• May 27, 2012

Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Retires!

by Ken Layne  10:47 am April 9, 2010

Bye JP!Whoa! No linky yet, but John Paul Stevens says he’s stepping down this summer, so Barry Radical Cleric Nobama gets to appoint another liberal, which will be a “contentious” process because, uh, Republicans will cry and wet their Depends and Obama will put whoever he wants on the bench. Did you known Stevens was actually put on the court to be a conservative? Why do smart conservatives keep turning liberal?

Stevens said Friday he will step down when the court finishes its work for the summer in late June or early July. He said he hopes his successor is confirmed “well in advance of the commencement of the court’s next term.”

His announcement had been hinted at for months. It comes 11 days before his 90th birthday.

See, not all old people are gross!

Anyway, the “John Paul Stevens is about to retire” story is about as old as Wonkette itself. Here’s a post from early 2006 claiming JPS was going to step down that summer.

Let’s see, Obama has been informed, on his spaceship coming back from Prague, and, uh, Obama plans to choose a replacement. Really? That’s the “background” White House statement? [AP/Wiki]

{ 110 comments }

the problem child April 9, 2010 at 10:49 am

Well we knew it was coming. Guy’s going on 90.

betweenstations April 9, 2010 at 10:50 am

Oprah stepped down from her show and is a Friend of Barry.

OPRAH FOR SUPREME COURT!!!!!!!!!!

JMP April 9, 2010 at 10:50 am

Gah, why can’t it be Scalia?

chascates April 9, 2010 at 10:52 am

Now we need a wise Asian.

mumblyjoe April 9, 2010 at 10:53 am

Why do smart conservatives keep turning liberal?

Shame on you, Ken. By answering your own question there, now I have nothing else to say in this comment.

Mild Midwesterner April 9, 2010 at 10:53 am

I don’t care about the nominee’s politics, I just want another bowtie on the court.

Norbert April 9, 2010 at 10:54 am

Plant and Page never call him, so John Paul Jones is probably available.

jfruh April 9, 2010 at 10:54 am

I wonder if this is to get someone on before the November shitshow produced a Senate that won’t confirm anyone to the left of an unholy union between Bork and Hitler? Ugh.

Prommie April 9, 2010 at 10:54 am

Obama needs to nominate someone big, like, 6’6″, 275 pounds. Someone who can knock some heads, give Clarence and Scalia a good swirlie if they keep up their shit, stuff that that looney-tunes googley-eyed Roberts in a trash can.

MargeSimpsonsBlackFriend April 9, 2010 at 10:54 am

God, here comes another stupid fight over who will be nominated. The following people can shut the fuck up in advance: Sessions, Graham, McCain, Kyl, and Lieberman.

Lazy Media April 9, 2010 at 10:55 am

Dude lived through the Depression. Anybody who lived through the Depression and is a conservative by today’s standards is living as a tax fugitive in Costa Rica.

Cicada April 9, 2010 at 10:55 am

Barry should just go balls to the wall on this one, since the Republicans are going to treat any nominee as the most radical judicial activist EVAR no matter what.
Quick, someone go find an Asian transgender judge who was raised by a former SDS member!

Buzz Feedback April 9, 2010 at 10:56 am

[re=552238]chascates[/re]: Tom Vu.

Lazy Media April 9, 2010 at 10:57 am

You heard it here first, baby. Bill. Fucking. Clinton.

HipHopOpotamus April 9, 2010 at 10:57 am

he’s going to appoint a muslin, innit he?

Cicada April 9, 2010 at 10:57 am

[re=552242]Mild Midwesterner[/re]: Two words: Tucker Carlson.

Larry Fine April 9, 2010 at 10:59 am

Octomom would make a good judge

slappypaddy April 9, 2010 at 11:01 am

let the madness begin. glenn, rush, sarah, come on, step up, time’s a-wastin’.

