Lobbyists Try to Weasel Around New DNC Rules Ahead of Convention

by Liz Colville

change we can put in obama's pocket

The Democratic National Committee last year enforced rules that are attempting make it harder for lobbyists to peddle their interests at this summer’s convention in Charlotte, NC, but the reality is, as long as there are laws, there are ways around, through, over and under them. The rules, part of President Obama’s quest to stop outside influences seeping into that purest font that is politics, completely forbid corporate or lobbyist cash, and cap individual contributions at $100,000. But, well, says some creep who knows about these things, “The Democrats have made it inconvenient for corporations to donate to the convention but not impossible.” Is that because corporations are people?!

You know, “forbid” is a funny word … But this year, the changes mean that lobbyists technically won’t get the same “VIP access” to the convention — hotel suites, great food, and perks of a probably usually lewd nature. Instead, K Street dwellers will have to play even nicer to their targets and at the same time have the humbling experience of being part of an event that feels distinctly not like a honeymoon. They’ll have to, er, get creative.

It goes without saying that the Republican National Committee has imposed no such restrictions on its convention attendees, because the Democrats need something to envy.

But one Democratic lobbyist has a plan, saying that “if there’s a way that our executives or Washington folks can get access to credentials through whatever means, well, we’ll just leave them to figure out what those channels might be.”

Um. Put that way, it doesn’t seem like the new rules mean anything at all. The hawkers can still throw cars, jewelry and Dom Perignon at their politicians, and there’s no limit to the amount that corporations can spend on such things. Bottom line: despite the rules, it’s still in everybody’s interest to be as shady as possible while still sounding comparatively righteous in the face of the amazing Republicans: Charlotte has vowed to raise close to $37 million this year, which is only $13 million shy of the 2008 convention’s pre-new-rules total. The question is, will they? [Politico]

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.

{ 85 comments }

nounverb911 January 12, 2012 at 12:10 pm

"Democrats need something to envy. "
The only thing the Democrats envy about Mitt is his hair.

Barb January 12, 2012 at 12:11 pm

Write in vote, Stephen Colbert!

nounverb911 January 12, 2012 at 12:12 pm

Is he announcing his candidacy tonight?

Barb January 12, 2012 at 12:13 pm

Well, since he said he was going to tonight, my guess is um, yes.

nounverb911 January 12, 2012 at 12:15 pm

Colbert/Barb 2012

Barb January 12, 2012 at 12:20 pm

No, I look bad in a sweater vest. I will have to pass. Wait, everyone looks bad in a sweater vest……….

chicken_thief January 12, 2012 at 12:38 pm

But, but, …. he's a REPUBLICAN!!!

Barb January 12, 2012 at 12:12 pm

"The hawkers can still throw cars, jewelry and Dom Perignon at their politicians"
The chicken hawkers should throw Dom, still in the bottle and with great force.

PalinzADummy January 13, 2012 at 12:02 am

Have you ever wondered if you might be Dorothy Parker, reincarnated?

HalluxValgus January 12, 2012 at 12:12 pm

an equally accurate headline would be "Weasels Try to Lobby Around New DNC Rules…"

Negropolis January 13, 2012 at 2:43 am

**golf clap**

Mahousu January 12, 2012 at 12:13 pm

“VIP access” to the convention — hotel suites, great food ..

Wait, I thought this was in Charlotte. Great food?

(I kid, I kid!)

Terry January 12, 2012 at 12:35 pm

Barbeque. Some regional seafood.

Redhead January 12, 2012 at 1:03 pm

"regional seafood?" They're about six hours from the nearest beach… ick.

chicken_thief January 12, 2012 at 12:39 pm

Best bbq in the South!

OneYieldRegular January 12, 2012 at 1:02 pm

I used to live there. Believe me, you have a point.

Chillwillard January 12, 2012 at 12:13 pm

Maybe they should try to attending as "Historians" or "Strategic Advisers."

gullywompr January 12, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Don't do anything stupid. Just let me give you the money and nobody gets hurt.

Mumbletypeg January 12, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Hush hush, sweet Charlotte.
Nice try, making out to be all 'romantical' in the living room – - we still know you're a whore in the boudoir.

Guppy January 12, 2012 at 12:38 pm

No no, that's New Jersey.

MissTaken January 12, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Hookers and blow for everyone!

nounverb911 January 12, 2012 at 12:21 pm

Isn't that North Carolina's state motto?

chicken_thief January 12, 2012 at 12:40 pm

How do we get an invite?!

DaRooster January 12, 2012 at 12:15 pm

So Republicans are saying that they have no respect for the rules of this country? Hmm… surprise!! Some fucking "Patriots."
If you don't like the way things are here… just leave.

James Michael Curley January 12, 2012 at 1:26 pm

As national conventions and proportional 'one man one vote' rules go, the freaking republicans are about up to 1976 compared to the democrats in compliance with FEC rules they agreed to to avoid federal lawsuits. Who was the chair of the RNC when this scam was started? George Herbert Freakin Walker Bush.

Oblios_Cap January 12, 2012 at 12:15 pm

"perks of a probably usually lewd nature"

I'm in the wrong line of business.

KenLayIsAlive January 12, 2012 at 10:00 pm

I hear you. In my three years of delivering pizzas, I never once received a perk of lewd nature, despite the suggestion of every porn ever made.

BarackMyWorld January 12, 2012 at 12:15 pm

It's like a corruption arms race, except instead missiles you have money and instead of potentially destroying America its actually destroying America.

ttommyunger January 12, 2012 at 12:16 pm

"Lobbyists Try to Weasel Around New DNC Rules Ahead of Convention" Nice economy of words, simultaneous use of verb and noun as same word in same sentence. Well done.

TanzbodenKoenig January 12, 2012 at 12:16 pm

"First they came for the lobbyists,
And I said nothing,
Because everyone was cheering too loudly as they were being led away
So no one could have heard me say 'good fucking riddance' anyway"

PalinzADummy January 13, 2012 at 12:06 am

When you put it that way …

Not_So_Much January 12, 2012 at 12:17 pm

Actual working rules to separate conventioneers and strippers? You are darling!

Callyson January 12, 2012 at 12:18 pm

Corporations can still make in-kind donations and are expected to offer telecom services, hardware, vehicles and other products. Businesses are still expected to host a plethora of offsite parties that aren’t bound by convention rules. And the heads of big corporations are being asked to cut checks under the $100,000 limit.
I'll take "other products" for $5000, Alex…

smokefillednewyear January 12, 2012 at 12:18 pm

…said Kenneth Gross, a veteran ethics lawyer at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.
Why does that sound like a parody of itself?

lizcolville January 12, 2012 at 12:22 pm

This guy is full of FLOM!

arihaya January 12, 2012 at 2:24 pm

the Skadden is Freuding itself

Blueb4sunrise January 12, 2012 at 12:19 pm

Piss on 'em.

ifthethunderdontgetya January 12, 2012 at 12:19 pm

The rules, part of President Obama’s quest to stop outside influences seeping into that purest font that is politics…

I'm sure his newest Chief of Staff, Jacob Lew of Citibank, will help end these insidious practices.
~

lizcolville January 12, 2012 at 12:23 pm

word

KenLayIsAlive January 12, 2012 at 10:02 pm

The rules, part of President Obama’s quest to stop outside influences seeping into that purest font that is politics, completely forbid corporate or lobbyist cash, and cap individual contributions at $100,000.

As long as you're making "rules", why not shoot for a slightly lower cap than 4x the median American income, eh, Mr. President?

KeepFnThatChicken January 12, 2012 at 12:21 pm

How come no one ever offers me hookers and blow?

freakishlywrong January 12, 2012 at 12:24 pm

Because you don't have a huge middle/working class to shake down and exploit on behalf of greedy, wealthy assholes.

KeepFnThatChicken January 12, 2012 at 12:30 pm

I'd probably be more accommodating with my donations if I knew there was hookers and blow. Which makes me sad for Republicans, because they get offered guns and little boys.

Ruhe January 12, 2012 at 12:39 pm

Can you imagine being a naive first-time fixer at the Republican Convention? "You say they like what?…Well…what am I going to do with all these hookers and all this blow? It's not like I can return this stuff."

PalinzADummy January 13, 2012 at 12:08 am

Like they wouldn't already have stepped teh fucking blow x 50 or more and screwed all the hookers themselves.

ETA: I mean, we're talking "naive *Republican*" here, and all.

SayItWithWookies January 12, 2012 at 12:21 pm

Well, class warfare is one thing — not taking shitloads of money from lobbyists, though? That's against the fuckin' Geneva Conventions.

BaldarTFlagass January 12, 2012 at 12:22 pm

Why is there going to be a Democratic convention? Someone is challenging Obama for the nomination?

ifthethunderdontgetya January 12, 2012 at 12:40 pm

Just because there's no actual reason for it doesn't mean people want to give up their sexy party time, Baldar.
~

Ruhe January 12, 2012 at 12:42 pm

No challenger. This is just an opportunity for the party to solidify it's new image: Persistent and not absolutely defeated mildness in 2012 and beyond!

chicken_thief January 12, 2012 at 12:48 pm

I'm surprised that McConnell and Boehner are allowing the Dems to have a convention.

Biff January 12, 2012 at 1:47 pm

In the basement, with the lights (and C-SPAN cameras) turned off…

Baconzgood January 12, 2012 at 12:22 pm

“if there’s a way that our executives or Washington folks can get access to credentials through whatever means, well, we’ll just leave them to figure out what those channels might be.”

Have they tried huge bags of cash with the "$" symbol on it? It works for the GOP.

BaldarTFlagass January 12, 2012 at 12:25 pm

They should hire the Beagle Boys. They specialize in huge bags of cash with the "$" sign.

elviouslyqueer January 12, 2012 at 12:24 pm

Several K Streeters said, rest assured, they will make the most of the event — even if it means a night at the Super 8 Motel instead of the Four Seasons.

Oh please. Like Charlotte's classy enough to have a Super 8.

chicken_thief January 12, 2012 at 12:50 pm

However, they'll never give up their reservations at the Golden Coral.

James Michael Curley January 12, 2012 at 1:31 pm

They did in 1972. Also it still cost $8 bucks. However Tom Burdett left the light on and they got hit with cripling electric bills.

Oblios_Cap January 12, 2012 at 12:25 pm


Others are threatening to stay home and withhold their help, which makes convention planners worry.

“The rules limit access to what is supposed to be a democratic process. So people who have to be there and want to be a part of the movement are creating work-arounds to make it happen. Hopefully we will reach a critical mass,” said convention consultant LeeAnn Petersen of Conventions 2012. “Right now, operatives are concerned that nobody is actually going to go. That it’s just too complicated.”

Oh noes! It's the end of Democracy as we know it!

Is a "work-around" anything like a "reach-around"? Because it sure sounds like it is.

freakishlywrong January 12, 2012 at 12:26 pm

How "above it all". Meanwhile, the influence peddling goes on unabated back home in D.C.

UnholyMoses January 12, 2012 at 12:27 pm

Shorter DNC:

We will not help lobbyists sully our convention. Instead, they'll have to do it all by themselves.

Hope and Change: You're doin' 'em wrong.

user-of-owls January 12, 2012 at 12:29 pm

lobbyists technically won’t get the same “VIP access” to the convention — hotel suites, great food, and perks of a probably usually lewd nature.

But there will still be bathrooms marked "Lobbyist" and "Colored." Right?

chicken_thief January 12, 2012 at 12:53 pm

At the R Convention, the bathrooms will be labelled "Wide Stance" and "Regular Stance".

KenLayIsAlive January 12, 2012 at 10:04 pm

"Sealing up the glory holes?!?!?! This isn't my America…"

PalinzADummy January 13, 2012 at 12:11 am

Needs MOAR indignation.

ManchuCandidate January 12, 2012 at 12:32 pm

Weasels must weasel.

bikerlaureate January 12, 2012 at 12:37 pm

It's almost as if looking out for the interests of Democratic voters is taking a back seat to… something else.

MissTaken January 12, 2012 at 12:38 pm

And to think there are actually people who say we should get money out of politics. Stupid fools!

Now pass me that caviar served up on Ryan Gosling's tight little ass.

johnnyzhivago January 12, 2012 at 12:43 pm

Corporations should know that I will discreetly accept annonymous contributions of unlimited size and will be sure that it ends up being used.

CapnFatback January 12, 2012 at 12:51 pm

“if there’s a way that our executives or Washington folks can get access to credentials through whatever means, well, we’ll just leave them to figure out what those channels might be.”

A channel I might try is the Fox News Channel. They're pretty good at giving out phony credentials to their "correspondents."

owhatever January 12, 2012 at 1:03 pm

Why doesn't our President just fone it in this year and give the convention money to Planned Parenthood and NPR?

OneYieldRegular January 12, 2012 at 1:19 pm

Oh, I say give them all the perks they want. They're going to need them once they've exhausted Charlotte's attractions by visiting the NASCAR Museum and Billy Graham birthplace.

FlownOver January 12, 2012 at 1:24 pm

"The secret lies with Charlotte."

Parse, and discuss.

BigDumbRedDog January 12, 2012 at 1:39 pm

I heard that the motto for this years DNC is "Hope that we can maybe someday in the future believe in, but probably not." I don't know, but it seems kind of wordy to me.

BZ1 January 12, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Lobbyists are people, aren't they (not sure about this)?

smokefillednewyear January 12, 2012 at 3:02 pm

Lobbyists are made of people.

KenLayIsAlive January 12, 2012 at 10:06 pm

They are mostly people, I believe. I seem to recall something about a crocodile heart…

PalinzADummy January 13, 2012 at 12:13 am

Also, too. You know. Just like corporations.

WeHaveIssues January 12, 2012 at 2:30 pm

Partying in Charlotte… good luck with that. Bring your blingee bibles.

Fare la Volpe January 12, 2012 at 2:45 pm

Bingo is at 3, followed by a late dinner at 4.

Negropolis January 13, 2012 at 2:57 am

Ah yes, Charlotte, home of the NASCAR Museum and Skank of America..errr…Bank of America. But, they got light rail, now, so it's totally cool, ya'll!

PsycWench January 12, 2012 at 12:31 pm

Mr. Rogers weeps in his grave.

Guppy January 12, 2012 at 12:37 pm

Just a sweater vest?

chicken_thief January 12, 2012 at 12:37 pm

I have to disagree – women look GREAT in (only) sweater vests.

James Michael Curley January 12, 2012 at 1:21 pm

I'm sure you would not look bad in JUST a sweater vest. Try cashmere, doesn't scratch the delicate parts.

nounverb911 January 12, 2012 at 12:37 pm

He wore a cardigan, just like Jimmy Carter did.

PsycWench January 12, 2012 at 2:09 pm

Same thing except for the sleeves…and the buttons..and the front of the sweater…
Well, the sex appeal is the same, anyway.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post:


blog advertising is good for you