• May 27, 2012

Man Who Made Harmless Video Sentenced To 60 Days, Not Allowed Around Children

by Jack Stuef  3:07 pm April 13, 2011

That guy who harmlessly made a YouTube video involving children? Obviously, he couldn’t actually be convicted of making child pornography, but that didn’t stop prosecutors from bullying him into pleading guilty and taking punishment for a crime that doesn’t exist:

under a plea deal, Emory pled no contest to “unlawful posting of an Internet message with aggravating circumstances”; Yesterday he was sentenced to 60 days in jail, three years probation and forbidden from contact all kids under 17. Parents are pissed that the sentence is too lenient. Because any crime involving kids and the Internet should automatically result in the death penalty.

“Unlawful posting of an Internet message with aggravating circumstances”? If that sounds like a crime they just made up so they could charge him with something, that’s probably because it is. At least he’s not on the sex offender registry? [Gawker]

{ 70 comments }

Barbara_i April 13, 2011 at 3:11 pm

Was Pedobear his defense lawyer?

KeepFnThatChicken April 13, 2011 at 4:00 pm

…and typical of lawyers, he fucked his client.

Lionel[redacted]Esq April 13, 2011 at 8:25 pm

Sadly, after the former head of the Washington State Bar Association did that, they made it against the code of ethics. Now I don't even know why I practice any more.

LocalGirlMakesGoo April 14, 2011 at 11:29 am

I worked in my dad's office (he does a lot of ad litem stuff) until the day I found myself asking a magistrate Why don't you just force her to get sterilised?

DownFist Troll April 13, 2011 at 3:16 pm

Did this video involve candy and some sort of van?

poncho_pilot April 13, 2011 at 6:28 pm

and a right wing christian zealot, an empty water bottle, and a playground?

Lionel[redacted]Esq April 13, 2011 at 8:39 pm

Which reminds me of the Sarah Silverman program, where they had an episode that showed that owning a van made you into a pedophile.

nounverb911 April 13, 2011 at 3:16 pm

“Unlawful posting of an Internet message with aggravating circumstances”?
Isn't that every teabagger posting/video/message/tweet ever posted?

weejee April 13, 2011 at 3:16 pm

Will he get the Pee Wee Herman Memorial Brown Paper Bag Award from NAMBLA?

harry_palmer April 13, 2011 at 3:17 pm

It's not like there are any more pressing problems the authorities should be giving their attention to these days.

GhostBuggy April 13, 2011 at 4:21 pm

Yeah, especially in fucking Michigan.

UpFistTroll April 13, 2011 at 3:17 pm

HOLY SHIT, every one of us is a hardened criminal now.

ThankYouJeebus April 13, 2011 at 3:30 pm

Is that what the aggravating circumstance was? It made these dooshbags hard?

BaldarTFlagass April 13, 2011 at 3:18 pm

"Internet message with aggravating circumstances"

Aggravating circumstances? As in "Life in these United States?" Obviously these people have never visited this site.

Beetagger April 13, 2011 at 8:06 pm

"Life in these United States" sounds like a warm, fuzzy page in Readers' Digest.

Andrew Drinker April 13, 2011 at 3:20 pm

“Unlawful posting of an Internet message with aggravating circumstances”

Um, what?

OhNoGuy April 13, 2011 at 10:25 pm

SPEAK ENGLISH!!

Negropolis April 14, 2011 at 12:52 am

I think the more technical definition of the charge is "we just made this shit up to nail folks whose actions we find personally offensive/vulgar."

SorosBot April 13, 2011 at 3:26 pm

Good to see prosecutors browbeating people who have committed no crime whatsoever because they offend the prudes.

arihaya April 13, 2011 at 3:29 pm

Jack, Ken,, you might be next,,,, have any last message for your followers here?

mereoblivion April 13, 2011 at 3:42 pm

"Rollo . . . Tomassi . . . heh heh heh heh . . ."

Billmatic April 13, 2011 at 4:21 pm

Is there more to that or am I supposed to guess?

OhNoGuy April 13, 2011 at 10:27 pm

They're not using that one call on the likes of us. They're calling someone who can plead them out.

MARCdMan April 13, 2011 at 3:34 pm

Isn't there a section in the Constitution that bans passing bullshit laws after the fact to catch people that have done something you don't like?

DonnyKerabotsos April 13, 2011 at 3:42 pm

If this harmless shit rates 60 days then Charlie Crist owes David Byrne 30 years.

Texan_Bulldog April 13, 2011 at 3:45 pm

So this guy can't be around kids anymore but all those Republicans are still allowed underage interns?

pinkocommi April 13, 2011 at 3:46 pm

Orwell must be rolling in his grave that he failed to include this plot twist in 1984.

KeepFnThatChicken April 13, 2011 at 3:59 pm

You mean the "fuck, I still didn't really do anything wrong!" plot twist?

Hatrabbit April 13, 2011 at 3:53 pm

“Unlawful posting of an Internet message with aggravating circumstances”

In English: "Don't piss off the Christianist Fucktards or you'll go to jail. Got it? Right."

KeepFnThatChicken April 13, 2011 at 3:55 pm

Veritas videos are aggravating. Does this mean we get to prosecute James O'Keeffe now?

Naked_Bunny April 13, 2011 at 4:12 pm

If you can find him in a video with children around somewhere and dub sex-related words over him when his lips move, then he will be guilty of child porn! Or you will. Hard to say, since they'll be invoking fake laws to punish someone for nonexistent crimes.

SorosBot April 13, 2011 at 4:14 pm

Well if that CNN reporter he planned to invite to his rape boat hadn't been warned of his plans that could have gotten him actual jail time.

Bonzos_Bed_Time April 13, 2011 at 4:05 pm

Won't somebody please think of the children! – M. Flanders

Sophist [غني عن ذلك] April 13, 2011 at 6:01 pm

Humorless pedant and giant nerd that I am, I cannot resist pointing out that that is Helen Lovejoy's catchphrase. </comicbookguy>

Naked_Bunny April 13, 2011 at 4:14 pm

The next case for this court? Convicting Henry Thomas and Drew Barrymore for not reporting an illegal alien to the INS.

GuyClinch April 13, 2011 at 4:23 pm

Hey, I do post! So there! … D'oh!

CrankyLttlCamperette April 13, 2011 at 4:24 pm

Wait, kids can't be around this guy?! How do I get me one of those? That would make riding the metro so much easier! "Sorry, you little snot-nosed buggers, you can't come within 50 feet of me or you're getting arrested!" Gawd, that would be so awesome!

SayItWithWookies April 13, 2011 at 4:28 pm

So if anyone takes — for instance — a speech by some fucked-up evangelical minister describing homosexuality (there must be tons of them out there) in the most lurid ways and mashes it up with images of children laughing, they've committed a crime? Could we possibly get the minister convicted too, beyond the person who made the mashup? I mean, he wouldn't've done anything wrong either, so why not, right?

sezme April 13, 2011 at 4:36 pm

And yet the parents of the racist fucktard kid walk free.

edit: Oh, hey thanks, trollfister!

LowProfileinGA April 13, 2011 at 4:46 pm

Got you covered.

Naked_Bunny April 13, 2011 at 4:47 pm

I sure wish my life were so hollow and joyless that I could spend my day downfisting every comment on a blog I don't like just to feel a tiny scrap of meaningless accomplishment.

Oh, wait. No, I don't. That's fucking pathetic.

102415 April 14, 2011 at 2:14 pm

He told his friends he starts from the end. Carry on.

proudgrampa April 13, 2011 at 4:43 pm

Jesus. Who the fuck did he have for a lawyer???

KenLayIsAlive April 13, 2011 at 5:05 pm

Haha. If you read the Times article, the defense lawyer was a guy the prosecutor had busted for cocaine possession some years before.

Fucking America. The inadequate access to the law is every bit as awful as inadequate access to health care.

MistaEko April 13, 2011 at 4:44 pm

Unlawful posting of an Internet message with aggravating circumstances

I'm gonna miss all of you.

__kth__ April 13, 2011 at 4:49 pm

3 years probation = 3 years that this dude does not have the right of free speech wrt this legal atrocity. But yeah, at least his life isn't completely ruined.

bagofmice April 13, 2011 at 4:49 pm

At step 2.

EatsBabyDingos April 13, 2011 at 4:50 pm

Reminds me of the time a guy in Fairfax was bullied into taking a year jail sentance on a crime that only had a max penalty of $500. He spent four months in jail before I hit the county with a habeas corpus; he was out in three hours. Sued the defense lawyer; his legal mal counsel screamed at me in after a deposition that if my case was so good, why wasn't I suing the judge and prosecutor, since they screwed up, too. I reminded him that they weren't paid by the poor shlub that was in the can for 129 days.

His crime? Fell in love with a woman and called her a few dozen times after they broke up. "Ringing the telephones with the intent to annoy." The prank phone call statute.

Naked_Bunny April 13, 2011 at 5:00 pm

Holy crap. Bart Simpson woulda got the chair with those guys defending him.

KenLayIsAlive April 13, 2011 at 5:03 pm

Oh shit, that's illegal? Sorry ladies.

KenLayIsAlive April 13, 2011 at 5:03 pm

May this incident serve as a simple reminder to anyone with any shred of creativity or brain power left in Middle America: Move to NY, LA, or SF as fast as you can.

SorosBot April 13, 2011 at 5:05 pm

Remember, he also did actually commit a crime when he broke into Sen. Landrieu's office and tried to tap her phones – and he only got probation for it. The elite don't have to play by the same rules as the rest of us.

glamourdammerung April 13, 2011 at 5:13 pm

So editing a video to imply criminal behavior is now an actual offense.

This is bad news for O'Keefe and Breitbart.

Gleem_McShineys April 14, 2011 at 1:50 pm

OBJECTION! Clearly, counsel is forgetting the long-standing obvious precedents displayed in IOKIYAR vs. Logic!

dahboner April 13, 2011 at 5:41 pm

Good grief!

HE WAS A WAITER AT APPLEBEES.

He should be waterboarded with the Bourbon Street Chicken and Shrimp.

And a side salad…

Tundra Grifter April 13, 2011 at 5:43 pm

Wait until they get ahold of that J. Crew photographer!

Weenus299 April 13, 2011 at 6:46 pm

Didn't David Cross do this shit in the 90s? I love me some David Cross Evil Comedy.

Tommmcattt April 13, 2011 at 8:15 pm

We are in big trouble, commentariat.

Lionel[redacted]Esq April 13, 2011 at 8:45 pm

At least he’s not on the sex offender registry?

No, but he is now on the Unlawful Posting of an Internet Message registry.

ShaveTheWhales April 13, 2011 at 9:49 pm

Are. You. Shitting. Me.?

Three months in the county for an obviously made-up charge, based on a tasteless but victimless internet posting.

Seriously, Wonkers, we're next.

Amo_of_Bogio April 13, 2011 at 10:29 pm

…and yet Kobe Bryant walks the streets a free man…

Amo_of_Bogio April 13, 2011 at 10:30 pm

…and yet James Inhofe walks the streets a free man…

fuflans April 13, 2011 at 10:31 pm

getting a tony.

fuflans April 13, 2011 at 10:31 pm

god. children.

bored now.

Negropolis April 14, 2011 at 12:47 am

This was over in Michigan's "Jesus County" as I like to call West Michigan. It's basically Nashville meets Great Lakes, minus the music and warm temperatures, and replacing the Baptists and Methodists with ultra-staid Reformed Church Dutch people.

Coincidentally, Governor Rick "Dicktator/Ricktator" Snyder signed into a law here in Michigan on Monday that removes most involved in "Romeo & Juliet" crimes (i.e. teen sex) from the sex offender registry.

More seriously, I'd not be surprised to see this happen anywhere in this country with how we've come to fetishizing childhood, with the ultimate irony being, of course, those that push these laws pass other laws that are simply horrible for women and children.

Negropolis April 14, 2011 at 12:49 am

WIN

Doktor Zoom April 14, 2011 at 1:22 am

Well, hell, it's not like he did something really harmful like painting the kids' toenails pink.

deanbooth April 14, 2011 at 8:20 am

Look under your seats… You go to jail! And you go to jail! And you go to jail!

horsedreamer_1 April 14, 2011 at 3:03 pm

If this results in Judd Apatow going to prison for the crimes of Knocked-up & Funny People, then I say, Hear!

DystopiaLite April 14, 2011 at 9:10 pm

Has anyone proved those kids aren't anchor babies? get Gohmert on the appeal

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: