Remember that LA Times article from a couple months back where they revealed that the average American family pays about $20,000 for health care every year? And then ran the article with a picture of a Hyundai sedan, because they are charging $20,000 for a Hyundai sedan these days? Anyway, turns out that's only true for Americans who have insurance. The LA Times has since learned that the rest of us -- the Poors who are uninsured and the unemployed, basically -- are not missing out on Hyundai sedans by paying for health care. This is because hospitals just go on ahead and charge people whatever they feel like, so uninsured people can get services for 10% of what they would cost insured people. DAMN YOU, POORS.
Unknown to most consumers, many hospitals and physicians offer steep discounts for cash-paying patients regardless of income. But there's a catch: Typically you can get the lowest price only if you don't use your health insurance...The difference in price can be stunning. Los Alamitos Medical Center, for instance, lists a CT scan of the abdomen on a state website for $4,423. Blue Shield says its negotiated rate at the hospital is about $2,400. When The Times called for a cash price, the hospital said it was $250.
Of course, like most things in this country, this is caused by Poors who want Free Handouts, and is not at all related to the fee-for-service model upon which our health care system is based and its attendant insurance reimbursement scheme, which incentivizes specialists with higher compensation to perform expensive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Hospital executives say they don't like to charge insured patients more, but say that's a result of the country's broken healthcare system. At Long Beach Memorial Medical Center...the hospital's chief financial officer said insured patients like her pay more to subsidize the uncompensated care given to the uninsured and low reimbursements for Medicaid patients.
You'll be shocked to learn that insurance companies feel that this is totally fair and totally reasonable, charging different prices to different people without telling them what the prices are or why they are paying them.
[Jo Ann] Snyder, [a] salon manager, stumbled across the two-tier system accidentally. She has filed suit against her insurer, saying she hopes her case will lead to more disclosure of the price options, and ultimately lower treatment costs for patients.
The Long Beach woman said she sought treatment in 2009 for a pain in her abdomen. First her doctor ordered a CT scan of her abdomen and pelvis at Liberty Pacific Medical Imaging, an independent facility near Long Beach Memorial.
She got approval from Blue Shield, and she paid the negotiated rate of $660. Snyder underwent surgery on her colon, and her doctor ordered another CT scan in January 2010 because she felt lingering pain.
This time, her surgeon referred her to the hospital's imaging center. Snyder said she assumed her bill would be about the same because it was the identical test. Instead, Blue Shield's rate with Long Beach Memorial was $3,497 and the insurer told Snyder she owed $2,336, records show.
Incensed by having to pay nearly four times as much for the second scan, she started searching for an explanation. That's when she discovered that the hospital's cash price was less than half what she owed through her insurance.
In a complaint filed last month in Orange County Superior Court , Snyder accused Blue Shield of unfair business practices, breach of good faith and misrepresentation over her medical bills. The suit seeks class-action status on behalf of other Blue Shield customers.
A spokesman for Blue Shield said the case has no merit and the nonprofit insurer negotiates the most favorable rates it can.
Sadly, the L.A. Times article neglects to mention any hospitals that will accept chickens or vegetables .
[ LAT ]
You Still Can’t Take A Chicken To The Doctor Unless It Is A Chicken Doctor
Sadly the ACA could incentivize insurers to negotiate <em>higher</em> rates, because of the implementation of the MLR cap (if you spend more on actual care, the 15% you&#039;re allowed to skim on non-medical expenses is a bigger amount).
That&#039;s not to say I oppose the MLR cap, just wish it&#039;d either been written differently or accompanied by other measures to offset the perverse incentive it creates. I suppose the theory is competition for enrollees on the Exchange will fix it, but I&#039;m skeptical about that.
Also, what they don&#039;t mention is that if you fail to actually <em>ask</em> for the superdiscount cash rate, they&#039;ll charge you the megascary &quot;full price&quot; rate that the insured see next to the negotiated rate to make them feel better about the assfucking they&#039;re about to take because it wasn&#039;t with the <em>biggest</em> dildo available.