WINGNUT RULES  7:18 pm November 15, 2011

Scalia & Thomas Have Anti-Obamacare Dinner (Kagan Should Recuse)

by Wonkette Jr.

What's for dinner? Obamacare!Notorious fringe-right “originalist” boobs Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas were so happy with the announcement that the Supreme Court will be hearing a challenge to the health care reform law that they celebrated immediately afterward by boozing it up with the legal team that will be arguing against the law. According to the Los Angeles Times, the Scalia/Thomas duo hit a Federalist Society dinner to pretend to listen to what other people think about the Obamacare law before they eventually and inevitably knock it down.

From the LA Times:

Clement’s law firm, Bancroft PLLC, was one of almost two dozen firms that helped sponsor the annual dinner of the Federalist Society, a longstanding group dedicated to advocating conservative legal principles. Another firm that sponsored the dinner, Jones Day, represents one of the trade associations that challenged the law, the National Federation of Independent Business.

Another sponsor was pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc, which has an enormous financial stake in the outcome of the litigation. The dinner was held at a Washington hotel hours after the court’s conference over the case. In attendance was, among others, Mitch McConnell, the Senate’s top Republican and an avowed opponent of the healthcare law.

The featured guests at the dinner? Scalia and Thomas.

As an interesting side note, today, if you went to the Drudge Report, you’d see the screamer headline “JUDGE NOT: KAGAN CHEERED OBAMACARE PASSAGE.” That link goes to a story about the nefarious emailing activities of now-Justice Elena Kagan, who, back when Obamacare passed, expressed a certain amount of excitement about it to a fellow Harvard Law elitist. Of course she wasn’t even a justice then, and as far as we know Supreme Court justices are at least allowed to have opinions (right?), but all the same the wingnut blog post helpfully points out that “a Supreme Court justice must recuse from ‘any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.’”

The March 2010 email exchange between Kagan and Tribe raises new questions about whether Kagan must recuse herself from judging cases involving the health-care law that Obama signed – and which became the target of legal challenges – while Kagan was serving as Obama’s solicitor general and was responsible for defending his administration’s positions in court disputes.

So Kagan must obviously recuse herself, due to an email she sent before becoming a Supreme Court justice … but Scalia and his mini-me didn’t show any sort of bias at all during their wonderfully timed wine-dine orgy with the anti-Obamacare plaintiffs’ lawyers. [LAT]

 

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.

{ 117 comments }

Come here a minute November 15, 2011 at 7:21 pm

With deepest regret I recuse myself from these comments because I have used the health care 'system' of the United States.

BaldarTFlagass November 15, 2011 at 7:26 pm

It's like we're all stuck in this time machine, but it only goes backwards in time.

memzilla November 15, 2011 at 7:42 pm

No! We're all stuck in the Bizarro Universe, which never intersects the other one but is co-temporaneous.

The only exception is the word "aloha," which still means both hello and goodbye.

glasspusher November 15, 2011 at 10:45 pm

No wonder this time machine is so fucking crowded.

James Michael Curley November 16, 2011 at 12:13 pm

That's because some ass drapped a pair of TruckNutz on it and the mechanism is out of balance.

Antispandex November 15, 2011 at 7:29 pm

The founding fathers had crappy medical care and they did just fine!…no wait. Um, The founding fathers had boot straps, see, that's the point here. Boot straps. Use 'em!

Mahousu November 15, 2011 at 9:54 pm

Scalia and Thomas' medical care should be limited to wooden teeth and bleeding. If that was good enough for George Washington, it's good enough for them.

flamingpdog November 15, 2011 at 10:44 pm

Goerge Washington used leeches.
Scalia and Thomas are leeches.

BlueStateLibel November 15, 2011 at 7:30 pm

OK, not even pretending about that "impartiality" stuff anymore, are we?

Lascauxcaveman November 15, 2011 at 7:42 pm

Eh, why bother. It's not like the Librul Media is going to tattle on them.

PuckStopsHere November 15, 2011 at 7:30 pm

Good thing Rick Perry will soon be uprooting this branch of govt.

nounverb911 November 15, 2011 at 7:54 pm

If a branch in the forest falls on Rick Perry, will anyone hear it?

flamingpdog November 15, 2011 at 10:45 pm

Will anyone care?

