Or is that story still several weeks away? It’s hard to tell what this ten-Internet-page article about queer fur-ducks & bunnies is an allegory for. Let’s go with “Mike Allen and Dick Cheney.” [NYT Magazine]
IMPORTANT JOURNALISM THINGS
March 31, 2010
{ 51 comments }
Good to see that the Times is finally blowing the lid off the gay bunny racket.
Ghey!
This is why real Amurrica hates NYC. No one should ask these things. It makes us feel….funny.
So the Times prints a ten-page report based on a question with an answer that’s been well known for decades (yes); well done media!
In fact, even if homosexuality in other animals wasn’t well documented, it would still be obvious by simple logic; all humans are animals, and some humans are gay, therefore some animals are gay.
Sadly, given the level of reality denialism among the Christians, even this much documentation won’t stop them from calling gay sex “unnatural”, because you know a dumb old book says so.
The things on the left are Liberace’s candelabra gay. The Rabbits on the right are only bathing cap gay.
Those Faggoty Rabbits are going to be dead meat.
The minute I get out of this Mossy Camo Bridal Gown, and can find my Bushmaster M16 clone.
(Anyone see the little brat to whom I gave the latter for the wedding photos?)
I got nuttin’.
I don’t know about bunnies, but my dog doesn’t care what he’s humping.
If it was good enough for Jesus and John then why not the bunnies?
EASTER: COULD IT SECRETLY BE GAY?!?!
In the spring a young man’s fancy lightly turns to thoughts of love … with whatever’s closest.
[re=546060]V572625694[/re]: Real America hates NYC because The Times deliberately runs ghey animal stories on Easter Sunday. Note the fuzzy chickie/bunny pictures to lure in the unsuspecting real American who accidentally picked up a copy of the NYT Magazine in the dentist’s waiting room, thinking it was Parade.
Why do you want real America to hate New York, NYTimes? Oh, sorry, that’s right, YOU hate New York, too, but for different reasons (Queens, tourists, Yankee fans).
No, they’re not gay. Politico editors were genetically engineered using frog DNA, so they could — in theory — change gender spontaneously. Life… finds a way.
[re=546071]Neilist[/re]: “…to whom I gave the latter”? Colloquial FAIL.
First Ricky Martin, now animals! When will Obama stop shoving his gay agenda down our throats?
I don’t know what you’d call Dick Cheney’s sexual orientation, but it’s certainly not homosexual — I mean, what the hell would you call a sex act that involves Dick sitting in a modified CAT scan machine watching two men in cargo pants, muscle tees and latex gloves applying electrodes and nipple clamps to a half-dozen naked Iraqis, while his daughter (the straight one), seated nearby on an ostrich with her hands tied behind her, devours a haggis that a dwarf is holding up on a serving tray while a naked, hairless albino transvestite sings Bertold Brecht songs and his third-grade teacher, who reeks of lavender perfume, advances a filmstrip of graphic photos of horribly burned children?
those albatross hairstyles are FABULOUS!
Oh, fur cryin’ out loud.
[re=546090]SayItWithWookies[/re]: The same old tired scene from the last half-dozen David Lynch movies? (Well, except Straight Story, where the title gave everything away.)
[re=546079]salt_bagel[/re]: I have five Peeps, two Cadbury eggs, and one half-eaten chocolate bunny shoved up my ass right now.
Not because I’m gay for gay Easter, mind you, but because I have anal diabetes and no health insurance.
[re=546078]Ruhe[/re]: Today, we are all fucking like rabbis.
After reading the article, the author should have done a little more research since, in describing what’s supposed to be anthropomorphic overreaction to the lesbian albatross research, they include a quote from Stephen Colbert; way to be culturally out of touch there.
Today, we are all lesbian albatrosses.
I don’t know if the bottom bunny looks to keen on what’s going on. He has that, “Dude, what are you doing?” look.
The chicks though, definitely a wide stance.
The things in the picture on the left have more to worry about than being gay. They have fur growing on their feet and eyeballs!
I’m pretty sure I saw those two chicks on the left making out with each other at Voyeur in West Hollywood last week. The one on the right was wearing a harness and fishnet stockings.
My God, the Gayez have control of the NYT Magazine? Is nothing in the country sacred?
[re=546077]Cornhusker Kickback[/re]: The humping of dogs is a survival instinct left over from when packs of wild dogs were subservient to vicious wolves and Uggs and any old damned thing.
[re=546090]SayItWithWookies[/re]: I don’t recall having invited you to my bar mitzvah, but I’m glad you could make it.
Hence the chihuahua breed is a cross between a dachshund and a penny loafer.
[re=546081]Lazy Media[/re]: It’s not wrong to hate Yankee fans, even when NYT does it.
I ate a Peep in a YouTube short once, and Fred Phelps invited me to go on tour. Now I understand.
BTW, fuck Peeps and Fred Phelps. Also.
[re=546100]chaste everywhere[/re]: Which is why I haven’t watched one since Wild at Heart — they’re long, involved, slow, pretentiously overcomplicated with lots of loose ends that go nowhere, and when they’re done you’re not even really sure if anything worthwhile happened. The same goes for David Lynch movies.
[re=546090]SayItWithWookies[/re]: Oh, you tease, you.
[re=546077]Cornhusker Kickback[/re]: Omnisexual?
[re=546090]SayItWithWookies[/re]: Well, I would call it another boring Saturday night at home with friends. But that’s because me and my albatross lover have an open relationship.
[re=546090]SayItWithWookies[/re]: Real American Stories.
[re=546084]joezoo[/re]: and here’s a rare picture of it happening: http://icanhascheezburger.com/2009/07/20/funny-pictures-u-mad/
I really need to stop talking to the NYT….
[re=546090]SayItWithWookies[/re]: Tim Curry has to be in there somewhere.
Cute Overload will now start posting snarky political-type observations.
Mmmmmm furducken…
Has anyone told Michelle Bachmann about this? If not, can I, if I promise to take a picture of the look on her hatchet face?
Wow, based on those photos even gay animals are better groomed than their straight counterparts. More stylish, too.
[re=546085]Jukesgrrl[/re]: Try again, Jukes. Only this time, try Engrish.
I wouldn’t call him gay, per se… but it is well documented that Bugs Bunny was an avid cross-dresser.
Yeah. Animals are real gay. The end.
This puts a whole new light on The Ancient Mariner’s Rime.
I heard years ago that guy giraffes like buttsecksing each other. But it wasn’t clear if they were doing it in a gay sort of way, or if they were just saying hello. But in some (human) circles, isn’t buttsecks an accepted way of saying hello as well?
I tend not to give much credence to anything in the NYT magazine but this story is totally true. When I was in college I worked at a horse barn and there was this one horse who would tap his right hoof and get a wide stance and look under the partition whenever I was in the adjoining stall.
Well if they can commit suicide, I suppose they can be gay.
The chickens look like a couple of guys at me gym.
[re=546313]Mr Blifil[/re]:
It’s in the bible, I think.
Comments on this entry are closed.