What are two things that are exactly the same? Are they “Arab witch-hunts” and “questions about Mitt Romney’s tax returns”? No. Those two things are not the same, as we proved with our persuasive logic yesterday. But here are two things that are exactly the same: “Mitt Romney opening his tax returns” and “Barack Obama proving he isn’t smoking crack or doing sex in men’s bottoms.” Yup. Those will work! Thanks, Judson Phillips, president of Tea Party Nation!
Blah blah blah Obama is an idiot who sucked at school, how did he get into Harvard oh right Affirmative Action, where is it … let’s see … oh! Here it is:
Obama by his own admission was a very heavy marijuana user in his youth. He has also admitted to using cocaine, though he denies using drugs such as heroin. He also says he was a significant drinker.
Why is this important?
Because these are all symptoms of addiction.
A man named Larry Sinclair claims that in 1999 he and Barack Obama had sex and then smoked crack cocaine. This is 1999, nine years before Obama would run for President.
Crack cocaine is very addictive. It is very destructive. Addiction specialist will tell you that a crack addiction is very tough to break.
Is Obama an addict? Was he an addict in the past?
These are all legitimate questions to ask about a man who has his hands on the nuclear trigger.
Why is Obama hiding these records and why isn’t the drive by media asking these questions. Why aren’t Republicans demanding the answers to these questions, instead of telling Mitt Romney he needs to play into Obama’s hands by releasing more tax returns?
Well-typed, Judson Phillips! Your grassroots band of merry Constitutionalists knows the really important issues facing our country: that we are presided over by a gay black crack addict.
And demanding that the gay black crack addict prove he is not a gay black crack addict is totally the same as asking to see the same tax returns that every presidential candidate has released for decades.
You got us this time, Judson Phillips! DOH!Related