• February 16, 2012

The New York Times is supposedly typey-typing its story that we already know will force David Paterson to resign before having any idea what’s in it. Why won’t David Paterson save the Times the trouble and just resign right now, for whatever?

David Paterson is really trying to put and end to the speculation he’s resigning.

“The only way I’m not going to be governor next year is at the ballot box. And the only way that I’ll be leaving office before is in a box,” Paterson said, at a press conference in Albany.

He also said he conducted an interview with The New York Times and they did not ask about extramarital affairs or drug use, which were two of the topics rumored to be part of the big Times piece that has yet to be published.

Presumably those two topics were already pretty established, and didn’t need further elaboration. Besides, when Paterson’s teabagging Maureen Dowd and snorting meth from Gail Collins’ ass during the interview, it’s even better evidence than “two independent sources” for publication.

[NY Observer]

{ 32 comments }

Cheney Guevara February 9, 2010 at 4:58 pm

What he mean to say is that he’ll only be leaving with his dick in a box.

hedgehog February 9, 2010 at 4:58 pm

You forgot getting a Dirty Sanchez from Frank Rich.

rafflesinc February 9, 2010 at 5:03 pm

“in a box” at least we know it’s a woman.

Snarkalicious February 9, 2010 at 5:04 pm

Right now, he’s too busy to resign, what with all the meth and Mother/Daughter combos he’s got lined up. Later he will be too tired. Governance is not for the weak of spirit.

Mr Blifil February 9, 2010 at 5:06 pm

The editors at the Times fucked up because at the hush-hush meeting with Paterson to discuss the terms of his surrender, the Times negotiator opened by saying “Look…”

JMP February 9, 2010 at 5:08 pm

[re=510337]rafflesinc[/re]: Yeah, but did he know it was a woman?

(Sorry, that was a groaner, I know)

Crank Tango February 9, 2010 at 5:15 pm

maybe I am just being “sightist,” but seriously, what is the point in being a blind adulterer? Even a threesome can’t be all that special if you’re blind, amirite?

hedgehog February 9, 2010 at 5:24 pm

[re=510353]Crank Tango[/re]: The whole world is Gov. Paterson’s glory hole.

Cheney Guevara February 9, 2010 at 5:24 pm

[re=510353]Crank Tango[/re]: you are wrong, and might want to consider closing your eyes during sex.

SayItWithWookies February 9, 2010 at 5:27 pm

[re=510353]Crank Tango[/re]: I’d think being blind makes adultery more enjoyable — you’re never freaked out by what last night’s partner looks like sober and in the light of day.

Dean Booth February 9, 2010 at 5:32 pm

“And the only way that I’ll be leaving office before is in a box.”

This made wonder if there are any blind mimes.

V572625694 February 9, 2010 at 5:37 pm

[re=510342]Mr Blifil[/re]: “Can’t you see how important…oh, sorry, Governor.”

Crank Tango February 9, 2010 at 5:42 pm

[re=510363]SayItWithWookies[/re]: and I guess you’re not always looking over your shoulder, afraid of getting caught.

[re=510362]Cheney Guevara[/re]: I never thought of that before–I’ll try that next time.

[re=510361]hedgehog[/re]: LOL

Radiotherapy February 9, 2010 at 5:45 pm

Do you know how hard it is to imprint Braille crib notes on the palm of your hand? C’mon, the deaf, dumb and blind kid sure likes a mean eight-ball.

Cheney Guevara February 9, 2010 at 5:46 pm

[re=510376]Crank Tango[/re]: it’s how i made it through college.

Snarkalicious February 9, 2010 at 5:49 pm

[re=510361]hedgehog[/re]: When you put it that way…pass the fuckin ice pick!

Gopherit February 9, 2010 at 6:05 pm

[re=510363]SayItWithWookies[/re]: I, for one, appreciate being able to see the strap-on on the bedside table.

Jim89048 February 9, 2010 at 6:08 pm

[re=510381]Snarkalicious[/re]: For real. When I was growing up, I was always told I’d go blind if I didn’t stop fapping. Now, Paterson makes it look pretty good.
Damn, was I stupid back then.

Mad Brahms February 9, 2010 at 6:21 pm

This editorial board scenario sounds like it should be ending with “The Aristocrats!”, really. I’d have to do a lot of cocaine *before* I got anywhere near Gail Collins’ ass, and let’s not even talk about Manohla Dargis, who would probably break down halfway through because rimjobs remind her of 9/11.

Extemporanus February 9, 2010 at 6:21 pm

[re=510353]Crank Tango[/re]: Even a threesome can’t be all that special if you’re blind, amirite?

If by “threesome” you mean “seeing eye doggie style”, then “special” doesn’t even begin to describe it.

Crank Tango February 9, 2010 at 6:22 pm

at any rate, it can’t be too much fun to do blow when you’re blind. Not since mcdonald’s got rid of those little spoons anyway. Then again I used to like just sticking the straw right in the bag but that is risky even when you can see how deep your in it…

Extemporanus February 9, 2010 at 6:32 pm

[re=510347]JMP[/re]: Are you suggesting that he might be third eye-blind as well?

[re=510369]Dean Booth[/re]: Yes, though they prefer to be called “referees”.

[re=510391]Gopherit[/re]: Dude, you take it up the ass from your bedside table?!

And here I thought hate-fucking my neighbor’s patio furniture was kinky!

Cheney Guevara February 9, 2010 at 6:35 pm

[re=510400]Crank Tango[/re]: i always heard blind people don’t enjoy cigarettes as much b/c half the fun is blowing out a cloud of smoke; not sure if that’s a myth

Crank Tango February 9, 2010 at 6:39 pm

[re=510406]Cheney Guevara[/re]: !
They prolly also have no concept of how cool it makes them look. I submit the blind gov’s wedding pic as evidence. If he had any idea how to look cool, he’d be wearing shades.

ThePuckStopsHere February 9, 2010 at 6:52 pm

I sure hope Gov. Paterson isn’t reading any of this.

bitchincamaro February 9, 2010 at 7:03 pm

Sometimes, you’ve got to read between the lines with the NYT. Here’s what I’ve garnered from the front page. Still putting it together, but need help:

analysts
unleashes
urges
stocks
Greek
plead
shaking all over
cometh
house of pain
fanatic

I know there’s a message here…

Radiotherapy February 9, 2010 at 7:07 pm

[re=510405]Extemporanus[/re]: Oh, the Embarrassment!

http://www.rhapsody.com/the-embarrassment/heyday-1979-83/patio-set

Crankenstank February 9, 2010 at 8:29 pm

Talk about the blind leading the blind! Excuse me, “leding”, in proper newspaperese.

lawrenceofthedesert February 9, 2010 at 8:45 pm

Once they saw the Stevie Wonder “red one” commercial during the Super Bowl, the NYT lawyers worried about a copyright infringement suit.

zhubajie February 9, 2010 at 10:28 pm

[re=510353]Crank Tango[/re]:I do things for the feel!

DC Hates Me February 9, 2010 at 10:34 pm

More proof that the New York Times deliberately tries to be unintersting.

hotdog February 9, 2010 at 10:43 pm

It’ll probably turn out to be some boring thing, like he demanded sexual favors in exchange for Hillary’s senate seat. And Caroline, you know, wouldn’t go down on him.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: