civil liberties say what

Running Low On New Wars, Senate Declares U.S. Soil Latest ‘Battlefield’

Against whom?

Good news, everyone! Ever since launching major foreign invasions got a little too expensive and pointless (mostly expensive) even for Congress, and Times Are Tough, our nations’ lawmakers have decided to start “focusing on the domestic issues” like everyone keeps asking them to do, ad nauseum. But since it is impossible for Congress to agree any piece of legislation relating to actual domestic issues like, say, rising poverty, they’ve defaulted back to their only known area of total agreement, “permanent war.” So here’s an idea, what if there were a way to just combine the two? Oooh, the Senate likey: yesterday they passed a bill effectively declaring the United States its own shiny new warzone that would codify the military’s power to hunt on its own soil for anyone — foreign national or American citizen — that they determine meets the vaguely-worded criteria of being “a participant in the course of planning or carrying out an attack or attempted attack against the United States” and ship them off to an internment camp to rot away without trial, forever. Will Bradley Manning finally get some company from his fellow citizens?

There were many, many idiotic defenses of this rancid bill that passed with bipartisan support, but let’s hear from our old standard warmonger neocon jaw-flapping pal Lindsey Graham as he drops yet another pick-up line on longtime crush John McCain, who co-sponsored the bill. Via HuffPo:

“The enemy is all over the world. Here at home. And when people take up arms against the United States and [are] captured within the United States, why should we not be able to use our military and intelligence community to question that person as to what they know about enemy activity?” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said.

“They should not be read their Miranda Rights. They should not be given a lawyer,” Graham said.

Opponents of the bill tried in vain to point out that the FBI and Homeland Security already get billions of dollars to stop domestic terrorists instead of more reasonably pointing out that this legislation is completely insane, but since those guys have such a horrible track record of “no successful major terrorist attacks in the U.S. since 9/11,” this obviously calls for the military to use its war powers to indefinitely detain “enemy combatants” (whoever they are, probably everyone who refused to go shopping on Black Friday?) against its own citizens.

Doesn’t that sound, uh, vaguely unconstitutional, sort of? Nah, said the bill’s other sponsor, Democrat Carl Levin of Michigan, in his floor speech:

The Supreme Court said — and I’m going to read these words again – “there is no bar to this nation’s holding one of its own citizens as an enemy combatant.”

Yeah, Levin’s probably right. The 14th-century legal concept of habeus corpus was just getting to be a little too “progressive.” Better stick to the older, more tried-and-true “military rule” concept favored by leaders for helping the restive masses learn to shut the hell up. [NYTimes/HuffPo/Daily Kos]

What Others Are Reading

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.


    1. OneYieldRegular

      I'm afraid "Occupy Bradley Manning's Cell" is NOT going to mean what OWS protesters hoped it would mean.

  1. SorosBot

    What part of "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation" don't these motherfuckers understand?

    1. Chichikovovich

      C'mon, they know how to read. It's just that they think "No person" means "Any person, at our discretion", and "nor" means "likewise".

      1. Native_of_SL_UT

        They also believe that the "life, liberty, or property," part is covered if they just give you a remote control to the TV in your jail cell.

      2. snarkycomments

        Kind of like how "bad" means cool and "fat" means snazzy. Jeez, Congress, these days, with their fancy emoticons and "hip" terms and slang. It's hard to keep up.

    2. Sharkey

      (snark off)
      "…except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger…"

      Heard of the War on Terror? It's just an excuse of course, but the geniuses we send to Congress think it's a "real" war.

      1. Mumbly_Occupado

        "…except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger…"

        Operative word being "in", Sharkey? Unless mine eyes and reading comprehension doth decieve me, that's talkin' 'bout Court Martials, not greenlighting a secret police.

        Of course, I'm sure Republicans don't see it that way, because in their eyes, literacy's for pussies.

          1. bagofmice

            Goddamn, I'm making jokes that only one person in the occupy the galaxy movement will get. Friggin predicates.

        1. Sharkey

          Splitting semantic hairs here, maybe "cases" is the operative word. "Legal cases" or just "law enforcement-related instances"?

          "No person shall be held to answer…"
          Maybe that is the problem.

          Why do I want to understand how people can actually quote the Constitution but be completely ignorant as to it's real meaning? This is not something I should want to know about.

          I mean, if our future is just a perpetual debate over the interpretation of the Constitution, maybe we need a new one because the existing one is too vague! AHHHH! They win!

          (p.s. not accusing sorosbot here…)

    3. GeorgiaBurning

      If it's not the second amendment they get a bit fuzzy. Betcha Halliburton or Wackenhut is already making plans for a nice gulag (or five) in the desert someplace.

        1. Biff

          There's one high above my nearest town, where their bright lights can fuck up the formerly dark skies we enjoyed. This CCA "campus" houses "guests" of the US Marshal's Service.

  2. MrFizzy

    We should put Lindsey Graham and Jerry Sandusky in the same cell. That would keep them both happy and out of the way.

  3. mavenmaven

    I guess all of us wonketeers will soon get to meet one another in person, between waterboarding sessions.

    1. Chichikovovich

      Stands to reason. You've heard the saying "armed only with their wits", right? Just shows that wit is a kind of weapon. And Congress represents the country, so deploying your wits against Congress is taking up arms against your country.

      I just hope the Wonketeers outside the US remember to write to us.

      (And if I don't get to the border in time, I get dibs on the softest part of the ground to sleep on!)

      1. Mumbletypeg

        I get dibs on the softest part of the ground

        Sounds terribly romantic. Anyone needs me, meanwhile, I'll be hiding out somewhere in Barb et. al's earlier thread-cascade of deportation-destination fantasies.

        1. RavenRant

          Except the 38 Senators who voted for the amendment to stop this atrocity. Enough to allow a veto, which O promised.

    1. Angry_Marmot

      A tragic misunderstanding. We thought he wanted a junta, while Senator Graham was crying out to the handsome poolboys for punta, punta gorda.

    1. Master Janitor V572

      You'll have every right to defend yourself, just like Bradley Manning does, when they let him have his clothes and talk to his lawyer and sleep, just before the military tribunal where they can now try him on hearsay evidence that his lawyer doesn't get to see before the trial or dispute in the trial.

      See? You'll get your damn trial, you liberal whiner.

  4. user-of-owls

    Foreign wars are too expensive. We need to fight them over here so we don't have to fight them over there.

    1. Biel_ze_Bubba

      Memo to Pentagon: New York is really expensive … you can save big money by fighting this war against red state citizens. Plus, they have guns, which will make it more interesting and war-like.

  5. coolhandnuke

    With this swell news, we inch closer and closer to the good ol' days of just three classes of people–slaves, warriors and the church/rich. Now the warriors–ordered by the rich–have the power to haul in any slave.

    1. Guppy

      Southern Republicans want the Army to act as law enforcement.

      And now we have come full circle. Too bad history education in Dixie is so poor, or someone there might actually appreciate the irony.

  6. Trannysurprise

    I don't know about you guys, but I am getting sick and tired of paying for Lindsey Graham Cracker's inability to just come out of the closet.

    So we now have to permanently flush Habeas Corpus down the toilet because he can't admit he wants to suck a cock?

        1. LesBontemps

          Hey, this is a blog for dick jokes! If it doesn't have dick in it then it ain't got dick, or something.

    1. PhilippePetain

      Which makes me wonder if the "overacted, excitable authoritarian voice" in campy films is going to sound a bit less…"continental" sixty years from now.

        1. Negropolis

          When fascism comes to America, it'll be wrapped in a Southern accent, deep fried, and slathered in butter and oil.

  7. user-of-owls

    Well to be fair, putting the military in charge of domestic security does reduce violent attacks. Just ask Mexico.

    1. Chichikovovich

      And on the other side of the coin, look what happened when Costa Rica – seeing the effects of an autonomous military culture in the neighboring countries – just did away with its military altogether in 1949. They've had to endure the hell of stable democracy, a social safety net and no civil wars in sixty years, in contrast with the Reagan-nourished paradises around them.

      1. user-of-owls

        True, but the rest of Central America gives them swirlies every day after lunch and they always get picked last for Dodge Cannonball.

  8. MaxNeanderthal

    Barkin'mad Old mother Hubbardistas, Cruise and Travolta are already planning "Battlefield Earth" sequel, "Battlefield USA".
    Or should that be Haldeman's "Forever War"?

  9. edgydrifter

    If Joe Lieberman is the first guy to get disappeared as an enemy of the state, it's going to be tough maintaining my outrage over this.

    1. schvitzatura

      the chair is against the wall, the chair is against the wall, john has a long mustache, john has a long mustache

      1. Tundra Grifter


        "If a fox stole your chickens; Would you slaughter your pig because he saw the fox?"

        Isn't that what we did in Iraq after people trained in Afghanistan attacked us on 9/11?

  10. user-of-owls

    This is going to make the whole "where do I want to retire" decision a lot easier for Bashar al-Assad.

  11. Eve8Apples

    I look forward to the day when Seal Team 6 tracks down and kills an anti-choice terrorist planning to bomb a Planned Parenthood Clinic or murder a doctor on U.S. soil.

  12. Bonzos_Bed_Time

    How dare you lead with a Professor Fransworth reference then quote Ms. Lindsey in the same posting! It's neither natural nor right.

  13. Toomush_Infer

    Wait, if I read this right, doesn't this mean we can start with Lindsey Graham (Levin's too old – just put him out on the ice)?…. 'cause this is definitely Terror I'm feeling here….

  14. SayItWithWookies

    Why the hell does this even make sense? Trying to look tough in an election year does not constitute sufficient reason to burn the fucking Constitution, motherfuckers.

    1. RadiosTyrone

      I'm sure he'll be morally strong on this one. And even if isn't, I'm really sure SCOTUS will knock it down — right after they disembowel Obamacare, of course.

    2. SayItWithWookies

      He's already threatened to, fortunately. Alas, it's in the damn Defense Appropriation Bill, which funds the military, which means many congresspeople will vote for it by default regardless of what's in it.

      1. Mumbly_Occupado

        And also God forbid a Democrat look "weak on Defense". Speaking of which, remember back when Bush actually did veto a Defense Appropriations Bill, for putting a mildly suggested timeline on his pet Forever Wars?

        Good times.

  15. Wonderthing

    Yay! Another freedom we won't be burdened with! My god, it's getting so all you have to do is wait for total totalitarianism and the breaking of the shackles of an unregulated market economy in order to be able to afford that dream house with the moat and the razor wire. Be sure to leave your smart phone on. If they don't know where you are, they get crazy. You don't want them to be crazy. It hurts too much.

    1. Mumbly_Occupado

      Oh god, he's from my alma mater, too. Thus confirming my theory that all Swat alumni end up being shitheads, failed libruls, or libruls who fail because they're shitheads. (Other famous alumni include Dukakis, A Mitchell Palmer (of the Palmer Raids), and Jerome Kohlberg, who popularized the leveraged buyout)

    2. Negropolis

      The only way I can explain Levin on this is that he's been in the Senate WAY too long (since 1979), and the only other explanation is that being the chair of the Armed Services Committee (since 2007, ranking Democratic member since 1997) must corrupt you in some way. Otherwise, it doesn't make any kind of sense to me unless I'm missing some 11 dimensional chess move, here.

      He was one of the senators who voted against the authorization of force against Iraq, and after that failed he was the biggest voice against waste during the war and one of the loudest calling for a timetable of withdrawl from the beginning. Why he got all hawkish all of a sudden is beyond my understanding. I mean, back in Detroit, the guy was a liberal lion serving as general counsel for the Michigan Civil Rights Commission, for a time, leading liberal causes as president of the Detroit City Council after the riot, etc…hell, the guy has/had an +80% approval rating from the ACLU.

  16. Lionel[redacted]Esq

    Since this obviously applies to Rick Perry for his Secessionist talk, I have no problem with it.

  17. Lionel[redacted]Esq

    And look at it this way, we finally have an excuse to unleash a full nuclear attack on Florida, South Carolina, and Arizona.

    1. bagofmice

      Goddamn, Florida and Arizona are their own fark tags. South Carolina however went out of its way to be South. That says something.

  18. HarryButtle

    Hey, Carl, is that the same Supreme Court that said Bush beat Gore and that corporations have 1st Amendment rights? Fuck you, you fucking fuck. I expect this from Graham and McCain and Lieberman, I don't expect it from you.

    Hopey said he'd veto it, but I'm not holding my breath.

    1. Lionel[redacted]Esq

      Good link. Made me think that, for all the rights attack on OWS for "rapes" that by now, Herman Cain has been accused of more unwanted advancements on women than all the people at the OWS movement combined. Must make sure to mention that on another thread.

  19. fuflans

    i don't know, the 14th c. was pretty cool: black death, 100 years war, avignon papacy, peasants revolt, great schism, great famine.

    sound like us – only they had dante and chaucer.

      1. Biel_ze_Bubba

        They've been busy putting "off" switches on the internet, if you haven't noticed. Because totalitarian fuckers do their best work in the dark.

  20. Mumbly_Occupado

    If it makes anyone feel better, this probably isn't about some new power the government wants to exercise, so much as backfilling a legal rationale for something the government's already been doing, for over a decade.

    No? Nobody? Yeah, me neither.

  21. Mumbly_Occupado

    On the bright side, this represents staggeringly successful work on the part of Slope Polishers Local 117

      1. bagofmice

        See, paper is where you went wrong. When everything is recorded, replicated, and encrypted we will be sane. This is a large definition of the word "Sane", granted.

    1. Jukesgrrl

      I spent today wrangling with Sears (aka Peggy) to get my supposedly-under-warranty refrigerator repaired and I think there's a good chance that will qualify me as an enemy combatant. How dare I ask for something I have a piece of paper saying I'm entitled to?

  22. Mahousu

    This could work out. Sure, first we'll have to endure having the Army conquer the U.S., but that shouldn't take too long – yeah, civilian Americans may be armed, but they're not as well armed as even the Iraqi army was.

    And true, a few tens of thousands of us might get killed, but that's just traffic accident level of mayhem. And traffic accidents should be way down, as no one will dare to drive through all the checkpoints that will be set up.

    The real advantage will come when they have to rebuild the country. No one will bat an eye when Halliburton spends $100 million renovating some school. True, some of the "renovated" schools might collapse because Halliburton cheated and used shoddy materials, but on balance things should be better.

    Best of all, it will pay for itself! Or so I've heard.

  23. DaRooster

    We all know Graham just wants to lock all us dudes up in a tiny room, with a whole in the wall, show us porno flicks… and catch the result…

  24. SayItWithWookies

    I just sent Senator Levin an email letting him know that he and every senator who voted for this amendment should be ashamed of themselves. And his contact page doesn't even require that I live in his state, for those non-Michiganders who want to send him a note.

  25. glamourdammerung

    I kind of think that Obama should just go with this, then round up all the "ayes", ship them to Gitmo, and force them to watch a 12 hour Ben Affleck romantic comedy marathon before releasing them to repeal the legislation.

        1. Dok-cupy Everything

          Jesus Christ…I know we ignore the Geneva Conventions, but there's still the whole cruel & unusual punishment thing….not even Scalia would allow what you propose, you heartless bastard.

        2. bagofmice

          Jesus fucking Christ? What corrupted you during your development that led you to a sandler conclusion?

