• May 27, 2012

Shutdown-Averting ‘Budget Package’ Actually Increases Spending This Year

by Jack Stuef  11:24 am May 17, 2011

Hooray for Rand Paul! He did it!Last November, the Teabaggers won the House for the Republicans, which meant government spending and all post-18th century bureaucracy was gone forever, yay. Except, that big budget deal that saved us all from government shutdown? It’s going to make the government spend more money this year than if spending had just been left alone, according to the Congressional Budget Office. But that’s because of defense spending, which shouldn’t count, as there can never be too much defense spending. Republicans are still on track to erase Washington, D.C. and its suburbs from the map, right?

Brendan Buck, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), explains on the Speaker’s blog “The effect on outlays (based on how quickly the administration spends money) meanwhile is slowed due to increased and accelerated spending for our men and women in uniform. As the CBO puts it, ‘part of the reason …is that some defense funding was shifted from slower-spending to faster-spending activities.’”

See, “our men and women in uniform” needed very, very new weapons, because they have to face off against the world’s technological behemoth: individuals who live in caves and holes in the ground in third-world countries. Makes sense. [TPM]

{ 120 comments }

Barb May 17, 2011 at 11:26 am

I'm surprised that Boehner hasn't signed the government up for Groupon yet. Think of all the money he could save us.

WhatTheHeck May 17, 2011 at 11:41 am

Think of all the money we could save if we didn’t spend any tax-payers’ money on the flooded districts of the south right now.
Keep government small. I think the republicans are on to something here.

BerkeleyBear May 17, 2011 at 11:59 am

Ron Paul actually said this over the weekend. Specifically that if we didn't have levees individuals wouldn't live near the river so there'd be no problem and no need for flood control.

SorosBot May 17, 2011 at 12:00 pm

Libertarian really is just another word for sociopath.

V572..whatever May 17, 2011 at 12:08 pm

A Libertarian is a Republican in mirrored sunglasses.

tessiee May 17, 2011 at 11:09 pm

A libertarian is a Republican who smokes weed.

Wilcoxyz May 17, 2011 at 12:27 pm

Right. Just like libertarians choose not to live in places prone to earthquakes, tornados, blizzards, coastal areas affected by hurricanes, etc. See, we don't need gub'mint taxes and spendy help. We need more libertarians choosing the right places to live.

Ken Cuccinelli May 17, 2011 at 12:41 pm

libertarians choosing the right places to live.

Most simply choose Mom's basement.

horsedreamer_1 May 17, 2011 at 12:49 pm

Because rivers have never been a leading conduit of commerce, let alone commerce itself.

Tennessee Valley Authority, anyone? Hoover Dam?

Biel_ze_Bubba May 17, 2011 at 3:24 pm

Hey, if the gummint didn't build those hydro projects, people wouldn't be using so much electricity.

BerkeleyBear May 17, 2011 at 11:57 am

That would actually require anyone in the GOP to give a shit about saving money, as opposed to wasting it on war and booze.

Lascauxcaveman May 17, 2011 at 12:11 pm

You're implying that money spent on booze is 'wasted'?

Them's fightin' words.

tessiee May 17, 2011 at 10:54 pm

Booze and hotpants!

memzilla May 17, 2011 at 11:29 am

Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!

Radiotherapy May 17, 2011 at 11:41 am

You won't find it there, Columbus.

nounverb911 May 17, 2011 at 11:30 am

Also, up is down, in is out, black is white.

Biel_ze_Bubba May 17, 2011 at 3:22 pm

And Republicans have family values.

SorosBot May 17, 2011 at 11:30 am

We spend almost as much on the military / "defense" as the rest of the world combined, which is unacceptable to the GOP; we must spend more than the rest of the world to truly conquer it; uh, keep America safe (I have no idea how to do that strikeout thingy).

Ruhe May 17, 2011 at 11:33 am

Not just the rest of the world. We must spend as much or more than the theoretical extraterrestrial opponents the Pentagon secretly plans for.

SorosBot May 17, 2011 at 11:51 am

We need to close the Death Star gap!

memzilla May 17, 2011 at 11:33 am

(strike)text(/strike). Substitute the "less than" symbol for ( and the "greater than" symbol for ). Thus, text.

Rosie_Scenario May 17, 2011 at 11:50 am

Servicey. Thank you. And here's an upfist.

James Michael Curley May 17, 2011 at 11:51 am

So you can line out the entire post.

Lascauxcaveman May 17, 2011 at 12:14 pm

¡ǝɯǝɯ ʇxǝu ɹno ʇı ǝʞɐɯ s,ʇǝl

V572..whatever May 17, 2011 at 12:10 pm

Wow, good job. I couldn't figure out how to essplain it without invoking unwanted HTML sʇɔǝɟɟǝ.

tessiee May 17, 2011 at 11:11 pm

We spend almost as much on the military / "defense" as the rest of the world combined, which is unacceptable to the GOP; we must spend more than the rest of the world to truly keep munnys away from the lazy browns and whorey wimmenz.

fxd

ProgressiveInga May 17, 2011 at 11:30 am

More Boehner: "Blah blah men & women in uniform blah blah class warfare blah blah welfare for those who need it blah blah no individual mandates blah blah socialism blah blah." I hate these fockers.

freakishlywrong May 17, 2011 at 11:38 am

"blah blah taxes are off the table blah grownup conversation blah blah blah serious blah blah shared sacrifice blah" Fuck em. Fuck em all.

Weenus299 May 17, 2011 at 1:02 pm

"fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck families and children fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck hardworking Americans fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck our military servicemen and women fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck sacrifice fuck fuck fuck fuck clean energy fuck fuck fuck fuck fiscal responsibility fuck fuck fuck …"

elviouslyqueer May 17, 2011 at 11:30 am

Well, obviously. Medicare, education, family planning services = unAmerican. Big, expensive toys that blow shit up halfway around the world = totally American. USA! USA! USA!

DownFist Troll May 17, 2011 at 11:31 am

Against Teabagger spending?! Why must you hate America so?

Troubledog May 17, 2011 at 11:32 am

You sleep until lunchtime, and this is the best you can do?

SexySmurf May 17, 2011 at 11:32 am

Brendan Buck is my new gay porn name.

Badonkadonkette May 17, 2011 at 11:36 am

Mine's John Böner.

Radiotherapy May 17, 2011 at 11:43 am

You say Ummm…alot.

ProgressiveInga May 17, 2011 at 11:41 am

Sarah Lou Sarah has a nice porn ring to it.

Radiotherapy May 17, 2011 at 11:43 am

Mine's Lou Sarah.

horsedreamer_1 May 17, 2011 at 12:51 pm

What did you think was cropped out of that supposedly topless photo of Sarah Palin with which Pareene teased us, oh, so many years ago?

tessiee May 17, 2011 at 11:17 pm

Her pendulous postpartum udders?

BerkeleyBear May 17, 2011 at 12:02 pm

Take the last names of the two main spokespeople for the Speaker and you get Buck Steel. I'm starting to think the Orange one has an affinity for barebacking.

Sue4466 May 17, 2011 at 11:33 am

You mean all the very serious talk about deficits and tax burdens on Our Children(tm) has just been so much political posturing for the base? Color me surprised (which still beats Boehner orange).

user-of-owls May 17, 2011 at 11:49 am

I'll stick to Indian Red, thank you very much!

Geronimo!

DaRooster May 17, 2011 at 11:33 am

"…part of the reason …is that some defense funding was shifted from slower-spending to faster-spending activities."

Oh well, there ya go… I wish I had the luxury to do that… I would love to spends me some monies hastily.

PsycWench May 17, 2011 at 12:03 pm

We did that the other night when we took the kids to Outback instead of Burger King. It turns out that if you spend money rapidly, you end up spending more. Too bad that was impossible to predict.

ShaveTheWhales May 18, 2011 at 1:49 am

i believe this is "hookers and blow", or more precisely "blow and hookers".

Allmighty_Manos May 17, 2011 at 11:35 am

But aren't we leaving Afghanistan and Iraq? I mean Osama's dead, right?

freakishlywrong May 17, 2011 at 11:35 am

I'm sure this will be breathlessly debated on the "news".

TsunamiAli May 17, 2011 at 11:49 am

Where they will discuss the "deficit" and "courage."

freakishlywrong May 17, 2011 at 11:58 am

Don't forget "entitlements"!

TsunamiAli May 17, 2011 at 12:02 pm

Only for those who "need it."

freakishlywrong May 17, 2011 at 12:19 pm

Due to what's known as "Republican Fiscal Policy" also known as Voodoo or Trickle down, the majority of us are going to need it.

JustPixelz May 17, 2011 at 11:36 am

"… increased spending for our men and women in uniform."

The uniform he means is, of course, the three piece suits favored by billionaires.

tessiee May 17, 2011 at 11:24 pm

Hey, you guys, remember when they had the story on the news about how some of the armed forces had inadequate equipment and armor? Also, remember when they had the story on the news about how the returning veterans had inadequate medical care in falling-down hospitals?

Boy, I sure am glad those problems have been fixed!

JustPixelz May 17, 2011 at 11:38 am

Hooray for opposite day! Less spending is more spending. Obama is a socialist. Gingrich is full of "ideas".

Badonkadonkette May 17, 2011 at 11:39 am

It’s going to make the government spend more money this year than if spending had just been left alone

No, no, dig up, stupid!

Ruhe May 17, 2011 at 11:39 am

Nuclear war with the USSR? We secretly wanted it but we didn't get it. Y2K? Good money for wilderness outfitters and gold sellers but otherwise a total bust. Planetary destruction via global warming? It seems like it's taking a long time and who has the patience. Armageddon and the Rapture? Does anyone even believe that shit anymore? A Black Swan sailing right up Wall Street? Nah, we survived it more or less. So what are you gonna do to destroy the world if the world won't destroy itself? How about we haggle about the debt ceiling until everyone starts to get worried that money doesn't actually exist. Bingo. Caveman days again, baby!

GOPCrusher May 17, 2011 at 2:41 pm

Come Saturday, you will rue those words. RUE, I SAY!

El Pinche May 17, 2011 at 11:39 am

ITS QUIET NOWN THAT CBO IS SECRETELY LEAD BY GOERGE SORROS

memzilla May 17, 2011 at 11:39 am

Yeah, I gotcher budget package right here, pal.

JustPixelz May 17, 2011 at 11:41 am

Government doesn't have a spending problem, it has an arithmetic problem.

Radiotherapy May 17, 2011 at 11:45 am

And who can forget the Trucknutz?

Bonzos_Bed_Time May 17, 2011 at 11:45 am

This is my rifle, this is my gun
One is for fighting, one is for faster-spending activities.

OC_Surf_Serf May 17, 2011 at 11:48 am

Hey 'baggers, there are free-market companies out there that will economically print spell-corrected posters with kerned layouts on durable materials…

Just trying to help…

Naked_Bunny May 17, 2011 at 1:07 pm

Wait. Are you saying that photo isn't a satirical Halloween display?

jaytingle May 17, 2011 at 11:48 am

It's times like these when I begin to question the good faith of the members of the legislature. I mean, it's as if they have ulterior motives.

spudgun May 17, 2011 at 12:54 pm

Smell that?? That's sarcasm!
;-)

Doktor Zoom May 17, 2011 at 11:49 am

Needless to say, even though the increased spending goes to defense contractors, this will be spun as proof that Obama is committed to giving all our money to irresponsible brown people.

owhatever May 17, 2011 at 11:50 am

Right wing social engineering costs a lot of money. If the gummint would just ban abortions, like the 4fathers said, the budgets would be balanced.

V572..whatever May 17, 2011 at 12:14 pm

Plus don't let teh Gheys get married. That's really expensive, what with two trousseaus per wedding.

Texan_Bulldog May 17, 2011 at 11:53 am

'Math is hard'. Barbie

user-of-owls May 17, 2011 at 11:55 am

“The effect on outlays (based on how quickly the administration spends money) meanwhile is slowed due to increased and accelerated spending for our men and women in uniform."

Ok, I'm a reasonably intelligent guy and I've spent several precious minutes trying to make any sense out of this statement whatsoever. The result: fail. In all seriousness, can someone help parse this thing not politically, but simply syntactically? How can 'increased and accelerated spending' lead to a 'slowing' effect on outlays?

BerkeleyBear May 17, 2011 at 12:13 pm

It takes a roadmap, but I read it as "the effect on outlays" = the reduction in actual spending supposedly made in the deal. So using semi consistent language, he's saying (I think) that while the deal itself will save money some day, it isn't today because we are spending money on defense.

Or in other words, if we don't continually treat military spending as emergency and sacrosanct, we might save a nickel down the road. That, and his unicorn is purple with a pink mane.

user-of-owls May 17, 2011 at 1:03 pm

It takes more like a galactic map, so thanks for burning some psychic calories with me!

GOPCrusher May 17, 2011 at 2:45 pm

Tax cuts+increased Defense spending=PROFITS!

edgydrifter May 17, 2011 at 11:56 am

Shut your traitor hippie mouths, peaceniks. We need those depleted uranium HummerNutz for the troops!

James Michael Curley May 17, 2011 at 11:56 am

It is ironic that if a 'bager put that sign up in my neighborhood I could call up code enforcement and have the owner cited for a nuisance. Ironic because the ordinance got passed by a bunch of Republicans, years ago, trying to surpress their opponents.

freakishlywrong May 17, 2011 at 12:21 pm

That was actually a smart ass liburl taking the piss out of the teabillies.

horsedreamer_1 May 17, 2011 at 12:54 pm

In 2004, I had a landlord who asked me to remove the Kerry-Edwards sign from my window.

Funny thing: they never asked me ahead of time about the Bush-Cheney sign they put in the yard.

DahBoner May 17, 2011 at 2:29 pm

Even funnier: Due to unfunded educational mandates, you thought the new sign said 'Take a dump here plz'…

Gopherit May 17, 2011 at 11:59 am

Well, it makes sense. If you're going to fuck over the poor as many times as the republicans have, you better have a lot of guns to back it up. Ask the French.

Radiotherapy May 17, 2011 at 12:02 pm

I know, let's give discount coupons to the Oldz for their health care and block grant Medicaid (whatever that means)….and shazzam, problem solved.

DaRooster May 17, 2011 at 12:04 pm

Maybe just me… but I really cannot stand people that are capital and lower case deficient…
Makes me think "Idiot" right off the bat… and well hey… what do you know.

tessiee May 17, 2011 at 11:27 pm

Also misusing "your" and "you're"; "there", they're", and "their"; and one that I don't even get, "were" and "where" (I mean, they don't even sound alike!), as in "We where going to the store".

DaRooster May 18, 2011 at 11:26 am

Going we're?

fuflans May 18, 2011 at 12:19 am

what about e. e. cummings mr. or ms. liberal fancy punctuation rooster? hmmmmm????

(me? i am just too lazy to capitalize on the intertubes.)

widestanceroman May 17, 2011 at 12:06 pm

Liberals just don't understand faith-based economics.

Fox n Fiends May 17, 2011 at 12:17 pm

Send this sarcastic pearl of wisdom to Krugman, stat

fuflans May 17, 2011 at 12:07 pm

hahahaha silly people! we won't need to balance the budget after saturday.

jesus will do it.

prommie May 17, 2011 at 12:16 pm

They are as bad at math as they are at spelling, grammar, history, and science. This should be no surprise.

tessiee May 17, 2011 at 11:27 pm

Knowleje is eleetist.

baconzgood May 17, 2011 at 12:18 pm

Does this suprise anyone? Republicans always bitch about the budget then fuck it up more. Remember Reagan, and Cheney's "Deficits don't matter". FUCK YOU TEA-BAGGERS! I hope you all rot in hell you hypocrites.

Fox n Fiends May 17, 2011 at 12:20 pm

I've come up with a simple way to balance the budget:
Cut military spending by 60%, permanently. Any proposed increase to that new spending limit will trigger a dollar for dollar tax increase on the wealthiest 3%. Problem solved.

UpFistTroll May 17, 2011 at 12:50 pm

Why don't we privatize the armed forces? Doesn't privatization fix everything? Well, that and lower taxes for the rich.

Biel_ze_Bubba May 18, 2011 at 12:33 am

Hah – have you seen what Xe is charging the U.A.R. for a lousy 800 mercenaries?

DahBoner May 17, 2011 at 12:24 pm

The job creators have their own private security, fire and even mercenary armies.

KeepFnThatChicken May 17, 2011 at 12:46 pm

Well curse thank Jesus they haven't have raised the debt ceiling raided the endowments. Or have haven't.

tessiee May 17, 2011 at 11:06 pm

I'm not sure whether to not/upfist or not/downfist your comment.

KeepFnThatChicken May 17, 2011 at 12:48 pm

Isn't that called "Project Graduation"?

Here's fifty bucks, kids. Don't go gettin' trashed tonight. Instead, give that fitty to your older brother and let him buy your beer tomorrow night.

mavenmaven May 17, 2011 at 12:56 pm

Of course, the increased military spending was not used for things such as providing armored vehicles for the actual soldiers until the Obama administration, and even those were flawed and dangerous http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/07/marines_MRA...

arihaya May 17, 2011 at 1:01 pm

Republicans are still on track to erase Washington, D.C. and its suburbs from the map, right?

those wingnuts have always wanted the capital city to be located in Richmond, VA

Weenus299 May 17, 2011 at 1:03 pm

What the fuck ever. Have we invaded Syria yet?

Golfing_OJ May 17, 2011 at 1:03 pm

Poor fuckhead BONER, all his lobbyist friends were giving him empty packs of Marlboros and Kools filled with hundred-dollar bills as outright bribery toward throwing his lily-white teabag pederast friends under the bus to appease "Wall Street" Nobama.

Ahem. Please excuse my brusqueness. I meant to say, "I wonder what Ross Perot is doing today."

Naked_Bunny May 17, 2011 at 1:09 pm

If we don't have tanks, then what is to keep Canada from conquering us?

ttommyunger May 17, 2011 at 1:10 pm

Note to local Asian sign-maker, Mee Ting: how about not signing your work so prominently until you get a little more proficient at it? Just sayin'

Lionel[redacted]Esq May 17, 2011 at 1:13 pm

No reasonn to fret. I'm sure Sean Hannity will point out that this is all Bill Clinton's fault.

orygoon May 17, 2011 at 1:59 pm

This is reminiscent of what happened when my son told me that we-the-'rents would save money if we would get phone service through his account on some kind of "family plan".

DahBoner May 17, 2011 at 2:22 pm

Xe is just short for 'Xenu'.

Where is Scientology on the list, again?

Ducksworthy May 17, 2011 at 2:43 pm

Next Kristallnacth the GOP plans to smash all the compact florescent bulbs. That'll save monies.

GOPCrusher May 17, 2011 at 2:43 pm

If all their munnies weren't going to Planned Parenthood, we could spend more on Defense.
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!

Guppy06 May 17, 2011 at 4:14 pm

Remember, boys and girs: by "our men and women in uniform," they mean "defense lobbyists."

loulouroo May 17, 2011 at 5:14 pm

F'ing Trailer Park Jesus!! Nice one, Tea tards and your mandates. What are we spending it on? The pointless war your boy Dubya started? Still paying for the useless Stars Wars non-sense your God Reagan started? And you still want to kick the poor vets in the ass after they've served? Nice one.

BZ1 May 17, 2011 at 5:25 pm

Brendan Buck, c'mon, that's a porn name…

lochnessmonster May 17, 2011 at 5:32 pm

I chalk it all up to "creative accounting".

tessiee May 17, 2011 at 11:07 pm

Or possibly "creation accounting"?

DaRooster May 17, 2011 at 5:38 pm

So this Ass-Hat imports his signs from China? It is signed at the bottom-
MEE TinG

widget2011 May 17, 2011 at 6:25 pm

If we didn't have any rivers we wouldn't need any levees.

muddypolitics May 17, 2011 at 7:58 pm

Gotta love it. "GOP says GOP's negotiating skills MIA on budget deal" >> http://bit.ly/kH7oih

SorosBot May 17, 2011 at 12:19 pm

That, and they use bullshit pseudoscience to claim that women and minorities are inferior to white men instead of the Bible.

horsedreamer_1 May 17, 2011 at 12:50 pm

&, at nite, when they pop in their Savannah Sampson dvd, they live in a wet basement.

Where's their "flood" relief?

Ducksworthy May 17, 2011 at 2:25 pm

Voodoo and Trickle Down have been replaced by Land War in Asia Trainwreck. Its what made the Soviet Union so successful.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: