WEINERVISION  12:04 am June 2, 2011

Weiner Photo Shocker: Weiner Confirms Photos of Weiner’s Underwear Exist!

by Wonkette Jr.

Well now, this is getting … dumber? Let’s say “dumber.” From the NYT CityRoom blog:

Mr. Weiner added, however, that he could not “say with certitude” if he was the person in the photo.

In an interview broadcast later on CNN, Wolf Blitzer asked the congressman “if he had ever taken a picture like this of himself?”

“There are – I have photographs,” Mr. Weiner replied. “I don’t know what photographs are out there in the world of me. I don’t know what things have been manipulated and doctored.”

Uhhh …. [NYT]

 

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.

{ 75 comments }

facehead June 2, 2011 at 12:21 am

The pearly Weinergates of journalistic Heaven have opened, prepare to be raptured (just you Wonkette Jr., the rest of us are gonna hang out for a while and masturbate).

jaytingle June 2, 2011 at 7:49 am

What do you mean prepare? We're already living in Breitbart's paradise.

HistoriCat June 2, 2011 at 9:01 am

DO NOT WANT!!

noodlesalad June 2, 2011 at 12:30 am

Manipulated and doctored like photoshop, or manipulated and doctored like a Swedish Pump? Let's hold a congressional hearing to find out, shall we? Congress isn't doing anything worthwhile anyways.

Lionel[redacted]Esq June 2, 2011 at 2:33 pm

I'm sure David Vitter has a lot of opinions about both manipulation and doctoring.

Barb June 2, 2011 at 12:34 am

Meh, until the TSA changes their "can't see London, can't see France, til we see your underpants" policy, this is a non story.

I've got a flight to McCarran on Monday. I am sure several guards are going to see more than "Weinergates" shows.

DaRooster June 2, 2011 at 1:06 am

They are looking forward to it… at least it will stay there.

trampndirtdown June 2, 2011 at 9:30 am

Have a good time at the concert.

Barb June 2, 2011 at 9:43 am

Thanks!

KenLayIsAlive June 2, 2011 at 12:35 am

Members of the GOP caucus are busy pouring over this photographic evidence as we speak.

What they're pouring on the photos, I'll leave you to guess.

RadioJr. June 2, 2011 at 1:31 am

They haven't been this excited since they were cross-examining Linda Tripp.

flamingpdog June 2, 2011 at 1:52 am

Crotch photos and Linda Tripp in the same thread? MY BRAIN, MY BRAIN!

GhostBuggy June 2, 2011 at 12:51 am

Yeah, well, this asshole's been going around the teevee, making too much Goddamn sense, saying whatever he wants to our beloved Michelle and others. The fucking nerve. Our intrepid journalists (ugh) have decided it's time for this fucker to GO. Get that damn cock picture out there, and make him talk about that instead. See how he likes that shit.

Also, Weiner? Really? Way to make this issue as creepy as possible, instead of just coming out and saying, "Fuck yeah, it's my dick! I put it out there so Boehner can suck it! I DEFY anyone to prove it's not my undoctored photo!"

Lascauxcaveman June 2, 2011 at 12:54 am

I'm sure I have a picture of my underpants around here somewhere… yes, here it is… no, wait. I think that's our plaid tablecloth drying over an alder log…

HurricaneAli June 2, 2011 at 1:11 am

Braggart.

elviouslyqueer June 2, 2011 at 10:13 am

YOU LIE!

jus_wonderin June 2, 2011 at 2:00 pm

Plaid?

Callyson June 2, 2011 at 12:55 am

This just gets better…from HuffPo's take:
We’re trying to get to the bottom of where the picture came from, and we’re trying to get to the bottom of what it’s of and who it’s of," explained Weiner when asked about the matter. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/01/anthony-
Um, dude, the phrase "get to the bottom" is particularly unfortunate in this circumstance…

littlebigdaddy June 2, 2011 at 12:37 pm

So that means Weiner's a top?

Lascauxcaveman June 2, 2011 at 12:56 am

OT, but on the Wonkette Ad front, it's good to see that the naked vegans have returned. And they seem to have upgraded their spokesmodel.

Viva Cuba!

RadioJr. June 2, 2011 at 1:33 am

I like smokin' Cubans too.

Lascauxcaveman June 2, 2011 at 1:41 am

"A woman is only a woman…"

flamingpdog June 2, 2011 at 2:01 am

Plegde to be a veg? Didn't Preznit Raygun take that pledge in the mid-80s?

iburl June 2, 2011 at 1:06 am

Is he saying the weiner has been manipulated and doctored?

Does that mean plastic surgery? Does it mean photoshopped? Drunk dialed?

Is it some elaborate medically themed masturbation fetish?

I smell the work of the ACORN pimp.

flamingpdog June 2, 2011 at 2:03 am

My doctor says manipulating your Weiner three times a week is good for the prostate, if you're one of the oldz like me.

smokefilledroommate June 2, 2011 at 1:20 am

Actually, it's Barry's knee in a underwear.

nounverb911 June 2, 2011 at 1:26 am

Has anyone asked the Weiner if he wears boxers or briefs yet?

Negropolis June 2, 2011 at 2:40 am

That question was already answered by the photo. It'd be redundant…so expect the media to ask it…again and again and again and again.

BarackMyWorld June 2, 2011 at 1:33 am
RadioJr. June 2, 2011 at 1:39 am

As I said the other day:
Wonkette Jr., show us your junk!!1!

JackDempsey1 June 2, 2011 at 1:57 am

Today, we are all Weiner watchers.

I suspect that some of us will continue to be Weiner watchers tomorrow, as well.

DaRooster June 2, 2011 at 9:36 am

It definitely beats having to be a Bush watcher… such as he was.

flamingpdog June 2, 2011 at 2:08 am

But more importantly, how does this affect Sarah's bus tour?

donner_froh June 2, 2011 at 2:16 am

So this is the circuses part of the Bread and Circuses to distract us from things like the beginnings of the second (and more severe) dip of the double dip recession, the one that will kill us all.

I don't think the bread is going to be very good, either.

UpFistTroll June 2, 2011 at 10:12 am

I knew I could count on Wonkette to take the rare moment of optimism I'm having and beat it senseless, leaving it broken and sobbing on the ground. Thanks. :)

Negropolis June 2, 2011 at 2:37 am

Why oh why does this dude keep giving interviews? STOP. Do not pass GO; do not collect $200 whore-diamonds.

UpFistTroll June 2, 2011 at 10:16 am

I don't understand why he doesn't just do the following press conference: "Yes, the pic is of me. No, I didn't put it on Twitter. Somebody stole private photographs of mine, and then hacked into my personal Twitter account, and I'm going to find out who did it and prosecute him or her to the fullest extent of the law." Bam: focus shifted from "crotchgate" to "criminal invasion of privacy". All he needs to do is keep hammering home the words "personal," "privacy," "stolen," "invasion" — these are words tied to powerful emotions, and they work well.

Put simply, he needs to play the game the scumsuckers are playing, because right now he's losing.

Negropolis June 2, 2011 at 10:39 pm

That's really all he needs to say. It either is or it isn't him. If it's not him, he just needs to deny it, and if it is him, all he has to do is to say that someone hacked his account. In a world where people are sexting hard-core shit every second we type, it is not even hardly that embarrassing to admit that the pic is yours. After that, he can simply say he didn't send it, regardless of whether he did or not.

wondering where i am June 2, 2011 at 1:29 pm

My theory is he is doing it deliberately–to get name recognition. It will help when he runs for NYC mayor, non? New Yawkers like dicks.

Negropolis June 2, 2011 at 2:41 am

I did not have twitlations with that twitress, Ms. Tweetlinsky…

DerrickWildcat June 2, 2011 at 3:10 am

I'm just not sure I can ever trust a representative form of government again.

HistoriCat June 2, 2011 at 9:04 am

"I've said it before and I'll say it again – democracy just doesn't work." – Kent Brockman

chascates June 2, 2011 at 3:29 am

Breitbart and Tucker Carlson have gotten themselves in such a lather over this alleged incident that they'll undoubtedly try to set up a trap, wherein James O'Keefe pretends to be a teenaged sex pot online to get Weiner.

littlebigdaddy June 2, 2011 at 12:41 pm

Well, as the old sexist joke goes, Tucker's just a-huntin' pecker.
Breitbart, on the other hand, is a peckerwood.

pinkocommi June 2, 2011 at 3:34 am

I find bedazzling my name on my underwear helps avoid mixups like this.

Negropolis June 2, 2011 at 3:42 am

Remember when mom's stitched their son's name into their underwear? I don't, but I hear that actually happened in "once upon a time" time.

flamingpdog June 2, 2011 at 10:32 am

"This one time, at band camp …"

mrblifil June 2, 2011 at 11:54 am

I also recommend going Commando, which precludes the possibility of this every becoming an issue.

wondering where i am June 2, 2011 at 1:31 pm

Remember when underwear had the days of the week printed on them? Or was that just girls?

chascates June 2, 2011 at 3:38 am

Via HuffPo:
After expressing a bit of frustration with reporters on Tuesday when asked to address the social media controversy, Weiner apologized earlier on Wednesday for having been "a little stiff" in his handling of the situation.

Negropolis June 2, 2011 at 3:41 am

Anthony's still got it!

James Michael Curley June 2, 2011 at 4:39 am

Of course the picture is Anthony Weiner. Notice how it leans hard to the left?

DashboardBuddha June 2, 2011 at 9:01 am

Throckmorton presents left

easynews June 2, 2011 at 5:37 am

"Ask not what my weiner can do for you. Ask what you can do for my weiner."

NadePaulKuciGravMcKi June 2, 2011 at 7:12 am

NYT City Room
Anthony Weiner believes every word of the September 11 story.
Anthony Weiner has no questions about the September 11 story.
NYT City Room

jaytingle June 2, 2011 at 7:46 am

"Modeling" can mean a lot of things.

neiltheblaze June 2, 2011 at 7:47 am

He should have said, "That's definitely not me. First of all, my private pictures are totally XXX rated, and the man in that photo is way too small. Here – let me just whip this out…."

easynews June 2, 2011 at 8:03 am
Serolf_Divad June 2, 2011 at 8:20 am

I can see why Wiener would have a hard time disowning the picture. I mean have you seen the size of that thing!? Seriously, hold up a picture taken from the waist down, of a well endowed, dark-skinned black man, his schlong hanging down to his knees and ask any white guy if it's a picture of him. If he doesn't proudly claim it as his, at best you'll get a string of non-denial denials: "Er… I'm not saying it is.. but I hasten to add that I'm not saying it isn't. I mean, I was in bermuda a couple of weeks ago and got pretty tanned, so conceivably… but you know, I'd really have to check… I don't know how such a picture of me (if it is me, which I'm not saying it is, you understand… not saying it isn't either) anyway, I'm not sure how it would have been made public…" etc.

Pop_Socket June 2, 2011 at 9:08 am

Weiner has been specifically targeted because he is one of the Democrat's more powerful talking heads.

KeepFnThatChicken June 2, 2011 at 9:11 am

if I'm going to share a photo of my junk, it's going to be of my junk. NOT MY UNDERWEAR.

Anthony, Anthony, Anthony…

weejee June 2, 2011 at 9:49 am

Is Mel Brooks on Brietfart's staff, or maybe on Weiner's?

prommie June 2, 2011 at 10:09 am

I heard an interview in which he actually said that it can't be him, because its too big, or as he put it, "it appears to have been manipulated, I am embarrassed to say, for the reasons stated by Jon Stewart the other night."

Thats a first, man claims "it couldn't have been me, my dick's not that big."

BZ1 June 2, 2011 at 10:14 am

RUSSERT: but, but, but, but?

REP. WEINER: I wish…

mavenmaven June 2, 2011 at 11:01 am

Here's what retard Dennis Prager had to say: “I’m just reading up on the latest of Congressman Anthony Weiner. Normally, I don’t talk about these things, but it is his treatment of the questions posed to him has made me highly suspicious that he should go the way of the Republican congressman who put up a picture of himself. What’s good for Republicans should be good for the Democrats.”
Weiner is from NYC, he's probably about to sucker punch these nitwits.

hagajim June 2, 2011 at 11:44 am

I guess if my name was Weiner I'd be tempted to twit my weiner too.

mrblifil June 2, 2011 at 11:52 am

I can't say with certitude that the 5 million pictures on the internet of a giant black cock attributed to some dude who calls himself "Mandingo" are not really pictures of my junk. If anyone would like to view hard evidence, they should hit me up for some cam2cam.

Gopherit June 2, 2011 at 12:34 pm

today, none of us can say with certitude whether we have 9" of mansteak.

And can I just say one thing? This meme is way cooler than "not intended to be a factual statement."

littlebigdaddy June 2, 2011 at 12:44 pm

I, for one, am willing to acknowledge that it could possibly be me. You just never know when someone's gonna take a picture of your junk and 'shop it.

ArmoredBore June 2, 2011 at 12:47 pm

Anthony, dude! Just man up and say something definitive. You're starting to sound like Sarah Palin™, ferkrissake!

AJWjr. June 2, 2011 at 1:33 pm

Not helping, Anthony.

DustBowlBlues June 2, 2011 at 8:14 pm

The only thing that pisses me about this is that he didn't send the photo to me.

ttommyunger June 3, 2011 at 12:15 pm

Are we talking Congress here, or Animal House? One hit after another with these people. Unbelievable!

Soylent Green June 3, 2011 at 6:06 pm

Am I the only one that see's whats going on? He's from Brooklyn, for Gods Sakes! He got pissed off by some Republican during vote and sent a nasty-gram: 'Yeah – I got your Dick Army right here'.
Now I won't debate who was more juvenile: Him for sending it, or the narc Republican that re-Tweeted it. I see a devious smirk on Dick Army's face.

KenLayIsAlive June 2, 2011 at 10:07 am

We must wonder wether if these people handling our Weiner are qualified for the job.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: