The Louisiana Democratic Party has released this new ad, “Forgotten Crimes,” to remind Louisiana’s voters that one time David Vitter wore diapers around and had sex with prostitutes, but faced no prosecution or professional punishment. Well, okay. But more importantly, Question of the Day: around :15-:16, are we seeing bush, grundle, scrotum, shadow of cock, or something else? Why is the Louisiana Democratic Party trying to “smear” David Vitter with these gritty pube videos? [Forgotten Crimes]
David Vitter/Prostitution Ad Features Mysterious Shadow, Maybe?
Previous post: Washington Post Aims To Become Same Website As THE POLITICO
Next post: Michael Steele Has A New Slogan!







{ 61 comments }
Reminding people that Sen. Vitter likes to wear diapers is a smear campaign (ahem).
I’m pretty sure that’s David Vitter’s vaginal-rectum area. The bugs all but prove it.
You wouldn’t want them to pamper him would you? Oh, um, er…
I didn’t see any schlong, did you?
Smear, get it? Because he’s a flaming bag of poo one must step on to extinguish. High five!
Part of Vitter’s problem was that he liked being smeared.
But I’m just glad to see that the Louisiana Dems have made an ad that, for once, doesn’t follow the usual political attack ad template, but is actually somewhat clever. Now if only the national Dems could do the same. Oh, and stop being afraid and remember that sleazy attacks are OK if they’re true.
[re=566385]Larry Fine[/re]: nope. studied closely, too.
First, I have no idea. Second, I’m not going to look for long enough to figure it out. Third, who the hell wears a leopard-spotted hooker dress to her husband’s I-Was-Unfaithful press conference? That’s the question that’s been puzzling me about this whole thing. Well — besides how they made Deborah Jean Palfrey’s murder look like a suicide, but that’s not terribly funny.
“bush, grundle, scrotum, shadow of cock”, ummm..I don’t know, Depends?
[re=566384]weejee[/re]: Depends…
(Had to get that out of the way.)
Oh and thanks, Jim, now I can’t stop thinking of the old Cat Stevens tune, and substituting “Cock” for “Moon.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGNxKnLmOH4
Um, excuse me for asking , but what is a grundle (some grundle?)?. Excellent ad.though
[re=566396]Extemporanus[/re]: was it a vagectum?
[re=566393]SayItWithWookies[/re]: “Who knows what evil lurks in the pants of men? The Shadow knows!”
Forgotten Crimes .. sounds like the hottest new mystery novel from NYT best selling author Ted Dekker.
[re=566393]SayItWithWookies[/re]: Also, why do these guys always seem to get Muppetface when they get caught?
Now that I’ve watched this clip, I’m thinking maybe yes, it would be good to punish him for breaking the law. Oh wait, I forgot: not gonna happen.
[re=566403]Smoke Filled Roommate[/re]: You know it!
[re=566395]freakishlystrong[/re]: [re=566396]Extemporanus[/re]: Jinx! You owe me a Hot Carl!
That was the raddest political ad since the Demon Sheep.
When does Chris Hansen show up?
Those five seconds of shower-plus-whatever are actually from my favorite gay-porn movie, “Cardinal Sin”, starring several priests and the Archbishop of Austria.
Hate to remind you people, in LA, it’s all good unless you are caught with a live boy or a dead woman.
[re=566396]Extemporanus[/re]: They’ll never get to the bottom of this. Too many
powdersmoke-filled rooms in Looosiana pollticks.[re=566385]Larry Fine[/re]: I think Jim just made that “cock shadow” up to titillate us and to smear poor sad Mr. Vitter, because why not?
[re=566421]weejee[/re]: Does Venerable Vitter call his private shitter in his office the Powder Room?
People are so afraid of Vittles that they want to be blacked out for anonymity like mob witnesses? Makes it creepier, but somehow far less effective. I think clown makeup would do the trick nicely.
[re=566421]weejee[/re]: I dunno. There’s still a chance that some hardboiled private dick will come along and crack the case.
It is sort of testament to the dumbness of Americans that political ads need to sound like movie trailers for anyone to pay attention to them.
At least when Vitter is handily reëlected we’ll have this to look back on with pride.
See. See. Going after Vitter is just like the RNC campaign about Obama rewriting the constitution, except it refers to something that already happened.
Come now. There are plenty of countries dumber than America. Alaska for instance.
[re=566393]SayItWithWookies[/re]: She did it to confirm that she was serious about her commitment to give baby Davy all the hot diaper buttsex he could stand, and then some.
[re=566406]Smoke Filled Roommate[/re]: I’m thinking there’s some Big Book of Facial Expressions for Sociopaths that they all get it out of. Eliot Spitzer seems to have gotten his from Stone Phillips, but I’m not sure of the provenance from there.
[re=566393]SayItWithWookies[/re]: Word.
And I’ll bring it up again, (mostly) sans snark. Why, when Democrats are caught doing illegal/immoral shit (Spitzer, Jefferson, Blagojevich, etc) do they resign semi-gracefully (except for Blago, but the hair requires significant upkeep), while Republicans who are caught doing illegal/immoral shit manage to stay in office while shaking their fingers at the rest of us over family values? I just don’t get it.
I’m proud to say I interned in Senator Vitter’s office during the time he would have been banging whores. Also, I was in his apartment one time to deliver something from the office, while I saw no whores present, I assume they were in the closets likely with diapers on.
THE DEMONCRAPS ARE HOOKER-BAITING!!!!
[re=566453]TakingAmes[/re]: See here’s how it is. There’s two bibles never mind the Jews/Christians thing, this is old testament, the part with all the rules and most of us only get the one with all the rules but a small group of select people, people who live in or associate with the C Street House, also Michelle Bachmann and her prosperity church of the divine grifter, they get to learn about another secret bible that’s made only for them that says, Rules are for Fools! We are the Chosen! and Fuck You All! Amen!
Honestly, I hate to say it, but as funny as shitty diaper baby David Vitter is, I’m kinda sad that that’s what we all focus on. Seeing a prostitute while preaching family values, sure, but, well. Honestly, there are a lot of people that are into very strange, even disturbing things, like yiffing, or getting beat up by sexy clowns, justforinstance, that are nevertheless, are just what gets them off. And further, honestly, it even makes sense for someone with a poopy diaper fetish to seek the services of a “professional” when the thing that gets you off is that esotheric and gross, you’re looking at a limited pool, when it comes to uncompensated partners. It certainly makes more sense than Spitzer, who really just cold loved fucking ladies, but apparently couldn’t find a groupie if his life depended on it, also.
I mean, by all means, call him out on hypocrisy, and if it happens to be hypocrisy compounded by egregious political malfeasance, a la Ensign, call him out even more. But making fun of a deviant because of his deviancy seems unfair, and certianly doesn’t make us better than those family values fundie types.
Why am I putting on this enpassioned defense? Well, I have to come out with something here: I get off on human suffering. Not the pain-causing sadism sort, but just the knowledge that the things that I do happen to becausing deep-seated existential suffering to a large number of people. There’s nothing quite like it. Fortunately for me, though, I heard the RNC is hiring, and my fetish is a lot cheaper and easier to for them to slake than, say, being into naked lesbian bondage clubs.
This sounds like an ad for a series on cable. I think the Democrats are on to something here. They could do a whole series with the number of f-ed up things Republican politicians have done. There show would probably make money too.
[re=566453]TakingAmes[/re]: The “Liberal” media makes a big deal out of Democrats messing up.
[re=566471]Ducksworthy[/re]: Sorry. That too was sans snark, also. This is the cult feels it deserves to run Amurikkka. And they will not take no for an answer. Not this time.
Maybe its the Stormy Daniels primary challenge commercial?
Definitely cock at 0:17.
http://www.imagebullet.com/n/normal_o4hJDCBBp6os.jpg
well, shit… I ripped the video at hi-res, went frame by frame, took a snapshot, cropped, and adjusted brightness and contrast, but I can’t figure out how to post the damn thing.
[re=566437]Canuck13652[/re]: In a world… where everyone is horny….and one man…must wear a diaper.
And for the record, Canuck, you puck-eating syrupheads are stealing the last remaining good jobs in Southern California with your tax credits and your gay rights and your lack of deaths-by-earthquake. Of course, if the film industry were run out of Vancouver, it’d take like 2 years before everything looked like student-made Truffaut knockoffs instead of the spectacular awesomeness of Michael Bay blowing shit up for 90 minutes.
Or alternately, an Oscar-winner.
Try this: http://bit.ly/aH6TQj
[re=566453]TakingAmes[/re]: It’s the same reason why everything former politicians like Gingrich, Palin, and now Cheney say is important and relevant, while the words of many current Democratic officeholders are routinely ignored, and forget about former ones (unless they’re caught in an affair, in which case it’s treated as if they were President).
Why is there a white hood hanging from a door knob in the background of the mysterious ‘former Senator Vitter supporter’?
Will this work?
Depends.
Does it to you?
[re=566521]SouthernDem[/re]: good work, does look like some ballsack there — maybe the wiener is pointing up out of view, if you get my drift.
[re=566513]assistant/atlas[/re]: Jesus Christ, that’s brilliant.
[re=566472]mumblyjoe[/re]: Why choose? Become an RNC staffer and you can both cause suffering and enjoy employer-sponsored field trips to the S&M club of your choice.
Why? To cover up some democrapic scandal in the offing!
Don’t ya’ll love how no one can tell the difference between the prostitute and his wife? They’re almost identical, and both named “Wendy.”
[re=566512]SouthernDem[/re]: Yes yes, definite wangdoodle. Happy now? Me neither. The real question is which gay porn site this ‘re-enactment’ was stolen from.
Can we get that show down-loaded onto our Grundles?
Spitzer can recover from his brush with “the oldest profession” because he was paying to satisfy his relatively sedate sweet tooth with multi-gemstone whore-diamond level call girl.
Vitter’s kink could only be satisfied by sex workers on the low end of the payscale, willing to put up with his diaperpoopy shenannigans.
Lifetime political recovery for Vitter? No. Lifetime of snickering and TMZ-gotcha style adverts at every turn?
Hell yes!
Grundle ? i prefer Taint!!!!!
As a man whose seen a lot of dick in his days, I can say with all certainty, that was a dick we all just saw. The 13 second dick.
so it’s customary for poopy diaper sex enthusiasts to shower BEFORE? Seems kind of, I don’t know, pointless.
Why does the madam look like Celine Dion?
Seriously, the working girls he frequented referred to him as “Vitter The Shitter”
Comments on this entry are closed.