• May 26, 2012
WHERE'S SARAH CONNOR?

December 1, 2009

Michelle Obama’s Robot Army Protects Barack

by Ken Layne  

Fitter, happier ....And how did those dirty White House Party Crashers get by Michelle Obama’s robot-assassin droid? Here is the actual White House Flickr caption: “An aide to the First Lady, wearing a radio on the back of her dress, watches as President Barack Obama, First Lady Michelle Obama, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his wife, Mrs Gursharan Kaur, greet guests in the Blue Room of the White House at the State Dinner, Nov. 24, 2009.” So, basically, this robot gal could’ve zapped the interlopers with her radio-laser weapon, but didn’t, because she’s a righteous bodhisattva. [White House Flickr]

{ 36 comments }

Nigel December 1, 2009 at 8:43 am

It’s Bush’s secret transponder from that Kerry debate.

memzilla December 1, 2009 at 8:46 am

She is the Mark I model of the Borg, still in beta.

Tundra Grifter December 1, 2009 at 8:58 am

[re=468599]Nigel[/re]: Dang! You beat me to it – that was my first thought (remember how the libural New York Times spiked that story?).

Well played!

slithytoves December 1, 2009 at 9:02 am

Jesus that looks uncomfortable. I gave up wearing high heels and backpack radios to work 15 years ago.

WarAndG December 1, 2009 at 9:06 am

And it monitors the device wearer’s blood pressure and pulse because…

Monsieur Grumpe December 1, 2009 at 9:07 am

Actually, that’s an Orgamzotronix Vibrolux 4.0™. I’m surprised she’s even standing up.

Aflac Shrugged December 1, 2009 at 9:10 am

Tune in Tokyo! No, seriously!

If she has that much of a “concealed” transceiver setup protruding from her evening gown, why not give her a less concealed radio in a more comfortable place, or maybe Maxwell Smart’s shoe-phone?

TGY December 1, 2009 at 9:13 am

That radio is *so* old I bet it can’t even get Rush Limbaugh.

proudgrampa December 1, 2009 at 9:15 am

Jebus. That looks uncomfortable.

depraved indifference engine December 1, 2009 at 9:16 am

now self-employed,
concerned (but powerless),
an empowered and informed member of society
(pragmatism not idealism)

Thank you, Ken.

Sussemilch December 1, 2009 at 9:20 am

Nothing sexier than a lady with 20 pounds of electronics jammed in her dress. Oooh baby

AggieDemocrat December 1, 2009 at 9:21 am

I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.

bago December 1, 2009 at 9:21 am

Seriously, she could rock an a2dp headset and slip her iphone into a place a little more comfortable.

Fly Over Girl December 1, 2009 at 9:21 am

Why does she have a door bell on her right arm?

fishskicanoe December 1, 2009 at 9:23 am

Radio? What radio?

That is one nice back!

gurukalehuru December 1, 2009 at 9:26 am

[re=468608]Aflac Shrugged[/re]: She may well have other electronics concealed in “more comfortable places,” but the photographer, unfortunately, took the shot he could get.

AxmxZ December 1, 2009 at 9:30 am

Party like it’s 1989.

pondscum December 1, 2009 at 9:43 am

Formal gowns are hella uncomfortable on their own. I can’t imagine jamming electronics and a gun into one as well. They should be allowed to wear tuxes. Like the one’s Jodie Foster is always rockin’ at awards shows. Or is that too gay?

Berkeley Bear December 1, 2009 at 9:46 am

[re=468626]Fly Over Girl[/re]: That’s her transmitter, so she can be “discreet” by talking into her sleeve instead of hauling up the walkie-talkie every time she has to tell the wait staff to send out more curry puffs.

I’m thinking she’s watched “In the Line of Fire” a few too many times.

Terry December 1, 2009 at 9:48 am

Holy moley, does the White House buy their electronics gear at Radio Shack? That is one honkin big walkie-talkie.

Come here a minute December 1, 2009 at 9:52 am

This robot really should have been able to stop the Gucci little piggy and her husband.

AxmxZ December 1, 2009 at 9:52 am

On the bright side, that’s one bad-ass looking lady-in-waiting.

el_burrito December 1, 2009 at 10:01 am

I think she has her dress on backwards.

southpaw December 1, 2009 at 10:13 am

The real question is: Where does she keep her gun?

Flanders December 1, 2009 at 10:25 am

[re=468616]depraved indifference engine[/re]: nca(t…?? Your acrostic sucks.

ManchuCandidate December 1, 2009 at 10:36 am

Fembots!

Unlearned Hand December 1, 2009 at 10:39 am

Please, that’s the decoy “radio”. The real one is a thought-activated cloud of nanites in her inner ear.

Mr Blifil December 1, 2009 at 11:03 am

I would not hit that.

PoetryMan December 1, 2009 at 11:23 am

Damn that’s big. Can’t they just use an iPhone?

el donaldo December 1, 2009 at 12:12 pm

Party up front; business in the back. That dress is reverse mullet.

Extemporanus December 1, 2009 at 1:44 pm

LEAVE SALMA HAYEK ALONE!!1

Extemporanus December 1, 2009 at 1:52 pm

[re=468601]memzilla[/re]: Actually, her name is Landbot, and she’s the illegitimate daughter of Lando and Lobot.

(Don’t ask…)

desertwind December 1, 2009 at 3:21 pm

Is it wrong of me to find this really really sexy?

doloras December 1, 2009 at 3:30 pm

[re=469208]desertwind[/re]: If it’s wrong, I don’t want to be right. YUM YUM.

depraved indifference engine December 1, 2009 at 8:26 pm

[re=468693]Flanders[/re]: Hey, you!

Blame Ken and Thom Yorke. Not my fault. You try making an acrostic out of that damned song!

LowerdPeninsula December 2, 2009 at 1:04 am

[re=468661]AxmxZ[/re]: I know, right?

[re=469208]desertwind[/re]: It’d be wrong if you didn’t.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: