• May 26, 2012
TO THE _____ OF HELL

March 29, 2011

Critic of Obama’s New War Robert Gates About To Be Out of a Job

by Jack Stuef  

A blandness as big as Texas.Defense Secretary Robert Gates has been a little, uh, unenthusiastic (to put it in non-treasonous terms) about President Obama’s new war venture in North Africa, as we noted yesterday. How often does the civilian leader of our nation’s military get to say a war is “not a vital national interest to the United States” before he either gets the sack or declares himself “president-general for life of America 2″? Not very long. Granted, Gates was pretty much on his way out anyway. But replacing him will be tricky, because Republicans probably won’t approve any appointment who’s not a Republican or they’re on the record previously allowing to be appointed to a job like this. So, Leon Panetta it is! And then we can start up Gates’ war tribunal. Sorry, Gates’ “small-scope international-community humanitarian action” tribunal.

Panetta also successfully battled Obama’s first director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair, the former official noted, to protect “traditional Agency funding and authorities,” including on the decision of who–CIA director or DNI–gets to pick the top U.S. intelligence official posted in countries around the world. “Panetta is one of the smartest people in Washington,” the former official continued. “He will be able to work with them and work them.”

Oh good, a guy who can make the CIA more powerful and block its oversight will now bring the same talents to the military. That’s always good for a country. Well, it worked out well in Egypt, at least.

Indeed, the main drawback to nominating Panetta for the job, according to this source, is it opens up the can of worms of who should replace him as CIA director.

On that question, the rumors are hazier. One name that’s been suggested is former Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), currently the chairman of Obama’s President Intelligence Advisory Board, who, said the former senior official, “knows Obama quite well.” As a moderate Republican, Hagel may also “help with bipartisanship,” the former official said.

Look, just have the Republicans pick a guy and Obama will appoint him. He has re-election to think about these days. Who cares what the CIA does? Have those guys ever abused their power?

Anyway, we are glad Robert Gates will be gone. Because it’s hard not to accidentally call him “Robert Gibbs,” and vice versa. Why are all white people named “Robert,” and why do they all look the same? Also, this guy hates children. [Yahoo News]

{ 108 comments }

V572del c:/*.* y/n? March 29, 2011 at 11:01 am

If all we want is an effective bureaucratic infighter, couldn't we re-animate Les Aspin? That worked out great.

And anybody who ignores the proto-militaristic homophobic Boy Scouts is okay with me.

Or how about admitted "womanizer" and undeniable sex-bomb former TX Sen John Tower? Maybe everybody's forgotten whatever it was he did that made them so mad a long time ago.

Or Sam Nunn? He could move some more military installations to GA, if that's possible.

mereoblivion March 29, 2011 at 11:39 am

Heavens, John Tower is "still" alive?

horsedreamer_1 March 29, 2011 at 11:50 am

Wasn't there a Navy Station in Newt's land-locked congressional district?

Ducksworthy March 29, 2011 at 11:01 am

Rummy's looking for work. Why not give the guy a second chance?

horsedreamer_1 March 29, 2011 at 11:10 am

Third chance.

V572del c:/*.* y/n? March 29, 2011 at 11:18 am

Or how about admitted "womanizer" and undeniable sex-bomb former TX Sen John Tower? Maybe everybody's forgotten whatever it was he did that made them so mad a long time ago.

Or Sam Nunn? He could move some more military installations to GA, if that's possible.

Limeylizzie March 29, 2011 at 11:21 am

Didn't he die in a fiery plane crash?

V572del c:/*.* y/n? March 29, 2011 at 12:04 pm

I moved the comment up under my original one to glean more p. But yes, he is dead, taken out by ValuJet/ASA. As a woman, did you not find him irresistible? If so, please explain.

Limeylizzie March 29, 2011 at 3:11 pm

Completely repulsive, and that's just his politics.

GOPCrusher March 29, 2011 at 3:08 pm

You go to war with the Sec of Def you have, not the Sec of Def you want.

hagajim March 29, 2011 at 11:01 am

Let's go with Larry Craig at CIA…he's used to sneaking around and he knows how to do the wide-stance, tap dance code.

KenLayIsAlive March 29, 2011 at 3:01 pm

I'm a little worried about him blowing his cover.

horsedreamer_1 March 29, 2011 at 11:02 am

You know who else had to name a Republican to be his SECDEF?

nounverb911 March 29, 2011 at 11:09 am

Bullwinkle T. Moose?

SudsMcKenzie March 29, 2011 at 11:19 am

Darth Vader?

donner_froh March 29, 2011 at 11:20 am

Merkin Muffley?

GuyClinch March 29, 2011 at 11:27 am

Richard Simmons?

mereoblivion March 29, 2011 at 11:41 am

Knute Rockne?

Not_So_Much March 29, 2011 at 11:44 am

Elizabeth Taylor?

horsedreamer_1 March 29, 2011 at 11:50 am

Rock Hudson did enjoy "In the Navy".

Weenus299 March 29, 2011 at 11:59 am

Miles Davis.

GOPCrusher March 29, 2011 at 3:19 pm

Dwight D. Eisenhower?

ShaveTheWhales March 30, 2011 at 12:59 am

Every Republican President ever?

Buzz Feedback March 29, 2011 at 11:02 am

"Panetta is one of the smartest people in Washington."

Which means he might be one of the dumbest people in America.

Sophist [غني عن ذلك] March 29, 2011 at 11:17 am

Talk about damning with faint praise, huh?

LiveToServeYa March 29, 2011 at 1:46 pm

You mean D.C. is Bizarro America? Interesting.

教授 Zoom March 29, 2011 at 11:07 am

How about Sarah Palin? Nobody's more defensive than she is.

DaRooster March 29, 2011 at 11:21 am

That's Offensive.

horsedreamer_1 March 29, 2011 at 11:35 am

A T Offense.

jus_wonderin March 29, 2011 at 11:07 am

On a more positive note, look at that cute Netflix family over there….

SudsMcKenzie March 29, 2011 at 11:10 am

They must be streaming "The Good Shepard".

jus_wonderin March 29, 2011 at 11:11 am

Now they are gone and an oversized woman is there. Did she eat them?

SudsMcKenzie March 29, 2011 at 11:21 am

That's OK, I can always check my credit score.

anniegetyerfun March 29, 2011 at 12:44 pm

I get an ad for cruises. Apparently the interwebs believe me to have enough money to travel to the cruise terminal.

Chet Kincaid March 29, 2011 at 1:49 pm

I got the "Transformers: Revenge Of The Boobies" gal. And if I get to rate Levi's panty butts again, this will be a banner day!

Terry March 29, 2011 at 11:07 am

"As a moderate Republican, Hagel may also “help with bipartisanship,” the former official said."

The "former official" thinks that a moderate Republican will be able to talk with the hard line GOP'ers better than a Democrat can? Is the "former official" smoking some of Willie's stash?

PublicLuxury March 29, 2011 at 11:08 am

John Ensign is pining for a future. He'd be very good at this, 'cause he really knows how to fuck people over. This would just be taking an already well developed skill and enhancing it to include countries, their first ladies, and citizens. Let's just get behind John and give him a nice reach around to show our support.

教授 Zoom March 29, 2011 at 11:11 am

Plus, it would be amusing to see the Navy make sense of having an Ensign in charge.

baconzgood March 29, 2011 at 11:09 am

WTF? Since when does the Defense Secretary not like war? Where is Rummy in all of this. That dude couldn't get enough war. If Rummy was still in there we'd be at war with Iran, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, North Korea, Spain, Canada, Bhutan, The Neptune People, Mothra, several South-Western states, Antarctica…

freakishlywrong March 29, 2011 at 11:22 am

Kind of like now. War and UnWar.

mereoblivion March 29, 2011 at 11:49 am

It was the best of times. It was the unbest of times.

Weenus299 March 29, 2011 at 12:02 pm

Eurasia. We have always been at war with Eurasia.

jdoleman March 29, 2011 at 11:09 am

Lets think outside the box and bring back Kissinger. He always wanted a new war to play with and now we can offer him three.

donner_froh March 29, 2011 at 11:16 am

He will get along with Obama since both have a Nobel Peace Prize.

harry_palmer March 29, 2011 at 11:10 am

For Secretary of War, why not Arnold Schwarzenegger? he has some time these days.

lowaltflier March 29, 2011 at 11:45 am

Or Jesse Ventura. He has experience in fights that are not real fights. So he should be okay with war that is not war.

SorosBot March 29, 2011 at 12:00 pm

Isn't it time to finish out the list of Predator cast members turned politicians, and give Carl Weathers the job?

weejee March 29, 2011 at 11:10 am

How about Gadaffy? He's a colonel so he's got the experience.

BlueMonkeh March 29, 2011 at 1:50 pm

Genius! That's how Obama will get him out of Libya. Why didn't we think of this sooner?

iburl March 29, 2011 at 3:53 pm

Plus, I'm sure he has no compunction about murder and torture, so he's a good fit.

Sophist [غني عن ذلك] March 29, 2011 at 11:14 am

Indeed, the main drawback to nominating Panetta for the job, according to this source, is it opens up the can of worms of who should replace him as CIA director.

Yeah, and the biggest drawback to shooting yourself in the head is deciding what to use the giant hole in your skull for. Herb garden? Walk-in closet? Decisions, decisions…

ShaveTheWhales March 30, 2011 at 1:05 am

That's a remarkable observation, which I would like to steal borrow for future use.

Come here a minute March 29, 2011 at 11:15 am

Gates is still negotiating his compensation package with Facebook.

randcoolcatdaddy March 29, 2011 at 11:16 am

I can't keep track of all this war stuff. Is this good news for John McCain?

freakishlywrong March 29, 2011 at 11:23 am

Yes. And for Republicans in general.

mavenmaven March 29, 2011 at 11:19 am

I'd appoint Michelle Bachmann. She knows a lot about geography and history; soon we'd have so many wars, all of them for Jesus!

genxr March 29, 2011 at 11:44 am

She sent a brigade of troops to protect Lexington, New Hampshire, and they were never heard from again.

OkieDokieDog March 29, 2011 at 12:32 pm

Plus she has no military experience. That's always a plus when going to war.

BlueMonkeh March 29, 2011 at 1:52 pm

Au contraire – isn't she some kind of soldier for jeezus?

Callyson March 29, 2011 at 11:21 am

Nominate a Republican because no Democrat can get through? Oh come on. Every high school girl knows the trick to this: make your first few choices so outrageous (hoochie mama style) that your mom and dad give in and let you wear something racier than they would have had you started with your chosen outfit first.
In this case, Obama should start with Madeline "What's the point of this big army if you don't use it?" Albright, then try one of the gay soliders who was kicked out under DADT, and then the Reeps will be so freaked that John Kerry will sail through…

freakishlywrong March 29, 2011 at 11:24 am

Val, Cehney's Gal Pal Plame, might do it if ya asked her real purty like.

SorosBot March 29, 2011 at 11:26 am

Anyone who thinks a former Republican can "help with bipartisanship" is a moron, because nobody can help with bipartisanship; the current GOP leaders will never, ever, ever work with Obama, they refuse to go along every single thing he does, trying to be "bipartisan" with these assholes is idiotic.

DaSandman March 29, 2011 at 11:27 am

SECDEF? This is a job for Lou Sarah!

elviouslyqueer March 29, 2011 at 11:27 am

I've got it! Hosni Mubarak would be ideal for SECDEF. Hell, he wouldn't even need to awaken from his coma.

Fare la Volpe March 29, 2011 at 11:27 am

I read that as Obama's New War Robot, Gates and was impressed by the poetry of it.

horsedreamer_1 March 29, 2011 at 11:32 am

That would just be a suped-up XBOX.

Oblios_Cap March 29, 2011 at 11:31 am

Droopy Dawg for SECDEF. Walnuts can be his Deputy and Miss Lindsey can be their Best Boy.

jus_wonderin March 29, 2011 at 11:33 am

Missy could be craft services or their "grip".

ThundercatHo March 29, 2011 at 12:07 pm

Are you doing a screenplay for some kind of senior, gay porn?

Chet Kincaid March 29, 2011 at 1:58 pm

Fluffer.

Dudleydidwrong March 29, 2011 at 11:34 am

I'd suggest Bradley Manning for SecDef. He already knows all the secrets and could probably teach the Pentagon and the Puzzle Palace a thing or two about computers. Besides, they might then give him some clothes.

elviouslyqueer March 29, 2011 at 11:43 am

Oh HELL YES. Plus, he's gay gay gay gay GAY!

genxr March 29, 2011 at 11:45 am

OTOH, Naked Bradley Manning would certainly liven up those Senate hearings.

mereoblivion March 29, 2011 at 11:42 am

The not-leaking-information part I can buy.

genxr March 29, 2011 at 11:43 am

That's when a certain former Minnesota governor brings out "Ol' Painless"

4TheTurnstiles March 29, 2011 at 11:43 am

Gary Hart can do it. And no monkey business this time.

Monsieur_Grumpe March 29, 2011 at 11:47 am

Get with the program Gates. These countries won’t bomb themselves.

Chet Kincaid March 29, 2011 at 2:00 pm

Yes they will, and with gusto.

cheaphits March 29, 2011 at 11:48 am

How about Chuck Norris, he's a Repubtard if there ever was one and the Boogeyman checks his closet for Chuck Norris every night before going to bed – perfect candidate for Secretary of Defense – Chuck Norris' beard is barbed wire soaked in ox blood and held together by the souls of mortals.

donner_froh March 29, 2011 at 11:57 am

Bipartisanship now means the Democrats are allowed to politely ask for lube before the GOP buttfucks them until they bleed.

Weenus299 March 29, 2011 at 11:57 am

Dick Cheney's available.

Jim89048 March 29, 2011 at 12:02 pm

Seeing this country's love affair with retarded reality shows, how about we make it a contest, instead of those boring confirmation hearings? we could call it SECDEF Comedy Jam, or something, with the winner (or loser, maybe?) getting the gig. The Donald can be MC–it would be epic!

ShaveTheWhales March 30, 2011 at 1:08 am

America's Next Top SECDEF.

meufchelou March 29, 2011 at 12:03 pm

How 'bout the Trump? WIth all those questions about where he was born, he's done for a presidental campaign, but this is a great consulation prize and will bring the birfers into the fold!

meufchelou March 29, 2011 at 12:06 pm

New keyboard needed: "consolation," "presidential"–but I stand by birfers

SayItWithWookies March 29, 2011 at 12:15 pm

Dennis Kucinich. He should go to his confirmation hearing and announce he's slashing his own budget by $450 billion and hopes the money will be used for cheap solar-powered computers made from recycled material for our nation's poor children. Not that he'll get approved, but I look forward to all of FOX's pundits being hoarse after two weeks of solid blithering.

Gopherit March 29, 2011 at 12:18 pm

Robert Gates, one of the architects of Iran Contra, and, until recently, a cheerleader of our involvement in afghanistan and iraq, is saying he doesn't think something is in our national interests? Something tells me his dislike has less to do with being involved in Libya than in the paltry amount (in comparison to our other two wars) that we plan to spend blowing stuff up there.

SorosBot March 29, 2011 at 12:21 pm

No, elves are best suited towards wizard, rogue, ranger, or multiclass builds; they only make OK basic fighters. Humans and dwarves make the best fighters of the standard races.

elviouslyqueer March 29, 2011 at 2:12 pm

/Gary Gygax

anniegetyerfun March 29, 2011 at 2:43 pm

I thought they were skilled with a bow and arrow? My only nerd knowledge comes from the LOTR movies. Also, they have sexy ears. Which would disqualify Dennis.

chascates March 29, 2011 at 12:21 pm

Bernie Sanders!

ShaveTheWhales March 30, 2011 at 1:09 am

No sane Senators, please.

OkieDokieDog March 29, 2011 at 12:27 pm

Plus Bo won't ask and Bo won't tell. Unless he's tempted by peanut butter, then all bets are off.

Guppy06 March 29, 2011 at 12:32 pm

Can't we just be honest and go back to "War Department?"

Worthly[♬♪♬♪♫♪♬]Skum March 29, 2011 at 1:00 pm

Charlie Sheen. He can call the job "2 1/2 Wars".

Slim_Pickins March 29, 2011 at 1:00 pm

Newt for SOD (in every sense of the acronym).

Schmannnity March 29, 2011 at 1:19 pm

Lieberman would be an excellent choice since Gates has been dragging his feet on Syria, Algeria, Somalia, Iran . . .

Steverino247 March 29, 2011 at 1:25 pm

Seriously, Wesley Clark would be excellent.

Silly Party Selection: R. Lee Ermey. The Press Conferences would be a hoot, if nothing else.

BlueMonkeh March 29, 2011 at 1:59 pm

Yeah, I mean he did say he was sorry about that "up yers, n*****" he tossed at Obama during the Toys for Tots party.

Chet Kincaid March 29, 2011 at 1:45 pm

Better, they can be trained to leak where strategically convenient.

LiveToServeYa March 29, 2011 at 1:49 pm

John McCain would make a good Secretary of Depends. …Oh, that! Never mind.

GOPCrusher March 29, 2011 at 3:39 pm

Ron Paul.
For the laffs.

BarackMyWorld March 29, 2011 at 6:20 pm

There hasn't been a Democrat as Sec. of Defense in 14 years.

Even during the 2000 election when the Republicans were trying to make military readiness a campaign issue, there was a Republican Sec. of Defense.

ShaveTheWhales March 30, 2011 at 1:05 am

Or, in fact, both.

ShaveTheWhales March 30, 2011 at 1:07 am

The big incentive for the "no-flies-zone" was that Daffy was bombing the shit out of the insurgents.

V572del c:/*.* y/n? March 29, 2011 at 3:23 pm

You’re probably too young and beautiful to remember this, but when GHWB wanted this that this shriveled pin-stripe-clad homunculus to be is SecDef, there arose a hue and cry to the effect that Tower was a hard-drinking “womanizer.” So great was his yearning to control the mighty stream of pork that is the DoD that he then actually went on a Sunday news show and took the no-booze pledge.In retrospect he probably was what we would now call a shamelessly aggressive workplace sexual harasser, à la Bob Packwood.Repugnant in any case.

Limeylizzie March 29, 2011 at 3:28 pm

Not too Y&B, but wasn't living here at the time I don't think, but how could he be a womanizer? I bet he was just a foul groper.

ShaveTheWhales March 30, 2011 at 12:58 am

Ah, but the hue and cry was from the inside-the-Beltway media. Therefore, you are both correct, allowing for definition skew.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: