THE WAR ON POVERTY-STRICKEN KIDS  1:31 pm January 17, 2012

A Children’s Treasury of Newt Gingrich Ratcheting Up Tensions With Poor Kids

by Kaia Mursi

Pick daisies on your own time, kid.Last night’s Republican debate in the former U.S. territory of South Carolina brought the declaration of not one but two wars! Which, thank goodness, we were just about to run out of wars! Rick Perry predictably bumbled South Carolinians into Civil War 2. And useless talking marshmallow Newt Gingrich finally and officially declared war on America’s poor children, after a long series of cross-border raids and minor skirmishes. Join your favorite warblog as we trace the run-up to Newt Gingrich’s War on Destitute Kids!

Gingrich first floated a trial balloon for his inchoate jihad several news cycles ago when he came out weirdly strong against child labor laws, which you probably (and quite wrongly!) assumed have been “off the table” since 1938. This was quickly followed by Gingrich stage-whispering that, if you ask him, what’s wrong with the future poors of America is they’re a bunch of shiftless criminals, that’s what:

“Really poor children, in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working and have nobody around them who works so they have no habit of showing up on Monday,” Gingrich claimed.

“They have no habit of staying all day, they have no habit of I do this and you give me cash unless it is illegal,” he added.

Gingrich has long been noted for his exacting historian-sociological technique so there’s no way he’s just TOTALLY MAKING THIS ALL UP as he goes along. And you can tell, because he understands that schools in really poor neighborhoods operate pretty much like your local Walmart, with an unsupervised child greeting you as you pull up in your truck, looking for meth and day laborers:

Newt Gingrich does not want to send your children into the coal mines.

So he said on WNYM this morning, telling radio host Curtis Sliwa that when he suggested putting kids to work in their schools, he wasn’t thinking of the Dickensian child-labor force his critics imagine.

“They could be the person who greets you when you walk in the door,” Gingrich said, per POLITICO’s Ginger Gibson. “They could help in the school library. They can help in the kitchen. They can help clean up after lunch.”

Impoverished kids apparently have not gotten with the program fast enough for Gingrich’s liking. And so, when asked last night about his jobs plan for our newest and cutest domestic enemies, he had no choice but to go nuclear:

New York City pays their janitors an absurd amount of money because of the union. You could take one janitor and hire 30-some kids to work in the school for the price of one janitor, and those 30 kids will be a lot less likely to drop out, they will actually have money in their pocket, they’d learn to show up for work. They can do light janitorial duty, they can work in the cafeteria, they can work in the front office, they can work in the library. They’d be getting money, which is a good thing if you’re poor. Only the elites despise earning money.

Anything to gin up a few more miserable votes, right? [The Root]

 

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.

{ 161 comments }

BaldarTFlagass January 17, 2012 at 1:46 pm

"Please, sir, I want some more."

-O. Twist

TanzbodenKoenig January 17, 2012 at 1:59 pm

Yea I'm starting to think Newt does most of his debate prep by reading Dickens and taking totally the wrong impression from the text

DonnyKerabotsos January 17, 2012 at 2:20 pm

"Better dead than fed."

-N. Gingrich

real_dc_native January 17, 2012 at 3:16 pm

By fed do you mean fed with food or federal assistance? I imagine Newt is against both of them for the poors.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 10:52 pm

But in favor of both of them for himself.

DaveJ January 17, 2012 at 2:23 pm

"Please, sir, I want some more."
–amazingly, this was also spoken by Newt Gingrich, in reference to the concept of "wives."

Loaded_Pants January 17, 2012 at 4:40 pm

And Sno Ball cakes.

Nostrildamus January 17, 2012 at 2:35 pm

Don't be uppity.

a_pink_poodle January 17, 2012 at 3:41 pm

MOOOOOOOOOOORE?!?

nounverb911 January 17, 2012 at 1:46 pm

"Really poor rich children, in really poor rich neighborhoods have no habits of working".

–Fixed.

Boojum_Reborn January 17, 2012 at 2:53 pm

Substitute "black" for "poor" and you get essence of Newt.

