AMERICA'S FAVORITE JUSTICES  1:57 pm June 18, 2012

Antonin Scalia Was Wrong To Uphold Everything, Will Now Destroy Everything

by Jim Newell

Remember this, yeah you doOnly a day or several days or a week until the Supreme Court saves America from the scourge of universal health care… or doesn’t? What’s for sure is that Justice Antonin Scalia is going to vote against it like a motherfucker, because he is a Tea Party Republican. You may recall how our nation’s foremost legal experts for years had been suggesting that Scalia would vote to uphold based on precedent and his past rulings in favor of an expansive reading of the Commerce Clause. For Scalia now to vote against ObamaCare would mean that he’s completely changed his mind and now rejects 70 years’ of court rulings. And look at this: Scalia has a book coming out in which he says he’s completely changed his mind and now rejects 70 years’ of court rulings!

From TPM:

In Scalia’s new book, a 500-page disquisition on statutory construction being published this week, he says the landmark 1942 ruling Wickard v. Filburn — which has served as the lynchpin of the federal government’s broad authority to regulate interstate economic activities under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause — was improperly decided.

Wickard, you say? That’s the one that Scalia himself enthusiastically drew from to support the expansive Commerce Clause ruling in 2005′s Gonzales vs. Raich, the case that got all those legal eagles thinking he’d vote to uphold ObamaCare. But he won’t, because he now hates everything:

At the time, Scalia emphatically agreed, writing in his concurring opinion that “where Congress has authority to enact a regulation of interstate commerce, it possesses every power needed to make that regulation effective.” The Reagan-appointed justice’s decision upset libertarians who saw Raich as a squandered opportunity to limit the 70-year trend of reading the Commerce Clause expansively and giving the federal government broad authority when it comes to national economic regulation.

In the preface of the book, Scalia, writing about himself in the third person, concedes that he “knows that there are some, and fears that there may be many, opinions that he has joined or written over the past 30 years that contradict what is written here” in the health care ruling, the Times reports. He notes that while precedent factored into some of them, in other cases it’s “because wisdom has come late.”

Okay, yes, it’s just Scalia. Will four other justices join him in going “Full Legal Wingnut” though and just start dismantling the entire regulatory state with this comical new precedent they unleash in the ObamaCare ruling? Probably, we say, because we have no idea.

[TPM]

 
Related video

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.

{ 144 comments }

nounverb911 June 18, 2012 at 2:00 pm

Did Scalia get some flipflops from Romney?

ProgressiveInga June 18, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Jimmy Buffet libel!

Ayn Rand Paul Tard June 18, 2012 at 2:55 pm

Only since the President flipped from Republican to Democrat and from white to black. See, you give people a little freedom and this is what they do.

BaldarTFlagass June 18, 2012 at 2:00 pm

Flip-flopper.

deanbooth June 18, 2012 at 3:51 pm

Nope, the Founding Fathers did; and Scalia intuits their new intention. It's just like when Jebus flip-flopped about slavery in 1865.

skoalrebel June 18, 2012 at 2:01 pm

Look, the basic constitutional principle here is this: if a nigger wants it, then it ain't constitutional. [spit!] This is what makes Scalia such a fine constitutional scholar. I plan to explain more of this in my Teabaggers Guide to the Constitution. You're welcome, America!

actor212 June 18, 2012 at 2:04 pm

Will there be a Kindle edition, too? I want to save a tree.

skoalrebel June 18, 2012 at 2:07 pm

What's a Kindle? Is that some kind of gay homo thing?

BaldarTFlagass June 18, 2012 at 2:07 pm

Yepper.

actor212 June 18, 2012 at 2:10 pm

It's Amish

mavenmaven June 18, 2012 at 2:13 pm

No, he's against electricity as well. Is it in the Constitution? Then he's against it.

HippieEsq June 18, 2012 at 2:08 pm

Chapter 1: Read 2nd Amendment
Chapter 2: Make up the rest
Chapter 3: Bring yer Gun.

not that Radio June 18, 2012 at 2:34 pm

Chapter 1 was stricken, in the interest of brevity. Chapter 3 makes reading redundant.

HippieEsq June 18, 2012 at 2:38 pm

solid point.

But I forgot Chapter 4: "The Tenth Amendment means whatever I need it to mean."

Schmannnity June 18, 2012 at 2:09 pm

Which clause covers hoverounds?

HippieEsq June 18, 2012 at 2:37 pm

The (complete opposite of) Supremacy Clause.

sullivanst June 18, 2012 at 2:41 pm

if a nigger wants it, then it ain't constitutional.

Ah yes, the White Supremacy Clause.

Maman June 18, 2012 at 2:03 pm

I am thrilled to hear that he listened to the merits of the case before making a decision anything else would have been imprudent. augh.

sullivanst June 18, 2012 at 2:23 pm

Well, the thing he considers to be of utmost merit is whatever result he wanted in the first place.

Mittens Howell, III June 18, 2012 at 2:03 pm

"Wisdom came late" — Insert Scalia eye-jism blingee right there.

Callyson June 18, 2012 at 3:09 pm

"Wisdom came late"

I see what you and Scalia did there, unfortunately…

Chet Kincaid June 18, 2012 at 3:21 pm

That's why Justice wears a blindfold.

actor212 June 18, 2012 at 2:03 pm

Perhaps a little Second Amendment reinforcement of consistency is to be considered here.

Not that I'd endorse any injuring of a SCOTUS, just that he should be reminded that gun registration laws have been upheld for decades despite very clear arguments against them from First Principles asshats like, well, Scalia.

Antispandex June 18, 2012 at 2:36 pm

You know, I am very seldom known to be serious about anything here at the old comment hole, but this subject pisses me off. The Court has never been about protecting anyone's rights. It was formed so that the Federalists would have a means of ensuring that the dirty commoners were never able to over rule the wealthy simply by voting. Hence, life appointment… and hell, APPOINTMENT. Second amendment solutions will never work though. The political right wing has convinced the left, that the right only applies to them. I feel better now. Back to the snark.

ProgressiveInga June 18, 2012 at 2:03 pm

NOW will Wickard finally apologize to Filburn???

Or vicey-versey.

CapnRadio June 18, 2012 at 2:03 pm

Considering his age and weight, it'd be foolish to expect Scalia to uphold anything.

Lionel[redacted]Esq June 18, 2012 at 2:05 pm

Scalia has always been good at walking the fine line between his personal ambition and what is wanted by his corporate overlords.

HippieEsq June 18, 2012 at 2:05 pm

SCOTUS precedent is as reliable a predictor as the color of my dog's (Earl Warren's) turd.

Not_So_Much June 18, 2012 at 2:05 pm

Scalia is a fucking wicktard. Go have a hunting experience with Cheney already. Take your Clarence puppet with you.

ManchuCandidate June 18, 2012 at 2:06 pm

He's for a Rigid (with a stick up the ass of the stick up his ass) strict interpretation of the constitution until someone pays him not to.

An_Outhouse June 18, 2012 at 2:33 pm

the someone paying him is the stick thats up his ass. That's the way he likes it.

Lionel[redacted]Esq June 18, 2012 at 2:06 pm

Have any of you ever thought about how terrible all of this would be if the Court doesn't strike down the health care law? Just think how uppity Obama would be then?

Chet Kincaid June 18, 2012 at 2:12 pm

Why, we'd see nothing but his nostril hairs for months!!

Mittens Howell, III June 18, 2012 at 2:06 pm

"In Scalia’s new book, a 500-page disquisition on statutory construction …

*Kathunk* … snore

Butch_Wagstaff June 18, 2012 at 5:02 pm

No shit. That's going to be one hell of a remaindered book.

Schmannnity June 18, 2012 at 2:06 pm

He took the words right out of Clarence Thomas' mouth.

elviouslyqueer June 18, 2012 at 2:14 pm

He took the words struck the dick right out of Clarence Thomas' mouth.

There. Fixed that for ya.

CapnRadio June 18, 2012 at 2:07 pm

He notes that while precedent factored into some of them, in other cases it’s “because wisdom has come late.”

This makes a whole lot more sense when you realize that "Wisdom" is the nickname of Scalia's favorite rentboy.

Jus_Wonderin June 18, 2012 at 2:07 pm

Oh, I get it, Scalia Decisis? But, flip all the principles.

Schmannnity June 18, 2012 at 2:08 pm

This is great news. My breakfast sausage didn't have the same flavor without human thumbs.

Generation[redacted] June 18, 2012 at 2:16 pm

As long as those human thumbs all come from within the same state, the feds need to stay out of it.

GregComlish June 18, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Good news for Sarah Palin: Wickard v. Filburn gives her a great opportunity to prove her intelligence with her mastery of the word "fungible".

Jus_Wonderin June 18, 2012 at 2:11 pm

I bet she will get this confused with fungerbil which was introduced to the lexicon by Todd.

RedneckMuslin June 18, 2012 at 2:42 pm

This has all been refudiated.

Blueb4sunrise June 18, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Are we going to be tested on this?

scvirginia June 18, 2012 at 2:17 pm

I believe the test has begun, and you must respond during these last few minutes left to us…

ifthethunderdontgetya June 18, 2012 at 2:12 pm

Republican Supremes to overturn Republican health care insurance mandates because President Mandingo passed 'em.

Filmclip at 11.
~

Schmannnity June 18, 2012 at 2:12 pm

Bye Bye Civil Rights Act of 1964.

anniegetyerfun June 18, 2012 at 3:02 pm

It hampers LIBERTY, anyway.

Goonemeritus June 18, 2012 at 2:13 pm

Go ahead shoot it down and see if single payer isn’t what you get for your trouble. He will go down in history as the guy that put an end to the private medical insurance industry.

scvirginia June 18, 2012 at 2:19 pm

From your lips to FSM's ears.

bureaucrap June 18, 2012 at 2:30 pm

Wish you were right, but not a chance. If anything, the Republican House will move to dismantle Social Security and Medicare NOW since the court will dismantle it next year anyways.

ChernobylSoup June 18, 2012 at 2:13 pm

His brief needs more pelican.

iburl June 18, 2012 at 2:17 pm

I'd love to sick a pelican in there.

Mittens Howell, III June 18, 2012 at 2:13 pm

When that piece of shit book comes out I'm totally driving a bus around and around it.

*Beep-Beep-Beep*

bureaucrap June 18, 2012 at 2:14 pm

Say goodbye to the social welfare state, say hello to the survival of the fittest. In the new world, it will help you enormously if you are physically impervious to environmental pollution, physically fit enough to not require health care, and rich enough not to need social security.

outragedcitizen June 18, 2012 at 3:28 pm

If it's survival of the fittest means you get to take the other guys stuff then I got it made cause I know I can take at least one of the Kock brothers.

Estproph June 18, 2012 at 2:14 pm

"In the preface of the book, Scalia, writing about himself in the third person…"

Insufferable twunt warning.

actor212 June 18, 2012 at 2:49 pm

Actor212 concurs

SorosBot June 18, 2012 at 2:15 pm

Yay now he can declare those pesky minimum wage and child labor laws unconstitutional again, and tonight we're gonna party like it's 1929!

Jus_Wonderin June 18, 2012 at 2:19 pm

It would be glorious (or horrifying) to see the tangent universe that allows Republican's to do whatever the fuck they want. This is the exact reason we can't have interdimensional and parallel universe excursions.

anniegetyerfun June 18, 2012 at 3:01 pm

I've always wanted a pair of leather boots that were hand made by toddlers. Let it begin!

mavenmaven June 18, 2012 at 2:15 pm

The Koch Bros will take care of Scalia and Thomas very nicely afterwards. That's their commerce clause.

JHRayne June 18, 2012 at 2:38 pm

I'm sure they have already.

Chet Kincaid June 18, 2012 at 2:16 pm

Scalia continues his statutory rape of the Federal Government.

Schmannnity June 18, 2012 at 2:20 pm

It's worse than that; the rape of a 223 year old.

Chet Kincaid June 18, 2012 at 2:21 pm

(I edited on ya, but it still works!)

iburl June 18, 2012 at 2:16 pm

Do you want a black president, or do you want the supreme court to neuter the federal government entirely? Those are the choices.

Designer_Radio June 18, 2012 at 3:53 pm

I thought Scalia LIKED black presidents, since he decides who gets to be president after all the Florida ballots are cast. Musta thought Clarence was running, they all look alike.

weejee June 18, 2012 at 2:17 pm

In return for an Amazon payday, Scalia in one broad stroke turns his CV into parakeet cage parquet for all of history forever and ever. Splat, too, also.

BerkeleyBear June 18, 2012 at 2:17 pm

See I thought he'd try to thread the needle more carefully, so he'd have the Raich opinion to fall back on when necessary to beat up pot heads. Specifically, I thought he'd write a partial dissent that found the mandate unconstitutional but did so on a bullshit definition of "commerce" that in his mind preserved Wickard in other contexts. This basically signals he couldn't reconcile Wickard with his newfound hatred of Federal power. Still, he'll find some way to find Raich completely different than Wickard when he needs to (i.e. when the GOP has control of Congress and the WH).

Still, I know Kennedy doesn't agree with him on Wickard, and Roberts has claimed precedents of that age deserve greater deference (although his record is less than stellar), so there's a good chance that the ACA will be upheld in the end. Or we should all start planning to have Social Security and Medicare wiped out as violative of Congress' powers, too.

sullivanst June 18, 2012 at 2:30 pm

his newfound hatred of Federal power.

Gee, I wonder if that had anything to do with the increase in Presidential melanin content between Gonzales v Raich and now…

scvirginia June 18, 2012 at 2:38 pm

"..so he'd have the Raich opinion to fall back on when necessary to write his next bestseller to say he is still getting older and wiser"…

There- now, doesn't that look just as plausible?

Baconzgood June 18, 2012 at 2:18 pm

If who-ha's fell under the Commerce Clause what do you think then?

actor212 June 18, 2012 at 2:21 pm

Clearly, you don't date much if you think they aren't already "commerce"

Chet Kincaid June 18, 2012 at 2:20 pm

So if I write a big, long, boring tome justifying my crimes in advance, can I skate at trial?

An_Outhouse June 18, 2012 at 2:30 pm

as long as it reinforces whatever the theme of the Bilderberg party was that year. And make sure the ghostwriter is related to somebody important.

Schmannnity June 18, 2012 at 2:37 pm

Mein Kampf? Bad example.

Generation[redacted] June 18, 2012 at 2:38 pm

Before you go and pick up Scalia's book, be aware the blurb on the back cover says, "I have a gun, I'm in fear of my life and I will shoot you."

Chick-Fil-Atheist™ June 18, 2012 at 3:18 pm

Foreword by Dick Cheney.

Generation[redacted] June 18, 2012 at 3:37 pm

"I literally could not put this book down." –George Zimmerman

JHRayne June 18, 2012 at 2:42 pm

What trial, lol. Besides, those judges would just 'receive payments' from Koch, Inc, as well.

DemmeFatale June 18, 2012 at 3:29 pm

You can only skate at trial if you're white.
(Sorry, my friend.)

MissTaken June 18, 2012 at 2:20 pm

Oh that Scalia, being all kinds of intellectual again!

TootsStansbury June 18, 2012 at 2:22 pm

Why do the black robed fascists hate big insurance so?

Antispandex June 18, 2012 at 2:23 pm

"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is “actually” innocent."

This is the kind of decision we can look forward to, until the present crop of conservatives on the court die off….or maybe a sort of a "Dred Scott, 2012". Whatever.

Allmighty_Manos June 18, 2012 at 2:23 pm

I think things starting going wrong with the Magna Carta.

Generation[redacted] June 18, 2012 at 2:39 pm

The Magna Carta was signed under duress, therefore SCOTUS has ruled it to be invalid.

sewollef June 18, 2012 at 3:34 pm

And the proponents of the document that 'forced' King John to acquiesce, for the most part, hated the document and didn't agree to it anyhow. It remained valid for barely three months.

freakishlywrong June 18, 2012 at 2:24 pm

And Barry is tyrannical?

tjwdraws June 18, 2012 at 2:25 pm

Is there anything in Commerce Clause about Supreme Court Justices making rulings based on what might sell the most books?

BarackMyWorld June 18, 2012 at 2:25 pm

I wish him no physical harm, but when I look at Scalia I do think "Surely this man cannot live forever."

Jus_Wonderin June 18, 2012 at 2:30 pm

I pray they don't get that "head in a jar" thing perfected.

Dashboard Buddha June 18, 2012 at 2:35 pm

It will just seem like forever.

RedneckMuslin June 18, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Satan's lived for a long time so there's that.

That is, if you believe that kind of shit.

JHRayne June 18, 2012 at 2:25 pm

You got that second sentence backward. It should read, "What’s for sure is that Justice Antonin Scalia is going to vote against it like a Tea Party Republican, because he is a motherfucker."

rickmaci June 18, 2012 at 2:26 pm

If [as the Federalists say] “the judiciary is the last resort in relation to the other departments of the government,” … , then indeed is our Constitution a complete felo de so. … The Constitution, on this hypothesis, is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they may please. — Thomas Jefferson in letter to Judge Spencer Roane, Nov. 1819

Exhibit 1 to Jefferson's argument about the despotic nature of the power of the Supreme Court post Marbury v. Madison, Scalia Mussolini.

Billmatic June 18, 2012 at 2:27 pm

Antonin Scalia means Sentient Turd in Italian.

scvirginia June 18, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Funny, my Italian dictionary says "yellow onion"…

Estproph June 18, 2012 at 2:55 pm

So it almost describes him, other than that sentient part.

An_Outhouse June 18, 2012 at 2:28 pm

Scalia needs to DNA test the dick that's stuck up his ass in order to make a decision.

Exhausted66 June 18, 2012 at 2:31 pm

I can't write about Scalia without thinking about back hair. Soooo much backhair.

Baconzgood June 18, 2012 at 2:31 pm

This is his way of saying "I'm not upholding any thing nigger but a lynching rope" eh?

Flat_Earther June 18, 2012 at 2:31 pm

Scalia is an originalist except when he is not; and he is not when being an originalist does not fit his particular brand of judicial activism.

randcoolcatdaddy June 18, 2012 at 2:32 pm

Scalia … a merely annoying skin condition or unsightly wart upon the American Constitution? You decide …

Dashboard Buddha June 18, 2012 at 2:34 pm

I say both

sullivanst June 18, 2012 at 2:42 pm

Neither. Scalia's actively harmful, not just ugly.

Buckminster June 19, 2012 at 6:09 pm

More like a bleeding hemorrhoid on the ass of the nation.

MissTaken June 18, 2012 at 2:33 pm

So I can legally grow medical marijuana in my backyard in a state with legal medical marijuana again? Yay!

Oh, wait, that doesn't help big pharma? Never mind.

Chet Kincaid June 18, 2012 at 2:33 pm

Creeping Scalia.

scvirginia June 18, 2012 at 2:49 pm

S'okay, we got plenty of snake oil to take care of it.

actor212 June 18, 2012 at 3:10 pm

Oh man! Even Weed-B-Gone won't get that shit out. You need a flamethrower!

Chet Kincaid June 18, 2012 at 3:19 pm

I refer, of course, to Backdoor Scalia Law! I am sure the dietary rules on pasta preparation are unreasonably strict!

not that Radio June 18, 2012 at 2:35 pm

Nobody expects the 500-page Disquisition!

Baconzgood June 18, 2012 at 2:54 pm

Our chief weapon is fear. Fear and changing our minds. Our two chief wepons are fear and changing our minds and ruthless devotion to to Right Wing idology. Amongst our wepons are fear and changing our minds are and ruthless devotion to to Right Wing idology and our nice black robes. DAMN! Um, I'll come in again…

not that Radio June 18, 2012 at 9:15 pm

Perfect.

BaldarTFlagass June 18, 2012 at 2:36 pm

“because wisdom has come late.”
You know what else comes late? Dementia.

Chet Kincaid June 18, 2012 at 2:41 pm

haha

Baconzgood June 18, 2012 at 2:49 pm

Periods too also.

Blueb4sunrise June 18, 2012 at 2:55 pm

MOAR MELVINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Baconzgood June 18, 2012 at 3:01 pm

I like you Stuart. You're not like the others…Here, in the trailer park.

Blueb4sunrise June 18, 2012 at 3:16 pm

HA!!!!!!! The Soil!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[I cheated....damn , I know that.......what's that from...what's that from...]

Poindexter718 June 18, 2012 at 2:44 pm

Wop Whitman: "Fangul! I contain multitudes."

Indiepalin June 18, 2012 at 2:56 pm

The Court made another improper decision when it upheld Kramer v. Godzilla (1980).

anniegetyerfun June 18, 2012 at 2:59 pm

Was a black president involved in Wickard? You Honor, I rest my case.

Gopherit June 18, 2012 at 3:02 pm

"What’s for sure is that Justice Antonin Scalia is going to vote against it like a motherfucker, because he is a Tea Party Republican."

That's some grade A prime newell right there.

JustPixelz June 18, 2012 at 3:07 pm

And by coincidence Clarence Thomas has a book on the same subject coming out at the same time. And — SURPRISE — Thomas completely agrees with Scalia. He even uses the same words.

SayItWithWookies June 18, 2012 at 3:08 pm

You know Scalia's a good Republican because his principles always conform to his immediate need. And that motherfucker could write a 500-page disquisition in his sleep, so even if he hadn't started before the case was argued in front of the Supreme Court, this is still an after-the-fact justification of his antipathy to — what is it again? Oh yeah — ensuring the general welfare. I'm sure he's heard that phrase somewhere before.

Chet Kincaid June 18, 2012 at 3:12 pm

Commerce Claus, aka St. Tony, the swarthy, jolly man in festive black robes, is coming down the chimney to take away all your Band-Aids! Merry fucking Christmas in July!!

Ayn Rand Paul Tard June 18, 2012 at 3:14 pm

As a Supreme Court justice he's not very appealing.

owhatever June 18, 2012 at 3:21 pm

From now on, nothing but entertainment stars on the Supreme Court. At least we can like them, and they couldn't fuck things up any worse. Stephen King's 500-page disquisition would be more interesting than Scalia's.

Justices Lindsey Lohan, Madonna, Will Ferrell would usually vote as a three-some and Chief Justice Morgan Freedman would cold nail that role. Justice Charlie Sheen would have the hottest clerks, and Justice Chris Rock would shout about white people. Just an idea. After all, W nominated his cleaning lady.

valthemus June 18, 2012 at 3:29 pm

"… he now hates everything…"

And we hate him. Symmetry is beautiful.

real_dc_native June 18, 2012 at 3:34 pm

At least Antonin Scalia is not one of those Activist Judges

banana_bread June 18, 2012 at 3:36 pm

I love you forever for reusing my picture. My e-peen grew three sizes this day.

real_dc_native June 18, 2012 at 3:42 pm

You know how we could save the tax-payers a lot of money? Skip the whole trial thing, The Supreme Court justices could just poll our corporate overlords about how the court should decide on each issue and then write their decisions in the form of books. The pundits can buy the books that they will never read but use to support even more wing-nuttery on TV so the Congress knows hos to legislate. And all the corporate overlords will be happy. (I'm moving to Canada or Poland maybe).

Me_K_Cong June 18, 2012 at 4:18 pm

“where Congress has authority to enact a regulation of interstate commerce, it possesses every power needed to make that regulation effective.”

"Every power"? Commerce trumps all? Scalia should have known he would have to eat that sentence some day. His 500 page book is just the appetizer.

pepperpat June 18, 2012 at 8:42 pm

Samuel Johnson?

Me_K_Cong June 18, 2012 at 4:19 pm

Ya know who else had to write a book to justify their crazy beliefs?

real_dc_native June 18, 2012 at 5:44 pm

Karl Marx?

bikerlaureate June 18, 2012 at 6:38 pm

Jenny McCarthy ?

lulzmonger June 19, 2012 at 11:26 am

L. Ron Hubbard?

crybabyboehner June 18, 2012 at 4:23 pm

This is sound marketing. You got to beat that competition.

JackObin June 18, 2012 at 8:31 pm

Scalia is a believing catholic. Anyone know his straight jacket size?

ttommyunger June 19, 2012 at 6:33 am

Thank you, Wonkette, for not posting an actual picture of this skin-bag. I was dreading having to actually witness his visage again when I clicked on the link. This person is the personification of everything that is wrong with mankind.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: