Anderson Cooper To Whistleblower: Why Do You Want To Hurt Those Nice Banks?

Well that was fast! The media has already, as Hamilton Nolan astutely predicted, turned on Greg Smith, the former Goldman Sachs analyst turned writer. You might remember Greg Smith from the scathing Op-Ed he wrote in the New York Times back in April, announcing his resignation from Goldman Sachs and revealing that their corporate culture is about as disgusting as we all have probably imagined it to be. At the time of the Op-Ed, the media wasn’t so sure about what to make of him, but erred on the side of “whistleblower,” with a dollop of hero! Except now the Lamestream Media has changed its mind and decided that he kind of sucks because the banks are full of shitbags, tell us something we don’t know. Actually, he isn’t “believable,” probably (this is from the New York Times). Or maybe he is actually a LIAR, look at him LYING his ass off and getting paid a shitload of money to do it! That last one, of course, is from Forbes magazine, a paragon of probity.

Anyway, so here is an interview that Greg Smith did with Anderson Cooper on 60 Minutes. And luckily, Cooper asked some very important questions. Like: wasn’t this a BETRAYAL? Wasn’t it a BETRAYAL of this huge multimillion dollar corporation to hurt its feelings by writing a bunch of mean words about it in the New York Times? (Answer: no, although we would have accepted “who cares.”) Also, is working at Goldman Sachs just like Fight Club, minus Brad Pitt pissing in your clam chowder and with less emphasis on personal hygiene products? (Yes, Anderson Cooper compares Goldman Sachs to Fight Club, though we’re not sure if he means the book or the movie.) Anyway, what is the REAL LESSON here? Banks suck, and no one empowered to do anything about it seems to care. Or alternatively, they seem to care about making sure that the banks can continue to act without consequences, and they help accomplishing that by assessing Greg Smith as a person rather than assessing the institutions that he’s offering criticisms of. Criticizing the BANKS, you see, would be “biased,” and we can’t have that.

[CBS News]

About the author

Kris E. Benson writes about politics for Wonkette and is pursuing a doctorate in philosophy. This will come in handy for when they finally open that philosophy factory in the next town over. @Kris_E_Benson

View all articles by Kris E. Benson
What Others Are Reading

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.


  1. hagajim

    Banks, the fucking Superman of 2012 Merika. Can do no wrong, can shit on everyone, nobody cares. Fuck 'em all.

  2. mrpuma2u

    Wasn't this a betrayal, because gawd knows what an upstanding, morally unimpeachable bunch of choir boys run Goldman-Sachs. It's like accusing the clergy of ass raping tween boys and then playing a shell game with the pervert priests. How could this Greg Smith character believe such a great buncha guys would do anything bad?

  3. Come here a minute

    It's downright unpatriotic to criticize a big bank.

    This bank is my bank,
    This bank is your bank…
    This bank was made for you and me!

  4. SayItWithWookies

    Banks are just like the military — nobody is entitled to criticize them or how they act unless they've been part of the culture. And anyone who criticizes them and has been part of the culture is just a malingering grievance-nurturer with an agenda and a profit motive.

    1. dr_giraud

      I saw a DFH spit on a banker at JFK who was returning from the Cayman Islands. That's not how to treat a hero.

    2. BlueStateLibel

      Depressingly astute and accurate statement.

      When the Revolution comes, I think it would be fun to make them switch places.

  5. SorosBot

    Let's face it, if Watergate happened today the media would be outraged that Deep Throat dared to betray Nixon.

  6. edgydrifter

    Let's compromise–Greg Smith was/is a greedy douchebag which is exactly why and/or entirely because he worked for Goldman Sachs, the world's foremost producer of greedy douchebags.

  7. Dudleydidwrong

    When you can't attack the information (usually because the info is correct), you must attack the conveyor of information. Of all people, Anderson Cooper engages in ad hominem attacks. Whatsamatta, Anderson, did you get turned down? Pity, pity, pity.

  8. BoatOfVelociraptors

    I dunno. It seemed like a square piece. Anderson gave the banks every chance they could to contribute, but was told to GFY behind closed doors, and instead we get muppets and mobsters.

    Sounds about right.

  9. Callyson

    Wow, I thought Anderson Cooper would *never* age, but he's starting to do so. If *he* can't fight showing the passing of the years…

    (rushing to call the doctor for some Botox injections…)

  10. sullivanst

    Well, AC might have a point about Fight Club, because it does seem that the number one rule of working at Goldman Sachs is you don't talk about working at Goldman Sachs, and the number two rule of working at Goldman Sachs is you do not talk about working at Goldman Sachs.

    1. weejee

      And the number three rule is if you break rules one or two you better look at getting a gills/lung transplant as you'll be swimming with the fishes?

  11. calliecallie

    spoiler alert…

    Goldman Sachs as Fight Club actually makes sense because – spoiler alert! – the guy in Fight Club was schizophrenic and tried to blow up everything.Kinda like those wanking bankers.

  12. pdiddycornchips

    Well at ;least when they wrongfully foreclose on someone's home and steal all the contents, they say they're sorry right away. What else do you want?

  13. decentcitizen

    Let's just acknowledge that this guy's an ass-hat and Goldman Sachs are a bunch of criminal douchbags. Problem solved.

Comments are closed.