SorosBot January 17, 2012 at 1:49 pm

Not only will our children be working, but a whole bunch of janitors will now be unemployed. They really do hate poor people, the sick fucks.

spends2much January 17, 2012 at 2:19 pm

What a brilliant way to drive down labour costs- make less skilled workers compete with destitute children for low-paying jobs. Honest to god, a generation ago, he'd be shouted/laughed off the stage for saying something like this.

Hey, Newt, when are you setting up the Thunderdome?

Boojum_Reborn January 17, 2012 at 2:54 pm

Two wives enter aaannndd…Newt eats them.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 10:54 pm

And not even "eats them" in the goodEEEWWWWW!!!
*iz ded*

Loaded_Pants January 17, 2012 at 4:44 pm

Now the image of Newt dressed as Auntie Entity has entered my brain. Damn you!

orygoon January 17, 2012 at 1:50 pm

I hope the small people remember this when they reach voting age.

slowhansolo January 17, 2012 at 2:01 pm

"I do this for the shorties…"

flamingpdog January 17, 2012 at 2:36 pm

If they live that long.

Monsieur_Grumpe January 17, 2012 at 1:50 pm

Don't let this guy babysit your kids.

CommieLibunatic January 17, 2012 at 2:53 pm

Are you kidding? I wouldn't even let this guy on my lawn.

BaldarTFlagass January 17, 2012 at 1:50 pm

“They could be the person who greets you when you walk in the door,” Gingrich said,

I'm sure that Walmart would absolutely love to pay children to do this instead of retired seniors trying to stay off the cat food diet plan.

not that Dewey January 17, 2012 at 2:19 pm

Don't know about the rest of you, but my school didn't have paid greeters.

widestanceshakedown January 17, 2012 at 2:30 pm

Here, here. We greeted ourselves with our own bootstraps and didn't need some snot-nosed, taxpayer-paid welfare prince to do it for us.

Boojum_Reborn January 17, 2012 at 2:55 pm

You had BOOTSTRAPS?!

Swampgas_Man January 17, 2012 at 5:58 pm

You had FEET?!

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 10:56 pm

"my school didn't have paid greeters"

The school where my mother used to teach (before she retired) had walk-through metal detectors, do those count as greeters?

not that Dewey January 17, 2012 at 11:33 pm

"Good morning, future criminals. My name is Stan, and I will be demeaning you and undermining your chances of a decent education today. Please place your shivs in the basket and step through me."

tessiee January 18, 2012 at 12:13 am

it's not pleasant to relate, but over the years, the neighborhood the school was in had declined from "poor" to "dangerous hellhole". Cars were stolen out of the parking lot, some teachers had been robbed, and at least one child was abducted and sexually assaulted not far from school grounds, so it wasn't the *kids* carrying weapons that was their primary worry.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 10:55 pm

"I'm sure that Walmart would absolutely love to pay children to do this instead of retired seniors"

"Pay"?

memzilla January 17, 2012 at 1:50 pm

As Boss Tweed said in Gangs of New York, you can always hire half the poor to kill the other half.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 10:57 pm

That was Jay Gould, and it was in real life, unfortunately.

nounverb911 January 17, 2012 at 1:51 pm

This is bad news for illegal aliens.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 10:58 pm

As if they didn't already have enough problems from landing their spaceship on Mel Gibson's farm.

ManchuCandidate January 17, 2012 at 1:51 pm

Fuck those little brats. Always crying about nap time, sharing toys, who touched who and complaining about the food. Fuck them.

Wait, we're not talking about GOPer candidates?

Loaded_Pants January 17, 2012 at 4:47 pm

You forgot wiping their noses on their sleeves.

GunToting[Redacted] January 17, 2012 at 1:53 pm

Is our childrens working?

freakishlywrong January 17, 2012 at 1:57 pm

Is our children slaving?

MissTaken January 17, 2012 at 1:54 pm

Finally! Just this morning I was thinking how lovely and civilized it would be for some little girl to fix my hair and makeup for me while I peruse Wonkette.

But will I have to feed the little varmint?

SorosBot January 17, 2012 at 2:01 pm

But wouldn't that create a bit of a problem for your daily masturbation routine?

MissTaken January 17, 2012 at 2:07 pm

Nah, I actually find perusing Wonkette helps my routine.

Fare la Volpe January 17, 2012 at 2:08 pm

Behave~

flamingpdog January 17, 2012 at 2:19 pm

Wait a minute, so you don't actually masturbate while reading Wonkette?

widestanceshakedown January 17, 2012 at 2:32 pm

Who doesn't? I only pause long enough to comment, and then back to admiring my p-ness.

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 2:55 pm

Just get an economy-sized bag of Urchin Chow™. Add hot water and it makes its own gravy.

slowhansolo January 17, 2012 at 1:54 pm

You want to talk about shiftless? Let's start with fascist pussies like Curtis Sliwa.

Spurning Beer January 17, 2012 at 2:12 pm

He was the vigilante dude in the rakish beret, no? With the hot girlfriend?

Mariecohn January 17, 2012 at 9:10 pm

Ok please help me out here. Is he a bad witch?

Mariecohn January 17, 2012 at 9:10 pm

I always thought him kind of a good witch, myself.

paris biltong January 17, 2012 at 1:54 pm

"They have no habit of I do this and you give me cash unless it is illegal,” he added.
When they're underage, it generally IS illegal. Including to employ them.

widestanceshakedown January 17, 2012 at 2:33 pm

Newt obviously had a very different kind of childhood, and knew taking cash was his true calling.

Boojum_Reborn January 17, 2012 at 2:58 pm

Republicans have a long tradition of telling children "I give you cash and you do this. Yes, but faster. Squeeze it harder." That's how poor children should make their munnies.

prommie January 17, 2012 at 1:55 pm

The darkies are so irresponsible. We have to train them.

SorosBot January 17, 2012 at 2:00 pm

There's a reason Newt announced this in South Carolina, which has a bit of a tradition with that.

MaxNeanderthal January 19, 2012 at 4:43 pm

I thought the "poor neighborhoods" phrase just made my dogs ear twitch….

paris biltong January 17, 2012 at 1:56 pm

Another good idea would be to let children give speeches in place of politicians, and get paid 50,000 dollars or more a shot.

johnnyzhivago January 17, 2012 at 1:56 pm

Has Newt ever actually spoken to a kid? Any kid – rich or poor???

flamingpdog January 17, 2012 at 2:40 pm

Only before eating them.

bravo_sierra January 17, 2012 at 1:57 pm

Has there been any mention at all about rich kids working in school? What about economically mixed schools? Would the poor kids be singled out for cafeteria clean up, while the rich kids take "how to converse with your help" Spanish?

freakishlywrong January 17, 2012 at 1:59 pm

And dogs, within earshot, all sat up and asked; "did you hear that?"

slowhansolo January 17, 2012 at 2:00 pm

Children are notorious disease vectors, so making them Wal-Mart greeters might simply be Newt's underhanded way of lightening the load on the entitlement programs.

Barb January 17, 2012 at 2:00 pm

"Really poor children, in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working…"
And the really rich kids in the really rich neighborhoods work so hard?

orygoon January 17, 2012 at 2:08 pm

It's too late for moi, but here's a corollary: could have home schooled and required the kids to do all the "home" work. No reading or science until them terlets are scrubbed!

Fare la Volpe January 17, 2012 at 2:09 pm

It takes a lot of hard work to inherit millions of dollars in trust funds.

First you gotta rub out Grandma and Grandpa, and sever the brakes on Dad's car, and sabotage Mom's tanning bed…

Loaded_Pants January 17, 2012 at 4:52 pm

& then there are the siblings to off.

Generation[redacted] January 17, 2012 at 2:09 pm

The elites despise making money.

Mariecohn January 17, 2012 at 9:13 pm

Bar, I was wondering if you had gone missing. So glad you're back now. (Were you gone, or is it my imagination?)

freakishlywrong January 17, 2012 at 2:03 pm

No snark. Really, what the fuck is wrong with these people? The media, all saying he "won" the debate, and not a peep about how truly deplorable he and his ideas are.

orygoon January 17, 2012 at 2:10 pm

We already have a terrible safety net for poor children and send them to horrifying schools. So you expect outrage about this?

GOPCrusher January 17, 2012 at 2:30 pm

The fact that he can say something so Gawd-Awful stupid and nobody is calling him out on it, makes me sad for the future of America.

orygoon January 17, 2012 at 2:06 pm

"Those rugrats do not pay taxes yet either; they just cost the rest of us money. We'll give them jerbs, convert to flat-taxes-only-on-labor, and fix that!"

Schmannnity January 17, 2012 at 2:08 pm

When he says "really poor children in really poor neighborhoods" he means really Black.

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 2:57 pm

You have the Newt Decoder Ring?

Schmannnity January 17, 2012 at 3:49 pm

It's like a dog whistle; it can only be heard by Whites south of Mason and/or Dixon.

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 4:03 pm

I'm thinking any black person with a shred of self-preservation can hear it pretty clearly, too.

MzNicky January 17, 2012 at 2:08 pm

There is possibly nothing lower that will ever been seen by the human eye than this gang of Repugnikans pandering to a crowd of redneck racist South Carolinians. I've taken three showers since last night and still feel befouled.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:06 pm

Really, you'd think there wasn't a poor *white* person in the whole state that could see through this, "Poor people are lazy and want handouts, that's why they're poor" bullshit. So much for the effect of 400 years of inbreeding on a gene pool's collective IQ.

OneYieldRegular January 17, 2012 at 2:08 pm

They have no habit of staying all day, they have no habit of I do this and you give me stock options, book royalties, outlandish speaker's fees, and a half-million dollar line of credit at Tiffany's unless it is illegal,” he added.

Generation[redacted] January 17, 2012 at 2:09 pm

“They could be the person who greets you when you walk in the door,”

Now there's a job that means instant popularity at any school!

GOPCrusher January 17, 2012 at 2:32 pm

If by "instant popularity" you mean having your underwear waistband over your ears, then I concur.

elviouslyqueer January 17, 2012 at 2:37 pm

And what better training for a rewarding career as a Wal-Mart greeter!

flamingpdog January 17, 2012 at 2:46 pm

I seriously doubt anyone has ever seen the words "instant popularity at school" and "Newt Gingrich" in the same sentence until now.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:06 pm

In the immortal words of Nelson Muntz:

HAH ha!

karimv January 17, 2012 at 2:10 pm

If he'd ever spoken to any actual families, he would know that constant budget cuts are already ensuring that school kids (and teachers) do 'light janitorial duty'. For free.

And they can't work in the cafeteria, because that's all been outsourced to big donors like Sodexho.

We can't have school kids interferring in the transfer of wealth from the public treasury to private corporations, after all.

Fare la Volpe January 17, 2012 at 2:12 pm

I have a friend who grew up in a Michigan school that had this exact program. The kids who worked janitorial staff were complete pariahs, even by the faculty. One of his own teachers took his cup of coffee and spilled it all over the floor as one of the poor kids walked by. "Clean up!" he cackled as the student picked up her mop. Then he went out to huff a cancer stick.

Welcome to Newt Gingrich's America.

natoslug January 17, 2012 at 3:14 pm

The Victorian Era has such a romantic ring to it. Newt must be feeling horny and nostalgic. For most of us, this can be solved by sleeping with an ex-girlfriend to remind us why the past was not as wonderful as we remembered — we don't need to drag the entire fucking nation back with us.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:08 pm

"The Victorian Era has such a romantic ring to it. Newt must be feeling horny and nostalgic."

Can you blame him? the Victorian Era was the last time Newt could get a girl without chloroform and a wad of $100 bills.

flamingpdog January 17, 2012 at 11:58 pm

LIke the new avatar.

natoslug January 18, 2012 at 9:45 am

It's about time we embrace the Republican version of SteamPunk. Roll back the progress and relive the glory. Today's fingerless working children are tomorrow's tasty meat pies.

starfanglednut January 17, 2012 at 6:14 pm

I'm sorry for what happened to your friend.

Allmighty_Manos January 17, 2012 at 2:13 pm

"New York City pays their janitors an absurd amount of money because of the union."

So you suck if you don't work, but suck if you do. Geez nonwhite working people can't get a fucking break from this guy.

Negligently_Joe January 17, 2012 at 2:42 pm

Some these poor kids who are unfamiliar with the "dignity of work" are the kids of aforementioned janitors, undoubtedly. So, Newt's plan is to unceremoniously lay off their parents, and force the kids to work for subminimum wages in their stead. Instead of studying for school.

To teach them about dignity, and the importance of working hard to attain your potential, and shit.

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 4:14 pm

This bloated sack can talk about 'absurd' wages when he collected $1.8M for his skills as a historian?

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:12 pm

"So you suck if you don't work, but suck if you do."

Exactly. If you don't work, you suck because you're a lazy bum who wants to live off of everyone else's handouts (because it's such a luxurious lifestyle). If you do work, you suck because you want to make a living wage for your fulfilling career scrubbing toilets and mopping up third-graders' vomit, instead of just groveling gratefully when Mr. Burns tosses a handful of pennies at your head.

Boojum_Reborn January 18, 2012 at 5:32 am

Child Cleaners Collective Power, Local Union 627.

SayItWithWookies January 17, 2012 at 2:13 pm

Lazy children are definitely the problem — when you compare American industry, with its restrictive, authoritarian laws that don't permit children to earn a living, to the more successful industrialized nations that allow this growing labor pool to be tapped, then you see why we're so far behind those nations. And I'm speaking here of Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and all those other nations whose success we aspire to recreate.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:14 pm

Yup. Anybody who's seen "Slumdog Millionaire" or "Salaam Bombay" knows that those countries are pretty much a kids' paradise — and a regular utopia for the grownups, too!

Oblios_Cap January 17, 2012 at 2:15 pm

Are there no workhouses? Are there no for-profit prisons?

Dashboard Buddha January 17, 2012 at 2:15 pm

"They can help in the kitchen. They can help clean up after lunch.”

That's right, dammit. What's an economic recovery without humiliating poor children?

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:15 pm

Oh, we're in a recovery now? Good to know.

kissawookiee January 17, 2012 at 2:19 pm

"they’d learn to show up for work."

And since experience is the best teacher, they'd learn firsthand why they're going to lose their jobs when they're old enough to be paid an adult wage and thus must be replaced by children.

keepem_sikanpor January 17, 2012 at 7:47 pm

Newt's Logan's Run rolling out in 2014. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0402344/
Where 21 is the new 30.

kissawookiee January 17, 2012 at 2:20 pm

I posted this in some other damn thread, but it's more apropos here, so you get to read it twice:

I do not understand why people who rail against the $5-an-hour Messicans stealing American jobs turn around and cheer for the idea of replacing an American worker with 30 $5-per-day kids.

widestanceshakedown January 17, 2012 at 2:36 pm

Promise us you never will.

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 4:15 pm

Logical consistency is not their strong suit.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:16 pm

Nor are compassion, spousal fidelity, physical attractiveness, or intelligence.

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 11:26 pm

Aside from douchiness and dickishness, they don't really have any strong suits, do they?

I am trying to maintain the snark, but this whole crowd of fourth-rate sociopaths and their odious, repugnant, mouth-breathing 'base' are wearing on my last nerve.

elviouslyqueer January 17, 2012 at 2:22 pm

Louder, Newt, in case dogs in Uruguay didn't hear you. Also, needs much more "those people," also.

x111e7thst January 17, 2012 at 2:22 pm

Mothers don't let your pickaninnies grow up to be janitors.

IncenseDebate January 17, 2012 at 2:23 pm

He's divorced from reality. Also. Too.

LesBontemps January 17, 2012 at 2:33 pm

At least twice!

ProgressiveInga January 17, 2012 at 3:54 pm

Per day.

arihaya January 17, 2012 at 4:05 pm

Reality was his second or first wive?

SenileAgitation January 17, 2012 at 2:24 pm

Good thinkin', Newt! Maybe these enlightened urchins would further supplement their custodian or greeter incomes with the sale of loosies, dime bags, test answers and protection from beatings. You know, learn to maximize earnings from additional income streams.

BlueStateLibel January 17, 2012 at 2:24 pm

Better watch out, Newt, the little raggamuffins are also really good at spying – remember Sherlock Holmes' underage little brigade? – they'll be peeping at your Fannie May contracts and spilling the beans in revenge if you don't watch out.

Fare la Volpe January 17, 2012 at 2:26 pm

"If they would rather die,'' said Gingrich, "they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population."

donner_froh January 17, 2012 at 2:32 pm

Of course kids in wealthy neighborhoods who are chauffeured by mom or the nanny to play dates, hockey practice and cheerleader camp, get iPhones when they are ten, cars when they are 16 and boob jobs (for the girls) when they are 18 are learning the lessons of hard work and self-reliance that they will need as adults.

GOPCrusher January 17, 2012 at 2:34 pm

Not sure if this has been pointed out, but Newt is a vile cocksucker.

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 2:59 pm

It bears repeating.

Schmannnity January 17, 2012 at 3:51 pm

Duly noted!

Mariecohn January 17, 2012 at 9:21 pm

Wait wait wait – I am an authentic cocksucker, and that pisses me off. Am I being just a little too literal?

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:17 pm

He's also fat.

BigDumbRedDog January 17, 2012 at 2:39 pm

Typical rich guy thinking. Got to teach these poor kids there place. Serving and cleaning up after everyone else. Asshole.

flamingpdog January 17, 2012 at 2:51 pm

Newt probably wants to hire one to clean up after his own asshole.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:18 pm

I thought that was Callista's job.

flamingpdog January 18, 2012 at 12:02 am

Kids work for a lot smaller diamonds.

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 11:20 pm

David Vitter could probably recommend someone for that job.

MinAgain January 17, 2012 at 2:46 pm

If only Jonathon Swift were alive today, he would be kicking himself in the ass for only proposing that the Irish eat their impoverished children.

BaldarTFlagass January 17, 2012 at 2:46 pm

Maybe all those poor children can join the Army. It's worked really well in equatorial Africa for years.

starfanglednut January 17, 2012 at 6:18 pm

They can clean up the blood!

DetectiveGrey January 17, 2012 at 2:48 pm

No snark on this one; Isn't it common in Asian schools for students to assist in chores and cleanup? As part of a class duty or something, they switch the job of cleaning classrooms between students on a semi-regular basis. I doubt Newt is taking a page out of their book, but I think a system like this could work, provided it were incorporated as more of a learning experience and less of a "schools get cheap labor" thing (which is what Newt seems to be advocating).

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 4:10 pm

If all the children, from whatever socioeconomic background, had to participate at the same level, it could be useful.

chicken_thief January 17, 2012 at 4:35 pm

In some parts of Africa the students help BUILD the school and desks.

Guppy January 17, 2012 at 2:49 pm

And what if New York enacted its own state child labor laws because of, y'know, states' rights?

owhatever January 17, 2012 at 2:50 pm

When he says "War on Poverty," the Newt means it.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:20 pm

When Newt says "war on poverty", he means "war on poorz".

colschick January 17, 2012 at 2:51 pm

This is someone who stiffed his OWN children on child support. Why would he care about anyone else's?

ElPinche January 17, 2012 at 3:02 pm

Gingrich , the snack-food president.

Ooooh how I wish Calista's robot brain would malfunction HAL-style then choke a fatassed racist bitch.

real_dc_native January 17, 2012 at 3:11 pm

But if these school children have to work after school, they won't be at home to take care of their half dozen younger siblings while their parents are out doing crack and having sex with everybody and robbing white people.

RavenRant January 17, 2012 at 3:13 pm

Newt has been on the government tit his whole life. Assistant Professor at a public college, in the House of Representatives from 1979 to 1998, when he was forced to resign in disgrace, for an underhanded bit of graft.

The only 'work' he's done since is to monetize his time in government in an elaborate edifice of graft and grift, peddling influence and his 'relationships' with other politicians. This parasite holding forth about the free market and the virtues of honest work… Oh, well, he has the gall to talk about the sanctity of marriage, too.

comrad_darkness January 17, 2012 at 3:14 pm

Someone please ask him how he added sufficient economic value at Fannie/Freddie to justify 1.7 million payday. Really. Please ask this godlike economic master.

For example, 7% of the ipad's value input is labor. To actually earn 1.7 million $ Newt would have had to assemble 48,571 fucking ipads. He's been a busy boy. I'm surprised he didn't burn off more fat in the process.

notreelyhelping January 17, 2012 at 3:18 pm

And just imagine how cool they'd be to the other kids! Sure Janie had to mop up that sick kid's puke 'cause her mom doen't have a job, but look at all the bucks she's making! No fair!

real_dc_native January 17, 2012 at 3:26 pm

"They have no habit of I do this and you give me cash unless it is illegal,” he added.

However, this habit is well entrenched in the Congressional culture. Unethical? Sure. but not illegal.

iburl January 17, 2012 at 3:44 pm

I may be wrong, but this whole plan to get kids cleaning bathrooms seems like it might just be Newt's way of auditioning future wives in an appropriately pantsless setting.

ttommyunger January 17, 2012 at 4:05 pm

Newt's douchebaggery knows no bounds.

Steverino247 January 17, 2012 at 4:11 pm

Let me guess. Newt was wearing a classic sailor outfit with the words "STA-PUFT" embroidered on the front of the cap?

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:27 pm

Where is Bill Murray when we need him?

grandinquisitor January 17, 2012 at 4:17 pm

Dear Newt,

Let's meet and settle this on the playground after school.

Regards,
A former poor kid who worked a lot

PS: Better bring your government health insurance card.

chicken_thief January 17, 2012 at 4:32 pm

***BREAKING NEWS***

Newt, in his quest to transform the nation's poor youth into self-reliant model citizens, has partnered with Jerry Sandusky. The coach will be in charge of Hygiene 101 while Newt will focus on Ethics.

BZ1 January 17, 2012 at 4:58 pm

"Are there no prisons?" asked Newt. "Plenty of prisons," "… And the Union workhouses???" (with abject apologies to Dickens)

Chet Kincaid January 17, 2012 at 5:01 pm

"Why do we need a U.S. Postal Service when these kids, who I believe are called 'shorties', can run packages of legitimate mail across town? They are already delivering crack cocaine, so why not redirect that energy while taking freeloading black adult postal leeches off government 'workfare' and cutting the postal payroll to a tenth of its current size? You're welcome."

Thedongsofwar January 17, 2012 at 5:46 pm

"Fuck kids. I'll be dead by the time they can vote anyways"

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:28 pm

We should be so lucky. That fucking parade float will live to 100, like Strom Thurmond, taking ever younger and more plasticized wives to cheat on.

lochnessmonster January 17, 2012 at 5:56 pm

What a nitwit!

Naked_Bunny January 17, 2012 at 7:08 pm

It never ceases to amaze me watching someone like Newt Gingrich, who makes obscene amounts of money without producing anything useful or even entertaining, dis janitors for making too durned much money for doing backbreaking labor involving hazardous chemicals and disease.

Naked_Bunny January 17, 2012 at 7:11 pm

Of course, after the school fires the janitor and replaces him with 30 children, they'll need to hire a manager or two to train and supervise them, at five times the wage the janitor made.

tessiee January 17, 2012 at 11:26 pm

"robbing white people… Oops, did I say that last part out loud?"

Antispandex January 19, 2012 at 11:05 pm

Yes, it's easy to see the strong work ethic possessed by, oh, say, Paris Hilton. Can't poor kids get a job like hers?

not that Dewey January 18, 2012 at 12:44 am

I hope you don't think I was trying to trivialize the situation — my point was actually that the kids in those situations were getting punished, their hope of an education diminished, for something that wasn't their fault. It was cheaper and more expedient to scan everyone for weapons than it was to address the causes of poverty and ensure that kids could attend safe schools. (was this during the Reagan Years, by any chance?)

Boojum_Reborn January 18, 2012 at 5:25 am

Those kids need GUNS for protection, against CRIMINALS who would rob them of their childhood!

Speaking of which, that sounds suspiciously like Newt.

not that Dewey January 18, 2012 at 8:43 am

Well, considering that the criminals from whom the kids need defending in this case are Republican politicians who would remove social safety nets and defund public education, Newt might find himself in something of a pickle.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: