• May 26, 2012
DISTRICT OF CORD

October 21, 2010

DC Men’s Shoes For Clowns and Elves, Not Men

by Cord Jefferson  

America's shoe reviewer.A very kind, smart, attractive young woman I know took grave exception with my denunciation of those medallion shoes all the District’s WASPy women seem to fancy. While willing to admit that perhaps they were, indeed, crap shoes, she was angry that I’d not leveled a similar attack on the preferred footwear of DC men. I’d never particularly noticed the footwear of DC men, but she was right!

I dare you to start looking down in the Metro instead of at the worried faces of all the other suckers. If you’re able to avoid getting shoved onto the tracks by someone who would rather see you dead than be late to their Meeting, you will notice that most of the men’s shoes in Washington, DC, look like what Frankenstein would wear if he were a metrosexual. They’re so square, like leather Kleenex boxes, and for whatever reason they’ve all got about a million panels of leather stacked on top of one another. Why so many panels, dudes?

It is very weird. But even weirder are the Brits and Frenchmen and Persians who come here to go to SAIS because their countries don’t have big enough boners for unchecked capitalism. Those guys all wear those ultra-pointy/elfish warlock boots, and they exclusively drink white wine or Chimay while saying stuff like, “I just don’t get American football.” What’s to get, Xavier? It’s guys with pituitary disorders wearing low-rent body armor and smashing into each other, for the masses to get drunk and scream at. It is … fun?

I honestly don’t give a shit what kind of shoes you wear. (Unless they’re platform flip-flops. Those need to die.) The scientific reason many men in Washington have such an abundance of ugly clown shoes is because they’re smart enough not to put a lot of thought into what they wear beyond “are these comfortable enough to walk in?” We should probably all agree, however, that a blind reverence for comfort and convenience leads to the sort of slow societal decline nobody wants to see: Snuggies and Rascal scooters and terrible chain-restaurant architecture.

L’Enfant was a bit of a badass, but ever since he left/died it seems as if the architectural MO of DC is “whatever fits a bunch of folks and don’t fall over so easy.” Boring vittles are everywhere, disguised with words like “panini” and “chevre.” Bars play the same damn Fergie music nonstop, and part of her act is to urinate in her pants onstage! It all sucks, but it’s also inescapable because it’s convenient, practical and easy.

On top of all this, it’s a bit sad to see how much effort ladies in Washington put into impressing guys in Washington, who appear to be wildly averse to exerting any effort that won’t lead to an office promotion. All the women are in their tidy, sunlit apartments, shining the medallions on their shoes, while all the dudes are devouring Fart Magic (19 Bud Lights and a “Jumbo Slice”), complaining about walking down stairs, and picking at razor bumps on their neck while riding on the bus (I have seen this).

Simple solution: Get some Chucks for the weekend and some desert boots for the weekdays, then get out of the way. Also, compliment your girlfriend’s medallion shoes once in awhile, even though they are not cool.

Cord Jefferson’s column usually appears Thursdays on Wonkette. Also he is always on the Twitter, ordering boxes and boxes of shoes from Zappos.

{ 44 comments }

Troubledog October 21, 2010 at 5:03 pm

There's a lady in front of me cleaning her ear with a car key right now.

Is it too late to get razor bump guy's number? I think we have a match.

Radiotherapy October 21, 2010 at 5:07 pm

Cord, I get the heebie-jeebies whenever I see a Muslim on the Metro. Am I entitled to $2 million?

mrblifil October 21, 2010 at 5:08 pm

Silly boy. Girls don't pick shoes to impress men. Girls who wear those sorts of shoes pick shoes to compete with other women to see who adheres to the magazine ethos most closely. Those girls don't have to do anything to impress men. Until they're about 48 they hold all the cards in that department.

SayItWithWookies October 21, 2010 at 5:13 pm

Just so you know, here's how I look for shoes for the office: I start off determined to find something that doesn't look like a clunky pair of Frankenstein shoes or some sissy things that were inspired by a scene in Enchanted April, and after about an hour of that I become so desensitized that I don't care and buy the last pair I wore that fit.
Fortunately I get to wear my sneakers on Fridays, which only causes me to hate and neglect my regular office footwear all the more. Sad but true.

edgydrifter October 21, 2010 at 5:14 pm

Seriously, Chucks? For the man who equally hates both comfort and style, maybe, but not for me. Here's who should wear Chucks:

1) Chuck Taylor

That's it. Nobody else. And since poor Chuck has passed on to the great parquet in the sky, that really means absolutely no one has any business wearing those damned things anymore.

I like the weekday desert boot thing, though. With the impending teapartypocalypse, it's good to be ready to stomp ass or run fast at all times these days.

Lascauxcaveman October 22, 2010 at 1:52 am

I was in an oldies band back in the 80's (the house band back at the teevee station I worked at – good times!) Our stage uniform was a white dinner-jacket tuxedo with red bowtie, red cummerbund and red hi-top Chucks.

After a night of boppin' hard all over the stage*, I always thought to myself, "Damn, I'm glad I don't have to wear these horrible shoes at work all day. Much less play basketball in them."

(*personal note to Monsieur Grumpe: that is, boppin hard with the WORLD'S HEAVIEST SOLID OAK IBANEZ BASS.)

awesome_dude October 21, 2010 at 5:22 pm

Don't make fun of the razor bump thing. When you zone out on public transit, a hand will always of its own accord wander to the neck area because of the absent minded "what even is this thing on my skin" instinct. Trying to control it snaps you into focus, defeating the purpose of zoning out.

qwerty42 October 21, 2010 at 5:25 pm

Jeeze, some of those shoes were probably a big hit in the 70's.

anniegetyourfun October 21, 2010 at 5:28 pm

Women in DC still wear Tory Burch flats? I live in Seattle, and we are roughly five to six years behind the fashion trends, and even WE are over those shoes.

Mind you, we tend toward the super-ugly school of fashion out here, what with our Five Fingers and Birks and whatnot.

realmurkin October 21, 2010 at 6:12 pm

I, too, live in Seattle and I see a lot of those stupid flats still. It is hard to be picky around here about the aesthetics of one's neighbors, though. I tend to breathe a sigh of relief whenever I encounter someone who isn't wearing polar fleece, North Face anything, horrible pants/shorts with cargo pockets, and/or ugly-ass athletic shoes. Also, when I see someone with clean hair and no stupid fake hipster glasses I want to give them a handy-j on the spot. Also.

anniegetyourfun October 21, 2010 at 6:43 pm

I honestly haven't seen any in a really long time, but I work up north, so maybe people up here just can't afford them.

Hipster glasses need to be stopped.

realmurkin October 21, 2010 at 8:22 pm

The only girls I really see wearing them are sorority-types in the U District and the occasional Bellevue trophy wife with a horrible Farrah Fawcett-esque blow out. The nouveau riche around here (and everywhere maybe?) are so fucking tacky.

I completely agree with you on the hipster glasses situation. Maybe if we both start slapping them off people's faces and crushing them underfoot, others will follow in our footsteps and the Seattle area will slowly but surely free itself from the hipster glasses scourge.

anniegetyourfun October 21, 2010 at 9:42 pm

It's time we started that trend. Slap, crush, and dash. It's a movement, like the Tea Party, only 1500% more useful.

elviouslyqueer October 21, 2010 at 5:30 pm

Cord, I can't believe you're hating on the Tory Burch. Never mind that they cost more than a renovated townhouse in DuPont, and never mind that they look like cheap ballet slippers with a Mardi Gras doubloon hot-glued to the front. Women love that shit.

As for men's shoes, I skew toward the "not completely ugly or so expensive that I have to mortgage the fucking house" school of footwear. Which means that I have a LOT of Converse.

/Imelda Marcos with manly bits

Lascauxcaveman October 22, 2010 at 2:10 am

Oh man, you'd die for the size 13 yellow Keds I scored at Nordies. I don't wear them often, but I had to buy them, just to remind myself that such a shoe actually existed. (Plus they were only $10).

I have to admit, for a straight guy, I'm way too into shoes.

102415 October 23, 2010 at 3:10 am

I've been *away* so I wasn't so sure what these*flats* were you were all so negative over. Thank you thank you for giving out the link so I could have a look at them. No, I've never seen those on feet here in NY. I have been thinking about getting some Repettos though. I'm hoping they will make me look like Brigitte Bardot. She's not dead yet is she?

slappypaddy October 21, 2010 at 5:35 pm

the problems of the apparatchiks and nomenklatura in the imperial capital are intriguing, to give them a meaningless label picked almost at random.

how all yall reckon to make out come pitchforks (i.e., firearms) and torches (i.e., molotovs) time? got your running shoes ready?

BarryOPotter October 21, 2010 at 5:39 pm

Words of advice: spend good money on your shoes and your bed. Because if you're not in one, you're likely to be in the other.

lochnessmonster October 21, 2010 at 5:40 pm

I do not know of these "medallion shoes" of which you speak. Maybe I can start a trend in the Midwest. How about a photo?

elviouslyqueer October 21, 2010 at 5:47 pm
MissTaken October 21, 2010 at 10:23 pm

Even the little girl in the pic who is wearing them is asleep from boredom. Ennui caused by shoes is a form of child abuse, no?

lochnessmonster October 22, 2010 at 6:40 am

Not going to be starting any fads anytime soon. But I think I like the boots on the lady better…

fuflans October 21, 2010 at 5:44 pm

this is very very pleasing. however, i don't think you should forget the freedom tray in the list of sad decline of america.

SilverFox October 21, 2010 at 5:45 pm

In the market for a new pair of kicks. Something to fill the void between my boat shoes and Bean boots. All I see are these chukkas and desert boots. What's the deal? I'm not exactly nostalgic for Reagan, but what's wrong with a good pair of loafers?

realmurkin October 21, 2010 at 6:18 pm

Classic Oxfords tend to not be too hideous.

qwerty42 October 21, 2010 at 5:46 pm

…i don't think you should forget the freedom tray in the list of sad decline of america.

What about the Freedom Fry?

realmurkin October 21, 2010 at 6:17 pm

Yays! Can we be catty about shoes on the Wonkett every week? Pleeezzze.

JustPixelz October 21, 2010 at 8:10 pm

Everyone on this post knows more about shoes than me. So I have a question for you all: What is the correct shoe style to throw at George Bush if he comes in range? Keep in mind, it's already after Labor Day and I am right-handed.

Thank you.

elviouslyqueer October 21, 2010 at 9:39 pm

Normally, I would recommend your basic 6-inch spiked heels (red, preferably, to cover up any unsightly blood stains). But Alexander McQueen's 10-inch stilettos are positively to die for (or, in this case, to die of).

Doglessliberal October 22, 2010 at 9:54 am

Sweetie, that would be like throwing a Picasso.

Lascauxcaveman October 22, 2010 at 2:14 am

Make it the heaviest shoe you can make go the distance from you to your target. Please.

(And practice, practice, practice. You'll only get one shot this time.)

ttommyunger October 21, 2010 at 9:09 pm

Seeins' how I live in the Sovereign State of Diabetestan, we see mostly jogging shoes (on turds who have never jogged in their fucking lives) or the fake leather ones with the velcro closure…. I wish I were making this up.

DCHatesMe October 21, 2010 at 11:43 pm

Have you ever noticed that people who think they have good style sense and spend enormous amounts of time and money on their appearance always look the silliest of all creatures?

Doglessliberal October 22, 2010 at 9:57 am

Sadly, they equate having a sense of style with slavishly following what is "in style" This tactic makes them look ridiculous because what is in style is often 1) ugly 2) completely wrong for their body type or age. Case in point: anything from the 80s looks bad on anyone and is ugly, yet it is both in style and worn everywhere. It is painful to the eyes to see obese young women jammed into jean leggings (!!!!) and long, belted t-shirts.

Doglessliberal October 22, 2010 at 9:58 am

Tory Burch flats are ugly, also.

Plus, I never got the concept of paying to be someone's walking advertisement. You want me to wear your logo? Show me the money, sucker.

Lazy Media October 22, 2010 at 6:59 am

The problem with fashion is that exists to sell stuff and keep us from being bored. If it weren't for that, city dudes would all wear close-soled, slightly pointed cap toe oxfords AND NO OTHER SHOE from age 12 to 90. http://www.clifford-james.co.uk/Admin/photos/larg...

Seriously, give me one pair of those, a pair of steel-toed work boots (for WORKING in and maybe hiking a little), a pair of basketball sneaks and a pair of running shoes (for respectively playing basketball and running), and replace them annually, and my shoe-buying days are over.

Toomush_Infer October 22, 2010 at 11:57 am

Hah hah hah, as if there are any wonketeers now wearing anything but different colored sweat socks too cold for the basement floor…

102415 October 23, 2010 at 3:17 am

Barefoot on the Persian carpet, baby.

piani45 July 14, 2011 at 3:49 am

Your blog is perfect, and I like this article. I think I can find more useful information here, thanks.
tory burch flats

Lascauxcaveman October 22, 2010 at 2:06 am

Uh oh. I'm going to ask you girls, and I want you to be perfectly honest in your reply: I'm a forty-something guy with normal, boring, forty-something clothes and grooming. Are my standard black-rim Clark Kent style frames considered "hipster" glasses?

(Because if they are, I can wear my contacts if it means I get my handy-j next time I come to Seattle, which is next month, for the Picasso exhibit at SAM. Meet me there, in the alley behind Spring street?)

PsycWench October 22, 2010 at 8:22 am

As someone who is not a girl and slightly older than you, here is my non-answer: If you're looking at women similarly over 40, they probably don't care what your glasses or shoes look like. Are you over your ex-wife? Do you have a stable job? Do you live with your parents and/or kids and if so, are they crazed maniacs? Do you practice at least basic hygiene? And most importantly IMHO: can you cook?

But yeah, those sound like hipster glasses to me, but I'm in SW VA so what do I know.

anniegetyourfun October 22, 2010 at 9:57 am

Standard issue Clark Kent frames are not hipster glasses. These are hipster glasses.

theawkwarlyst October 22, 2010 at 11:10 am

Clark Kent-style frames are hot. But I live in the other Washington (without medallion shoes, thank god).

Lascauxcaveman October 22, 2010 at 2:44 pm

No to everything except the hygiene, job and cooking, yes on those.

Still happily married to first wife and my two kids are almost freakishly smart and well behaved. If they didn't have such wicked veins of snark running through their very cores, you'd have to call them "Stepford Kids."

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: