Silly Paultards, The Great War Is Over

They’re just mad we insulted the fact his son is named after Ayn Rand. Oh God here comes the vomit again, I can’t repeat that fact without losing it

Yet another somebody who forgot to put on their big girl panties this morning.

Google Shrugged.

Snicker: “This is not a free speech issue, google is a community…”

This knucklehead thinks Google is a Phish concert. That’s precious.

“Login or register to post comments”
Sucks.

And I just registered on Wonkette just to say that the Paultard site needs registrations to comment. FML.

Geez, I don’t search for porn that often. And that’s porn.

>>Should just take a couple of minutes a day of my time

Your sacrifice is noted, oh great Internet Activist.

Again with the conservative obsession with turning random words into proper nouns. There ain’t been proper Satire in this joint ever. Just common satire.

As someone who can’t help but google news search Ron Paul everyday for almost two years

Wait. OMG. Are they making fun of themselves?

If not, Jesus Christ, go outside. There’s a great big world out there.

“As someone who can’t help but google news search Ron Paul everyday for almost two years…

Hmmmmmmm…

He’s the one they call Dr. Feel good
[In your pants]
He’s the one that makes ya feel all right
[Because he gives Paultards a boner]
He’s the one they call Dr. Feel good

I was going to leave a witty and scathing comment on the Paultard site, then I saw this:

“For all you new chicken owners, a little lesson I just learned the hard way
Posted June 16th, 2009 by MikeLawson
If you have 3 chickens that basically act like little puppies and are pretty attached to you, don’t assume if you get 3 more that the old ones won’t just pack up and leave. For about 1/2 a day after getting 3 new birds, I had 6. Now I have 3, but it ain’t the old girls. They left. Weird, huh?”

Now I just want to lie down.

That whole Satire guise, it sure is a bitch.

I guess you should apologize, twice, so that Ron Paul can thank the military for making this exchange possible.

We could contend that DP is offensive material as well, especially right next to the good doctor’s face. I mean, fine, Furlough, I get that you want Ron and Rand Paul to double-stuff your poop hole, but do you need to put it on the internet?

Aragorn: Open war is upon you whether you would risk it or not.
Theoden: So much death. What can men do against such reckless Paultards?
Aragorn: Ride out with me. Ride out and meet them.
Theoden: For death and glory.
Aragorn: For Wonkette. For your people.
Theoden: The Horn of Helm Hammerhand will sound in the deep, one last time!

Step I: I admitted I was powerless over Ron Paul and my life had become unmanageable.

Does furlough hang out w/David Denby?

They’ve got their own Bruce Dern and their own blimp, all they need is another outdoor Super Bowl with Wonkette editors in attendance.

I say we go to the mattresses.

The little outraged Paultard wrote This is not a free speech issue, google is a community

Google is a community like Ron Paul is a viable candidate for president.

Now, I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by snarking for his/her website. He/she won it by making the other poor dumb bastard go insane for his website. People, all this stuff you’ve heard about Wonkette not wanting to fight, wanting to stay out of another war, is a lot of horse shit. Wonketteers traditionally love to fight. All real Wonketteers love the sting of battle. When you were kids, you all admired the smart ass, the quick wit, the big league asshole, the vilest comedian. Wonketters love a winner and will not tolerate a loser. Wonketteers play to win all the time. I wouldn’t give a rat’s ass for a man who was bested by a Paultard and laughed. That’s why Wonketteers have never lost and will never lose a war. Because the very thought of losing is hateful to Wonketteers.

Now, a Paultard is an individual. He lives in basements, eats cheetos, sleeps on cheeto dust, fights for cheetos as indidviduals. This Ron Paul/Ayn Rand stuff is a bunch of bullshit. The bilious bastards who wrote that stuff about individuality for the Paultards don’t know anything more about snark than they do about fucking.

Now, some of you boys, I know, are wondering whether or not you’ll chicken out under fire. Don’t worry about it. I can assure you that you will all do your duty. The Paultards are the enemy. Wade into them. Make them cry. Mock them about their bellies. When you put your hand into a bunch of goo that a moment before was your best internet friend’s avatar, you’ll know what to do.

Now there’s another thing I want you to remember. I don’t want to get any messages saying that we are holding our position. We’re not holding anything. Let the Paultard do that. We are advancing constantly and we’re not interested in holding onto anything except the Paultards. We’re going to hold onto him by the Furry nose and we’re going to kick him in the giant ass. We’re going to kick the hell out of him all the time and we’re gonna go through him like Paultards through M&Ms.

There’s one thing that you men will be able to say when you get back home. And you may thank Newell for it. Thirty years from now when you’re sitting around your fireside with your grandson on your knee and he asks you what did you do in the great Paultard War II, you won’t have to say, “Well, I posted on Huffington Post.”

Alright now, you sons-of-bitches, you know how I feel. Oh, and I will be proud to lead you wonderful guys into battle – anytime, anywhere.

That’s all.

If you’re googling Ron Paul every day, even now, of course you’re going to find Satire of him. The man is irrelevant, and a joke, a laughingstock. The regular news isn’t going to cover him because he is not important, and what he says is insignificant, even more so than when he was in last place for the Republican nomination; the only reasons anyone has to mention him now are either that they are among his silly, cult-like followers (you, Mr. Furlough) or to make fun of his unimportance and his ridiculous fans (that’s this place).

For extra bonus internet points, click on Kevin Tuma’s political cartoons. IT’S LIKE INSERTING WHITE-HOT NEEDLES BEHIND YOUR EYES AND INTO YOUR FRONTAL LOBE. I’d say that the comics curmudgeon would have a field day with them, but there isn’t anything of any substance to criticize. . .

Btw, what IS gold’s next move? [Sigh...]

Dude, what’s with their dis of Wonkette ads? Take a look at their ads, they have a half page dedicated to a plant that cures poison ivy, fifty different ads for signing a petition to end money, twelve more ads for a third party system and eight more just for one book somebody wrote about Ron Paul. Hmmmmm, jenky webpage with myriad small ads and flashing cheesy tif images…Sounds like someone copied the code from a PRON page and “Find and Replaced” “Ron Paul” for “horny good time locals”

Does this mean that the Alliance of Expediency with Redstate is politically acceptable again?

[re=340075]ManchuCandidate[/re]: Pattonesque.

[re=340075]ManchuCandidate[/re]: win!

[re=340083]SmutBoffin[/re]: HOW COULD YOU LINK TO THAT? That’s just cruel.

Please provide Twitter updates on the emerging conflict.

“The username TruckNutz has not been activated or is blocked.”

Oh, god dammit…now I have to go back and masturbate to Politico while I wait for someone’s cheeto dust-stained fingers to activate my account.

Fucking Paultards…

[re=340004]shortsshortsshorts[/re]: General Shorts, I salute you sir.

[re=340088]d4g33z[/re]: UP! And Silver and Oil and Natural Gas! UP!

I have a hard time believing he’s that good a doctor.

[re=340115]El Pinche[/re]:

I draw the line at smelling like a Paultard.

[re=340135]proudgrampa[/re]: God help us all..

Oh those fuckers…

T. R. Ucknuttz,

username: T. R. Ucknuttz
password: HrXXpATXe4

–––––––––––––

and then:

The username T. R. Ucknuttz has not been activated or is blocked.

It’s like they’re just fucking with us.

[re=340083]SmutBoffin[/re]: Wow, that’s some high test stupid, right there.

I am confused about the “IMMIvasion” one though – aren’t those Messicans doing the whole libertarian thing and acting in their own rational economic self-interest? I would think libertarians would applaud that sort of thing. What’s the alternative? Have the EVVVVILLEEE
GUBMIT use force to keep the Messicans out?

Coherency is not apparently a Randian virtue.

When all this is finally over people will ask me, “Hey ‘Stance, why do you do it man? What did a Paultard do to you?” You know what I’ll say? I won’t say a goddamn word. Why? They won’t understand. They won’t understand why we did it.

Will someone please tell the Paultards about Google news alerts?

ManchuCandidate: Just get a proper education, it is up to you to choose from whom you want to get educated, just be proactive and feed your brain with some substantial information

Armentano, Dominick. Antitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy Failure, 2nd ed. Oakland, Calif.: Independent Institute, 1990.

Bacevich, Andrew J. The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006

Bamford, James. A Pretext for War: 9/11, Iraq and the Abuse of America’s Intelligence Agencies. New York Anchor, 2005.

Bovard, James. Terrorism and Tyranny: Trampling Freedom, Justice, and Peace to Rid the World of Evil. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

DiLorenzo, Thomas J. The Real Lincoln. New York: Three Rivers Press, 2003

Engdahl, F. William. A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order. London: Pluto Press, 2004

Fleming, Thomas. The Illusion of Victory: America in World War I. New York: Basic Books, 2004

Fleming, Thomas. The New Dealer’s War: FDR and the War Within World War II. New York: Basic Books, 2002.

Flynn, John T. As We Go Marching. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1944. Flynn was an accomplished journalist, analyzes facism in Italy and Germany and concludes by considering the state of America in his day.

Folsom, Burton W., Jr. The Myth of the Robber Barons: A New Look at the Rise of Big Business in America. Herndon, Va.: Young America’s Foundation, 1993.

Garrett, Garet. The People’s Pottage. Caldwell, Id.: Caxton, 1953. This is a persuasively argued and compellingly written early critique of the New Deal policies of the 1930s.

Gibbon, Edward. The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. New York: Modern Library, 2003 [1776-88].

Griffin, G. Edward. The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve, 4th ed. Westlake Village, Calif.: American Media, 2002.

Hayek, Fredrich A. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1944.

Hazlitt, Henry. Economics in One Lesson. New York: Three Rivers Press, 1988 [1946] The classic text has helped millions of Americans understand basic economics and the free market in just a few hours. (An indication of how the world has changed: Hazlitt once wrote editorials for the New York Times.)

Hoffer, Eric. The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements. New York: Harper & Row, 1951.

Holzer, Henry Mark, ed. The Golden Clause: What It Is and How to Use It Profitably. iUniverse, 2000.

Jastram, Roy William. The Golden Constant: The English and American Experience, 1560-1976. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978.

Johnson, Chalmers. Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire, 2nd ed. New York: Henry Holt, 2004.

Kwitney, Jonathan. Endless Enemies: America’s Worldwide War Against Its Own Best Interests. New York: Congdon & Weed, 1984.

Lane, Rose Wilder. The Discovery of Freedom. New York: John Day 1943.

MacKay, Charles. Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. London: George Routledge & Sons, 1869 [1841].

Mises, Ludwig von. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1949.

Mueller, John. Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. New York: Free Press, 2006.

Napolitano, Andrew P. Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When Government Breaks Its Own Laws. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2006.

Napolitano, Andrew P. A Nation of Sheep. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2007

Palyi, Melchior. The Twilight of Gold, 1914-1936: Myths and Realities. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1972.

Pape, Robert. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York : Random House, 2006.

Psaternak, Boris. Doctor Zhivago. New York: Pantheon, 1997 [1958].

Paterson, Isabel. The God of the Machine. New York: Putman, 1943. A classic work of libertarian political theory.

Powell, Jim. Wilson’s War. New York: Crown Forum, 2005.

Rand, Ayn. Atlas Shrugged. New York: Random House, 1957. I consider all of Rand’s novels worth reading, in spite of my strong disagreements with her on important matters.

Read, Leonard E. The Love of Liberty. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y: Foundation for Economic Education, 1975.

Rees-Moog, William. The Reigning Error: The Crisis of World Inflation. London: Hamish Hamilton, 1974.

Roberts, Paul Craig, and Lawrence M. Stratton. The Tyranny of Good Intention: How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice. Rosville, Calif.: Prima 2000.

Rockwell, Llewellyn H., Jr. Speaking of Liberty. Auburn Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2005.

Rothbard, Murray N. America’s Great Depression, 5th ed. Auburn Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2000.

Rothbard, Murray N. What Has Government Done to Our Money? Auburn Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1990. The entire text is available for free here.

Rueff, Jaques. The Monetary Sin of the West. New York: Macmillan, 1972.

Scheuer, Michael. Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror. Washington D.C.: Potomac Books, 2004.

Sennholz, Hans F. Age of Inflation. Belmont, Mass.: Western Islands, 1979.

Soloman, Norman. War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death. New York: Wiley, 2006.

Sterns, Jessica. Terror in the Name of God: Why Religious Militants Kill. New York: Harper Perennial, 2004.

Tansill, Charles Callan. Back Door to War: The Roosevelt Foreign Policy, 1933-1941. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1952.

Tocqueville, Alexis De. Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002 [1835, 1840].

Tuchman, Barbara J. The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam. New York Ballantine, 1985

Weaver, Henry Grady. The Mainspring of Human Progress. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Foundation for Economics Education, 1953.

CASH 4 GOLD!!!!!11!!!

[re=340245]Paulite[/re]: Here’s a better idea: instead of copy/pasting that list everywhere, YOU read the fucking books.

queeraselvis: I am not looking for any power here, I am just trying to interact with you guys and exchange some thoughts, nothing more. I am not here for blaming, smearing or swearing

LOL, I love the Cheetos joke, funny, you guys are creative and funny in some way

[re=340245]Paulite[/re]: Oh look— the Paultard can cut and paste! I can cut and paste too!

a) the dirty fucker is going to die in my window of starvation over the next few days

b) the dirty fucker is going to jump and look at me with his one eye (he can’t move his head to fix both eyes on me) until then. Every shower, every tooth brushing, every piss and so on…

c) the dirty fucker is presumably going to get more and more desperate (riiight???) and probably start scratching (if he can get his nails to glass?), possibly banging his stupid head into the window, or likely breaking out in blood-curdling EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE’s through the night?

d) The dirty fucker is eventually going to die and then attract whatever organisms are attracted to decomposing rat for what? Shall we say maybe 10 months? A year? On the window of my BATHROOM?!?!

As for all you animal lovers out there, I’m not so cold-hearted that I’d actually wish death on this fucker if I had a choice, but what are my options??? My only option is to open my bathroom window so he can fall into my shower or bathroom floor! And while I’m so damn nice that I’ve actually considered it, I’ve firmly decided that is NOT going to happen. So I’m here at CL with a big – and I mean a MIGHTY big – FUCK YOU TO THE BASTARD RAT at my bathroom window!!!
________________________________

That was a Craigslist post all about a rat. GUESS WHO IT SOUNDS LIKE, Paulite?

Take a guess… really.

[re=340245]Paulite[/re]: I hear that collections of secret gold pamphlets are going at a premium these days. The swankier ones even come with their own tin foil hats – pre-measured. They even have a cheeto-dust-resistant version.

[re=340228]Paulite[/re]: First of all, it’s an XBox 360 Elite. See, I’m a Liberal, and I like my gaming consoles the same way I like my presidents: Fancy, Black and to come out of the box with a hard drive and HDMI port.

Second, before you teach me about anything, how about you take a refresher course on grade school level composition? Your post looks like you packed a bunch of commas and periods into a musket and shot at your screen.

I’d be just as happy to say all of this to you on your website of choice, but it seems like your administrators don’t want to let us play your reindeer games.

(I can’t believe I just had Paultard wag his/her/its Cheeto-stained finger at me about grammar.)

[re=340245]Paulite[/re]: http://wonkette.com/408731/beaches-are-communist-stay-home-this-weekend

[re=340245]Paulite[/re]:
You know what? Aside from Gibbon, Tuchmann, Baecivich, and Bamford (which I’ve read), they’re mostly Libertarian ideological screeds.

Most are rather dated or stupid. Be like learning about modern biology from a 1953 text that does not mention DNA or basing your politics on a 1957 novel.

[re=340245]Paulite[/re]: OMG I’m sooooo impressed!

What a tool.

[re=340245]Paulite[/re]: WOW!!! You must have read more books than anyone else in your elementary school this summer!!! Gold star for you, Reader Rabbit!

LOL @ the comments, come on guys, be fair, I am only one here
But I will be glad to have a discussion with everyone of you.
I will visit more often in the next days, and we can discuss the subjects that matter to us.

buggers: OMG I’m sooooo impressed!

Me too LOL

[re=340075]ManchuCandidate[/re]: That was truly inspiring. Thank you.

[re=340269]Paulite[/re]: So like the ones that take over a plane with nothing more than a utility knifw is a coward. And how many Paultards are brave enough to defend the freedoms in this country?

The terrorists are despicable, not cowards.

[re=340269]Paulite[/re]: 9/11 WAS ORGANIZED BY GNOMES DEEP WITHIN THE JUNGLE. THEY HAVE BEEN ORGANIZING A SHADOW GOVERNMENT FOR SOME TIME NOW UNDER THE VEIL OF THE RON PAUL REVOLUTION. PAULTARDS CAUSED 9/11.

WAKE UP SHEEPLES. DON’T YOU GOOGLES?

[re=340228]Paulite[/re]: Sweet! I’m sixteen again? Back to sexing with teh virgins and dropping acid!

[re=340281]shortsshortsshorts[/re]: Thank Jeebus for the Blimp….that saved us and won us the election last time…..

[re=340269]Paulite[/re]: Tell the cowardly baby running your site to let us in or shut his fucking cheetos hole about Wonkette. If you wanna WAR with the big boys at least put your diaper on. Don’t go hide in mommy’s closet watching her nail the mailman so the mean Wonkette won’t deface your GeoCities-copied website. Man up or shut up and fuck off, clown.

[re=340285]JeffGoldblum[/re]: They keep mentioning DP on that site. Do you think Ron and Alan Greenspan rubbed weiners when the rogered the hell out of Ayn Rand?

Did you all miss the memo on not feeding the troll?

[re=340075]ManchuCandidate[/re]: Thanks Manchu.
I’m glad you didn’t use fornicating instead of fucking.
I don’t think General Patton would have liked that rewrite from the movie.

[re=340234]MattW[/re]: Yes, that was what was really pathetic — that he couldn’t figure out he didn’t have to Google-search for Ron Paul manually…

[re=340275]Paulite[/re]: “I will visit more often in the next days, and we can discuss the subjects that matter to us.”

WEll, that sounds delightfully edifying for everyone involved — WAIT A MINUTE — We don’t DISCUSS subjects here; we SODOMIZE THEM IN FURRY SUITS. The next time you show up here, you’d better be wearing your best SUBMISSIVE PANDA fursuit, and we will get all DADDYFUR ON YOUR ASS.

[re=340005]nbawriter[/re]: yr funny.

Note to Paulistas: wash hands before handing oneself, let one’s “man”hood become the same Cheetos yellow as your fingers, in mom’s basement, also.

Hey Guys, thanks for the love and the attention, I don’t get that much in the DP LOL
Sorry, I had to leave the basement and my cheetos, but I am back now.
If you get a chance, please call your congressman/senator and ask them to co-sponsor HR1207/S. 604 The federal reserve sunshine act, this is really important, here is more info regarding this:

S604: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-604

HR 1207: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1207

Cheers

Is this the bill that puts us on the gold standard? Or allows for free coinage of silver? Or replaces the GOP with the Know-Nothing party? If this bill is passed, will Congress, also, have to wear throwback uniforms? Just asking.

[re=340450]Paulite[/re]: I’m going to have to concur with [re=340268]ManchuCandidate[/re] and [re=340379]goodluck/badluck[/re]. I come from the far left, so I’d probably have a lot of common ground with you, but I got over the whole ‘Libertarianism will solve everything’ idea when I was 22. If we are going to go with the whole “everyone gets to do what they want” thing, then I get to start shooting polluters in the face because I’m tired of them robbing future generations of their HUMAN RIGHT to live on a non-toxic, healthy planet. Once you guys expand your concept of human rights to go beyond the right to fuck your neighbor over in an effort to make money, then you’ll find we’re in agreement. I say that my rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are severely constrained by a corporate and wealth dominated economic system where it’s just good business to poison people and their environment and fuck over workers for an extra $0.00001 per widget. According to the Libertarian school of philosophy, it is the government’s duty to protect me from those threats.

DangerousLiberal says:
Is this the bill that puts us on the gold standard? Or allows for free coinage of silver? Or replaces the GOP with the Know-Nothing party? If this bill is passed, will Congress, also, have to wear throwback uniforms? Just asking.

No, this is the Bill that will tell us where the 10+ trillion dollars the fed printed went to. Very important to know where our/our childrens/grand childrens tax money went to, right? Is transparency important to you?

Not even Doctor Paul believes in the nonsense he spouts, given how much he sure wants the state to interfere in gay marriage, the Panama Canal, seperation of church and state, etc., etc.

[re=340250]d4g33z[/re]: Oh hell, he can’t actually read the books! That would be some kind of cooperative relationship with the author. Can’t have that.

[re=340450]Paulite[/re]: Around here DP doesn’t mean what you think it means.

[re=340245]Paulite[/re]: Oh look, the Short-Bus Fairy left us a “special” present.

“I consider all of Rand’s novels worth reading, in spite of my strong disagreements with her on important matters.”

So, do you also have this opinion as to the writings of the Unabomber, or the TIME CUBE guy?

Batshit insane as they are, neither of them glorified rape – but Rand sure as hell did. She never wrote ANYTHING that wasn’t a waste of the time it takes to read it … but those novels of hers make an excellent default test of basic intelligence: anyone who can’t see them for the mentally diseased, logically corrupt ziggurats of putrid horseshit they are isn’t worth debating, based on the “never kick-box with a quadrapalegic” principle.

As for Teh Magick Wizzerd Ron Paul, the guy didn’t even have the stones to stand behind all those racist articles in his newsletters. If you’re going to play up to the “states’ rights” Stormfront crowd, at least own up to it when you get caught with your panties around your ankles … how gullible does one have to be to think he never had a clue about all those articles that he printed & paid for – you know, the ones he put his name on? Gullible enough to think that a return to the gold standard at this point would be anything other than an epic fiscal clusterfuck (let alone Raelian Economics “brainstorms” such as abolishing the Fed) … or perhaps even gullible enough to vote for that creepy little nutjob.

Yeeeeesh.

Speaking of the worst things on the Internets, I just spotted some douche using the #Iranelection tag on Twitter to pimp his lame-ass electronic “composition.” People suck. Mark my words, Twitter will be “Second Life” within six months, as soon as the porn spammers get serious about it.

[re=340450]Paulite[/re]: This is a mistake, this is a mistake…

Paultard, I am going to try to explain a fundamental misconception shared by the Doctor Pepper movement, which is that uninhibited personal liberty is an inherent good that can’t be denied.

You see, societies are like game. Games have rules because we don’t want them to turn into free for all nut grabbing blood on the floor scrums, except in hockey. Consider, for example, your last game of Dungeons and Dragons. If the other players didn’t follow the rules, would it really be very much fun? Could you have captured the + 10 flaming sword of death from the evil orc?

Societies have rules because uninhibited competition is a BAD thing. See blood on the floor, supra. Markets have rules for the same reason. See credit default swaps, collapse of financial sector. Societies that don’t enforce rules against excessive greed and abuse of power by the rich and powerful get those rules enforced one way or another, eventually, often in a bad way. See French Revolution. In the meantime, lots of misery. Id; also see Great Depression, New Deal.

Are you getting the concept? If so, for your next lesson, we will cover personal hygiene and chewing with a closed mouth.

It’s hilarious, all the liberal douchbags in congress (except 22 of them) are now voting to carry on with the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, aren’t you mad?
The shitheads neo-cons war is now the shitheads liberal war, pathetic LOL

You should be mad, real mad, you have been betrayed again. This is what Dr. Paul had to say:

On June 15, Rep. Ron Paul gave the following speech in opposition to the Democrats’ new $106 Billion war funding bill, after it was sent back to the House from the conference committee. (The bill passed Tuesday evening.):

Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this conference report on the War Supplemental Appropriations. I wonder what happened to all of my colleagues who said they were opposed to the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I wonder what happened to my colleagues who voted with me as I opposed every war supplemental request under the previous administration. It seems, with very few exceptions, they have changed their position on the war now that the White House has changed hands. I find this troubling. As I have said while opposing previous war funding requests, a vote to fund the war is a vote in favor of the war. Congress exercises its constitutional prerogatives through the power of the purse.

This conference report, being a Washington-style compromise, reflects one thing Congress agrees on: spending money we do not have. So this “compromise” bill spends 15 percent more than the president requested, which is $9 billion more than in the original House bill and $14.6 billion more than the original Senate version. Included in this final version — in addition to the $106 billion to continue the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — is a $108 billion loan guarantee to the International Monetary Fund, allowing that destructive organization to continue spending taxpayer money to prop up corrupt elites and promote harmful economic policies overseas.

As Americans struggle through the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, this emergency supplemental appropriations bill sends billions of dollars overseas as foreign aid. Included in this appropriation is $660 million for Gaza, $555 million for Israel, $310 million for Egypt, $300 million for Jordan, and $420 million for Mexico. Some $889 million will be sent to the United Nations for “peacekeeping” missions. Almost one billion dollars will be sent overseas to address the global financial crisis outside our borders and nearly $8 billion will be spent to address a “potential pandemic flu.”

Mr. Speaker, I continue to believe that the best way to support our troops is to bring them home from Iraq and Afghanistan. If one looks at the original authorization for the use of force in Afghanistan, it is clear that the ongoing and expanding nation-building mission there has nothing to do with our goal of capturing and bringing to justice those who attacked the United States on September 11, 2001. Our continued presence in Iraq and Afghanistan does not make us safer at home, but in fact it undermines our national security. I urge my colleagues to defeat this reckless conference report.

[re=340652]Paulite[/re]: do you really “LOL” when you type it? that may be indicative of a deeper problem.

also, no, not mad. haz power.

Wow, kids. WOW.

Don Juanquete: Uh, Von Brunn was a Paultard. No one said it. Or if they did, they got banned.

That’s a cheap shot, because YOU know he is a Nazi, a collectivist, he believes in the Nany state.
Do some reading in order to understand what libertarians stand for.
For your info, the founding fathers were libertarians, would you call them Nazis?

[re=340652]Paulite[/re]: Mad?
THIS IS WONKETTE!!!!1

[re=340952]Paulite[/re]: Still waiting for a response… (see [re=340513]Mad Farmer Manifest[/re]). I thought you came here to debate, but you are just throwing turds. If Dr. Paul is so morally consistent, why has he stayed in the morally bankrupt Republican party?

[re=341107]LittlePig[/re]: “That smarmy ass LOL and smiley face shit is annoying as hell, too.”

That’s called being a “concern troll.”

Mad Farmer Manifest: If Dr. Paul is so morally consistent, why has he stayed in the morally bankrupt Republican party?

Because the two parties, Donkey and Monkey, are the same, it is indeed one party. The latest elections should confirm that to you if you belong to those who never care about history. Did anything change in washington? Yes, the tone only, but the bad policies, the banckrupting of this country, the plundering of the people, the shredding of the constitution and the wars are still going on.

Dr. Paul figured out that the Monkeys, the neo-cons party, is the easiest to hijack and restore since it was traditionally the party of the people.

[re=340952]Paulite[/re]: “Do some reading in order to understand what libertarians stand for.”

Alright, explain Paul’s stance on banning gay marriage and how it does not contradict the bullshit you have been spewing.

Here is more for you, actually he voted AGAINST such bills:

The Federal Marriage Amendment Is a Very Bad Idea

by Rep. Ron Paul, MD
by Rep. Ron Paul, MD

Mr. Speaker, while I oppose federal efforts to redefine marriage as something other than a union between one man and one woman, I do not believe a constitutional amendment is either a necessary or proper way to defend marriage.

While marriage is licensed and otherwise regulated by the states, government did not create the institution of marriage. In fact, the institution of marriage most likely pre-dates the institution of government! Government regulation of marriage is based on state recognition of the practices and customs formulated by private individuals interacting in civil society. Many people associate their wedding day with completing the rituals and other requirements of their faith, thus being joined in the eyes of their church and their creator, not with receiving their marriage license, thus being joined in the eyes of the state.

If I were in Congress in 1996, I would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which used Congress’s constitutional authority to define what official state documents other states have to recognize under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, to ensure that no state would be forced to recognize a “same sex” marriage license issued in another state. This Congress, I was an original cosponsor of the Marriage Protection Act, HR 3313, that removes challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act from federal courts’ jurisdiction. If I were a member of the Texas legislature, I would do all I could to oppose any attempt by rogue judges to impose a new definition of marriage on the people of my state.

Having studied this issue and consulted with leading legal scholars, including an attorney who helped defend the Boy Scouts against attempts to force the organization to allow gay men to serve as scoutmasters, I am convinced that both the Defense of Marriage Act and the Marriage Protection Act can survive legal challenges and ensure that no state is forced by a federal court’s or another state’s actions to recognize same sex marriage. Therefore, while I am sympathetic to those who feel only a constitutional amendment will sufficiently address this issue, I respectfully disagree. I also am concerned that the proposed amendment, by telling the individual states how their state constitutions are to be interpreted, is a major usurpation of the states’ power. The division of power between the federal government and the states is one of the virtues of the American political system. Altering that balance endangers self-government and individual liberty. However, if federal judges wrongly interfere and attempt to compel a state to recognize the marriage licenses of another state, that would be the proper time for me to consider new legislative or constitutional approaches.

Conservatives in particular should be leery of anything that increases federal power, since centralized government power is traditionally the enemy of conservative values. I agree with the assessment of former Congressman Bob Barr, who authored the Defense of Marriage Act:

“The very fact that the FMA [Federal Marriage Amendment] was introduced said that conservatives believed it was okay to amend the Constitution to take power from the states and give it to Washington. That is hardly a basic principle of conservatism as we used to know it. It is entirely likely the left will boomerang that assertion into a future proposed amendment that would weaken gun rights or mandate income redistribution.”

Passing a constitutional amendment is a long, drawn-out process. The fact that the marriage amendment already failed to gather the necessary two-thirds support in the Senate means that, even if two-thirds of House members support the amendment, it will not be sent to states for ratification this year. Even if the amendment gathers the necessary two-thirds support in both houses of Congress, it still must go through the time-consuming process of state ratification. This process requires three-quarters of the state legislatures to approve the amendment before it can become effective. Those who believe that immediate action to protect the traditional definition of marriage is necessary should consider that the Equal Rights Amendment easily passed both houses of Congress and was quickly ratified by a number of states. Yet, that amendment remains unratified today. Proponents of this marriage amendment should also consider that efforts to amend the Constitution to address flag burning and require the federal government to balance the budget have been ongoing for years, without any success.

Ironically, liberal social engineers who wish to use federal government power to redefine marriage will be able to point to the constitutional marriage amendment as proof that the definition of marriage is indeed a federal matter! I am unwilling either to cede to federal courts the authority to redefine marriage, or to deny a state’s ability to preserve the traditional definition of marriage. Instead, I believe it is time for Congress and state legislatures to reassert their authority by refusing to enforce judicial usurpations of power.

In contrast to a constitutional amendment, the Marriage Protection Act requires only a majority vote of both houses of Congress and the president’s signature to become law. The bill already has passed the House of Representatives; at least 51 senators would vote for it; and the president would sign this legislation given his commitment to protecting the traditional definition of marriage. Therefore, those who believe Congress needs to take immediate action to protect marriage this year should focus on passing the Marriage Protection Act.

Because of the dangers to liberty and traditional values posed by the unexpected consequences of amending the Constitution to strip power from the states and the people and further empower Washington, I cannot in good conscience support the marriage amendment to the United States Constitution. Instead, I plan to continue working to enact the Marriage Protection Act and protect each state’s right not to be forced to recognize a same sex marriage.

October 1, 2004

But I suppose it is easier to cut and paste to “disprove” the many issues with why Ron Paul is such a lousy pick for anything above city dogcatcher than to actually read or educate themself.

Ahh look the little shit flingers don’t like dirty words like liberty, freedom, personal responsibility…you little shit eating sheep want the fuzzy wuzzy government to wipe your ass and take care of you from cradle to grave… Marriage isn’t a government institution, it is between two people, and God if they so choose. As you chickenheads plot your next “virtual war move” the UN is trying to take your water sources, your land, and your children to fight their wars. The Federal Government is helping them by also trying to claim rights to ALL water and land in our country..Want to bitch about democrats and republicans? Doesn’t make a fucking difference because they are both being led by the nose by the CFR..you know the council of foreign relations?..no you probably don’t know do you…go back to watching your american idol and flinging shit at all who are different from you, while your country goes to shit because you were to fucking stupid to do some research and see the federal government for what it is worth..

The fact that any kind of protesting is now considered “low level terrorism” should scare the hell out of you..but then you douchebags aren’t about to stand up for what is right are you..just sit on here talking big shit when your not busy playing in lala land on world of warcraft of some other fake shit…See we my friends live in the real world but you little nutsuckers couldn’t handle it.

Ever care to stand up for yourself and protest..you are in our country the great FREE Amerika a friggin terrorist…check it out for yourself..maybe some day you will wake the fuck up and get off your bitching asses and stand up for something other than a donut.

protest = Terrorism… documentation here.. http://open.salon.com/blog/dennis_loo/2009/06/14/dod_training_manual_protests_are_low-level_terrorism

JUNE 14, 2009 7:35PM
DoD Training Manual: Protests are “Low-Level Terrorism”

The Department of Defense is training all of its personnel in its current Antiterrorism and Force Protection Annual Refresher Training Course that political protest is “low-level terrorism.”

The Training introduction reads as follows:

“Anti-terrorism (AT) and Force Protection (FP) are two facets of the Department of Defense (DoD) Mission Assurance Program. It is DoD policy, as found in DoDI 2000.16, that the DoD Components and the DoD elements and personnel shall be protected from terrorist acts through a high pirority, comprehensive, AT program. The DoD’s AT program shall be all encompassing using an integrated systems approach.”

The first question of the Terrorism Threat Factors, “Knowledge Check 1″ section reads as follows:

Which of the following is an example of low-level terrorism activity?

Select the correct answer and then click Check Your Answer.

O Attacking the Pentagon

O IEDs

O Hate crimes against racial groups

O Protests

***

The “correct” answer is Protests.

A copy of this can be found on the last two pages of this pdf.

The ACLU learned of this training and on June 10, 2009 sent a letter to the Gail McGinn, Acting Under-Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, objecting to their training all DoD personnel that the exercise of First Amendment rights constitutes “low-level terrorism.”

For those who have worried about a trend – evident, for example, in the USA PATRIOT Act, the universal and ongoing government surveillance of all of Americans’ electronic communications that began in February of 2001 (seven months before 9/11), the global war on a tactic (terrorism), therefore making this war unending, the unprecedented pre-emptive arrests of protestors at the 2008 Republican National Convention with those protesters being charged as “domestic terrorists,” the justifications for torture, pre-emptive wars of aggression, ongoing occupations, American gulags such as Bagram, suspension of habeas corpus, and “prolonged detention” for acts someone might commit, not what they have done, FBI et al infiltration of protest groups and the government’s acknowledged use of undercover agents (agents provocateurs) in said infiltration, thus giving the government under the rubric of fighting domestic terrorism unrestrained and unsupervisable power to suppress legitimate political activities, the unleashing and justifications for Christian fascists to murder those they do not like (such as the assassination of Dr. George Tiller and the killing at the Holocaust Museum a few days ago) – this news adds further fuel to the fire.

These are not items from some famously vilified, non-US dictatorial regime. These are items from the good ole USA, land of the free and home of the brave.

Just how brave are we now? How free are we still? Are we brave enough to be “winter soldiers” and stand up against these fascist moves? Or will we go down in history in infamy, the way the “Good Germans” of the 1930s and 1940s did?

LOL! If this is all that Wonkette has, then I am FUCKING NOT IMPRESSED.

Nothin’ but big talk from a bunch of shitty anons.

[re=341549]IED WONK[/re]: Dude

a) it’s a humor site,

and

b) even so, all you guys do is validate your own assumptions, saying things like “the founding fathers were libertarians”, which is only true for sufficiently fuzzy definitions of “libertarian”. The founding fathers were much less concerned with force issues (e.g. duels, as I noted above) and were not big fans of the only real corporate entity they had to deal with (the British West India Company). Now that corporate citizens have more rights than actual human ones, I doubt the Founding Fathers would be all that pro-corporate.

I still haven’t seen proof that libertarians understand there is no asphault fairy, much less how sewage systems and power grids are supposed to just appear organically in this utopian paradise.

Given the choice between paying taxes and living in a society that will effectively be like Prohibition-era Chicago, I’ll pay my taxes, thanks. If you don’t like America (and you don’t, as real-life America never looked anything like your dreams, except for cases like Chicago above), move to Somalia and make your way up the corporate (aka warlord) ladder there.

[re=341615]LittlePig[/re]: I also dropped by to see if they were still at it, now that the thread is 48 hrs old. Cut & Paste: Everything a Paultard does best was learned in Kindergarten!!