  26. Dudleydidwrong

    ad nauseam…that says it all: " to the point of being made physically ill," as in vomiting, shitting sick. What's with this fucking bunch of turds who sit in Congress and act like they are protecting us by fucking us over and expecting us to look at them with pride? Sucking dirt bags. And Levin? Levin? That horse's ass makes Judas look like a fucking pope and Benedict Arnold a fucking Supreme Court justice. Et tu, Carl? You skunk's placenta!

  27. Chichikovovich

    You should cut Lieberman, Graham, etc some slack. They do it out of love for this country, just like Newt. They love the country so much they have to betray us. They have so much love for the second amendment that they hardly have any room for the rest of the constitution. And you have to admit, they have gone well beyond the letter of the law to ensure that all those enemy combatants who are swarming over the US from Memphis Tenn. to Cairo WV, are never more than a ten minute drive from somewhere they can buy a barrel of assault rifles with no hassle or undue delay.

      1. Chichikovovich

        No it was Joan Jett. She was singing in the car along with Benetar's Live from Earth CD when she said it.

  28. Terry

    Sooooo, will this law apply to the crazy assed crackers in militias or does it just apply to Muslims and various people of color?

    1. Dashboard Buddha

      and hippies and grannies, and little kids and anyone else who "inconveniences" the folks that decide…or even just say the Koch brothers suck.

  29. chascates

    Ha! From several sites now:
    According to a tweet from NBC News’ Jamie Novogrod, [Michele] Bachmann responded to the recent raiding of the British embassy in Iran, by saying that if she was President, she would close down the U.S. embassy there.
    There’s just one problem: The U.S. has not had an embassy in Iran ever since the Iranian hostage crisis, when revolutionaries from the budding Islamic state held 52 Americans for 444 days

    1. BaldarTFlagass

      Obviously the liberal media whore Novogrod edited out the part where Michele said that if she were president and that shit went down, she would reopen the US Embassy in Tehran. Then she would close it down, and show them Iranian Arab Muslim Taliban mofo's who's boss!

    2. user-of-owls

      Well sure, but it's not like she said "English embassy" and quickly corrected herself or something heinous like that.

    3. Chichikovovich

      Novgorod? That's a Russian name, isn't it? And I heard that they were part of the Hanseatic League, which is obviously a subversive front organization for terrorists. Communist media in action.

  30. chascates

    Herman Cain is on PBS in a clip saying he's had a groundswell of support and he's not going to quit. Meanwhile, Newt on Hannity tonight says:

    “I helped lead the effort to defeat communism in the Congress.”

    So there really were communists in the Congress?

    1. Chichikovovich

      No, there were none. Ever. The very idea is preposterous.

      And for that, we have Newt's vigilance to thank.

        1. Chichikovovich

          I'm not sure I would go that far. Tim Foley looked like he could be pretty fat and hairy under his suit.

  31. rocktonsam

    I lured my kids and their friends to my house and chained them to the furniture as human shields in case of drone attacks.


    1. Chichikovovich

      You could just chain yourself to the furniture – do the Cleavon Little thing from Blazing Saddles.

      "I warn you – if you try to kill me, then rocktonsam will get it too!"
      (My God, I think he means it!)

  32. Blueb4sunrise

    HAH! SUCK IT GEN-X,Y and Z! All of us poor oldz will be dead soon anyway!!!!
    We had the best evah of everything, and let it go into the shitter!!!!!!!!!!

  33. owhatever

    The Patriot Act keeps on rolling. Let us hope that Lindsey and his boys carry out their threat the next time a bunch of beer-bellied Bubbas in South Carolina are arrested in a barn full of guns for planning to overthrow the Kenyan socialist government of the United States. Then they can be interrogated with enhanced techniques and be put away with other enemy combatants at Club Gitmo.

    Also, Wonketteers, that sound you hear in the sky is a Predator with your name on it.

  34. Dok-cupy Everything

    Here's hoping that Canada and France will lead a new Coalition of the Willing to liberate us from our military overlords.

    Oh, yeah, don't forget Poland….

    1. Jukesgrrl

      I never forget Poland. I'm from Pittsburgh where every school child learns the name of Kazimierz Pułaski, who saved George Washington's life in the Revolutionary War and is known as "the father of American cavalry." He was killed in the Battle of Savannah and is one of only seven people to have earned honorary American citizenship. Somehow I think he'd give it back if he heard about this latest insult to our Constitution.

      1. Chet Kincaid

        Tell me about it. Pulaski Day is a holiday in Illinois, and Chicago and Cook County government closes on it; Pulaski Road is one of the major thoroughfares running from the north suburbs to deep in the south suburbs.

    2. Chichikovovich

      The first wave of the invasion is already in preparation. Pipeline construction workers are mobilized in full battalion strength, waiting for the signal.

  35. BaldarTFlagass

    Remember how in the Sopranos, there was this overarching sense that Tony and Uncle Junior and their crews all longed for "the good old days," when being in the Mob was cool and shit? I am having the same feeling about living in America, these days.

  36. user-of-owls

    Apropos of nothing: I'm a bit worried that Newt may have a low ego problem. His self-effacement is almost too painful to watch in tonight's interview with noted spiritual guru Sean Hannity:

    “I helped Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp develop supply side economics. I helped lead the effort to defeat communism in the Congress.”

    “Whereas I would have thought originally it was going to be Mitt and not-Mitt, I think it’s going to — it may turn out to be Newt and not-Newt.”

    1. RadioYKWE

      Actually it's quite second eyelid opening that this thoroughly discredited, money grubbing, bloated amphiboid is even around. His latest cloacal dropping is that he's "just a country history professor," not one of those elitist, East Coast liberals. Because I'm sure you, Owls, as a country professor get paid $1.6 million by the Heritage Foundation for "consultant" work.

    2. DustBowlBlues

      Crissy pointed out that the new nasty in DC began when Newt took over. What an egotistical, nasty piece of work he is. Dumb sumbitch just quoted the Declaration of Indie as if it were part of the constitution. And called each citizen "sovereign" so now I'm making up laws that apply to Dust Bowl Blues. I hereby pass a law that I will not overeat during Xmas. Who will arrest me if I break my law? Yeah, Newt. How can I hire a police dept to make me keep to my law if they're sovereign and living under their own rules?

      It's things like this that keep me up at night. The fear that I live in country stupid enough to keep calling this clown "intellectual."

  37. chascates

    HuffPo: Herman Cain said he will make a final decision on whether or not he will continue his 2012 presidential run one week from now.

    Fuck, he doesn't know whether to shit or go blind!

    1. RadioYKWE

      My sister-in-law, Terri, was living in England after the most important event in human history and I used to warn Mrs. Radio: CUIDADO! TEN CUIDADO SE CUIDADOSO on the tele. Do not say things like Terry east or Terry west. Didn't you ever see Brazil?
      But anyways, yeah, we're first to have the Black Suburbans pull up in our driveways.

  38. DustBowlBlues

    "Against whom" Funny slide mouse over text (I'm on an iMac) and proper English. Watch out, Kirsten: I'm forming a girl crush on you.

  39. Warpde

    "lawmakers have decided to start “focusing on the domestic issues”
    Does this mean I can't beat the wife anymore?

  40. Beowoof

    Uphold and defend the constitution, HA. Well after most in Congress pledged allegiance to Grover Norquist, fuck the rest of that constitution shit, let's just do what we want.

  41. Negropolis

    If America is "Winning" like Charlie Sheen is "Winning", god almighty, I want to and hope that we lose. epically.

  42. Blueb4sunrise

    That What do you think? box on the right is getting to be the funniest thing here.

    Over the last six months, have you increased or decreased your personal spending?

    1. Fukui_sanYesOta

      When I'm bored I spend half the time just fucking with it. I've never heard of Tom Cruise, for instance. </admission>

  43. RavenRant

    16 Democratic Senators voted for this: Bob Casey (PA), Kent Conrad (ND), Kay Hagan (NC), Daniel Inouye (HI), Herb Kohl (WI), Mary Landrieu (LA), Carl Levin (MI), Joe Manchin (WV), Clair McCaskill (MO), Robert Menendez (NJ), Ben Nelson (NE), Mark Pryor (AR), Jack Reed (RI), Jeanne Shaheen (NH), Debbie Stabenow (MI) and Sheldon Whitehouse (RI). And, of course, asshole 'independent' Joe Lieberman (CT).

    Menendez later changed his vote.

    DNC and DSCC will never get another dime from me. And if Hopey doesn't veto this like he said he would, ARRRGGHHH! Also, what the hell is wrong with Michigan and Rhode Island?

    1. Negropolis

      Stabenow can go either way (she's awefully moderate, more moderate than she was in the Michigan legislature when she was a solid liberal), but what in the hell is Levin doing leading this? This is just totally insane, to me. I'm embarrassed.

      1. RavenRant

        The fact that 60 Senators voted for this is insane. I think it would be a worthy goal to replace every one of them.

        And again, if Obama doesn't veto this, I am at a loss as to what to do next in this psycho country.

  44. Negropolis

    And when people take up arms against the United States and [are] captured within the United States, why should we not be able to use our military and intelligence community to question that person as to what they know about enemy activity?”

    Are you fucking kidding me? I've heard a lot of stupid shit in the last year, but this one ranks right up there at the top.

    Honestly, someone should frame this as giving "the black man in the White House" more power, and I assure you, this bill would be DOA. And, Levin? Really? Et tu, Brute? What has happened to you? This is, quite frankly, unreal.

    Congress is really shooting for that 1% approval rating from their 1% overlords, huh?

    1. RadioYKWE

      1% approval rating
      That is one of the most insightful, tragic/comic things you have ever emitted, my friend. And, it's statistically significant.

    2. fletc3her

      I'm always trying to remind NRA members that they won't get to keep their guns when they are being held indefinitely in Gitmo.

  45. fletc3her

    Our very own special order.

    First they came for the Wonketeers and I cheered because, meh, let's face it guys.

    Then they came for some other people, but I guess I was rounded up with the first group so I don't really know what happened after that.

  46. RadioYKWE

    I just saw Michele, One L, just say she is AGAINST extending the payroll tax holiday. Hello, calling Grover. Mr. Norquist she violated a sacred vow!!1! Primary the bitch.
    Maybe, just maybe, Hopey's eight level chess is hitting home.

  47. slowhansolo

    I hereby retract everything I said the other day about Bob Casey being a decent guy. Maybe Pileggi throwing his hat in the ring scared him. Either way, fuck him and fuck every other one of the goddamned pussy-fart traitors in Congress who just voted to make America fundamentally not America.

  48. Negropolis

    But, we've always been at war with America…errr…Eastasia. Damnit! They are going to send me to the FEMA camps, aren't they?

  49. DerrickWildcat

    “They should not be read their Miranda Rights. They should not be given a lawyer,”

    And they have to wear frowney face pajamas and have their meal card stamped, "No Dessert!"

  50. RavenRant

    They think 1984 and The Handmaid's Tale were instruction manuals, and that The Flintstones was a documentary.

    Also, that the hero of It's a Wonderful Life is Mr. Potter, and The Christmas Carol is a tragedy about a savvy 'job creator' led astray by libruhl demons.

  51. user-of-owls

    I had another one of my apocalyptic dreams last night.

    This time it was Take Your Daughter To Work Day at Wonkette.

  52. joobajooba

    This is cute. So Congress and the Supreme Court wipe gun laws off the books on the grounds that Americans should be able to defend themselves against an overreaching government. Then they support a whole new swath of laws that let the government throw into the dungeon anyone who takes up arms against it.
    That's one way to stay in business.

  53. prommie

    And the real crime is, if you ask Siri what to do if your country is heading down the road toward becoming a fascist dictatorship, and she just says "Really?"

  54. Antispandex

    Oh, and you can take your Posse Comitatus and shove it, liberal wage slaves, because Uncle Joe said so!

Comments are closed.