all. All they do is win, win, win, no matter what…
This comment has been executed for seditious treason
This comment will self-destruct in 5 seconds.
Ceci n'est pas une comment.
Hee!
This deletion has been commented on by the Commentariat
Dammit! This is worse than a bunch of Brazillians throwing their shoe s.
kkkkkkkk!
All these comments have been published on Wing Nut Daily
Nu-uh, they're spelled correctly. Wing Nut Daily has strict standards forbidding correct spelling, grammar and use of capital letters.
This comment has been [REDACTED]
This comment sees what you did there.
This comment has been messed with by "Mr. Inbetween."
This comment has been removed due to legal action by the Church Of Scientology.
This little comment went to market, this little comment went home.
All these comments are belong to us.
This comment came a day late and a dollar short, so no one's paying attention anyway
So, where do all the reporters and Democrats get together to plan their treasonous destruction of this country, the Downtown Holiday Inn in DC?
You're late – the destruction plotting has been going on for almost 4 years now, but at a big white building down the street, not the Holiday Inn.
The whole idea behind improving the economic indicators and lowering the unemployment rate is that it'll be so much more devastating when the country is destroyed during the President's next term! Bwah hah hah hah hah!
Wonkette Newsletter
I found the meetup drinky things very conducive to plotting the treasonous destruction of this country.
More of them!
Sorry I missed the Philly drunky thing
Translation: I am too fanatical to think critically about anything that varies from my own solipsistic narrative, thus everyone who disagrees with me must be a traitor.
So, facts and truth are now treasonous. Double Plus Good!!!
“A man advocating executing journalists for treason in honor of Free Speech"
Both sides do it ?
What if God was one of us?
He/She/It would have crushed us in disgust at his/her/its failure to build a reliable, intelligent, peaceful model.
Just a stranger on the bus
Trying to make her way home.
One of us? She'd be drunk and snarky.
Now, there's a God I could get behind.
Ummm. I'm telling what you said.
Just a fool like one of us?
Well, like ET, he'd be trying to make his way home, home…
Well, I have to give the author credit. He first time-traveled back to 2004 so he could use one of Geo. W. Bush and Rudy G.'s "Free Speech Zones." Otherwise, how the hell would he have gotten away with writing such an inane piece of bullshit drivel? And no signs of jet lag or anything–well, nothing except perhaps a serious concussion.
Cold Fusion and/or the Flex Capacitor??!?!? in 2012!!!1! Finally!!!11!1!
You know who else was a pathetic, whining, butthurt loser?
I don't often go to the AOTK card; but AOT,K.
Phrase it as "who wasn't", that'll make for shorter answers.
John Boehner?
Genghis Khan?
Xerxes?
Norm Coleman?
Thanks for that memory. What a sniveling shitweasel that was.
Eric Cantor forever?
Black "journalist" dude is so down with the framers of the Constitution, I'd like to see his reaction when he finds out those he worships only thought he was 60% human.
Which is still 100% more than they thought of women.
Dude has put a lot of quality thought into his position on the fringe, so I'm sure his rationalizations of this inconvenient truth are entertaining.
Black journalists can be assholes too, my friend.
It is improbable that the framers of the Constitution anticipated a situation in which the press were entirely given over to seditious, anti-American policies.
Do the name "John Peter Zenger" ring a bell, asshat? Cuz he's the PRIMARY reason we have a fucking First Amendment, shithead, that speaks truth to power, you motherfucking ignert biatch.
Also, Areopagitica…do you speak it, muthafuckah?
A John Milton reference? On Wonkette?
FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP.
Zenger was the first journalist to badmouth Bill Cosby: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Cosby
Can I vote "thumbs up" for this twice? Or would that be voter fraud?
oh, lord, high school flashback….me no likey
Let's defend our free speech rights by killing those that are exercising said rights! Wow, I had trouble even typing that it was so dumb.
"Wow, I had trouble even typing that it was so dumb."
But you just pretended you were a conservative for a second, and voila, there it was!
…honestly I stopped reading halfway thru, when shyt bags start saying "sedition" I tune out! Do they even know WTF they are talking about?
And they're not even drinking yet. That's the scary part.
Maybe there's something Congress can do about this assault on free speech.
"What’s ironic is the extent to which Americans’ free speech is under assault at present"
Dude, how? Name one way. The only assault on free speech I'm seeing is coming from you.
You just proved his point for him. Did I just blow your mind?
The ways are beyond enumeration, duh.
Freedom is just another word for no reporter too good to kill
Psst, you righties are supposed to try and hide the fascism of your policies, not go full overt fascist like this.
Dude would just have to add "… and Jews" after "Marxists" and his piece could have appeared in Völkischer Beobachter any time 1920-1945.
These right wing jag-offs pontificating about "freedom" is kind of like Stevie Wonder talking about silent movies.
If goofy ideas ever go to $100 a barrel, I want to negotiate drilling rights for Erik Rush's head.
Love it!
So reporting is sedition and FOX news is Freedom. Should I just get my handmaid's costume ready and start answering to Ofkevin?
I wonder if you can get those transvaginal thingies on Amazon.
This message will self-destruct in five seconds…
John Adams would agree. But that didn't turn out so well for him that one time…
Something something aliens something soemthing sedition something something.
Never was the saying, "The truth has a well known liberal bias", more appropriate.
Those whose speech and actions impinge upon the God-given rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence and codified in the Constitution
Objection. Facts not in evidence.
"Endowed by the Creator" would suffice…
Pshaw. "Creator" could be Ganesha, Cthulhu, or Jefferson's mom, for all we know.
I'm going with Ganesha. At least he's a happy god.
Lord Ganesha the remover of obstacles the god of peace and prosperity.
"Well-Endowed by the Creator" even better.
I swear to God, it's like they spend all day beating themselves on the head with sledgehammers.
Better that than beating their wives. But that's God's plan.
I thought they were beating me. Why does my head hurt so much?
Ironic, since their heads are essentially bags of hammers.
Explains the saying, "dumber than a sack of hammers."
Well, they're officially in full wingnut-mode now, aren't they. Twelve days from now we'll be seeing heads explode (with votes).
If O'bam wins next month, there will be secession meetings all over Wingnutlandia by Wednesday night..
So they can't wait four years and then elect Jeb Bush?
Please let it be true.
So that's why they bought all those guns…
That is not clumsy, basement dweller sophistry. That is the real deal!
Collusion among media figures and political figures? OH MY STARS!!1!
Pearls. Fainting couch.
I am far more disturbed by journalists who make up words like snor'eastercane.
*That* is treason.
Or phrases like "boundless reams of footage."
Was that in 50 Shades of Gray?
That's my favorite Pokemon!
That word is perfectly crumulent!
Translation: Obama's up in the most recent polls and Romney's momentum appears to have stopped. Cue the angry tears from the Right.
Bring Me the Head of Gloria Borger!
Yes, yes, WithVotes™
So, this is why Fox employs Zombies only?
OT— Wouldn't exercising the right to vote be an expression of Free Speech… and in so being, wouldn't that make the GOP attempted suppression of the vote in various states a violation of the First Amendment? Can we sue the Secretary of State Husted in Ohio?
Well, if what he says is true, (and I have no doubt it is) and he's a member of the press "whose speech and actions impinge upon the God-given rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence and codified in the Constitution", the only patriotic thing to do now is turn himself in.
Wait… shouldn't he shoot himself? Or jump off a bridge?
Now what kind of Fascist country would we be if we didn't have show trials for heretics?
Damn! If only Tucker Carlson was a reporter or a journalist or something…
I, for one, welcome my new executioner-at-whim overlords.
Ah, give me the good ol' Yeltsin years when rich businessmen were knocking off reporters left and right. At least they drove fancy cars.
That's right.
Give those lieberal reporters the CHAIR!
~
That chair does not look "comfy."
Erik Rush sure is agitated. He must be having his period.
Here's a little secret about Erik Rush. Dude smoked more weed than the Latin Kings and Jay Z combined.
Reporters should have a red flashing crystal in their palm of they're hand that signals the end of a presidents term,and time for them to go to carousel.
"the political disenfranchisement of liberals, progressives, socialists and Marxists can begin in earnest, and in the open"
Too much freedom?
Free speech isn't free.
It's $40 a month for Internet hookup. And $140 a month for phone texting/surfing.
I don't know what my mouth is for, anymore, except for the eating part.
Bullshit!
The Republican Party has turned into one of those Saw films.
From the quality of writing, it looks like he got that blog post out in plenty of time to prevent the steel trap from slamming shut on his head.
Wow. That is some world-class malarkey.
That would make a great Wonkette handle!
Mal Arkey.
This country is at a crossroads. We have a serious choice to make: mass executions of liberals or The Road To Serfdom.
As the leader of the free and proud nation of Freedonia, I'm pretty sure I'll escape with just a little re-education and self-criticism.
These are the laws of my administration….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSsUoxlSADk
You know who else would definitely have supported executing liberal journalists were he alive today?! That's right, Martin Fucking Luther King.
Well, he was, as they constantly remind us, a Republican.
Yeah, they got a lot of mileage out of Lincoln with us, until the Southern Strategy.
Not at all. He is making a logical argument. Obama is a traitor, so any reporter who says Obama is a traitor is a patriot, and any reporter who does not say that Obama is a traitor is a traitor. Now if we had a Republican president, any reporter who said he was a traitor would be a traitor, and anyone who did not would be a patriot. QED.
The key is that Erik Rush knows the GOD-GIVEN rules by which we must conduct our government, so his definition is absolutely correct for all time. Simple, really.
"God given rights set forth in the constitution"
like freedom of the press?
I like the comment: "It is improbable that the framers of the Constitution anticipated a situation in which the press were entirely given over to seditious, anti-American policies."
The article's author can't comprehend that the framers of both the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence were seditionists. You can fact check with King George III. How ironic that it's now illegal to talk sedition.
Ha, I remember having a few choice words for this fucker Erik Rush in these pages in times of yore, so off to finger-punch the search box I go:
http://wonkette.com/429947/fun-new-wnd-accusation…
so is the not liberal media elevating mittens to whatever too?
I'm still waiting for those "boundless reams of footage" he keeps talking about.
Reminds me of Patton Oswalt's line: "I acknowledge you believe that, (but) that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard."
"It is improbable that the framers of the Constitution anticipated a situation in which the press were entirely given over to seditious, anti-American policies."
Oh no you don't, dickcheeze. It is ALSO improbable that the framers anticipated a situation where one man could murder dozens in just a few minutes with a firearm that spits out hundreds of rounds per minute. If you get to play this game with the 1st Amendment, why don't we get to play the same game with the 2nd Amendment?
Because shut up, that's why.
The Joseph Farah- Eric Rush Banana Republic of Teabaggistan. I suppose he can rename himself 'Tea Pot', after Pol Pot, who had similar ideas about the press.
Sinister photo! Is Erik Rush the "Mirror, Mirror" Universe Andrew Sullivan?
So after he wrote this Erik Rush gunned down everyone in the World Net Daily offices and then jammed a ..44 magnum in his mouth like a shiny steel cock of death and blew his head off. Right? Right?
With votes, obvsly.
Interesting to call for execution. Perhaps we could try some other forms of punishment? I always wanted to try water boarding someone!
Only a true conservative lover of the constitution would be able to suggest something like this. Where do we find the details the patriotism test that we should give the press? I'm thinking something simple-if the reporter sinks, he/she was clearly a witch/islamofacist/maoist/marxist. If he/she floats, patriot.
I love fake patriots like this guy-only things done to further beliefs other than yours are traitorous. Things like this done to further your own cause? Patriotic. Disregarding the constitution to silence a perceived enemy and to win a political victory? America. Fuck yeah.
Build a bridge out of him!
I want to say something snarky, but frankly, I'm just scared. (Points against me- mixed marriage, mixed children, non-Christian, liberal record, never had a job i.e. I work in the public sector, urban dweller, academic family.
If you're not scared, you're not paying attention. Use the fear like I do, as motivation to get off my ass and vote. All kidding aside, when these types get a little light shined on them they usually wither and droop pretty fast. The ones who don't (see the Koch brothers) are the truly scary ones. But you still can vote. Do so while it is still available.
Oh, dear. I hope you have your trunk packed and your clothes properly labeled for "re-education" camp.
Reading Jerome Corsi is like watching a man suck his own dick. It's both fascinating and repellant, but Jerome is the only one having a good time.
Is Corsi the man from Nantucket???
Erik must be fun at parties.
I wonder if his family treats him the way we treat right-wingers in ours.
Tolerated, but never, (under any circumstances), engaged.
Avoidance has been my go-to, although I do miss a good Thanksgiving dinner.
Remember, this is Erik Rush, not Jerome Corsi, writing. I find his rich and varied biography frightfully interesting:
http://www.erikrush.com/blog/?page_id=2
Why should America be scared shitless by multiculturalism, when a tragic mulatto can turn out to be an outstanding WND author like the clear-sighted Mr. Rush?
OK, having worked as a studio, club, and stage musician, and knowing what goes on, his only biomedical research consisted of, "how much of this shit do I need to shoot up before I start trippin' balls…?"
How is his different than the homo-hate spewing closeted Republicans?
You know, I read "sociopolitical" as "sociopathic" and it actually made more sense.
I actually did too. Glad I'm not the only one.
Also too, In 1986, he relocated to Colorado and became a Christian in 1989.
That explains a lot, doncha know.
What's kind of surprising is that it took that long. You move to Colorado Springs in the morning, and you're practically a snake-handling, tongue-speaking Pentacostal by sunset.
"…after Mitt Romney brought up Obama’s 2009 'Apology Tour,' the press did their best to support Obama’s claim that this never happened, despite boundless reams of footage that exist chronicling the event."
It was boundless, all right. Fantasy has no limits, as it isn't tethered to reality.
Freedom for me, not for thee.
Well isn't that convenient! Who knew that the death panels were actually real, and staffed by WND thinkers!
Trials for treason and the requisite sentences would apply, and I would have no qualms about seeing such sentences executed, no matter how severe. You have awakened my bunghole, and now you must pay! The streets will flow with the blood of the non-believers!"
Give me a minute while I catch my breath……
The instances wherein they have promoted, shielded and aided him are beyond enumeration.
Or:
I can't think of any.
This man needs serious psychiatric attention.
"We'll have to leave it there…"
Freedom of speech is important, because everyone else needs to hear exactly what people like this ignorant fuckface REALLY believe – & if this kind of in-your-face fascist hatespeech doesn't get the polity up off its ass & involved in civic action to short-circuit their psychopathic agenda, nothing will.
PS: If Erik "Can't Stop Fucking That Chicken" Rush wants to see REAL government-media collusion, perhaps he could Google "Operation Truth" … a major op to subvert the Press from none other than Ronald "Fascist Death Squads Are Just Like The Founding Fathers" Reagan.
This is many shades and kinds of awesome.
Stay klassy, asshole. It's crazy they can't see how inappropriate it is still use Chris Stevens, and in such a classless way, at that. That reference was fucking gratuitous. Disgusting.
"This is a very important concept to consider, because it is based on these presumptions of protected speech and equal protection for all that progressives and socialists have engaged in their predation upon our liberties."
Hey guys, mid nineteenth century slavery apologists called, they want their rhetoric back.
So by disagreeing with the PREVIOUS president, Obama was shaming America and committing treason, and by agreeing with the CURRENT president the press are shaming America and committing treason? Glad we cleared that up.
ALIEN & SEDITION ACTS LIBEL!!!
wait….
Killing people who disagree with you. Is this peak wingnut or do we have to wait until they actually start killing? I assume they aren't doing this with votes, either.
A whole week of free speech? That's mighty white of them.
After the first two sentences of that quote the Grammar Nazi bit of me imploded.
Open bracket (<) i closed bracket (>) YOUR TEXT GOES HERE open bracket (<) slash (/) i closed bracket (>)
e.g., YOUR TEXT GOES HERE
em /em
standard html tag
Thanks, that's what I was doing wrong there.
so maybe next time I can get it right
Open bracket (<) i closed bracket (>) AH DID JUST WHAT EWE SAID HOW COME IT DON'T WORK, DERPY DERP open bracket (<) slash (/) i closed bracket (>)
DOES THIS WORK FOR BOLD AS WELL?
jesus I guess.
Diebold, at least.
Comments on this entry are closed.