Discussion about this post

User's avatar
𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

Evidently, it wasn't an act.

Expand full comment
𝔅𝔢𝔢𝔩𝔷𝔢𝔟𝔲𝔟𝔟𝔞's avatar

It's the "intent" element of the crime that he's going to try to beat. No intent = no GTA. That won't be a hard sell in this case, even without an Ambien defense.

There are plenty of other charges that don't have the same intent element, like larceny and "unlawful taking," so he's not out of the woods by any means. His lawyer will make a deal for a non-felony conviction, and he'll plead to a misdemeanor.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...