DOES THIS INVOLVE YOU? DID ANYONE ASK FOR YOUR OPINION? [Twitter via Yglesias]
MEANWHILE ON TWITTER
December 14, 2009
Political Wire
-
Authors
Kirsten Boyd Johnson (924)
Rebecca Schoenkopf (413)
Liz Colville (170)
Kris E. Benson (10)
Sulagna Misra (3)
John Schoenkopf (7)
Jim Newell (5640)
Josh Fruhlinger (646)
Erik Jay (27)
Blair Burke (181)
{ 102 comments }
That principle: “Always Be a Whore for Corporate America.”
I bet HITLER stood up for his principles. There, I said it.
What a disgrace that a man of principle is being attacked. By the way, what are those principles today?
The principle: Don’t fuck with Joe Lieberman.
And you are …?
Anyone know Yiddish? What’s a Hebrew word for “wrinkly, wicked, vindictive, ugly ass-faced little troll goblin and his senile old sore loser butt buddy?”
[re=477802]rambone[/re]: Crap, you beat me to the Hitler thing. I hesitated just a moment and someone else gets the cool placement. Damned pang of conscience. Fortunately, I threw it off quickly.
and get the @#$%^ off my lawn!!
Watch out, Cindy, he’s in a shitty mood. The c-word will be flyin’ tonight.
Yep, announcing that you won’t support a supposed compromise that you yourself suggested is “standing up for principles”.
To be fair, McCain is right in that Lieberman is standing up for his primary principle of spite.
They’re just pissed off that they have to spend all this time talking about things that might actually cause some improvements in the lives of ordinary Americans instead of speechafying about the glory of blowing up shit.
And by “his principles” I mean “Etna.” That Joe Lieberman, bravely standing up for the corporate bureaucrats that write our checks every election cycle.
Hey John! Do what your daughter did and SHOW US UR TITS!
Fuck you and your freaky little friend, too.
“Just like I was viciously attacked for following my ‘crash all planes’ principle by crashing every plane I was ever in… oh wait I was made Senator-for-Life and almost the President for that. So anyway how about some consistency!”
[re=477808]HedonismBot[/re]: I bet it sounds a lot like “Lieberman”.
Okay, Walnuts…
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/joe-lieberman-not-the-man-he-used-to-be-on-medicare-buy-in.php?ref=mp
Only way this makes sense is if principles means: Blond Lobbyist who looks like Cindy.
GO BACK TO SLEEP GRANDPA
John McCain: basically an evil Pol Pot.
(borrowed and abused)
Joe Lieberman, standing up….damn, wish I had a ball sack that big. Whoops sorry, those are hemorrhoids.
By tonight Lieberman will be attacked on a split video screen by HIMSELF, who campaigned in 2000 for the very thing he is whining about today – what a disgrace!
How nice of President McCain to stick up for Vice President Lieberman.
[re=477808]HedonismBot[/re]: Yiddish and Hebrew are not the same. But to answer your question, “Schmeggegeh”, “Schmuck”, and “Schlmiel” are good for starters (all Yiddish).
And yet the liberal right is silent.
he is right about one thing–joe lieberman is a disgrace. messy!
More from the Yglesias post:
…I guess to McCain being bitter and ignorant counts as standing up for your principles.
Actually, I think that’s a perfectly fair characterization of McCain’s ideological drifting over the years.
…
Stay relevant WALNUTS!, stay relevant.
Take a moment, as the bile rises in your throat, to consider the reaction of one Rahm Emanuel to our very special Lieberman Monday. With Emanuel around, I can only envision a small set of plausible explanations for the continued existence of the CT monster.
1-Rahm is bound in titanium chains at the bottom of an underground missile silo.
2-Rahm has become a Quaker.
3-Somewhere in the Virginia countryside, there is a mass grave that dwarfs the killing fields of Kampuchea which is filled with disemboweled puppies and the corpses of bludgeoned White House Homeless Person Internship Program winners.
bludgeoned WH interns who were orphans
[re=477808]HedonismBot[/re]:
Anyone know Yiddish? What’s a Hebrew word for “wrinkly, wicked, vindictive, ugly ass-faced little troll goblin and his senile old sore loser butt buddy?”
It’s now Lieberman.
Does anyone else notice that? Something smells like loser.
Well, that’s sure to get Walnuts another invite to Meet the Press.
When your own “principles” include ditchin’ the old ball and chain when a car crash leaves her disfigured (and ugly!), your view of Lieberman’s “principles” shouldn’t be expected to reconcile the buy-in flip flop.
Principles = money + spite
Oh, just shut up and take your Metamucil, Senator Poopypants.
Joe Lieberman’s principles are the finest principles the insurance industry can buy.
[re=477834]user-of-owls[/re]: Rahm is a ninja. Lieberman won’t even notice the sword going in, only that he’s getting sleepy.
[re=477826]bureaucrap[/re]: You forgot the best one of all, SHMENDRIK!!!
[re=477845]queeraselvis v 2.0[/re]: He’s only Poopypants WHEN he takes his Metamucil. Damn Vietnamese plugged up his colon, too.
[re=477834]user-of-owls[/re]: Aw, peas. All that time editing just to leave a scrap lying around at the bottom. FAT, FEATHERED FAIL you monkey dung.
It is disgraceful. Even on Twitter, there’s no need for your syntax to be this awful, Senator McCain. Let me help you.
“The liberal left (subject/unnecessary adjective) / viciously attacks (verb, active voice) / Joe Lieberman (direct object/douchebag) / for his principles on health care (prepositional phrases complementary to the verb/gross misunderstanding of what constitutes a principle). What a disgrace! (interjection/self-serving bullshit).”
If you can’t speak the language, get out of the country.
How dare the media report on the doings of feckless flabbery duplicitous fiend!
Note to Senator McCain: It’s okay to attack someone for standing up for their principles when their principles are shitty and transparent.
P.S. You washed up old fuck.
Aww, let the crazy old man ramble. He’s pissed off numerous conservatives/former supporters in my area with his stunt the other day bashing local stimulus improvement projects.
I see the Sore Loser caucus is out in force today.
So why doesn’t Lieberman just go and caucus with the Republicans? I bet they’d let him be Chairman of the Homeland Security Committee… oh, wait…
Give the phone back to Meg, you walking colostomy bag.
Did anyone in the EVilLIEberal Media ask Senator McWalnuts what those principles are, exactly?
Connecticut for Lieberman Party Platform, Plank 1: Leave the poor Americans in a ditch to die. Plank 2: I gets rich off the insurances people with their mad money skillz! (Plank 3 was something about a bigger wall for some ghetto in the middle east, and a final solution something or other, but I forget the details…)
FIVE AND A HALF YEARS, Jim, FIVE AND A HALF YEARS! No one has to ask McCain anything! What about FIVE AND A HALF YEARS do you not understand?
Lieberman is standing up for his principals, the very same principals John McCain has– mainly grandstanding on some very important issue and getting face time on TV. And then after that, making a big deal about rising above the petty partisanship of the day, wuss out and vote with the Republican Party.
[re=477823]dr.giraud[/re]: How many national elections do you have to lose in order to become irrelevant?
I wish that Joe stood up less for his “principles” and more for THE FUCKING STATE OF CONNECTICUT!
I had no idea that it was physically possible to stand up for one’s principles while simultaneously kneeling down to suck the cankerous cocks of one’s top corporate campaign donors whilst they repeatedly fist said principles up the ass with gold-plated brass knuckles bearing words such as “DENIED” and “HAHAHA” spelled out in tiny diamonds pried from wedding rings and purchased from pawnshops at a bulk discount.
Meh, he got the disgrace part right. I think that’s about all you can ask from him & his twattering…
[re=477826]bureaucrap[/re]: In short, the word we want is “smegma”. Sounds about right.
Can we give this fukker back to the Viet Cong?
[re=477871]Darkness[/re]: Connecticut for Lieberman party dropped him. The party founded solely for Lieberman’s reelection is now running ads AGAINST Lieberman.
God I love America. And by “love” I mean “laugh at its failure then cry myself to sleep with gin-soaked tears.”
[re=477802]rambone[/re]: Hey, can those of us who need the time to go Godwin subtly please have some space to do it in?? Thank you.
[re=477826]bureaucrap[/re]: I actually think that both McCain and Lieberman could best be described as mamzers. A Hebrew word, it means bastard, someone whose parentage, and therefore their Jewishness, is uncertain, or has been questioned. This could have huge implications for their future marriage and acceptance in the Jewish community.
When used as an epithet, it’s a pretty bad one. Previous generations of American Jews didn’t (admit) to cursing, or at least didn’t do it in English, and you’d have to do something pretty bad to get called a mamzer.
Schmuck, schlemiel, schlmoziel, schmendrick, are pretty mild compared to mamzer.
[re=477892]Potater[/re]: I was going to adjust, but then decided to go with “party as it is in the mind of Lieberman” since that’s all the reality that matters here. Also, at least the gin no longer leads to blindness on the way to blessed unconsciousness. That’s progress for you.
SenJohnMcCain has never seen a principle that couldn’t be paid down.
Can’t the House and Senate vote to rescind Liebfraumilch and (while they’re at it) Mcpain’s health insurance policies? Pretty sure, six months would do it for either of them….
[re=477899]Katydid[/re]: Wait wait wait…. Schlemiel, schlmoziel, hassenpfeffer incorporated…? Boy, that, um, does not clarify anything about my childhood television viewing.
Senator McCain, are you just giving your Twitter account info over to the insurance and pharam industry lobbyists and letting them do your Tweets for you?
Yeah, I thought so.
Get off my fuckin’ lawn, Senator McCain.
[re=477834]user-of-owls[/re]: All right, that’s it. I’m just going to do it…. RAHM EMANUEL IS A FUCKING PUSSY.
There, I said it. I don’t even care if I end up at the bottom of the Potomac.
Because, seriously, WTF, Rahm? I thought you were some badass muthafucka and yet it’s still the same old shit with Lieberman day after day after day. If you want to keep your reputation as pitbull without lipstick, you’ve got to fucking earn it, bitch. So get off your tush, and slap some sense into Joementum with your purported 80-pound ballsack or I will continue to call you a pussy. And you will deserve the title.
However, if you are in fact bound in titanium chains at the bottom of an underground missile silo, then I guess I will let this slide.
EDIT: Joe Lieberman… what a disgrace!
Yeah. Joe has always been such a loyal Democrat.
[re=477802]rambone[/re]: Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism, dude, at least it’s an ethos.
[re=477937]rikitikitavi[/re]: you only are allowed to reply with that to the commenter “neilist”…
Dear WALNUTS!
You keep running an ad here in Tucson telling me I need to contact my Congressional representatives and tell them to make the liberals stop robbing Medicare. First of all, Grampa Crash Helmet, one of my three representatives is you. Are you telling me you have Alzheimer’s so bad you need ME to tell YOU to do what you’re already doing? The second one would be Jon Kyl, your troll buddy who’s even further up Joe Lieberman’s ass than you are. The third would be the far-from-liberal Gabrielle Giffords (you know, that cute lil cowgirl in the Longworth Building), who charmingly calls herself a Democrat but would stab Nancy Pelosi in the heart on national TV before she’d vote to cut a penny of Medicare. She needs to get reelected three times more often than you do and she knows who goes to the polls on election day in this state. So there’s no way she’d cross our esteemed retirees.
I can only guess what you’re doing is raking in cash from the evil lobbyists and channeling it to our four local station managers as ad-buys. Judging from the “editorials” they run, they’re your drinkin’ buddies when you’re in Pima County. So you no doubt want keep them on the hook for times you need favors from TV-land. That would be your idea of a jobs program for Arizona, wouldn’t it, you old fart?
NOT your friend,
Jukesgrrl
[re=477915]Darkness[/re]: It might signify an unhealthy interest in Mel Brooks films.
[re=477826]bureaucrap[/re]: “Alta Kocker” would be applicable. (not sure of the spelling, but translates to “old shitter” which I would think with Wonkette’s proclivities might be a favorite.)
[re=477880]loquaciousmusic[/re]: any idea how this is playing in the Nutmeg State? I would think poorly — insurance companies and all.
Since Lieberman is throwing a fit and blocking the medicare expansion that he previously supported, is the principle involved the old “flip flop”? That sounds like something McCain would stand up for.
“Viciously attacked” by the liberals with all the force and vigor of a quadrasaplegic three year old. The asshole should have been drummed out of the caucus and stripped of his Chairmanship long ago.
I can’t wait for David Broder’s Very Serious Column proclaiming Lieberman’s intransigence as a modern profile in courage.
Somebody should kick McCain in the vag.
[re=477808]HedonismBot[/re]: Dickhead.
[re=477951]thesheriffisnear[/re]: ??? Mel Brooks would make sense, Laverne and Shirley, not so much.
They’d make a nice couple, like Oscar and Felix. And Lindsey of course.
If we’re mean enough to Meghan’s grandpa do you think she’ll show us het tits again? What, he’s not her grandpa?
Jit bags stick together
Joe Lieberman is trying to condemn me to paying $1,349 per month for health “insurance”– essentially my entire take home pay– for the rest of my fucking life. FUCK Joe Lieberman and the FUCKING horse he’s FUCKING out in his backyard.
Pretend that’s funny, for Baby K. I seem to have trouble getting to humor on this issue.
[re=477826]bureaucrap[/re]: You forgot shonda. I hate it that fuck is Jewish.
[re=477950]Jukesgrrl[/re]: Why do you bother watching network TV in this three horse shithole? More importantly, how can you stand it?
And yeah. This state fucking sucks.
On C-SPAN this morning they played a tape of him saying he won’t vote for the current bill but he doesn’t know what is in the bill. How can he be against the bill if he doesn’t know what’s in it???
[re=478057]lochnessmonster[/re]: He has the ‘Heimers…….and Dems are no better than the filthy gooks that used to beat him.
[re=478076]Gopherit[/re]: Nguyen!!!!!
[re=478057]lochnessmonster[/re]: He was against it before he was against it.
I thought he said, “What A DICKFACE!” in which case I would have wholeheartedly agreed.
[re=477808]HedonismBot[/re]: Actually, I think it might be something like “zwei mischkheit alterkackern.”
I guess “standing up for his principles” is SenJohn’s euphemism for ‘bending over for his principals.’
Either that or he just misspelled…
Shut up, Sean Jean. I would never wear your pants.
[re=477827]Vulpes82[/re]: Why won’t the liberal right stand up for this good man?
[re=478057]lochnessmonster[/re]: That’s what he means by being against it “on principle”. As opposed to being against it “based on an honest policy assessment”.
[re=478116]AliBabaInBA[/re]: Yeah, I was thinking it was a typo, too. Agent = Joe the Liar; principal = insurance lobby.
[re=477876]bored with gravity[/re]: “How many national elections do you have to lose in order to become irrelevant?”
John Kerry, Al Gore = 1
John McCain, Joe Lieberman, Sarah Palin, etc. = infinity
What really pisses me off all those ‘tards who put “Sore Loserman” signs in their yards after the 2000. I’m sure they’re all teabaggers now, AND they all love Lieberman for his principles.
FUCK FUCK FUCKITY FUCK FUCK.
[re=478056]Gopherit[/re]: I enjoy watching the local newscasters go apeshit over what passes for bad weather here. I’m especially amused when they scream, “BRING IN THE PETS!!” every time the temperature dips below 70 degrees F.
[re=477989]qwerty42[/re]: Connecticut doesn’t know what the hell we want.
Just a point of clarification here: if there is a liberal left, must but there not be a conservative left? What the fuck is that? The same as the liberal right?
I got that Masters Degree in Political Science so long ago that we didn’t even have terms like this. Color me old and confused. But not as old and confused as McCain.
In other news, the economy is strong.
[re=477822]Gorillionaire[/re]: I smell a poignant, creative, witty commercial coming on…
BTW, this has been beginning me FOREVER; what specifically is that thing in your avatar? I see it’s a pink gorilla, but is it a namebrand toy or what?
[re=478153]Jukesgrrl[/re]: At least you have local media to ignore… Up here in “Preskitt” I have to ignore the bobbleheads from Phoenix!
reading through Gandpa Simpson’s tweets – i’m really into this “stimulus stinker of the day”. is that like getting a boner when you shit your pants, gramps?
Comments on this entry are closed.