Herring_Burnit November 16, 2011 at 2:49 am

If a branch in the forest falls on Rick Perry, will anyone hear cheer it?

I bleev "All of them, Katie" just might apply here.

fuflans November 15, 2011 at 9:13 pm

uprootin'

i think you mean uprootin'

coolhandnuke November 15, 2011 at 7:30 pm

If any justice was served at this dinner, lets hope they were served by a few Project Mayhem waiters.

memzilla November 15, 2011 at 7:35 pm

"The March 2010 email exchange between Kagan and Tribe raises new questions about whether Kagan must recuse herself from judging cases involving the health-care law that Obama signed – and which became the target of legal challenges – while Kagan was serving as Obama’s solicitor general and was responsible for defending his administration’s positions in court disputes."

"The November 2011 Federalist Society Dinner between Scalia and Thomas, Pfizer and NFIB raises old questions about whether Scalia and Thomas must recuse themselves from judging cases involving the health-care law that Obama signed – and which became the target of legal challenges – while Scalia and Thomas were both serving as Supreme Court justices and were responsible for impeding his administration’s positions in court disputes."

/fixed (courtesy of Alternate Universe News Service)

JackDempsey1 November 15, 2011 at 7:35 pm

…AND, *get this*, the SCOTUS health care plan, provided by John Q. Public, has access to the highest quality leaches.

user-of-owls November 15, 2011 at 9:09 pm

Actually, I think what provides "access to the highest quality leeches" is a ticket to the Federalist Society dinner.

jjdaddyo November 15, 2011 at 7:35 pm

Matt Drudge, I dub thee, King of the Trolls.

OneDollarJuana November 15, 2011 at 7:38 pm

Hope Thomas got a big, gooey clump of pubic hair in his Coke.

DaRooster November 15, 2011 at 8:43 pm

I hope he got a big clump of coke in his pubic hair… kind of a peanut butter/chocolate thing.

user-of-owls November 15, 2011 at 9:11 pm

I hope he got a big clump of peanut butter fully blocking his aorta….kind of a 'if this was a just world' thing.

Herring_Burnit November 16, 2011 at 2:50 am

From your lips to the ears of any creetur with the power to accomplish this.

user-of-owls November 16, 2011 at 11:25 am

Normally I'd say that would be Mr. Peanut, but I'm increasingly dubious about relying on someone sporting a monocle to bring about social justice.

flamingpdog November 15, 2011 at 10:48 pm

No, no, no Slappy Thomas, you s'posed to snort da coke off da ho's asscrack, not offa her carpet.

OneDollarJuana November 15, 2011 at 7:39 pm

Maybe we should Occupy the Supreme Court next.

memzilla November 15, 2011 at 7:39 pm

We need a Supremer Court.

nounverb911 November 15, 2011 at 7:56 pm

Starring Diana Ross?

Texan_Bulldog November 15, 2011 at 8:04 pm

Ain't no mountain high enough…to throw these douchebags over the side of.

Guppy November 15, 2011 at 8:02 pm

Neither party will touch that treaty with a ten-foot pole.

Negropolis November 16, 2011 at 12:17 am

So long as we're doing superlatives, I want the Supremest Court! A Supremacist Court? Not so much, 'cause we've already had a number of those.

horsedreamer_1 November 16, 2011 at 12:24 am

You're plessing your luck.

edgydrifter November 15, 2011 at 7:39 pm

In a more perfect parallel universe, Scalia, Thomas, Alito and Roberts are sewn into a SCOTUS Centipede and made to crawl through the indigent wards of every county health office and charity clinic in the country where uninsured patients get to throw hepatitis-tainted syringes at them for fun and prizes.

Unless they actually apply the commerce clause in a manner consistent with every other broad federal program (*cough*drug war*cough*) they previously supported, in which case I take it all back and wish them well.

No, fuck that. I still prefer the SCOTUS Centipede idea.

emmelemm November 15, 2011 at 7:47 pm

The problem with the SCOTUS centipede is that these assholes would probably enjoy it.

Fukui_sanYesOta November 15, 2011 at 8:41 pm

Hell, they do that for fun

teatarded2012 November 16, 2011 at 9:58 am

Dear God…My Eyes!!! MY EYES!!!!

Lascauxcaveman November 15, 2011 at 7:40 pm

I'm embarrassed to admit I had to think a bit to remember who this Kagan person is.

Even after all those softball-and-Suburu jokes we made about her not so long ago.

FatalServerErrorFace November 15, 2011 at 7:43 pm

Hey Las, can I call you Las?
I get Kagen and the Kurgen mixed up all the time.

Lascauxcaveman November 15, 2011 at 7:47 pm

Call me anything but late for dinner.

BaldarTFlagass November 15, 2011 at 7:54 pm

Father! Forgive me, I am a worm… BUHUWAHAHAHAHAHA! I have something to say! It's better to burn out, than to fade away!

RadiosTyrone November 15, 2011 at 8:19 pm

How could you forget Lady Kaga and her outrageous outfits?

Negropolis November 16, 2011 at 12:18 am

Her choice in pantsuits is lengdarily scandelous!

neiltheblaze November 16, 2011 at 6:38 am

Though, that time she showed up wearing her T-Bone Supreme Court robes was pretty outrageous too.

flamingpdog November 15, 2011 at 10:55 pm

Women in Kagans – that's one of my all-time favorite women's softball movies!

SayItWithWookies November 15, 2011 at 7:41 pm

I was under the impression that Kagan already said she was going to recuse herself from some decisions that she had been involved with prior to becoming a justice — not that this is the first time a conservative has made a big deal out of nothing. But it's perfecty appropriate that she do this, as it is appropriate that Scalia/Thomas don't recuse themselves — as they're advocating an amoral, fuck-you-I-got-mine interpretation of the ideals that made this country great, it ill-behooves them to adhere to a standard they abhor.

weejee November 15, 2011 at 7:42 pm

May the attendees at that Feralist Society dinner all succumb to a very husky cousin of one of those nasty cruise ship GI cleansings. Poo-poopy-do.

Arken November 15, 2011 at 7:47 pm

What if I told you that you could have a job for life and literally say or do anything you wanted and still be able to keep the job? Not only that, but every decision you make on the job gives you power over hundreds of millions of people. The only downside is you have to wear an ugly black gown.

Pres.Libunatic November 15, 2011 at 8:07 pm

Or, in Thomas's case, literally say and do nothing at all and still keep the job.

Seriously, I've appeared before the SCOTUS before (ceremonial SCOTUS bar admission) and Thomas looked like he was sleeping off a bender from the night before, staring up at the ceiling, blinking, yawning, wishing he were in a whore's lap instead of in the courtroom… at that moment there was no question who the "Judge" in Hunter Thompson's story "Fear & Loathing in Elko" really was.

Arken November 15, 2011 at 8:11 pm

I believe he's asked a total of two questions the entire time he has been on the court.

Chichikovovich November 15, 2011 at 8:33 pm

"Are you going to eat that?" and "Whew! Who cut the cheese?" (all the other justices were looking at him, though).

EatsBabyDingos November 15, 2011 at 8:11 pm

The upside is free Federal back-waxings.

Dok-cupy Everything November 15, 2011 at 7:51 pm

When in doubt, accuse the other side of exactly what you're doing. Bonus points if their infraction is less obscene.

Millennial Malaise November 15, 2011 at 9:52 pm

Given their herculean powers of projection, I'd say the herd of neanderthals that comprise the Republican party are in doubt about 90% of the time. Everything else is "TAX CUTS!

starfanglednut November 15, 2011 at 7:51 pm

The most disheartening thing about this whole business, to me, is that the reason the repubtards oppose the Affordable Healthcare Act, is that a black guy came up with it. It would probably be the same if a woman (say, Hilary) had done so. If a white male came up with it, they would at least debate its merits. No matter how much they bitch and moan, and lie and rationalize, and pretend to like totems like Cain and Bachman, they hate women and people of color. They hate Obama because he's black, not because of his policies. It's that fuckin simple and I'm fuckin sick of it.

BaldarTFlagass November 15, 2011 at 7:55 pm

I motherfucking hate these motherfucking motherfuckers.

OccupytheDashboard November 15, 2011 at 8:27 pm

word

not that Dewey November 15, 2011 at 9:54 pm

I'm gonna tell James O'Keefe that you cursed in a blog post.

Nothingisamiss November 16, 2011 at 12:42 am

You, my motherfucking word great, are motherfucking right.

Guppy November 15, 2011 at 8:04 pm

Ah, if only one of them got their dick sucked so they could be impeached…

Schmannnity November 15, 2011 at 8:24 pm

What if one sucked the other? Two birds.

flamingpdog November 15, 2011 at 11:02 pm

Ah, if only one of them ever got their dick sucked …

/fixed

Guppy November 15, 2011 at 11:51 pm

Hey, in Clarence Thomas' case, it ain't for lack of trying!

sati_demise November 15, 2011 at 8:12 pm

Wall Street has already priced in Pfizer purchase of Supreme Court judges.

EatsBabyDingos November 15, 2011 at 8:15 pm

Flatulent pus monkeys. Not sure why, but flatulent pus monkeys.

Nothingisamiss November 16, 2011 at 12:43 am

I think this should've been saved for the next GOP debate, but it works here, too.

JackObin November 15, 2011 at 8:18 pm

Antonin Scalia believes in god. Ergo, he is mentally ill.

weejee November 15, 2011 at 8:32 pm

Jebus cheers.

ShitFilledExistence November 15, 2011 at 8:21 pm

Thank god drug companies can no longer attempt to influence doctor's offices with promotional items, right?

RadiosTyrone November 15, 2011 at 8:40 pm

Swag Libel.

ShitFilledExistence November 16, 2011 at 2:11 am

Awhile back I worked briefly as a front office medical receptionist. You could always tell who the drug reps were–they looked like young newscasters. I was basically told to 'be extra nice' because that's who gives us free lunches and pens and office clocks and to grant them instant access (they seemed to be a priority before patients). One time I was getting some coffee and listened to some 6' tall drug rep fembot try to manage her way through the pros and cons of whatever AstraZeneca bullshit she was peddling and was met with… chemistry! The doctor she was talking to began speaking about certain chemical structures of medication and she was dead lost… I think I laughed out loud. Oh–but lunch was good that day and I got a free notepad/pen combo.

It's great that these same companies can still woo the High Court.

Schmannnity November 15, 2011 at 8:22 pm

Occupy The Supreme Court! First Amendment certiorari review expected.

BarackMyWorld November 15, 2011 at 8:29 pm

Its not like Justice Thomas has a member of his immediate family employed by a group lobbying against the law he'll be deciding, and that group contributes directly to his family's income…

Wait…what?

Joshua Norton November 15, 2011 at 8:31 pm

I predict that Scalia will recuse himself.

Then we can all take an arial tour on his fleet of flying pigs.

littlebigdaddy November 15, 2011 at 8:32 pm

Needz moar chronic conditions being treated at underfunded urban emergency rooms.

RadiosTyrone November 15, 2011 at 8:42 pm

Needs moar than half of health care expenditures in the last six months of life.

Millennial Malaise November 15, 2011 at 9:55 pm

Needs moar than half of all bankruptcies in America due to medical bills.

johnnyzhivago November 15, 2011 at 8:32 pm

Ethics rulz???? We don't needz no stinkin ethics rulz!!!

CZL November 15, 2011 at 8:35 pm

What about Virginia Thomas' lobbying efforts on behalf of the Tea Party? I mean, sure, Tommy hasn't even so much as been in the same room as his wife in the past 20 years, but surely that's a greater indicator of partiality than Justice Kagan's e-mails.

Oh no wait, this is America, where conservatives are ALWAYS morally pure upstanding bastions of righteousness (even when they're buying rentboys by the pallet) and nominal "liberals" and "leftists" like Kagan are always devious, underhanded foes of justice by opposing the freedom of rich people to do whatever the fuck they want without having to bother to pause to think about the "poors," which in this case means anyone that makes less than $250,000 a year.

RadiosTyrone November 15, 2011 at 8:36 pm

I'd give the odds at 50:1 that Obamacare is history. And the sickest [sic] thing of this whole charade is that either way, we are farther from a single-payor system then we ever were. The health insurance, big Pharma AND health system lobbyists can skate blissfully through this show trial knowing full well they win no matter what. There is a reason why we pay three times (at least) what the rest of the civilized world pays for mediocre health care. Those tens of millions of dollar salaries for the likes of Rick Scott are not cheap.
I try not to use our heath care system much, but when I do, I drink Dos Equis. Stay healthy my friends.

Fukui_sanYesOta November 15, 2011 at 8:48 pm

I try not to use our heath care system much, but when I do, I drink Dos Equis. Stay healthy my friends.

Ironically, in the Sharron Angle healthcare-barter-plan, "duo equi" is the exact value of a liver transplant.

fuflans November 15, 2011 at 9:12 pm

god. i hope you're wrong.

mrblifil November 15, 2011 at 9:59 pm

Wanna be in the status quo? Figure out ways to buy time. Then you're golden.

Millennial Malaise November 15, 2011 at 10:07 pm

Sigh. The fact that this piece of middling pile of legislation (apparently, the best we could do) is now sitting in the hands of this Supreme[ly craven] Court, appears to make "medicare for all" or a "public option" seem nigh impossible especially if they rule against the mandate in Obamacare.

If the unlikely happens, however, I don't see how the bill works at all if the mandate is taken out. Sure, the Court might kick this can down the road until the mandate actually kicks in, and America gets to keep (hopefully) all the residual policies that kicked in immediately but we still have the problem of not everyone being covered! What then?! What's the bright idea fellas? Vouchers for charter hospitals run by Johnson & Johnson? Ugh!

DaRooster November 15, 2011 at 8:44 pm

Hey Thomas… you know how your wife gets her "egg money" right? I think it should disqualify you from this debate… but what do I know… http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48812.h

(You know… a whole "conflict in judgement"… but that would be justice and we all know you don't do the fair thing.

littlebigdaddy November 15, 2011 at 8:55 pm

Soft bigotry of low expectations, y'all!

user-of-owls November 15, 2011 at 9:03 pm

“a Supreme Court justice must recuse from ‘any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.’”

Thus, Elena obviously does not have to recuse herself.

Ha ha ha! Juris-fail, you hairy-balled shitheads!

emmelemm November 15, 2011 at 9:06 pm

It doesn't even MENTION women in the Constitution! HA! Take that!

user-of-owls November 15, 2011 at 9:16 pm

And though it MAY mention guineas and Negros, it doesn't do so favorably.

user-of-owls November 15, 2011 at 9:20 pm

And one more thing: if those two cunts were actually mothered by women, who are not mentioned in the Constitution, that makes the both of them unconstitutional in their entirety! QED, ipso facto and sic semper tyrranis!

I'm starting to like the law, actually.

fuflans November 15, 2011 at 9:15 pm

i'm fairly fragile right now. can someone please reassure me somehow?

thanks.

starfanglednut November 15, 2011 at 10:51 pm

Aww, don't worry. You are loved here on teh wonkette.

flamingpdog November 15, 2011 at 11:14 pm

Prairie dogs are the crankiest animules on the planet, but we luvs our fuf.

Fukui_sanYesOta November 15, 2011 at 11:18 pm

Yeah, repeating what the fangled nut said. We love you much.

Sure, the system is fucked and koch-puppets like Scalia have too much power right now, but it's not forever. If those right wing puslickers deem the affordable healthcare act unconstitutional there will be hell to pay. Maybe even Jim-Bob and Cletus will wake up and smell the distinctive scent of being used as a toilet by the rich.

fuflans November 15, 2011 at 11:29 pm

oh i love you guys so, but i just really want to be reassured that the scalia court won't triumph.

all the fucking time.

please?

Fukui_sanYesOta November 15, 2011 at 11:40 pm

Personally, and I'm not a law-talking guy, I don't think the SCOTUS will knock it down. That sets a really dangerous precedent for destroying legislation designed to help the poorest in society plus it's skating close to messing with the tenth amendment. Having said that, there have been some interesting interpretations, the most recent being that woman who got fucked over for growing pot for personal use in California.

Sure, this is the same supreme court which upheld CU vs the FEC, but you kind of expect that from fuckheads: that's indirect fucking of the poor. This would be a direct raping.

I don't think they'll gun it down, but I can't be sure. If they do, it'll be a politicized decision from the bench which directly and harmfully affects the electorate, and that is not where this country wants to be.

Spurning Beer November 15, 2011 at 9:17 pm

Worst case: Uncle Clarence doesn't recuse himself, votes to overthrow the healthcare act, and gets away with it.

Best case: He tries that shit, and voters go ape-shit. America gets occupied.

DerrickWildcat November 15, 2011 at 9:21 pm

They couldn't beat Kansas…well, in basketball. Probably could beat Kansas in Football, but not Basketball.

Pragmatist2 November 15, 2011 at 9:56 pm

A modest correction: The Supreme Court will not overturn the law and Scalia will vote to uphold it. I am prepared to pay the bar bill for a Wonkette staff party if that is wrong and the party lasts less than 5 minutes and there is one bartender and he has one arm.

flamingpdog November 15, 2011 at 11:19 pm

Too late – Dr. Richard Kimball finally caught the one-armed bartender.

mrblifil November 15, 2011 at 10:02 pm

Hey here's an idea. Maybe during the strategy meetings at DOJ, who will argue before the court too, last I heard, someone might want to walk across the hall and ask Uncle Eric if he thinks all this sounds kosher.

sati_demise November 15, 2011 at 10:24 pm

Eric Holder. Oh, that one big fail of a technocrat-authoritarian-wimp?
Him stand up to those upright Judges?

Nothing will be done. I would bet on that. Holder should have been fired.

mavenmaven November 15, 2011 at 10:24 pm

money money money, its a rich man's world…

glamourdammerung November 15, 2011 at 10:53 pm

Dear NATO,

It would be pretty groovy if you all could maybe come bring some democracy this way. Thanks!

unclejeems November 15, 2011 at 11:14 pm

Warren, Douglas and Marshall go out. Scalia, Thomas and Roberts go in. Who can explain it. Who.

vodkamuppet November 15, 2011 at 11:15 pm

How do I even laugh at this? I have a cousin in the Czech Republic who wants me to move there to help with his tool & die business and I keep telling him no but I'm starting to think I'm an idiot for sticking around. Hmmmm…. Prague or Detroit? Why am I still here?

Fukui_sanYesOta November 15, 2011 at 11:57 pm

Prague is a great city and that's quite an opportunity. Not easy moving from the US to the EU, but if he can sponsor you, give it a go. What's the worst that could happen? Oh, you don't like it and come back.

Czechs are often nuts and great fun.

fletc3her November 15, 2011 at 11:36 pm

If Scalia and Thomas recuse themselves from every case they have a conflict of interest in they might as well just stay home.

Negropolis November 16, 2011 at 12:05 am

Not only do the emperors not have any clothes, but they are grossly flaunting it by trying to poke you with their joy-boners, the dirty, old men.

horsedreamer_1 November 16, 2011 at 12:26 am

Time was, a Papist like Tony wouldn't have had even a chance to step off the boat.

Callyson November 16, 2011 at 1:25 am

From the LA Times:
In fact, justices are exempt from the Code of Conduct that governs the actions of lower federal judges.
If they were, they arguably fell under code’s Canon 4C, which states, “A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of honor, or featured on the program of such an event.“
Scalia and Thomas: "Codes of Conduct are for little people."
Jerks.

Crowe2011 November 16, 2011 at 2:04 am

From what I can see Thomas recuses himself from almost all cases (and Scalia for some reason has two votes).

meatlofer November 16, 2011 at 11:40 am

And then Thomas put his hand on Scalia's leg and reached into his lap fat for his genitals,and with the other hand he grabbed his head and pulled it towards his clarence and said,"You do want this job, don't you?"

James Michael Curley November 16, 2011 at 12:23 pm

Way back there in Seminary Law School, they said: "You can Petition the Court with Prayers, Petition the Court with Prayers, Petition the Court with Prayers … " Forget it. We're fucked.

rickmaci November 16, 2011 at 1:26 pm

The number of justices needs to be increased for two reasons. The current number of justices is too small to handle the volume of work, most of which is done now by shoveling the heavy lifting work to the "law clerks". Also, the number of justices is too few, given the growth of the country. There should be at least 4 more justices. At the same time, Congress should establish strict conflict rules for recusing justices. With that, no one justice could have as much dictatorial power for life as Scroogelia has now.

ttommyunger November 16, 2011 at 9:30 pm

Here's hoping Scalia had lots of drawn butter, dinner rolls, baked potato with loads of cheese and sour cream and three desserts….Just sayin.

Herring_Burnit November 16, 2011 at 12:59 pm

(Adjusts monocle) Eh? What's that you say?

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: