ANTI-LOBBYIST RACISM  5:12 pm February 4, 2011

Yeah, Clarence Thomas’ Wife Is a Lobbyist

by Jack Stuef

Can she sit on the bench too? She would probably ask questions. Really good ones.Ginni Thomas may have been forced to resign her duties as Washington Teabag Queen because she was drunk-dialing Anita Hill all the time, but that doesn’t mean she can’t make a living! (Clarence Thomas doesn’t report her living on his tax forms, by the way, even though the law says he has to. But let’s see the Supreme Court uphold that conviction.) This news has made some people upset because, uh, this Supreme Court justice’s wife is a lobbyist, for God’s sake. But it wasn’t like it was ever in question the way Clarence Thomas would vote on the things she’s advocating. It’s just that she officially gets to tell people she can deliver them a vote on the Supreme Court, if necessary, by threatening to deny her husband access to delicious cookies.

This is pretty excellent:

Freshman Rep. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) — who courted tea party activists and who was endorsed by Liberty Central, the tea party nonprofit group she headed until December — was unaware of Thomas’s new effort.

“This is the spouse of Justice Thomas?” he said, when asked by POLITICO on Tuesday about her outreach. “No, I’ve never met her. It’s not something I’ve heard about. And I hang out with a lot of freshman,” he said.

Oh freshmen. “We used to hang out with Rand Paul too, but then his voice changed and he got armpit hair and Brittany Thompson started dating him. Anyway, why can’t we leave school grounds at lunch time?”

Roughly half a dozen aides for new members told POLITICO that their offices received handwritten meeting requests from Thomas the day after they were sworn in, as well as follow-up e-mails requesting a meeting with her — but only one of them had met with her. The rest had no plans to do so.

Haha, loser. But why did even one meet with her? To get Anita Hill’s number to post on 4chan? [Politico]

 

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.

{ 176 comments }

Buzz Feedback February 4, 2011 at 5:16 pm

Lobbyist for the Pubic Hair Liberation League.

OneDollarJuana February 5, 2011 at 12:30 pm

It's why the Boner wants to get rid of food inspection. The FDA might take a dim view of pubic hair in Cokes.

Rarian Rakista February 5, 2011 at 6:12 pm

I can only imagine what a pubic hair BBQ brush would look like, all sopping with god knows what.

SorosBot February 4, 2011 at 5:17 pm

David Schweikert hangs out with a lot of Freshmen? Hm, this might be our Mark Foley replacement.

HarryButtle February 4, 2011 at 7:03 pm

If only…he's my new representative and many of us in Scottsdale/Tempe would like to see him go away sooner rather than later. A scandal involving young boys would be a dream come true. All that much better if the youngin's a Messican anchor baby.

I mean, I'd feel sorry for the boy, but it's really for the greater good.

Grief_Lessons February 4, 2011 at 5:18 pm

Someone get that woman a coke.

gef05 February 4, 2011 at 5:34 pm

You're confusing your indefinite articles with your grammatical numbers.
viz
"Someone get that woman some coke."

Boojum_Reborn February 5, 2011 at 12:23 pm

Hold the pubes.

problemwithcaring February 8, 2011 at 2:35 pm

Or not.

metamarcisf February 4, 2011 at 5:22 pm

Frank Zappa once wrote this verse about Clarence Thomas:

"Standing on the porch of the Lido Hotel
Floozies in the lobby love the way I sell
Hot meat Hot rats Hot zits Hot wrists Hot ritz Hot roots Hot zoots…"

Grief_Lessons February 4, 2011 at 5:29 pm

With a big ol' lie
And a flag and a pie
And a mom and a bible
Most folks are just liable
To buy any line
Any place, any time

When the lies get so big
And the fog gets so thick
And the facts disappear
The Republican Trick
Can be played out again
People, please tell me when
We'll be rid of these men!

Monsieur_Grumpe February 4, 2011 at 6:25 pm

Willie the Pimp!
I love you man.
Not in teh gay way.
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Willie the Pimp!

Monsieur_Grumpe February 4, 2011 at 6:27 pm

http://www.musicsense.it/186624video2539633-Willi

Kind of a bad recording but still.

zhubajie February 5, 2011 at 6:02 am

The Jimmy Swaggart Trilogy was the best but his other political songs were pretty good, too. What a shame he isn't here now to immortalize Palin!

chascates February 4, 2011 at 5:22 pm

Whore.

SorosBot February 4, 2011 at 5:23 pm

No, she's a lobbyist; that makes her the john.

BerkeleyBear February 4, 2011 at 5:33 pm

I think of them as pimps, giving Congress a taste of the good life but then turning them out to screw all of us.

WhatTheHeck February 4, 2011 at 5:22 pm

…by threatening to deny her husband access to delicious cookies

Those wouldn’t be Oreo cookies, would they? You Know, the ones which are black on the outside and…

nounverb911 February 4, 2011 at 5:31 pm

Has she met with Alan West yet?

PsycWench February 4, 2011 at 6:06 pm

You eat those? I thought they were strictly for throwing at Michael Steele.

Sophist [APPLESAUCE] February 4, 2011 at 6:56 pm

You Know, the ones which are black on the outside and…

…full of lard and cornstarch and petroleum-based preservatives in the middle, just like most Americans?

OhNoGuy February 4, 2011 at 10:21 pm

Which ones are white on the outside, pink on the inside and nobody wants to eat? Never mind, I know.

SexySmurf February 4, 2011 at 5:24 pm

Jack, I think you owe someone an apology.

glamourdammerung February 4, 2011 at 5:42 pm

In other words, expect a creepy phone call from Ginni in 20 or so years demanding you apologize to Clarence.

AutomaticPilot February 4, 2011 at 6:24 pm

And don't forget to fucking pray about it.

edgydrifter February 4, 2011 at 5:24 pm

"She's who now? Seriously? Yeah, but… she's white, and… and…"
[sound of head exploding]
–the last words of Rep. David Schweikert (R-AZ)

sportshort February 4, 2011 at 5:33 pm

"…the law says he has TO." Jaysus, don't youse has any prufreaderz?

Toomush_Infer February 5, 2011 at 4:31 pm

Believe in this case it's:"….the law says he has TWO…."…but explicate it any fucking way you want, man…

Name_Tag February 4, 2011 at 5:34 pm

"i've never met her. it's not something i've heard about because it doesn't involve trying to repeal things as idiotically as possible."

DustBowlBlues February 4, 2011 at 5:57 pm

Which is how you KNOW the douchebag Repupblithug is lying, because that ugly white bitch is totally about repealing things as idiotically as possible.

fuflans February 4, 2011 at 5:34 pm

That image is very disturbing. I wish you’d have chosen something else. I realize that it’s a shameful part of American history that we should never forget, but it’s too much.

user-of-owls February 4, 2011 at 5:50 pm

There's a reason they're called "classics." Tres bon!

AutomaticPilot February 4, 2011 at 6:26 pm

Do you think that's her O face?

OhNoGuy February 4, 2011 at 10:27 pm

I think thats how she looks reaching for the phone.

Beowoof February 5, 2011 at 9:36 am

I think that is how she looks reaching for the bone.

There fixed that for ya.

x111e7thst February 4, 2011 at 5:35 pm

Ginni Thomas seems like she might have a thing for freshmen too.

DashboardBuddha February 4, 2011 at 7:18 pm

"Mrs. Thomas…are you trying to seduce me?"

seppdecker February 4, 2011 at 5:37 pm

Obviously, the woman has no self-respect to lose. She married Clarence.

nounverb911 February 4, 2011 at 5:37 pm

Ginni reminds me of James Gandolfini in drag.

Extemporanus February 4, 2011 at 5:46 pm

Obscure True Romance reference FTW!

Wait, what?

trampndirtdown February 4, 2011 at 9:29 pm

I kind of thought she looked like Meg Whitman in a Peter Boyle sort of way.

Clancy_Pants February 4, 2011 at 5:38 pm

Dude (Looks Like a Lady)

EdFlintstone February 4, 2011 at 5:39 pm

No conflict here, nothing to see, move along people. Those quaint old days of "ethics" are a thing of the past with this supreme court. No recusals needed for your duck hunting buddies or your sons law firm or your wife's johns, err I mean clients.

weejee February 4, 2011 at 5:44 pm
Radiotherapy February 4, 2011 at 6:59 pm
OhNoGuy February 4, 2011 at 10:31 pm

Ethics – when bought, you stay bought.

CapnFatback February 4, 2011 at 5:39 pm

It’s just that she officially gets to tell people she can deliver them a vote on the Supreme Court, if necessary, by threatening to deny her husband access to delicious cookies.

C'mon, Jack, if her "cookies" were really all that delicious, Justice Thomas wouldn't have to be asking around to confirm the existence of pubic hair on his beverages.

PublicLuxury February 4, 2011 at 5:41 pm

She's not a cutie is she? Shouldn't a woman have some femine charms? Perhaps it's all between the legs coupled with a heavy dose of porn.

natoslug February 4, 2011 at 5:47 pm

Clarence has the hots for John Lithgow. Ginnie is the closest he could get, outside of a pig-faced horse hybrid.

imissopus February 4, 2011 at 6:19 pm

Wait, that's not an old production still from The World According to Garp?

Texan_Bulldog February 4, 2011 at 6:14 pm

I imagine she can suck the brass off a doorknob. I mean it's not like Clarence stays with her for her looks or her personality.

Extemporanus February 4, 2011 at 5:42 pm

Does she have clearance, Clarence?

AutomaticPilot February 4, 2011 at 6:29 pm

Hey, that's one of my favorite movies!

Terry February 4, 2011 at 7:00 pm

Roger, Roger

LionelHutzEsq February 4, 2011 at 9:21 pm

What's our vector, Victor.

MinAgain February 4, 2011 at 5:43 pm

She could star in her own series of children's books about Thomas (in) the Tank Engine.

Oldskool_ February 4, 2011 at 5:44 pm

She has that crazy Jehovah's Witness vibe. Thank god she doesn't live around here..

user-of-owls February 4, 2011 at 5:45 pm

Gimme a C!
C!
Gimme a U!
U!
Gimme a N!
N!
Gimme a T!
T!

What's that spell?
GINNI!

edgydrifter February 4, 2011 at 5:46 pm

Ginni Thomas personifies "slab-faced."

Limeylizzie February 4, 2011 at 5:53 pm

She looks as if she is just dying to gobble some cock in that photo.

user-of-owls February 4, 2011 at 5:59 pm

Honestly, Lizzie, I never took you for an advocate of bulimia, but there you are just sticking your finger down our collective throats with that imagery. For shame, woman, for shame.

Limeylizzie February 4, 2011 at 6:02 pm

Sorry Owls, hey thanks for your little note of yesterday!

user-of-owls February 4, 2011 at 6:56 pm

Aww, shoot. Only wish I looked good in jackboots and Gestapo leather.

transfatz February 6, 2011 at 11:10 pm

Jeez you two, get a room!

Schmannnity February 4, 2011 at 6:47 pm

Not!

Tengu February 4, 2011 at 5:55 pm

"Founder AND CEO of Liberty Central"? Wow, she's earned it!

LionelHutzEsq February 4, 2011 at 6:06 pm

The ironic thing is, Long Dong Silver's wife run a much more effective lobbying office.

LionelHutzEsq February 4, 2011 at 9:22 pm

And with that, I hit 105 whore diamonds.

Thank you and good night! Tip your waitresses, try the veal!

zhubajie February 5, 2011 at 6:08 am

Is Long Dong still alive? I write his name in for president, every chance I get! He'd revive 1/2 the world's respect for the office.

capnhuggyface February 4, 2011 at 6:20 pm

Is she wearing a pink SS outfit?

Schmannnity February 4, 2011 at 6:37 pm

I wonder what Thomas and Scalia would say about the Founders' stand on miscegenation? They would have to Original Intent her ass out of the house.

OhNoGuy February 4, 2011 at 10:38 pm

And Clarence wouldn't have to be concerned about a "hi-tech lynching" . No, no ,no this would be strictly traditional, just like the Founding Fathers intended.

Maroon.

LionelHutzEsq February 5, 2011 at 6:47 pm

You totally do not understand how a great legal mind like Scalia's works. Of course he would have no problem with it. The founders were perfectly fine with it just as long as you treat the spouse like a slave.

DustBowlBlues February 5, 2011 at 7:01 pm

" treat the spouse like a slave."

Treat like a slave? Don't you mean KEEP as a slave? Jefferson died so deeply in debt, owing completely to living way over his means and dressing like a dandy and gentleman farmer and all that shit, that, unlike Washington, who freed his slaves after his death, Jefferson could only afford to free 5 of his 300 slaves. The rest were sold to pay his estate's costs. And of the 5? None were Sally Hemmings. Jefferson was a rat bastard. Adams was a more important to the founding of the republic and decent , too. (I have to tyupe particular words because, as uyou camn tell, thje keuyboard is fucked up. Blows thje mimnd of spellchjecker)

Negropolis February 6, 2011 at 3:54 am

I never got the love for Jefferson. Of the founding fathers, his worldview and philosophy always struck me as one of my least favorite. He wanted America to stay a small, agrarian society, and deplored urban areas. He was a proto-Southerner before such a region had been clearly defined. Washington was literally from the same area, but had a more expansive, inclusive and grand view of America. Thank god he was allowed to set the tone for the nation, and even more so that Adams, a citified Yankee, followed him.

rocktonsam February 4, 2011 at 6:39 pm

good lord shes white

Negropolis February 5, 2011 at 2:35 am

You said it; if she happened to be black and/or a liberal, we'd be hearing about how not only was she under federal investigation, but how Clarence, with a heavy heart, had filed for divorce (for political motives, of course).

EdFlintstone February 4, 2011 at 6:40 pm

What's she wearing? It looks like a pink SS uniform.

Terry February 4, 2011 at 7:01 pm

It's part of the Delores Umbridge line for WalMart.

DashboardBuddha February 4, 2011 at 7:08 pm

I'll be damned…it really does. Maybe she wants to be the Pink Panzer [tm]

LionelHutzEsq February 4, 2011 at 9:24 pm

Palin has trade marked that too?

DustBowlBlues February 5, 2011 at 7:13 pm

Only the lady liberty hat works for me.

GeoatBeck February 6, 2011 at 11:04 am

No that would "Code Pink" You know, Hamas, MB's etc…

Negropolis February 6, 2011 at 11:37 pm

The streetlights just came on, and Satan rang the dinner bell. Time to go back to hell…er…home.

Schmannnity February 4, 2011 at 6:44 pm

Het Ginnie! Bronco Nagurski called and he wants his shoulder pads back.

LionelHutzEsq February 4, 2011 at 9:25 pm

Anyone that makes a Nagruski call out with Ginnie Thomas deserves to be fisted all the way to heaven.

Gomez571 February 4, 2011 at 6:47 pm

"I don't know who Maxime thinks she's kidding. If Hagrid's half-giant, she definitely is. Big bones… the only thing that's got bigger bones than her is a dinosaur."

the_problem_child February 4, 2011 at 6:54 pm

No, that was judicial disclosure forms. Even C-Tom doesn't fuck with the IRS.

glamourdammerung February 4, 2011 at 8:17 pm

Oh, I had thought it was disclosure as well as taxes. My mistake.

Still a violation of federal law though. Just as I am sure it will be added to the list of "looking forward and not backwards" AKA what used to be known as "the rule of law".

OhNoGuy February 4, 2011 at 10:25 pm

Didn't Dred Scott invalidate that? You sure? I thought it had something to do with Clarence and assholes on the Supreme Court.

Beowoof February 5, 2011 at 9:33 am

Republicans only think about looking back when they can fuck a democrat.

Walkinwiddaking February 4, 2011 at 6:57 pm

"(Clarence Thomas doesn’t report her living on his tax forms, by the way, even though the law says he has too. But let’s see the Supreme Court uphold that conviction.)" Being the first Uncle Tom Supreme Court Justice.. well, you have to cut the man some slack.

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 6:59 pm

The Tea Party is not a lobby. It is not a political party. It represents the moral majority. Many of you here have been coddled into believing your mainstream. There is nothing radical about standing up for what has been all along. The libprog agenda is what is radical. They are what has eroded the morals, they have to. They can not "progress" their agenda if we are not at each others throats. The left has all the violence and destruction and the Tea Party has none.

natoslug February 4, 2011 at 7:15 pm

You seem to be lost. I think you'll find what you are looking for here: http://www.tbirecoverycenter.org/rehabilitation.h

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 7:20 pm

No, I know where I am. Thank you for your concern. :)

edgydrifter February 4, 2011 at 7:16 pm

It's spelled "GOATSEbeck." Criminy, you baggers fail at everything.

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 7:20 pm

What is? What have we failed at? We seem to be kicking but. From all the feather ruffling, I'd say you are the one failing.

NewYorkJew February 4, 2011 at 7:23 pm

Well, one thing you've failed at is spelling BUTT!

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 7:28 pm

I use that to fish out libprogs, it drives them absolutely insane. Maybe as much as Sarah Palin. Freudian slip I guess.

Guppy06 February 4, 2011 at 7:16 pm

What was that about "believing my mainstream" again?

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 7:23 pm

"believing your mainstream" that was for Manchurian the grammar checker. You do not think the Tea Party is a radical group do you?

Guppy06 February 4, 2011 at 7:55 pm

I'll get back to you on that once I'm done consulting my mainstream.

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 7:59 pm

Do not knock yourself out Guppy, I would like a bigger fish.

Rotundo_ February 4, 2011 at 7:31 pm

Golly, I guess I never thought of things that way. I'm sure that all the money Dick Armey and the Koch brothers are pouring into this spontaneously generating movement that isn't remotely related to Republican Party interests is being given with no quid pro quo whatsoever. Patriotic gestures from patriots. Thanks for setting us all on the correct path and showing us the light. Tax cuts and military budget increases forever big guy. May you bask in the sweet glow of liberty forever! THANKS!!!!!1!!!1!

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 7:40 pm

What money is that? There is no way and no amount of money that could have energized the people in the time span that it happened. My neighbors, fellow citizens and I, receive/received squat. That is what your mother ship needs you to believe and you have never actually talked to anyone in the Tea Party. Bringing American down to the median (by means of global wealth redistribution) is hardly a strategy for success as we clearly see.

Rotundo_ February 4, 2011 at 8:35 pm

My eyes opened again, Thanks for sharing the wisdom, and I look forward to the bright future that Tea Party policy will bring to our great nation, Thanks again for getting the truth out there and keep up the good fight.

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 8:43 pm

I'm here for you buddy ;)

mourningnmerica February 4, 2011 at 8:39 pm

I talked to a bunch of Tea Party people. They are, by and large, extremely ignorant, slow witted, willful old people united by no more than their hatred of non whites. Now please do what you Tea Baggers do, and sniff my fucking balls, from the underside. I don't mean to imply 'Tards are not welcome here, but shit, don't you have a Re-Enactment event to go to or something….

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 8:45 pm
GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 8:46 pm
GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 8:47 pm
GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 8:49 pm

I am finding the very opposite to be true. You are a pretty good example of that. Mom must be proud.

Perhaps you are mistaking your inability to grasp the subject at hand with their perceived ignorance?

LionelHutzEsq February 4, 2011 at 9:30 pm

And don't forget FOX News giving them unlimited support and slanting their news to support them.

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 9:39 pm

Opposed to all the slanting by the state controlled media. Fox was not that big to have done this. This only shows how slanted the lefties were, that even with the almost exclusively left news stranglehold, the truth shined through. David against Goliath. The good conquered.

the_problem_child February 4, 2011 at 10:35 pm

Oh, yeah. Morons.

