In Which A Fox News Host Argues That Crushing Youth Unemployment Is 'The Best Thing to Happen to Them'
Here is Andrea Tantaros, one of the however-many hosts of Fox News'The Five, showing a chart of the historically horrid unemployment rates for the 18-24 year old demographic and proceeding to make one of those savvy counterintuitive arguments that earn her the big bucks: "I've argued once that maybe the economic downturn was the best thing to happen to them because then they weren't... so... everybody gets a trophy; maybe theyhadto go back home and work at the Quizno's and the Blockbuster and learn the value of a dollar."
So, to recap: The unemployment rate among 18-24 year olds is crushingly high. Andrea Tantaros looks at this and says -- quote -- "maybe the economic downturn was the best thing to happen to them," because now they can learn values.
A few things.
If someone has a minimum wage job, they are not unemployed. Depending on their skill sets, they may be underemployed.
When young people who have developed skill sets cannot find jobs that match their skill sets and work at minimum wage retail jobs, the economy is in poor condition.
High unemployment is an objectively bad thing.
When young people are unable to start their careers because of long-lasting terrible economic conditions, a bit of the future is lost.
Young people with expensive college degrees or apprenticeships or a viable entrepreneurial vision taking jobs at low-skill retail chains deprive high school students or other brand new entrants to the economy from having those jobs.
Suffering is bad.
Andrea Tantaros is one of the worst people in history.
[Nine hundred other ways of describing how wrong and immoral this is.]
[ Media Matters via Atrios ]
You'd kind of hope that most employers would realize that it might make sense to make an adjustment for people graduating into an historically terrible jobs market. The point is, though, that your job skills development is deferred and people assume you start to forget your education (FSM knows I couldn't solve a Sturm-Liouville eigenvalue problem any more, let alone a path integral).
If that isn't a Catch Me if You Can reference, it should be.