Your Liz Glover made so many new friends today at the park near Ronald Reagan airport. At least several Real Americans spent their days there milling about the bucolic fields, ducking from airplanes, and showing off their favorite machines that exist to kill other human beings from a safe distance. This guy has two guns, and he’s in a park. Why is he doing this? The Constitution, that’s why.
Political Wire
-
Authors
Rebecca Schoenkopf (424)
Kirsten Boyd Johnson (927)
Sulagna Misra (4)
Kris E. Benson (11)
Liz Colville (170)
John Schoenkopf (7)
Jim Newell (5640)
Josh Fruhlinger (646)
Erik Jay (27)
Blair Burke (181)
{ 107 comments }
how could you not take that guy seriously?
After what I’ve seen, I’m getting that the whole idea of restoring the “constitution” is focusing on restoring that pesky tinted people = 3/5 of a person.
I would like this guy to show me WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION it says that he can force people to wear a yellow streamer, or “talk to them” if they’re not wearing one.
I think I’ll tell girls that I too am carrying a Glock, just so I can claim that I misunderstood them when prosecuted for indecent exposure.
I shall sleep well tonight knowing our Liz is out there keeping watch on all things wingnutie. And yeah, it does beat going to work Jimbo.
“It should be done, but it’s not in the constitution to do it”.
I cannot wrap my head around that at all. Not putting your grandmother out into the street when she can no longer work to die isn’t in the constitution either, but I’m pretty glad we put laws in place to keep it from happening. If the point of the constitution is not to “promote the general welfare” then frankly, what is the point? We could have organized government through a set of court proceedings and left it at that. This guy wants to remove the guiding moral principle from governance which to a great extent renders governance moot. Are our laws simply to be a set of structures put in place to protect property and capital? Really? This is the America these people envision?
Oh, and I know some bars I can recommend for this dude where a yellow streamer on his left hip would be most appreciated…
I watched until my ears started throbbing for the bullshit being shoved in them. This guy has probably never read the constitution and has no idea what it means.
Although, he was modest guy, demonstrated by not wanting to pull out his glock penis to show to Liz.
Didja see Liz reach out and touch his Glock? Sexytime!
“There are things our government does now that are just not in the Constitution.”
“Elect black people” is what I think he’s getting at.
“Well, it’s very simple, our Constitution is being ignored by our citizenry…”
He’s not in favor of the gov’mint regulating matters like gun control, but if he or the other folks running the meeting see someone not wearing the yellow hankie and thus not acting according to their “rules”, they’re gonna “talk to him”.
Social Security, Medicare, Student Loans–thass COMMUNISMZ!!
And they don’t want a ‘constitutional law professor’ who just happens to be a non-white, non-Southerner as President.
Praise Jeebus. Also.
I like her question about medical marijuana. You can almost see the wheels turning in his head: this chick might want to get high with me and do the sexy dance. But in theory someone with my rock solid conservative morals should be against The Pot. So: dilemma.
[re=559782]rambone[/re]: Indeed. When Liz asked to see his glock, I thought we’d catch a glimpse of a penis wrinkle.
Lessee here:
Gay-ass moustache on a cracker? Check.
Pro-wrestling fag wrap sunglasses? Check.
Gay-ass pleated khakis from Target? Check.
Small penis truck? Check.
Can’t answer a simple question about marijuana legalization? Triple check.
I’m guessing Republican.
The dude has a Glock and an AR-15, and he can’t afford a proper holster? Also, he won’t “un-holster” the pistol, but he’s okay with the rifle slung across his back. Still, he’s seems like an okay sort, for that sort of crowd. And his final answer was very clever.
Yes, let’s restore the Constitution to its original form. Back to before they fucked it up with all those stupid Amendments, like the 2nd.
Once again, you people are missing the “Real Story.”
This so-called “Amerikan” is carrying a Glock. That’s an AUSTRIAN pistol, e.g., a weapon made in a foreign country, by foreigners, while hardworking American PATRIOTIC gun manufacturing workers can’t find WORK for Smith & Wesson, Colt, etc.
(And I bet that “AR-15″ is some knockoff clone made in South Korea or whatever.)
