WONKETTE GOES TO COURT  8:20 pm September 29, 2011

Wonkette Operative Is Legal Hero At Wall Street Occupation

by Riley Waggaman

Here’s a quick report from the Occupy Wall Street camp before your correspondent takes a shower break in Brooklyn: Veteran Wonkette commenter and former executive director of the National Lawyer’s Guild Riverside68 is fighting the cops, in court! We met with him at the “legal table” in Zuccotti Park, to discuss what he and his lawyer pals are plotting. (Proving he was truly a veteran Wonkette commenter, he even gave us a bottle of tasty Wolaver’s Pale Ale Vermont beer!)

Anyway, here’s what’s up:

“We’re filing a summary judgment motion to whether or not the NYPD can close off a block and arrest every single person on that block. And that’s what they did in 2004 [at the GOP convention here], and that’s what they’re doing now, and we’re saying that’s unconstitutional — and our part of that motion will be filed on Monday.”

But what is a “summary judgment motion”? We asked a friend whose dad represented people in the Watts Demonstrations. Here is what he reported back, on Gchat:

It means you walk in with overwhelming evidence so that the judge says, ‘Oh, there’s no question, we don’t need to go to a trial.’”

There is some specific technical standard for establishing that there is no question: Summary judgement means everyone agrees to the facts. There’s no controversy and the court should grant the relief sought. The protesters are saying, ‘it’s clear. here are the facts: they arrested everybody…’ Compare with the People’s Park arrests in Berkeley in the early 70s. They said it was an illegal gathering and then started arresting people. That doesn’t mean the arrests are lawful…

Go Riverside68!

 

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.

{ 50 comments }

Barb September 29, 2011 at 8:26 pm

Better get some more of those tasty beers for the Transit Workers Union, who will be there tomorrow. Huzzah!

PalinzADummy September 29, 2011 at 8:28 pm

DAMMIT, Barb, I wuz gonna be first!

MissusBarry September 29, 2011 at 8:38 pm

I had my first first-comment today. Not my best material, for sure, but I admit it was still kinda exciting.

PalinzADummy September 29, 2011 at 8:43 pm

I'm crushed, I tell ya, crushed.

PalinzADummy September 29, 2011 at 8:27 pm

Since I am already in srs luv with Riverside, and also too the FIRST commenter on this thread, I now consider myself full of WIN.

tcaalaw September 30, 2011 at 9:19 am

Ah, the tragedy of premature FIRSTing!

PalinzADummy September 30, 2011 at 12:37 pm

Still better than premature fisting, is all I'm gunna say about this.

MissusBarry September 29, 2011 at 8:35 pm

This is just Wonktastic. Fingers and toes crossed for that judgement. Perhaps Riverside could get some sort champagne-on-balcony taunting injunction, too?

Blueb4sunrise September 29, 2011 at 8:38 pm

Errrr, Riley, could you possibly get more photos of this protestor?
TYIA.
http://idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/09/occu

Callyson September 29, 2011 at 8:41 pm

whether or not the NYPD can close off a block and arrest every single person on that block
Why doesn't the NYPD cut to the chase, and just arrest everyone not working on or cashing in on Wall Street?
Or better yet, why don't the cops just take a good look at what is happening to their pension funds?
What was that line from the classic film "Goodfellas"? I think it was "Why don't you go down to Wall Street and arrest some real criminals!"

Limeylizzie September 29, 2011 at 8:47 pm

Wonketteers are an amazing group of people, I am completely serious about that.

Tommmcattt September 29, 2011 at 9:26 pm

Yes, I think of them among my favorite freaks, which, if you know me, is my highest term of approbation.

Goonemeritus September 29, 2011 at 8:48 pm

Three cheers for the brave Wonketteers fighting back against the man.
I have to know is he the Skoal Bandit?

MiniMencken September 29, 2011 at 9:07 pm

Tuco say, "Summary judgement good. Summary execution of capitalist leeches better."

johnnyzhivago September 29, 2011 at 9:25 pm

Give 'em hell, Riley!!

fuflans September 29, 2011 at 9:30 pm

congrats to wonkette action and enjoy the shower riley.

Mumbletypeg September 29, 2011 at 9:45 pm

Wow. Sorta surreal to cogitate that this is good news for – - for once.
I haven't felt this elated to read about a mobilized effort since those Democratic senators boarded a bus out of wacky Wisconsin in a plea of sanity.

occams8ball September 29, 2011 at 9:46 pm

thank you sir Riley. Link to "feed a freak" again too please, I just got paid.

BarackMyWorld September 29, 2011 at 9:52 pm

THIS IS CLASS WARFAER!!!! HOW WOULD UR LIFE BE ANY BETTR IF THEIR WEREN'T NO RICH POEPLE?!?!? ECONMY IS LIBRULS FAULT!!!!

flamingpdog September 30, 2011 at 12:04 am

Spanky2B, is that you???

No, wait, can't be – this actually has something to do with Riley's post.

V572 Moon! September 29, 2011 at 9:55 pm

Cops arrest everybody. Seems fair to me. It's not as if free speech or the right to peaceably assemble or seek redress from the government are guaranteed in the Constitution or anything.

And good for you, Riley, for going to the root of all evil and calling it by name.

weejee September 30, 2011 at 9:51 am

Pale Ale ???

V572 Moon! September 30, 2011 at 9:54 am

¿Que?

weejee September 30, 2011 at 10:05 am

The root of all evil.

V572 Moon! September 30, 2011 at 10:08 am

Not while they’re still brewing Zima, if they are.

Spurning Beer September 29, 2011 at 10:51 pm

Summary judgment, inna rub-a-dub style:

Wall Street robbed American home-buyers.
Wall Street then robbed American taxpayers.
Wall Street then bought American legislators, yet again.
Wall Street "earned" billions in bonuses for their brilliant services in valuing imaginary assets inaccurately.
Wall Street then demanded that investment income continue to be taxed more lightly than earnings.
Wall Street pretends to be populated with "job creators," when in truth they want to minimize payrolls at any cost in human suffering.
Wall Street then called in the local constabularies to shut up the protesters.

Wall Street needs to be brought down a peg, and taxed properly. Miserable self-righteous sociopathic assholes.

Biel_ze_Bubba September 30, 2011 at 12:25 am

Only one peg? These crooks are twenty pegs above the middle class schmos that they parasititze.

I think the country needs a thorough de-worming.

Tommmcattt September 30, 2011 at 6:15 pm

This is now my facebook status.

TanzbodenKoenig September 29, 2011 at 10:58 pm

BITCHES LEAVE

- by bitches of course i mean the NYPD

Sharkey September 29, 2011 at 11:17 pm

Wolavers.

OneYieldRegular September 30, 2011 at 9:53 am

I see a terrific remake of "Red Dawn" in that.

GhostBuggy September 30, 2011 at 12:16 am

This is inspiring…we, the Wonkette commentators, should band together and head down to NYC and really support them in massive wa- oh look, there's some rum.

iburl September 30, 2011 at 1:21 am

Well, drinking rum and loudly and mindlessly repeating every thought that pops out of some random celebrity's mind could go together nicely.

finallyhappy September 30, 2011 at 12:34 am

I wish I was an important Wonketteer- let me know if you are visiting DC – and I'll tell you if I am working with tourists that day- and where.

Negropolis September 30, 2011 at 1:45 am

Wouldn't it be nice, if this grows to the point of where we can capture the feeling in a bottle, export it, and form a formidable opposition to the obstructionist tea party? Wouldn't it be nice if we could send them running for the proverbial hills so that Congress we could flip the Congress back like a muthafuck? God, I hope this really catches fire.

riverside68 September 30, 2011 at 8:11 am

The part that got lost in the translation is that I am working on the arrests from 2004 republican national convention.

sigh, it is sad that only after 7 years have we reached partial summary judgement motions on mass arrests. BUT IF WE WIN, keep your fingers crossed, then mass arrests are not allowed (i.e. you get to collect damages when they do it).

If we loose, forgetaboutit, WHOSE STREETS-COPS STREETS!

But for now, TAKE TO THE STREETS, CAUSE WE DON'T KNOW WHO OWNS THE STREETS YET!

(And the legal team loves all the publicity, particularly around pepperspray and toni balony, cause both are soooooo 2004, so get out there and get filmed getting sprayed!)

Golfing_OJ September 30, 2011 at 9:57 am

"WHOSE STREETS-COPS STREETS!"

We'll just fucking see about that, won't we.

SarahsBush September 30, 2011 at 1:04 pm

Own them, riverside. OWN THEM.

Pragmatist2 September 30, 2011 at 8:49 am

Oh, dear. When we start congratulating ourselves, there is a risk of stepping on the slippery slope to Huiffingtonpostism. No, that is not what Woody Guthrie died from. It is a slower and subtler disease in which the patient acquires money through a good divorce, starts a web site which she populates primarily with stolen content and the idiotic ramblings of her D List friends, and then requires that every third article reference her first name in the headline in a self-congratulatory way.

tcaalaw September 30, 2011 at 9:23 am

Fortunately, Ken Layne doesn't have a funny accent and he didn't marry a closeted gay man, so we should be safe. And by "safe," I mean, "Not the HuffPo."

Pragmatist2 September 30, 2011 at 9:38 am

All true, but still one can't be too careful.

paris biltong September 30, 2011 at 9:12 am

Sounds like a dragnet case. Used to be that drug convictions would be thrown own when the cops arrested everyone in an area and then sorted out the ones holding. No more so, I understand. They round up every suspicious-looking character and then figure out (or manufacture) whatever evidence they may need. No fun anymore.

BornInATrailer September 30, 2011 at 9:50 am

Riley, will you PLEASE call Breitbart? Tubby, sobbing bitch keeps drunk dialing me to talk about you.

prommie September 30, 2011 at 10:08 am

Ahem. General Strike? Anyone?

GOPCrusher September 30, 2011 at 1:17 pm

My father always advocated that the American working class should stage a general strike the day after Labor Day, but the idea never gained traction during the 60's and 70's.
I'm afraid that after 30 + years of the Raygun Revolutionary War Between Labor and Management, the masses that do have jobs are either beaten down to the point where they are afraid to lose their jobs, or are the other end of the spectrum and believe that the American Worker should be thankful for the meager scraps thrown to them by the Corporate Overlords.
Only the people of those Socialist European countries have the balls to throw a general strike anymore. Hell, at least the workers in India have the sack to kill the CEO when they are put out of work.

Lazy Media September 30, 2011 at 10:11 am

What exactly do the protesters want? It sounds like I'd be fer 'em, but if they're just vaguely against capitalism like those anti-G-8 dipshits, I'll continue to not care. If they have an actual agenda (tax corporations and rich people more, spend the money on jobs programs), then OK. But the Paultard with the "End the Fed" sign is not impressing me much.

chicken_thief September 30, 2011 at 10:32 am

I don't know, folks. We might be rushing things a bit. I did get a small raise last month, so maybe after 30 yrs or so of "trickle down" it's actually starting to work. Should we wait another 30 yrs or so just to be sure?

Allmighty_Manos September 30, 2011 at 11:53 am

The First Amendment is pretty clear that protesting is limited to yelling about health care, guns, the gold standard and the fed. And the gays amd browns. The rest of you commies should move back to Vermont.

FNMA September 30, 2011 at 12:39 pm

It's also about cash money.

ttommyunger September 30, 2011 at 9:17 pm

Slow down, Wonketeers, the NSA only has so many analysts.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: