Sarah Palin Earns Fox News Check By Implying Common, Obama Are Racist
"It is just too easy," dutiful Fox News screecher Sarah Palin said to get another check last night, referring to her ability to pick a fight with the White House for allowing a (CELEBRATED) black hip-hop artist into the building, knowing that a very familiar segment of the country will automatically believe any negative thing a white public figure says about such a man. Her syntax was convoluted as always, but she still managed to imply Common and the president are racist: "We thought we were to be united under the leader of the free world, Barack Obama in tamping down racism and inciting violence — and cop killing certainly — and killing a former president." Yes, why hasn't Obama tamped down inciting killing a former president? The only thing children are being taught today is that it feels good to have sex, do drugs, and force Jimmy Carter to drink a fatal amount of antifreeze. [ Politico ]
Newt Gingrich released his opening campaign video. He says the United States should "impose" solutions on "those forces that don't want to change." Your number's up, gay people! And he says he will "tell the truth," so we guess he's going to be totally upfront with his wife about all the affairs he's going to have these coming months. [ YouTube ]
A survey says 85% of college graduates move back home with their parents after they get their diploma. This is because the economy has found human beings are no longer required in order to make profits. Future: won. [ Time ]
Nope Bob, I didn't defend any of them. You might not be able to understand this (!) but I was just being critical of your simple use of a placeholder like BYRD to represent every Democrat -- as if that guy stood for anything other than who he is. Or WAS. He's dead now. You knew that, right?
But hey, you're into that broad-brushin' thing, then? So, I have to ask -- how many diaper-whores do you visit, Mr. Vitter Junior? (in case you don't get it, I'm automatically equating YOU with a bad example from your party, which is exactly what YOU did with Byrd. See how it works? Of course you don't. You're welcome!)
Walk on past the part of my post that showed -- WITH YOUR OWN LINK -- that you were mistaken. Lo and behold! A confused conservatard doesn't comprehend!?! Color me shocked.
Shorter: Dude, Snopes doesn't say what you think it says.
Maybe you think you can shout enough about the "bigotry" part of my comment, to completely erase the fact that your own link says you're cherry-picking quotes out of context, or making them up out of nowhere. SHOUT! LOUDER! IT! IS! OUTRAGE!
But sure, Bob, why don't we make a deal?
I&#039;ll call my own self a scumbag lowlife... as soon as you ask your black stepdad what he thinks of people who cherry-pick Obama&#039;s quotes out of context, or make them up, in order to rile up racists, magically allowing the racists to <i>justify their own racism.</i>
Ask him that, and be sure to point out who was doing that. Big Unmistakeable (even to a Conservatard) Hint: <b>IT IS YOU.</b>