Why can’t this guy “Buy American”? Heck, the last people who used Austrian firearms were a bunch of NAZ . . .
Oh.
Never mind.
so this guy thinks prancing around in a park with his penis extensions showing is some sort of effective political action under the very constitution he’s enthralled by? has he read it? does he understand it? yeah, i know all about the right to bear arms and the forming of an effective militia blah blah blah, bur he and his ilk display no clue — NO FUCKING CLUE — of what the issues facing the united states now, not in 1775, are, and how they may effectively be approached. has he heard of voting? has he heard that all politics is local and that maybe the place for him to be expending his political energies is at such boring an usually unarmed venues as city council meetings, county commissioner meetings, and zoning and land use hearings? these people — and he does have a nice neo-himmler mustache, this one — have NO FUCKING CLUE that their feelings of powerlessness spring directly from their subconscious realization that their very actions are expressions of powerlessness.
okay, i’m stopping making sense, so i’ll shut up, but one more thing — liz, never touch someone’s gun unless they invite you to. it is rude and can be construed as threatening.
medical marijuana is a non-issue. it is a stalking horse, or a red herring, or some other irrelevant animal. the issue is recreational marijuana. the issue is ending the drug war. any gun-toting constitutionalist ought to be aware enough of his own issues to know this. liz hopelessly confused this guy by asking him a question that made him try to think. the underlying vacuity of his position opened before him and he fell into it.
[re=559798]frailamerica[/re]: I can’t tell for sure, but it looks like he’s using one of those “Glock Clips” that attach to the pistol, in lieu of a standard holster.
Great way to shoot yourself in the foot, according to Those Who Know. (His penis, in contrast, would be safe: Too small to hit in an AD situation.)
[re=559800]Neilist[/re]: well at least glock had the good sense to employ some rednecks in Smyrna, GA. Although Smyrna sounds a little commie to me…
Some people just love guns, get off on guns (hmmm, where is Neillist?) but they was raised to handle them safely, dangnabit! my NRA member neighbor said when she was a kid, she was not even allowed to point her toy gun at people. All the long guns there had to be unloaded. Maybe there is a difference depending on what kind of gun you love. Do rifle owners like to point and shoot more than pistol owners?
The dangerous gun lovers are usually drunk, pissed off, and/or horny. bam!
[re=559799]smitallica[/re]:
sure, this guy would agree.
Today, we are all old oak trees.
[re=559800]Neilist[/re]: yea, they make Ruger guns here in Az.
[re=559802]slappypaddy[/re]:the marijuana question get people to reveal whether or not they are a Paultard. Yes=Paultard. no= ‘tard
[re=559801]slappypaddy[/re]: “their feelings of powerlessness spring directly from their subconscious realization that their very actions are expressions of powerlessness.” Holy Weltanschauung, slappy, you just blew my fucking mind there. FTMFW!
[re=559784]Tommmcatt[/re]:
/Snarkless, but filled with thematic gibberish:
“Are our laws simply to be a set of structures put in place to protect property and capital? Really? This is the America these people envision?”
It is the America people need to envision because the America, in reality, has a guilty fucking conscience. It’s perfect that you mention the idea of “guiding moral principles” because this country has always suffered a grave deficit when it comes to balancing that particular account. I suspect that on some subliminal level, the fear these folks have of the government taking their gun rights-and all of their other liberties right along with them- is similar to the idea of a jewel thief who puts his booty in a safe, because ill gotten gains have to be fiercely protected. They feel that they’ve something to answer for, so it’s best to be on the defensive. Then again, I’ve had a couple of cocktails, so consider the source.
Need moar Liz, less wingnut.
[re=559784]Tommmcatt[/re]:
It has always been about land, toys, and the gunz to defend them. Moreover, they also feel that those “rights” apply exclusively to them. Truly, the only “gun” that should be taken away from them is the one that allows them to reproduce.
[re=559806]Crank Tango[/re]: My two Glocks (a Model 23 and Model 27) were made in Ancient Smyrna, by Wily Greeks.
Glock set up a factory there to equip Alexander the Great. Or so I’ve been told . . . .
[re=559809]sati demise[/re]: Ruger MK II with the bull barrel: An American Original! And relatively easy to replace the barrel/receiver with a silencer:
http://www.impactguns.com/store/AWC-AMPHIBIAN.html
(Hard to reassemble after cleaning, however. Damn hard.)
“I’m not sure what to say about that”
Translation:
I haven’t memorized that talking point yet.
[re=559813]donner_froh[/re]: Zactly! More Liz, less Glock-un-schpiel
[re=559815]Neilist[/re]: I have a model 22–I’d like a carry model, do you like the 23 or 27 better? I am thinking 23 cuz it’s still something to hold onto…
I wonder how much corn syrup- fueled blubber the .40 will cut through tho. Enough?
They’re too blinded by rage and lead poisoning to consider that their own paranoia and cowardice are their greatest threats.
Tie a yellow ribbon round the ol’ gun geek.
There are two things in this world it takes absolutely no brains to do. Pull a trigger and stick your dick in a hole. (Trig could take apart an AK-47 whilst getting a humdinger.) While I understand their is academia pertaininig to each, they are both primeval acts. And certainly, both can be a good old time. The trick is to realize the subtlety, politics, and complexity of human behavior that is component in civilization. While I agree Liz did a pretty good job here (yeah, DON’T TOUCH these freaks dangerous toys), who the fuck would want everyone walking around loaded for bear (with government mandated yellow ribbons no less)? Liz should have asked, “Are yellow ribbons in the constitution too?” What is it gonna take to swing the pendulum the other way?
ARM THE COEDS
these teapartiers, or militias, or whatever they want to call themselves, are nothing more than ill-schooled, ill-fed, ill-willed children playing dress-up with their mommies’ tea cozies and their daddies’ pea-shooters. that they even exist, much less are free to make public displays of themselves, is american democracy at its disquieting very best.
Ugh, as someone who lives about a mile from a national park, can I just say — ugh.
And, shame on Obama for signing this stupid thing. The Park Superintendent & rangers & normal people didn’t want this.
[re=559819]Crank Tango[/re]: I have a 22 and a 27. Get a Pierce extension and it drives like a dream.
It’s demonstrations like those held today that, IMO as a gun owner, present the greatest threat to my rights. These idiots can’t seem to fathom that there is NO stomach in congress to restrict guns in the US. Having these public firearm-fapping sessions do nothing but scare the timid into action against guns. Just STFU and carry concealed like the rest of us hippies.
“This guy has two guns, and he’s in a park. Why is he doing this? The Constitution, that’s why.”
No, it’s because he has a teeny weenie dick.
That airport is called National, btw.
[re=559825]Gun-toting Progressive[/re]: thats what I keep trying to tell my NRA neighbor, there are no political parties in America who want to take guns away from law abiding citizens, zero. The NRA just sets up the scare tactics to get gun owners to support ‘con-servatives’. One issue people are very easy to scare it seems.
[re=559824]desertwind[/re]: as someone who lives right next to a national forest, I double that. wtf Obama? at least my public access is far, far away. The corn syrup junkies would never make it out to my house.
Well, at last!
The teabaggers rolling viagra ad made it into the nation’s capitol,
while the nation’s capital was going out to Goldman Sachs.
Manhood issues are big these days, what with women being all uppity…
Not so easy to marry your sister as it used to be.
Lower taxes? Protest the president!
Less anti-gun laws? Protest the president!
See Barack? You can’t please them,
[re=559819]Crank Tango[/re]: Crank (to respond in part just to annoy the LIE-bruals in here):
The 23 is my CCW piece. It’s not that hard to conceal (in part because of my height), and the grip is large enough for the cartridge.
The 27, on the other hand, is a leeettle bit too much cartridge for the size of the grip. (At least, without the magazine extension.) The 19, which is the same thing in 9mm, is a bit more manageable.
But in theory, the whole “subcompact semi auto” idea of the 19/23 is wrong. For a pocket pistol, you should be using something like a Detective Airweight, either hammerless or with the shrouded hammer (which they don’t make anymore, unfortunately). With the Airweight, you don’t have to take it out of your pocket: You can just blast away without fear of a jam.
Although that’s a great way to ruin a sportcoat or your favorite Carthart.
[Is Liz getting HOT for me yet? If not, don't tell. I prefer to live in my World of Illusion.]
[re=559826]Terry[/re]: Eh, Reagan National. He was still drooling and warm when they were able to cloture (o’ cualquier) that misnomer.
[re=559807]sati demise[/re]: “The dangerous gun lovers are usually drunk, pissed off, and/or horny.”
You left out “manic depressive” and/or “meth-addled.”
But I’m here for you anyway, Sati.
You should have asked him how big his dick is and why he feels the need to compensate for it with guns.
[re=559828]sati demise[/re]:
“The NRA just sets up the scare tactics to get gun owners to support ‘con-servatives’”
Gun sales also went through the roof for a while after Obama’s election, and on the heels of months of scare tactics about “teh soshulists comin to taek ahr guns!” I might add.
So, NRA scare tactics also serve to increase profits for gun makers. In other words, Obama’s election was a good thing for gun makers and the second amendment.
Well, it’s good to see that the teabaggers’ rolling viagra ad made it into the nation’s capitol,
just as all the nation’s capital was going out the other door to Goldman Sachs.
Manhood issues are big these days, what with big trucks going off the market, & women getting all uppity.
Can you say penis extension without looking gay?
Did the tax rate go down? Protest the president!
Less restrictions on gun laws? Protest the president!
See, Barack? You can’t please them even when you give them what they want.
And now some guy from KENYA won the marathon!
Oh, no! My manhood – er, Rights! – are being threatened again!
I dunno, I think some of you are being a little harsh on this guy. He wasn’t all that bad, as far as wingnuts go. I started out prepared to be annoyed with him, and ended up “meh”.
Restore the constitution? So women should no longer have the same rights as men and Black people are only 3/5ths human? That would be restoring the consitituion. Oh and I don’t think it says anything in there about trying to prevent a womans right to choose so they obviously have no problem with that either…….pfffffft!
[re=559831]Neilist[/re]: no, Liz would never be hot for someone who wears Carthart or a ‘sportcoat’.
So, now we have you on the line, tell us…. does the type of gun a person loves tell you anything about them?
For the record, the first place my eyes went to on this video was that fella’s crotchtal area, and I think he’s actually packin’ more than just heat. I’m thinking choad, which is definitely workable material. However, the man whose dick is big enough to make him think he must save the world is just as dangerous as the man whose dick is small enough to make him think he must destroy it.
Maybe we should give free guns to poor people. This would both please and displease pro-gun, anti-socialists. And then their heads would explode.
[re=559836]Up To Here Again[/re]: I dont know why Obama is not getting this. No matter how much he gives them on any issue, they are not going to support him. The GOP will not even vote for their own ideas now. Obama supporting something is the kiss of death for them because of teh socializms, communizms, agreeing with the anti christ, et al.
Jesus christ these people and their tactical semi-autos. It’s called a phase, dipshit. Grow a pair and go buy some single or double action revolvers.
These idiots remind me of the minutemen dumb fucks that take their brand new, shinny guns to their border outposts and then radio the authorities when they spot an illegal.
[re=559845]Abou Diaby[/re]: Yeah, you won’t see those pussies anywhere near Juarez or Laredo. They know they’ll end up as human fertilizer for the drug cartels.
military shades … check
monotone policeman/military voice … check
short haircut and porn stache … check
would bend over and squeal like a little girl if the right man in leather chaps came along … check…
Shots were fired later in the evening. They were vodka and Jager shots, from wingnut anuses; a good time was had by all.
[re=559838]Flanders[/re]: I’m in the “meh” camp on this guy – at least for his political theory. He get’s a few points for at least staying consistent with his assumptions (no health care, social security or welfare – even though he ignores the bit in the Constitution about promoting the general welfare). He also manages to present his case without a single reference to “welfare bums”, “Democrats” or “others”. The fact that he wouldn’t unholster a loaded weapon is a good thing.
However, that daughter of his and her fascination with daddy’s gun is either an accidental shooting or a whole lot of family counseling just waiting to happen.
I own guns, but then I live out in the backwoods where I can shoot without endangering or disturbing anyone. I also have a State of Texas permit to carry my Ruger LCP concealed.
I don’t, however, feel the need to display them – loaded or unloaded – at a public political event since, as has been pointed out, the current political climate is darned favorable towards gun rights and I’d like it to stay that way.
I thought his child-bride was adorable.
“Now git on back to the compound, Britney-Shania, and rustle me up a sandwich and a juice box. Tonight we’re going to watch 300 again so I can get a hard-on and you can dress it up in Barbie clothes… Wait. Is that camera still on?”
I was all like “awww…he’s not going to whip it out for us to see.”
[re=559854]tbogg[/re]: More like, tonight we’re going to watch 30 Rock, so I can pretend Tina is Sarah
[re=559826]Terry[/re]:
Thank you for the reminder of the Airport name. As a graduate of the PATCO class of 1981 I am happy to see someone clarify that.
Unfair — they were also invented to kill varmints.
The cute little girl shading the heavily armed man with her parasol provided a welcome Fellini-esque touch to this clip.
[re=559800]Neilist[/re]:
Actually, they’re made somewhere near Smryna, GA, an Atlanta exurb, but I get your drift.
Besides that, they’re shite guns. Any real gun nut wants a H&K or Sig Sauer, Glocks are for pussies, and the reason cops shoot people without being sure – the safety is “don’t not pull the very-light trigger.”
His AR-15 may be US made, but whatever, take his Volunteer ass back to Tennessee. (What is up with MS and TN and their extra letters? Consequence of a poor education system?
Who took my glass of booze??
Erick Erickson was on CNN for some reason, also saying that health care isn’t in the constitution. Alright, sure, but how the ideals of the Declaration of Independence? How do tea baggers manage to reduce “LIFE, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” to “stay away from mah freedumb, socialists muslins!”
Apple Flavor?
What a puss
[re=559870]simpethesis[/re]: Of course, the the ability for the elected representatives to pass law affecting interstate commerce is. It’s like saying regulating aviation, or landing a man on the moon, isn’t in the Constition. Healthcare in 1776 was comprised of a jar of leeches and smeeling salts.
I can’t go back and watch this again. Did he really say that Social Security isn’t in the Constitution? And yet I’m sure he would scream to the high heavens if anyone threatened to abolish it.
[re=559870]simpethesis[/re]: Well in the Founders’ day, health care meant a shot of rum and a few leeches. If that were still the case you’d have to buy enough rum and leeches to satisfy your five-thousand-dollar deductible before the insurance company would cover anything, and then they would probably throw you off the rolls because they don’t want to have to pay for all your rum-and-leech-based health care.
Funny how this piece of shit whines about the constitution while indicating that he has no clue that his purported gun privledge is in the bill of rights. And yes, there are assholes like this who are or were in the Navy (see his emblem on his little blue shirt). Twerps like this are not confined to the Army or USMC.
All those idiots who claim we can’t do health reform, or whatever they’re protesting against, because of the Constitution hasn’t read it. Article 1, section 8, bitches. The government can tax, and spend that money for the general welfare. That’s it – the government can spend its tax money however it wants, as long as it’s for the general welfare.
This convinces me. “Getting laid” has simply got to be put in the Constitution. If there were a federal mandate that chronically untouchable people would have to either figure out a way to get laid or pay a (non-criminally enforceable) fine, a lot of problems would be eased considerably. This should apply to the high percentage of Teabagging/conservative/anti-social nutjobs who will be surprised when it turns out same-sex attraction has been the source of their trouble all along.
Skoal ISN’T in the Constitution.
Things not in the Constitution that this nutjob definitely likes:
1. The minimum wage (for him and all his friends)
2. Interstate highways (kind of convenient, but definitely not in the document)
3. The Tennessee Valley Authority (if he really is from there)
4. A standing navy (so he could get his little USS Constitution shirt)
5. The National F-ing Parks system! (yes, Congress can deal with land, but the idea of a park didn’t occur to those wrinkled old whiteboys)
I realize I could go on, and on, but the irony of a guy standing in a national park bitching about government exercise of implied powers is just too much.
[re=559840]sati demise[/re]: “[Does the type of gun a person loves tell you anything about them?”
Why, yes, actually, e.g.,
(1) Desert Eagle .50 cal. semi-auto owners: Typically, American Jewish IDF-Wannabees and/or Republican Legislators (same thing, really) who frequently confuse the stray raccoon for “Big Game.” If encountered, the safest place to stand is directly in front of the barrel, as they can’t hit the proverbial broad side the barn.
(2) AK 47 owners: Hicks/Rednecks/Crack & Meth Dealers who can’t afford anything better. Exceptions being fans of the cinematic stylings of the Immortal John Milius . . . WOLVERINEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSS!!!!! (Nb. There’s a REMAKE in the works. Is Nothing SACRED?!?!)
(3) Glock Owners: Hispanic gangbangers with too much disposal income, and/or “Aryans” who insist that Hitler, too, was an Austrian. Given the way Glocks work (always cocked; safety integral to the trigger), these often can be observed in emergency rooms after they have shot themselves in the foot practicing their “quick draw.”
(4) M16/M4 (and clones) Owners: Middle class white guys with more money than sense, because they never had to carry one of these POS in the US Army. (All the Special Ops units insist on the right to carry something that actually works, e.g., the H&K 401; a rebuild of the M14.)
(5) Remington 870 Pump 12 gauge owners: Traditionalists, e.g., Mom, Apple Pie, American Flag, Load of Double OO right in the back. Great friends; bad enemies. If you live in the same apartment/condo complex, don’t worry: A standard buckshot load probably will not go through the wall. Probably. I mean, most of the time it won’t. Usually.
(6) M-1 Garand owners: Clint “GET OFF MY LAWN” Eastwood. Avoid, particularly if he’s driving a Detroit POS. (Recognizing that the last is redundant.)
(7) Ruger .460 Magnum Express owners: Complete Loonies who bought the classic “Big Game” rifle “just for the heck of it.” If you live near one, move immediately: The bullet can sort of wander through about five or six walls before it even starts to think about slowing down.
Good times. Good times.
:::Sigh:::
(Gee, why are there all these vacancies in my building? Think Liz will move here Yoga Studio in here?)
[re=559854]tbogg[/re]:
I like the Britney-Shania, but most of these asswhipes name their daughters something cute like Chastity or Amber because they know they’re all just one step away from stripping anyway.
[re=559848]El Pinche[/re]:
Paper targets and plastic deer don’t shoot back. I think a microsecond after they witness their fellow gun-toter’s chest suddenly erupt into a blood fountain, they’ll be runnin’ o’er the hill and o’er the dale.
[re=559854]tbogg[/re]: Dang, son.
[re=559903]Neilist[/re]: (6) M-1 Garand owners: Clint “GET OFF MY LAWN” Eastwood.
Reminded me…I have a very elderly, sweet old guy in my neighborhood. We happened to get into a conversation about history one day and he veered the conversation onto the M-1 and mentioned Garands that he owned…so I asked if he collected them.
He told me that he wasn’t really a collector, he was just a hobbyist trying to fill time since his wife passed away. He only owned @25 M-1′s.
I love the olds.
I’ve had a 9″ penis all my life and I’ve been a lifelong Democrat, but he has a point….
[re=559918]El Pinche[/re]: Must have been an interesting delivery…..
[re=559903]Neilist[/re]: You missed the one I carried, the XM177 E2, sorta the grandpa to the M4. It too was a POS ‘cepting the humongus brake that kept you from getting totally blinded at night and did cut the obscene racket some. I’m thinkin’ that would be in the hands of Cletus of the Cave. Those crazy MFs who really, really liked it, and who one and all around them seriously wondered what the fuck they were going to do when they got home (& should the guvment let them go).
[re=559903]Neilist[/re]: Sorry, I’m gun-illiterate; but it seems you neglected to give the profile for the “23″ carrier that you stated a preference for….
Just sayin’ –
[re=559903]Neilist[/re]: You neglected to mention one of my own pieces of potential personal heartbreak, the Colt Defender Series 90. That cocked and locked
safetynightmare has perforated feet written all over it.The funniest thing with ‘Murikans is their logic.
According to that logic, one must ROFL about the FCESM (French Cheese Eater Surrender Monkeys)
The same logic shows them that the FCEM government fears its people, while the ‘Murikans fear their government (I’m not the one saying this, I have read this on ‘Murikans blogs).
The funny part of that logic is that : Have a ‘Murikan ever seen FCEM striking on TV?
They strike with their legs and arms and leave the bear home.
[re=559792]chascates[/re]:
FUN FACT: The very first major issue where there was a serious question as to the constitutionality of an act of expansion of the government was the purchase, for $15 million, of the Louisiana Territory, via treaty, by President Jefferson. The Constitution was silent on the matter of territorial expansion, but Jefferson went full on ahead, anyway, and let the Constitution stuff sort itself out.
The reason I mention this is that it got me thinking. Not this guy, but a lot of the people who share his views on all this unconstitutional whatnot needing to be taken away, happen to live West of the Ohio river. What I’m driving at is, do you think France would be willing to give us a refund, or would they only give us store credit?
[re=559840]sati demise[/re]: Never trust anyone who carries a 1911.
FEH! I just can’t watch this gun-shagging prat in the video – I’ll have to rely on you lot to let me know how grandly your TeaTard-population celebrated their Timothy McVeigh Day holiday, and what they’ve got planned for their Uncle Adolph’s B-day today….
Meanwhile, in the sporting news…
Oh, oh! Neillist, do me. (Waitasec, that sounds all wrong…)
What I meant was, I have a Colt Woodsman .22 and a Winchester 190 .22 rifle with a 4x Weaver scope. Both from the 1970′s. These are my “varmint” guns, but to tell the truth, I’ve killed more varmints with my shovel (I mean, what kind of asshole packs a .22 around all day?)
Anyway, what do my guns say about me? If it’s any help, I drive 1990 Camry 4-door, also and too.
[re=559969]Lascauxcaveman[/re]: You’re smart and may have actual vinyl albums. Your father taught you very much. You’re earthy and may be either a Capricorn, Virgo, or Taurus. Lucky numbers 10,3,34,29,2 and Powerball 26.
In bed.
[re=559903]Neilist[/re]:
Tie a yellow ribbon round the old asshole.
[re=559825]Gun-toting Progressive[/re]: Your point being?
The girl was right – her daddy been in the sun too long…
Where was the “Abolish social security and medicare” sign? They really need to drive that point home if they want to win in 2010.
[re=559831]Neilist[/re]: Who cares if they make it any more? Most used, 40-year-old American guns are higher quality than what’s being made now, unless they’re ex-cop or ex-military and shot out. My CCW is a ’60s-vintage Smith Model 38 Airweight with the shrouded hammer.
Theoretical CCW, that is; I don’t plan on carrying unless I get a stalker or go to work at a liquor store. But it’s what I stick in my pocket when I go outside at 2 a.m. to investigate a drunk who hit a telephone pole across the street.
I love it when she squeezes my Glock.
[re=559815]Neilist[/re]: Actually, Glock, Inc., in Smyrna doesn’t manufacture guns; they’re just the U.S. distributor for them. All the pistols are made in good old Austria. They’re not that unsafe; they won’t go off if you drop them, f’rinstance, and there’s no safety on a double-action revolver, either.
I think the safest gun I own is an Iver Johnson safety automatic hammerless, model of 1897, in .32 S&W. It has a trigger safety like the Glock, the pull weight is about 15 pounds, and the round is ineffective to the point of comedy. Oh, and the stiff, creepy trigger pull makes it wildly inaccurate. Very difficult for this gun to hurt anybody.
As often as guns are tragically employed to accidentally or otherwise put a hole through their owner’s head, I see guys like this and think that it doesn’t happen often enough.
Happy Timothy McVeigh Day to you all!
[re=559909]Servo[/re]:
Well said. I would love to see how these suburban gun lovers react if shit were to really go down. I have a feeling ole’ love handles McGee wouldn’t last an hour before he’d remove himself from the battle due to back pain or shortness of breath.
Let me be the first to point out that if Petty Officer Bubba there paid half as much attention to his diet as he does to his toys, the gun strapped to his waist would look a little larger.
Hey Liz, next time on your way out (and I do mean once you are way way way out) I suggest you light a 100 pack of Black Cat firecrackers and let the hilarity ensue…
Comments on this entry are closed.