LionelHutzEsq February 4, 2011 at 11:58 pm

Are you capable of doing anything but spouting inane cliches you heard on the radio? How is the media "state controlled"? Was that true in 2002 when WaPo and Judy Miler were repeating everything that Cheney was telling them without question? Or did this just happen in the last two years with our glorious Kenyan leader? If so, why has Glen Beck's Chalkboard been so quiet? Why has Sarah Palin's Twitter account not let her post it? Dear God, they must be part of the conspiracy!!!

GeoatBeck, we have traced the source of your thoughts. They are coming from inside your head. Get out of your head!

DustBowlBlues February 5, 2011 at 7:22 pm

Slanting the news? You call that slanting? You, sir, are a master of understatement.

(Ack. Keyboard makes me go back amnd delete all kimnds of shjit–esp. Ms. mnot to memntiomn uy)

Let's all just thumbs down trolls to fuck their pees and move on. If my keyboard weren't so difficult, I'd give the nitwit a lecture on revolutionary history and the Boston Tea party. Then again, replies help his pees, hence I am responding only to you.)

glamourdammerung February 6, 2011 at 1:43 pm

After they have to play the "any disagreement is trolling" nonsense instead of manning up after being called out on only posting here to insult the users, I tend to agree. They are going to keep insisting their are somehow a victim any way around. After all, that is what movement conservatism is about anyway.

GeoatBeck February 7, 2011 at 1:01 am

Lecture or diarrhea diatribe? Tell us of your revolution (that be Che right?).

LionelHutzEsq February 4, 2011 at 9:26 pm

I remember my first beer.

AznMom420 February 6, 2011 at 10:01 pm

Man who taught this eagle to talk all these goddamn words. Shouldn't you be out in the garage with my total gym and my singing fish statue?

Negropolis February 6, 2011 at 11:34 pm

Aye; the stupid is strong with this one.

GeoatBeck February 7, 2011 at 12:36 am

Let's test your hypothesis. I have been involved with the Tea Party since it's inception. I think I know a wee bit of what it is and is not. So are you just showing your stupid or do you have a frame of reference in which you conclude you obviously misinformed opinion?

AznMom420 February 7, 2011 at 12:55 am

I agree two years is a really long time to do anything and that's really special! Our little baby movement has definitely mastered all of the finer points of the terrible twos, but soon I'm sure you'll grow out of shouting NO! at your nanny state and shitting in your overalls. Two more years and you can almost sit at the big kids' table without spilling your sippy cup.

GeoatBeck February 7, 2011 at 1:04 am

Is that your way of acknowledging that you folks have no clue and your only response can be some mindless, childish dribble?

All you hear is no, that is programmed by your handlers so I can hardly blame you.

OneYieldRegular February 4, 2011 at 7:22 pm

Could someone please tell me why the little institution for which I work seems to have FAR more stringent policies regarding potential conflicts of interest around spouses and partners than the WTF-ing Supreme Court of the United States?

BornInATrailer February 4, 2011 at 7:34 pm

Would have preferred a story about an Amtrak train hitting Ginni while she fed on a deer carcass.

twoeightnine February 4, 2011 at 7:50 pm

Eww, eww, ewwwwwww. I do NOT want to think about Ginni's ginni cookie.

cheaphits February 4, 2011 at 8:09 pm

Lillian McEwen, who was the woman who partook in Thomas's "freewheeling sex life" between 1981 and 1986 has a story to tell. and is flogging it to publishers.

"He was obsessed with porn," McEwen also said of Thomas, a claim that is particularly relevant to Hill's allegations that the then-chairman of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had repeatedly relayed scenes from pornographic movies to her."

These people are creepy.

mrblifil February 4, 2011 at 9:47 pm

Porn obsessions are not creepy as long as you only share your porn obsessions with your little friends manacled in the basement.

DustBowlBlues February 5, 2011 at 7:25 pm

Now she tells her story? Where was she when it mattered?

mourningnmerica February 4, 2011 at 8:42 pm

How can she be a Tea Party lobbyist, when she is personally contributing to the mongrelization of the races?

Schmannnity February 4, 2011 at 11:00 pm

Good news. They haven't bred, like so many conservative couples. See, e.g., Chief Justice Roberts, Pat Buchanan, Anne Coulter (thank God), Laura Ingraham, (thank God), etc., etc., etc.

DustBowlBlues February 5, 2011 at 7:55 pm

It's like the guy here whose daughter has two illegitimate children by a black guy. He still uses the N word, except it doesn't count for his family. (fuck this keuyboard) Rules don't apply to the stoopid.

ttommyunger February 4, 2011 at 9:16 pm

Yeah, and she's also an ugly, alcoholic cunt.

LionelHutzEsq February 4, 2011 at 9:23 pm

Jesus?

Veritas78 February 4, 2011 at 9:33 pm

Is this the sort of white woman that someone was wondering "whey dey at?" If so, I think we can all breathe a little easier.

MarionNYNY February 4, 2011 at 10:40 pm

Somehow I don't think Clarence misses Gin'n's cookies.

PuckStopsHere February 5, 2011 at 12:11 am

That is, without doubt, the ugliest tranny I have ever seen.

transfatz February 6, 2011 at 11:22 pm

Usually trannies have much better fashion sense. But here s/he is, competing with Rudy.

SudsMcKenzie February 5, 2011 at 12:57 am

He still, presumably, has to sleep with that. If this was anyone but a Supreme Court Justice, that would be justice served.

donner_froh February 5, 2011 at 2:41 am

Clarence found a Coke can in her pubic hair.

Negropolis February 5, 2011 at 2:44 am

Why couldn't Clarence get himserlf a decent-looking white woman, at least? She must have a rather ample posterior.

politics_nerd February 5, 2011 at 5:43 am

WHERE DA WITE WIMMEN AT!? Oh.

smitallica February 5, 2011 at 10:42 am

I'm less surprised that C-Tom's wife is a lobbyist than I am that, apparently, she's also a dude.

GeorgiaPeachy February 5, 2011 at 12:53 pm

Come on now, she's got to be Lisa Lampanelli in costume.

NadePaulKuciGravMcKi February 5, 2011 at 2:10 pm

the US judicial system
it makes a body proud

GeoatBeck February 5, 2011 at 5:08 pm

And a word from our progressive friends
http://redblueamerica.com/blog/2011-02-03/send-cl

karen February 5, 2011 at 9:36 pm

What does pointing out stupidity and hatred on both sides do? Republicans are whores, Democrats are whores. If you would actually like to have a discussion about a topic, then start a discussion with empirical evidence, not talking points and bias. Otherwise, snark or GTFO.

GeoatBeck February 6, 2011 at 10:34 am

You did not even read the article or the replies?

GTFO… ?!

I win.

BklynIlluminati February 5, 2011 at 5:33 pm

Wonkette you need to check your voicemail. Someone is asking for an apology a Ginni somethingorother….

XOhioan February 5, 2011 at 9:40 pm

Let's dispel the notion that this is an interracial marriage. Toads do not marry out of their species.

karen February 5, 2011 at 9:41 pm

She reminds me of this latest Hark! A Vagrant strip: http://www.harkavagrant.com/index.php?id=297

80s Business woman, minus the exercise I guess.

the_problem_child February 4, 2011 at 9:40 pm

Nope, teabagging tards who can't spell are worse than Palin, because they are the backbone of Amerikkka.

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 9:47 pm

Well open up your mouth, here come the Tea Baggers!

I crack me up! (crude, but you bring out the worst in people).

Actually (I figure you do not know this) the Tea bag represents the Boston Tea Party, it was about many things, including taxes. The Tea Bagger thing is all the work of the libprogs.

the_problem_child February 4, 2011 at 9:52 pm

Teabag the Liberal Dems before they teabag you? http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2009-03-18-tea_b

glamourdammerung February 5, 2011 at 4:31 pm

Yeah, you are totally not just here to troll.

GeoatBeck February 4, 2011 at 9:58 pm

What can I say, that's funny!

I'm speechless. I guess their are a few morons in every group.

Thumbs up

the_problem_child February 4, 2011 at 10:34 pm

Indeed. And sometimes more than a few.

glamourdammerung February 5, 2011 at 4:32 pm

I guess their are a few morons in every group.

Yeah, but at least most of ours are coming over here from Breitbart's clown festival because they were told to.

GeoatBeck February 5, 2011 at 7:40 am

Which is it? At first you mock it as a lie, then you invoke a previous administration.

We? You mean your handlers? I can not believe you did not get the memo. I can't believe you are still in denial. I could go all day starting with Jeffrey Immelt, GE owned NBC, MSNBC and White House press access.

LionelHutzEsq February 5, 2011 at 3:39 pm

Sir, I have found you an argument; but I am not obliged to find you an understanding.

But access is hardly control, is it? Or are you arguing that since Jeff Gannon had access to the White House, there was state control of male escorts during the Bush Administration?

I mock you for two reasons. First and foremost, if you can't bring the funny here, you are committing a terrible sin. You should repent son.

Second, if you can't provide any support to your arguments, you are a danger to our civilization. Please give one proof that we have "State Controlled Media." And, no, the fact that the Times hasn't found out the truth about Obama's birth certificate doesn't count.

GeoatBeck February 5, 2011 at 4:30 pm

The administration are like pimps or a pushers, they give access and to continue to get that access, you do as they say. That is control my friend (Chicago politics). Not sure what you birth certificate comment is about.

How is Emmelt in the White House anyway. He lost more than 36,000 jobs, almost wiped out his investors (many of which were GE employees) took stimulus money and made jobs over seas and now an advisor to Obama. Think it might be because he ran his media groups into the ground to support him?

You sir are a danger, accepting whatever your handlers tell you as truth, makes you very dangerous. You have nothing I have seen to bring to the table. You attack, if attacking was what brings success, we would have not seen the 600 plus turnovers from Democrats. Wake up and wise up.

I provide plenty of support, it is just no one can dispute it, hence the attacks and name calling. Read for yourself.

PS – I find my own understandings, I am not part of the "free stuff" crowd, needing one given to me.

GeoatBeck February 5, 2011 at 4:44 pm

????

Weren't criticizing spelling and grammar earlier?

You're from Breitbart?

glamourdammerung February 5, 2011 at 4:52 pm

No.

I was the one of the folks that pointed out how you try to change the subject when you are shown to be wrong.

GeoatBeck February 5, 2011 at 4:54 pm

No, I would rather debate. I rather we were throwing facts around and not feces. Misinformation and propaganda can be dangerous in times such as these.

GeoatBeck February 5, 2011 at 5:00 pm

Again with the circular logic. Like a liberal you are doing just what you claim the other is. I haven't been wrong yet. Contrary to libprog popular belief, a misspelling or grammar error, does not invalidate an argument. Which is funny, as they are just as likely to make one. If you have an example, show it.

DustBowlBlues February 5, 2011 at 7:09 pm

I accidentally gave you the trolls thumbs down. Sorry. I'm replying to make up for it. I will thjumbs up you from now on.

glamourdammerung February 5, 2011 at 5:22 pm

If you have an example, show it.

http://wonkette.com/436944/family-jesus-council-a

glamourdammerung February 5, 2011 at 5:24 pm

Well, no one is forcing you to continually troll here.

GeoatBeck February 5, 2011 at 5:54 pm

Really! You mean I do not have to stay here, I can go?

I bet you could just ignore posts and move on. Is that allowed?

Geezz……………..

glamourdammerung February 5, 2011 at 8:15 pm

The fact I could ignore your posts does not refute the fact that you are only here to troll.

You can keep crying about it all you would like, but that also does not refute what I clearly pointed out about your behavior here.

GeoatBeck February 6, 2011 at 10:48 am

How is it that, anyone who does not hold your point of view is a troll? No crying here. It is a sad state of affairs though.

imissopus February 6, 2011 at 2:57 pm

Don't forget claiming they only want to "debate the issues." Of course their perception of the issues is so far removed from any reasonable sense of reality there really is no way to debate them in a meaningful sense. I say just ignore the goat fucker – nothing anyone here says will change it's mind.

Negropolis February 8, 2011 at 4:50 am

Your mother's a whore. :)

GeoatBeck February 8, 2011 at 5:02 am

I win again.

You people are too easy.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: