Even as President Obama on Monday described a narrower role for the United States in a NATO-led operation in Libya, the American military has been carrying out an expansive and increasingly potent air campaign to compel the Libyan Army to turn against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.
When the mission was launched, it was largely seen as having a limited, humanitarian agenda: to keep Colonel Qaddafi from attacking his own people. But the White House, the Pentagon and their European allies have given it the most expansive possible interpretation, amounting to an all-out assault on Libya’s military. [...]
From the air, the United States is supplying much more firepower than any other country. The allies have fired nearly 200 Tomahawk cruise missiles since the campaign started on March 19, all but 7 from the United States. The United States has flown about 370 attack missions, and its allied partners have flown a similar number, but the Americans have dropped 455 precision-guided munitions compared with 147 from other coalition members.
This is our war. We're responsible for how long it takes, and we're responsible for whatever individual or group of individuals ends up in charge when the dust settles. Make no mistake about it. So we should probably send Donald Trump to Libya to take over; that's where he was born, after all. [ NYT ]
Paraphrasing Bill Hicks: "Right after he's elected, the new president is taken into a smoke filled room with the 5 or 6 industrialists who are actually running the world. They then show him a film of the Kennedy assassination that no one has ever seen before. When the film ends, the industrialists ask ,'any questions'?"
The way I cook sometimes that actually makes sense.