Larry Fine April 9, 2010 at 11:02 am

[re=552255]HipHopOpotamus[/re]: someone who can enforce Shariah Law without delay.

thefrontpage April 9, 2010 at 11:02 am

Obama just announced several of his finalists for the seat:

1. Jim Carrey

2. Dana Carvey

3. Steve Harvey

4. Harvey Weinstein

5. Harvey Fierstein

6. Fox Mulder

7. Dana Scully

8. Michael Bey

9. Quentin Tarintino

10. Rupaul.

# # #

ManchuCandidate April 9, 2010 at 11:03 am

[re=552238]chascates[/re]:
I would recommend Mr Miyagi, but he’s dead now.

Crank Tango April 9, 2010 at 11:03 am

[re=552241]mumblyjoe[/re]: I will throw out the obvious answer that it is because dumb conservatives keep getting dumber and more conservative.

I will also make a dumb comment about Ken liking cinnamon toast crunch. He does.

Prommie April 9, 2010 at 11:03 am

[re=552254]Lazy Media[/re]: No, he will appoint a former senator, daschle, maybe?

germansteel April 9, 2010 at 11:04 am

[re=552254]Lazy Media[/re]:

You did beat me to it. Wouldn’t that be great, Billy (A constitutional law prof himself, back in the day) giving shit to the retards who didn’t think the Paula Jones lawsuit would take up much of the presidents time, and who handed over the WH to a war-mongering imbecile?

Nappied Hypotenuse April 9, 2010 at 11:05 am

[re=552244]jfruh[/re]: I hope so. It’s nice to see a justice using some strategy on the way out the door. Now, if he would only give Roberts a fatal swirlie at his retirement party, I could be truly happy.

red sky April 9, 2010 at 11:05 am

[re=552254]Lazy Media[/re]: Too old, we need someone who’s going to be there for another 40 or 50 years. That and we need a bus to drive thru McDonalds while Scalia, Alito and Thomas are having lunch there. I’ll give Roberts a pass, for now…

queeraselvis v 2.0 April 9, 2010 at 11:06 am

SCOTUS needs David O. Carter FTFW. Get to it, Barry!

Katydid April 9, 2010 at 11:06 am

Lieberdouche twat: “My vital vote for new SCOTUS justice will be based on how much attention I can get for ME ME ME” in 3,2,1…

WIDTAP April 9, 2010 at 11:07 am

For nomination: Goodwin Liu, perhaps?

He has the advantage of potentially pissing off both the Republicans and the Chinese (PRC).

Plus think of the fun when some gentleman from the South in the Senate objects to him as a nominee born in Taiwan because “we should never forget Pearl Harbor”.

HipHopOpotamus April 9, 2010 at 11:09 am

Fox’s coverage of this is absolutely genius. Also.

coolcatdaddy April 9, 2010 at 11:09 am

[re=552254]Lazy Media[/re]: Actually, GW Bush would make a great nominee for Republicans. He and Clarence Thomas could form the “I’m just hitting here being stupid” block on the Court and let Allito and Roberts just run the place.

weejee April 9, 2010 at 11:09 am

[re=552254]Lazy Media[/re]: Good thought, but we needs another gal. Wonkette Emerita, Ana Marie Cox. Maybe in 2050 it will be known as the buttsechs seat.

Monsieur Grumpe April 9, 2010 at 11:09 am
FMA April 9, 2010 at 11:10 am

[re=552245]Prommie[/re]: Alan Page is available. Former Minnesota Viking and now state Supreme Court justice. He’s kind of old, but he could still kick some serious ass.

JMP April 9, 2010 at 11:10 am

Ford’s appointment of Stevens does, in retrospect, somewhat make up for pardoning Nixon. But only somewhat.

[re=552246]MargeSimpsonsBlackFriend[/re]: Too late; Lieberman already made douchebaggy statements over a presumptive Supreme Court nominee a few days ago.

WIDTAP April 9, 2010 at 11:12 am

[re=552285]WIDTAP[/re]: Whoops. Goodwin Liu was actually born in Augusta, Georgia. Parents were Taiwanese immigrants. But that is all the better for the meme.

bitchincamaro April 9, 2010 at 11:13 am

Leave it vacant. For the lulz!

freakishlystrong April 9, 2010 at 11:14 am

How have the wingnuts turned every piece of good news for Hopey into a face-biting shitstorm? Which is what the debate over (anything) devolves in to.

Katydid April 9, 2010 at 11:14 am

Seriously, though, I’ve read good things about Goodwin Liu, not only that he’s a pretty good liberal, but also that he testified against Alito. His judicial philosophy is the opposite of Scalia’s, which would make the conservatards’ heads asplode, sploosh, small brains everywhere. Scalia might have a stroke.

But Liu’s still awaiting confirmation for the 9th Circuit, so I don’t know if he can realistically be nominated to SCOTUS. But I wanna see heads asplode.

user-of-owls April 9, 2010 at 11:15 am

[re=552238]chascates[/re]: Margaret Cho?

Oh, wise, not wise-cracking. Never mind.

FMA April 9, 2010 at 11:15 am

[re=552291]coolcatdaddy[/re]: Makes sense. Even morons deserve representation on the court. And since about 20 percent of the population are barely functioning retards, they should have more than one justice representing their retarded interests.
Or maybe not…

Johnny Zhivago April 9, 2010 at 11:15 am

Hillary Clinton – it would get her out of the way for good. It might cause some republican heads to actually explode, however.

Cape Clod April 9, 2010 at 11:16 am

[re=552246]MargeSimpsonsBlackFriend[/re]: I’ll second that. Nothing pushes the buttons of an attention whore more than a SCOTUS fight.

Jim89048 April 9, 2010 at 11:18 am

The chances of finding, let alone nominating and confirming, someone as liberal as Justice Stevens has proven to be, will be next to impossible. The Wise Latina is cool and all, but she’s not as left-ish as Souter was, thereby her appointment bent the curve to the right a little. Anyone who replaces Stevens will likewise bend the court further to the right. We’re screwed, is what I’m trying to say.

jimmj1210 April 9, 2010 at 11:18 am

i’d say judge judy, if only to get her off tv, she’s so obnoxious. or judge wapner, altho he might be dead by now. mario cuomo would make an excellent pick, but maybe too old and probably coulnd’t make up his mind by 2012 whether to accept

Not a Country Bumpkin April 9, 2010 at 11:19 am

Alan Page of the MN Supreme Court – former linebacker for the Vikings (the purple people eater era), would be my pick. And for bonus points – he wears a bowtie!

snideinplainsight April 9, 2010 at 11:19 am

I honestly thought Paula Abdul was great, I don’t know why they didn’t make her judge for life.

Manos: Hands of Fate April 9, 2010 at 11:19 am

I heard David Frum is looking for work.

Nigel April 9, 2010 at 11:20 am

Lawrence Lessig, please. The real one, not the Christopher Lloyd character.

GoinGreen April 9, 2010 at 11:21 am

My vote is for John Paul Jackson – he thinks we’re all in the shitter in 2012, anyway.

SayItWithWookies April 9, 2010 at 11:21 am

I hear Tiger Woods’ dad is available.

Katydid April 9, 2010 at 11:22 am

[re=552285]WIDTAP[/re]: Oops, took me too long to type it out. You linked to the same story I did. But I really love that Liu testified against Alito, saying “That concern is Judge Alito’s lack of skepticism toward government power that infringes on individual rights and liberties…His deferential instinct toward government is at odds with the Supreme Court’s vital role in protecting privacy, freedom, and due process of law…”

Liu is not wrong. But you’re right, he did vote against some liberal interests, but I like his judicial philosophy.

I’d also like to see Obama nominate a black judge for several reasons, not least to make Jeff Sessions’ look like a fool during the hearings when he says, “Boy, why you think you oughtcha be on that thar Su-preme Court?”

What Fresh Hell is This? April 9, 2010 at 11:22 am

Either Harold or Kumar — or Chong (can’t be Cheech since we already have one Messican).

No more Papist men, though! Goodwin Liu WAS born in Georgia, unlike carpetbagger Newton Leroy McPherson.

An American in Toronto April 9, 2010 at 11:23 am

[re=552304]Katydid[/re]: [re=552299]WIDTAP[/re]: I think you’re onto something. You know how much Barry likes making statements with his choices and the first Asian on the court would be a big get.

ella April 9, 2010 at 11:24 am

[re=552296]JMP[/re]: Lieberman’s always a step ahead when it comes to douchebaggery.

pirate king of the Jews April 9, 2010 at 11:25 am

Trig

bored with gravity April 9, 2010 at 11:25 am

Obama should use the George W Bush strategy of choosing whoever is walking past his door RIGHT NOW.

superdave April 9, 2010 at 11:25 am

[re=552299]WIDTAP[/re]: Goodwin Liu? Taiwan in teh hizzouse!

Come to think of it, Liu is my mom’s maiden name. There’s a pretty good change I’m related to him. Taiwan ain’t all that big a place.

FMA April 9, 2010 at 11:26 am

[re=552318]Not a Country Bumpkin[/re]: Actually, Alan Page was a defensive tackle.

snoidoid April 9, 2010 at 11:26 am

How about ex-pope John Paul? Oh, yeah, I forgot…

Crank Tango April 9, 2010 at 11:26 am

[re=552249]Lazy Media[/re]: or hiding out from the mossad in brazil, no?

Katydid April 9, 2010 at 11:27 am

[re=552330]An American in Toronto[/re]: Yes, but, really, he caught my attention because he’s mostly a liberal, he believes in a living Constitution, and is supposed to be pretty smart. And, best of all, HE TESTIFIED AGAINST ALITO’S CONFIRMATION.

Conservatards. Heads. Asploding. Tiny brains everywhere.

JMP April 9, 2010 at 11:31 am

How about New York Judge for Criminal Court, Part 2 Harold T. Stone; his impish pranks and one-liners will break through the stuffiness of normal Supreme Court proceedings.

V572625694 April 9, 2010 at 11:32 am

OT: Bart Stupak not running again! The UP is in chaos!

What? You didn’t know Stupak was a UPer? It explains everything.

WIDTAP April 9, 2010 at 11:36 am

[re=552344]Katydid[/re]: You really are fixated on that “tiny brains everywhere” imagery, aren’t you? I’m not saying that’s bad. I’m just saying when the Second Civil War comes, I’m putting you out front.

steverino247 April 9, 2010 at 11:37 am

[re=552281]queeraselvis v 2.0[/re]: Hell, yeah. I’ve been reading the Taintz decision and he is spot on. He’s a former Marine who was at Khe Sahn so the R’s can’t fuck with him there. Presided over the Mexican Mafia trials, made Orange County open up to gay students, etc., etc.

Here’s the best line (so far) from the Taintz case: “The Court has a word for such a refusal to follow the orders of the President of the United States, but it will leave the issue for the military to resolve.” Hmm, I think the word is cowardice. It’s your fucking war right-wingers, go serve in it.

Hart88 April 9, 2010 at 11:37 am

Oh shit. PUMAs are going to nuts if Hillary isn’t nominated. This should be fun to watch.

WadISay April 9, 2010 at 11:42 am

What’s the Fox News take on this? “Some are asking if Obama intends to nominate his 60s radical puppetmaster Bill Ayers before it’s too late.” [picture of H-bomb besplosion]

Katydid April 9, 2010 at 11:46 am

[re=552359]WIDTAP[/re]: Ah thought it was already here. We seem to be fighting it every day on Our Wonkette.

gurukalehuru April 9, 2010 at 11:46 am

Judge Reinhold.

ph7 April 9, 2010 at 11:49 am

Retiring to tour with Led Zeppelin full time?

Way Cool Larry April 9, 2010 at 11:51 am

[re=552246]MargeSimpsonsBlackFriend[/re]: but will that stop them? I’m afraid not!!!!

But god, this WILL be painful.

JoeMac April 9, 2010 at 11:53 am

I hear John Kyl plans to filibuster unless Obama selects Trig for the job.

GoinGreen April 9, 2010 at 11:53 am

[re=552384]ph7[/re]: I heard it was because he really enjoyed touring with Them Crooked Vultures.

CthuNHu April 9, 2010 at 11:55 am

[re=552269]ManchuCandidate[/re]: So? Clarence Thomas is on the court, isn’t he?

Army of None April 9, 2010 at 11:56 am

I thank the Health Care Reform Bill for re-educating me as to how our Government really works. Now, on what day of the week will the event be telecast whereby President Obama goes to the Office of Very Important Senator Lieberman and asks him what he wants, this time, to give his most important support to the idea of replacing the retiring Court Justice? Will some thoughtful aide put a soft pad down on the floor to prevent the grovelling from discoloring or ripping the knee area of the President’s suit pants?

JoeMac April 9, 2010 at 11:57 am

[re=552292]weejee[/re]: I am in with the Ana Marie suggestion, a hot red head with a nice rack and the supreme court will no longer be boring.

Snarkalicious April 9, 2010 at 12:02 pm

Y’know…John Edwards has a law degree.

imissopus April 9, 2010 at 12:06 pm

Van Jones. That would be a thing of beauty.

NJB April 9, 2010 at 12:08 pm

Orly Taitz – for the comedy.

June Cleaver 2.0 April 9, 2010 at 12:18 pm

[re=552344]Katydid[/re]: Everything that you said. Plus, he’s cute.

magic titty April 9, 2010 at 12:37 pm

Wow. Wonkette wasn’t funny at all in 2006, was it?

JadedDIssonance April 9, 2010 at 12:51 pm

Recess Appointment!

GOPCrusher April 9, 2010 at 12:57 pm

Considering that Jon Kyl stated last Sunday on Faux Noise Sunday that the Republiklans would filibuster any appointment that has “a pre-conceived idea about the law”, expect more obstruction.

thesheriffisnear April 9, 2010 at 1:02 pm

Diana Ross ‘cuz then it would be…never mind

GOPCrusher April 9, 2010 at 1:03 pm

Anita Hill

What Fresh Hell is This? April 9, 2010 at 1:06 pm

[re=552516]GOPCrusher[/re]: Ooo, great idea — or without the “preconceived idea about the law” (or anything else), the nod would go to Pallin.

King of the Dipshits April 9, 2010 at 1:18 pm

I would go with Joe Biden. While there are people on the SCOTUS who say some stupid shit, there is no one who represents Americans with turrets syndrome.

Bearbloke April 9, 2010 at 1:52 pm

[re=552254]Lazy Media[/re]: [re=552272]germansteel[/re]: Sorry Mate – altho’ Bill Clinton would be an interestingly vengeful choice, ol’ Slick Willie is busy campaigning to become the next UN Sec-Gen – you heard THAT here first!

However, a good liberal Asian (Buddhist? Female?) would be a fine pick.

sanantonerose April 9, 2010 at 1:57 pm

[re=552266]thefrontpage[/re]: Jim Carrey as Fireman Bill or Jim Carrey as Ace Ventura?

sanantonerose April 9, 2010 at 2:01 pm

Pat Priest of San Antonio, the judge who signed off on Tom DeLay’s money laundering and conspiracy to launder money charges. *my hero*

richardwb1 April 9, 2010 at 2:07 pm

[re=552380]gurukalehuru[/re]: Judd Nelson

WIDTAP April 9, 2010 at 2:07 pm

[re=552493]JadedDIssonance[/re]: Reece Whitherspoon Appointment!

GDTRFB April 9, 2010 at 2:14 pm

[re=552271]Prommie[/re]: Daschle is not a lawyer. Pretty sure Rupaul isn’t either.

I Heart Accuracy April 9, 2010 at 2:50 pm

An Asian Muslim redhead. Conan O’Brien needs a job. I bet he’s a secret lawyer.

sanantonerose April 9, 2010 at 3:23 pm

FTW:

William Sanderson, famous from the Nick at Nite television network as the marvelously eccentric Larry, of “Larry, Darryl and Darryl” on Bob Newhart’s Newhart television series, and from the cult film Blade Runner, graduated from Memphis State Law School (now the University of Memphis Law School).

JP April 9, 2010 at 3:33 pm

I nominate Rachael Maddow. She has ruled out a Senate race, but she hasn’t ruled out a Supreme Court gig. She seems smarter than several judges already serving.

Even if she wasn’t confirmed, it would be great fun just watching all the tea bagger skulls explode at the hearings.

snideinplainsight April 9, 2010 at 4:03 pm

Can I just ask, who broke his nose? Pictures of him straight-on, it really looks like someone must have smacked him, at one time.

Virgin Birther April 9, 2010 at 4:24 pm

You and I may think of it as a chance to stack the court, but Barry probably just sees it as an opportunity to get his unemployed wife out of the house for a few hours a day.

bluetom00 April 9, 2010 at 4:26 pm

ZEPPELIN REUNION TOUR 2010.

zhubajie April 9, 2010 at 6:06 pm

Bill Clinton for Supreme Court!

zhubajie April 9, 2010 at 6:16 pm

[re=552245]Prommie[/re]: Jesse Ventura!

BeWoot April 9, 2010 at 6:53 pm

I’m with JP. Rachel Maddow!

The habit of naming only lawyers to the court is a modern custom and not one worth perpetuating. Besides, what are the odds of finding a gay atheist Muslim chinaman? No matter how much fun it would be to watch Mitch McConnell wetting himself and Fox “News” in full meltdown, we need to settle for the best we can get. And a young smart lesboliberal would be a major leap forward. Plus, we’d still get to see Mitch & Friends piss themselves, drop in frothing faints. ‘Twould be good times.

MarvintheCat April 9, 2010 at 8:24 pm

Former Secretary of Labor and current Cal Berkeley professor Robert Reich. For realz.

smellyal8r April 9, 2010 at 10:06 pm

I do think Bill or Hill Clinton would be a hilarious stroke, especially Mrs. C. I thought one just had to be a lawyer to get the nomination, not a sitting court judge? If not, well then hell, there’s a ton of people to consider. I too thought an Asian would be a nice touch or a real left wing African American woman to really give Thomas “the business”. Where’s Anita Hill these days? The Repubs are going to piss and whine through the whole thing, but I don’t think enough of them will stick together to filibuster someone who is ultimately qualified (unlike, say, Harriet Myers).

hotdog April 9, 2010 at 10:28 pm

[re=553098]smellyal8r[/re]: Technically one doesn’t need to be a lawyer, which is good for Bill because technically he’s no longer a lawyer, having had to relinquish his license as a result of some sort of incident involving a deposition and a blowjob.

Bearbloke April 9, 2010 at 11:05 pm

[re=553098]smellyal8r[/re]: Anita Hill, eh? Mebbe not, once you hear that she taught law at Anal Oral Roberts Uni from 1983 to 1986, and may be partially responsible for turning Frau Michelle Crayzeeyes Bachmann (J.D. class of 1986) loose upon your tortured country…

covered April 10, 2010 at 1:00 am

Charlie Sheen. Easy one.

Jukesgrrl April 10, 2010 at 1:28 am

[re=553067]MarvintheCat[/re]: Robert Reich … I’ll drink to that.

And by the way people, you do NOT have to be a lawyer to sit on the Court. You do not have to have been a judge in the past (e.g. Earl Warren). The Constitution specifies no rules whatsoever about the justices; they don’t even have to be American citizens (how radical were those founders?!) Technically speaking, Obama could appoint Justin Beiber if he wanted to. Which is about the same thing as W. trying to foist Harriet Miers on us. By the same token, if Sarah Palin were ever president, she could appoint Trig, although she would probably appoint Ted Nugent.

smellyal8r April 10, 2010 at 12:34 pm

[re=553134]covered[/re]: Sam Waterston.
[re=553136]Jukesgrrl[/re]: Good research. Thanks. I hear Jennifer Granholm is in the “vague discussion” category and she’s a Canadian…

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: