Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pierre_de_Fermat's avatar

I think French bashing goes back to the Hundred Years War (Dutch bashing dates to the Anglo-Dutch wars), and a rivalry that only ended in the 19th Century (it really PO'd the Kaiser that his cousin Bertie preferred the French and Paris to the Germans -Prussians- and Berlin). The Brits were able to export this to the New World because the rivalry was carried on in the Americas, and provided the backdrop to some savage warfare in the colonies. That said, once the American colonists rose in rebellion, they turned to the only power that could (or would) help. For the original issue, I myself find the claims of an English king to the throne of France to be absurd, but of course, the nation-state that we know did not yet exist in a form we would recognize. So the Brits and French fought an pointless, bloody war that weakened both and contributed to the rise of the Habsburgs. Uh .... how did I get off on this?

Expand full comment
TundraGrifter's avatar

Thank you! You made my point better than I did.

To be serious on a Sunday morning, it is my personal theory the decline of the British nation had a great deal to do with (depending on how you count) a hundred years of constant war.

For generations the best and the brightest - and certainly the bravest - died around the globe to preserve the Empire. Then came the absolute horrors of WW I - more casualties (killed and wounded) in one day at the Somme than we lost in Viet Nam.

"A scrimmage in a Border Station-- "A canter down some dark defile-- "Two thousand pounds of education "Drops to a ten-rupee jezail--"

~ "Arithmetic on the Frontier," Kipling The Crammer's boast, the Squadron's pride, Shot like a rabbit in a ride!

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?