Ultra Orthodox Hasidic newspaper Der Tzitung is telling its readers like it isn’t- by editing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from the now-iconic Bin Laden raid Situation Room photo. Oy vey.
The religious paper never publishes pictures of women, as they could be considered “sexually suggestive.”
We kind of wish she was elected president so we could have seen what this newspaper would do. A lot of foreign leaders smiling and shaking hands with the air? Or would they just consistently stick, say, Steve Buscemi’s face on her body?
But wouldn’t either of those things turn on somebody out there? Ugh, humanity, always messing up the religions. [Jezebel]
{ 99 comments }
pics or it didn't happen
I'd vote for `shopping in Gary Busey. That fucker is funny looking.
Have to use the mug shot. http://www.sucksorrules.com/objects/detail/people...
Edit:crap! That's Nolte in the link.
Also: downfister loves Hilary.
Maybe that old mug shot of Nick Nolte?
The religious paper never publishes pictures of women, as they could be considered “sexually suggestive.”
I guess then that every single reader of this newspaper in the whole world is straight, right?
They should 'shop in photos of Golda Meir or Bella Abzug wherever Hillary appears.
But pics of engorged penises are still okay, right?
Only if they're circumcised.
On the other hand, that pic of W air-massaging Merkel would have been great.
Sounds like a Doonesbury strip. You never see the president just his "aura".
I got a raging boehner lookin at the photoshopped picture. Be straight with me… I'm gay, right?
Joe Biden so relentlessly exudes raw sexuality that a picture of him isn't really a fair test.
Bah, d0wnfisted. Guess posting about the veep's hotness hits a little too close to home for some people.
Ooh… I didn't even notice J-Bid on the first go. You owe me a box of kleenex…
& Wonkette owes Kleenex money, for that usage of copyrighted material.
Their wedding announcement page must be hilarious.
Couldn't they just slip Bill Clinton in there?
Actually, that's probably a lot MORE sexually suggestive.
I assume, in their world, Golda Meir never existed.
They were able to make an exception for Margaret Thatcher though.
To this day, they believe those photos were of a man with a funny name.
I can see how her clasping her mouth could be sexually suggesting…you naughty, naughty girl, Hillary! Or should I call you by your porn name…Beverly Milton.
I thought her porn name was Foster Shooter.
/hiding in plainsight
In their defense, Bill edits Hillary out of things all the time.
Although Hillz is looking really great these days, I think "sexual suggestion" is a bit much. I mean, have you seen those cankles?
Yeah! Lets hear it for pantsuits!
I understand this completely. Hasadic Jewish guys curls are the sexist things EVER!
Oh and they aways smell of mothballs and sweat, it's those heavy hats in the hot and humid NYC summertime, I only know this from sitting next to them on the subway not from any sexytime I had with them.
A couple I knew actually encountered a Hasidic flasher, once. In Jerusalem, of course.
I like Hilz…but I'm having a hard time drawing a line between her and sexually suggestive.
These guys got all hot and bothered by Madam Clinton? 100 Ameros says these prudes have more skeletons in their closet than a workaholic necromancer.
Lots of them hide the payoth and go to Tel Aviv for fun weekends, if you believe the Israeli press.
Today, we are all ASSraelis.
(Google that. I dare you.)
And here I never thought I'd stumble upon a group of people more sexually mal-adjusted than Ted Haggard. I was wrong.
They also edited that short little counterterrorism analyst out of the photo. Silly women, always thinking they can keep up with the menz.
Director of Counterterrorism!
Those crazy Hungarians (that's the sect of hasidim whose paper this is, historically mega-extreme), they don't like women, Israel, bicyclists, or pretty much anything.
Bicycles are too fancy? Really? Oy gevalt…
When I think of bicycles, I think of how they rub on the delicate parts. Can't say it's suggestive of anything but the sex that will be postponed due to chafing for me, but they obviously have different perceptions of suggestiveness.
The religious paper never publishes pictures of women, as they could be considered “sexually suggestive.”
*All* women, huh? Well, I guess Barbara Bush can take comfort that somewhere, her very image is still considered to be sexually suggestive…
Things are working out quite well for her in that newspaper.
Ultra Orthodox Jews and Taliban Moslems. Que es mas repressed and sexually dysfunctional? Discuss amongst yourselves.
The remarkable thing is that while the Ultra-Orthodox Jews and Taliban Moslems both fervently hate each other, 98% of worlds population couldn't tell them apart. That's gotta hurt.
After all, those bearded dudes all look the same, right?
Hell, they can hardly tell one another apart … 95% of what they believe matches up perfectly.
Back when I had a beard and tended a parking lot in Indiana, lots of people assumed I was either a Hasid or an Amishman. Except the real ones, of course.
Wearing zippers & eating pork rinds kind of ruined the mystery.
Mustache. No payoth.
Well, of course, everybody knows Hillary doesn't show up on film or in mirrors!
I love Hill and all…but sexually suggestive? Really?
Too sexy for her pantsuits.
Was this originally reported by Alex Jones' ponytail-wearing photoshop expert?
as they could be considered “sexually suggestive.”
That's the nicest thing anyone's said about Hillary in ages.
as they could be considered “sexually suggestive.”
Not by Bill I bet.
"See, honey, if Hillary had an important job, she'd be in that picture with the president. Now what's for dinner?"
Seriously? The hasidim must be the horniest guys ever. They probably get pants sparkles when they see orchids or billowy clouds.
For the love of God, don't show them any of Georgia O'Keefe's works.
Or Lucian Freud.
or Bob Ross.
Bob Ross is always playing Hide the Vagina in his paintings.
A lot of foreign leaders smiling and shaking hands with the air?
Didn't Pink Floyd do that like thirty years ago?
Snowbilly is not going to like this when she gets elected president. I suspect we're going to be bombing ourselves a newspaper.
"The religious paper never publishes pictures of women, as they could be considered 'sexually suggestive.'”
When in doubt, keep it out, huh…. Does the same policy apply to the Washington Monument, hot dogs, cigars, other phallic items, not to mention young boys' buttocks?
Melons, cherries, cantaloupes, avocados, and anything to do with spelunking.
I don't think many congressmen (of the Republican variety) are turned on by pictures of Clinton or any other woman. Not sure about the readers of this newspaper, though.
Sometimes a nuclear missile is just a nuclear missile, ja?
Végre nevetni hangosan.
Roll padlón nevetett le a seggét?
Igen.
Oh dear lord, I am now thinking I might have to switch to some Magyar spy thingy
meg mondom nekked…
Or would they just consistently stick, say, Steve Buscemi’s face on her body?
I'm not saying you are gay, Jack. I'm just saying you certainly understand gay.
Tits and you're going to get photoshopped the fuck out.
Hey Hillary! Show us your tits! –
The Boys from Brazil
How "sexually suggestive" can a simple photograph of a woman be?
This sounds like a challenge. Here's an entry, featuring what appears to be a young Maureen Dowd. Well, not all that young.
BZ1 said "simple photograph of a woman", not "photograph of a simple woman".
And is she being rubbed by Sonny Bono?
I have to recuse myself, because the simple act of imagining a simple photograph of a woman has caused me to cum.
Do you remember that Wonkette story about the lady newscaster a while back? No? Here's a reminder: http://www.bimmerfest.com/forums/attachment.php?a...
Don't feel bad, Hillary. Back in the 40's they were always airbushing out the wildly erotic looking Eleanor Roosevelt.
The (no doubt hot and bothered) boys at Der Tzitung probably approve of these things, too.
Talk about sexually suggestive! What a dream boat. . .
They should cut n paste a picture of a pig over her face… then they would be shaking hands with a ham-hock.
These guys have a lot in common with the Taliban. Burqua, Photoshop. Make the womens disappear.
I wanna say something that may be considered blasphemous… but, carpe diem.
I understand why Bill strayed.
There. I feel better.
Calling Bubba's behavior "straying" is like calling Charles Manson "unkind".
They must have got the idea from my favorite artist, Jon Haddock
I thought the very fact that women exist was sexually suggestive – and the reason why men need to redefine rape and forbid abortion, because women only exist to make babies.
Everyone knows that women are unclean devious she-sluts who only exist to serve men. And yes if I were a Hasidic wife, I'd be sneaking a little blood from the monthlies or a spoonful of #1 into hubby's kosher meal just to show that fucker who's boss. Pass the pees!
"All the Pics that Fit to 'Shop"
Uh, no. That would be religion, always messing up the humans.
The irreligious have shown lots of talent, left to themselves.
They're just worried that anti-Semitic extremists would get ideas about using exploding cankles
We should wait for official word from Orly Taitz and Fox Business Network about whether either picture (or both!) were photo-shopped.
I'm surprised they didn't take out the Schvartze, too.
you should send Sara Benincasa over to interview this paper's editor & staff!
also – is Hillary (with or without hand over mouth) really such top potential masturbatory material for conservative Jews?
I'm always sure to observe the sensibilities of men who fuck their wives through a hole in a sheet. Lest they should happen to momentarily think of the act of fucking their wives as sexually suggestive.
Turning intercourse into a modest utilitarian act is a sure-fire way to perpetuate the species. I mean, you've seen how many kids they manage to have?
If this means Megs McCabe nekkid, I'm all for it.
Ossze szarom a fekete nadragomat a rohogestol.
I am sure Playboy has reached out to Megz. I mean, they got Reagan's (step?) daughter, when she was in her fifties — why not get Walnuts's daughter thirty years earlier.
Comments on this entry are closed.