The very scary National Organization for Marriage folks have launched this new initiative, “2 Million For Marriage,” about trolling for hot anal sex on Craigslist. This group is still not considered a parody, for the record. [NOM via TPM]

Donate with CCDonate with CC


  1. Ok, so between teabagging for taxes and M4M for gay marriage, I think the only logical next step must be “Tossing your Salad against illegal immigration”. On account of all the lettuce picking and what not.

  2. [re=286515]Scarab[/re]: They’re asking us to fuck 2 million people? Okay, but I think I may need some supplies for that. Tell me, does NOM provide the lube?

  3. Ok, I’m a dumbass, it has been pointed out my last comment was in the freakin’ article. I thought my friend made a funny. Carry on.

  4. [re=286544]Toonces[/re]: YOU STOLE MY IDEA! See previous thread on the teabagtwats. I can’t wait for tossed salad against illegal immigration. Oh, I can’t wait! The other obvious choice would, of course, be Dirty Sanchez’s against illegal immigration.

  5. Maybe they will “pack” some canuck illegals onto an antique boat in Ohio for the “Cleveland Steamer All Over Canada’s Ass Protest” Fox will organize next?

  6. Here’s something about Mary:

    She has testified as an expert witness on marriage before the U.S. Senate and in various state legislatures.

    First, I wasn’t aware that there was such a thing as an “expert witness on marriage.” Second, how many seconds until Mary’s husband gets caught in a Westchester park bathroom with his pants around his ankles and trying to seduce a cop?

  7. [re=286544]Toonces[/re]: The next big thing will be GOP-sponsored events in protest of the deficit: “Don’t let Obama snowball you!” parties.

  8. If this isn’t a joke, I’m still having a difficult time with this group’s appropriation of gay-world rangelanda – “rainbow coalition,” the 2M4M/MSM thing, that co-joined rings logo – not to mention that at least half the actors in that ad were clearly walking down Queen Wilhelmina’s Tulip Path.

  9. So I get a little wound up over this subject but I find these Nommers to be curious folk. I’m trying to figure out the driving philosophy behind the Nommer movement and it seems to be gay = icky. That’s just surprisingly base and laughably fear-based. I expect a little more nuance from the bitters.

  10. “Yeah there’s a storm on the loose, gay folks now can wed.
    They’re no longer silent, all freedoms are dead.
    Cannot decode – my whole life spins into a frenzy.

    Help I’m steppin’ into the Twilight Zone
    Vermont’s a madhouse, Christians being stoned
    Two million for marriage, jump into your cars
    You know where to go, now that Iowa’s gone too far!”

  11. [re=286544]Toonces[/re]: Finally, salad tossing party! We will toss the salads of every congress person until they come together on immigration reform!

  12. I should point out that the brilliant folk over at NOM failed to register, the obvious domain for their campaign (and where people who hear about it naturally go).

    They don’t own it.

    I do.

    So I’ve recruited some friends and we’re putting up our own site there.

  13. Can someone explain to me the, ” I’m a doctor and I can’t express my religion” coomment? What does this have to do with keeping marriage a hetero-only club?

  14. = nation of men, imagine my surprise.

    “We are not a gay organization, though some of our members may be gay. We are not feminized, politically correct men, though our members exhibit varying degrees of civilization.”

    Fun with acronyms!

  15. Here’s a photo of Maggie, fwiw. The more you know.

    Was she voted “Girl Most Likely to Have a Gay Husband She Met in Show Choir” in college?

  16. [re=286673]Dave J.[/re]: Arghh. She is K-Lo’s “better looking” twin. I think these ladies are just upset that ANYONE is having sex because it is obvious that they are not.

  17. [re=286645]lobo2009[/re]: I took it to mean that Maggie wanted a shout-out in there to all the pro-lifers who are now somehow “forced” to educate patients about family planning options.

  18. oh i thought you were being clever with the 2m4m, but they are just stupid.

    two meows for me?
    two men for me?
    too many for me!
    too manly for me!
    too messy for me!
    too measly for me!

  19. [re=286587]NoWireHangers[/re]: I thought it was two men looking for four men to tie then up, slap them, and make them renounce their heterosexuality. But yours makes more sense.

    [re=286636]2m4m[/re]: You sir, are a true American.

  20. Coming soon: our great new video “2 girls 1 cup”, about two sassy roommates having fun learning to bake, while saving themselves for marriage.

  21. [re=286636]2m4m[/re]: Please keep us posted of developments over the weekend. We are ready to spread the good word to the enemy sites where we are embedded

  22. Tom Lerher, the political satirist, said he quit comedy in the late sixties when real politics rendered satire unnecessary. Dam NOMMERS, trying to kill comedy!

  23. [re=286549]comradepaulson[/re]: No, that’s available separately, from NOM’s sister organization, the National Organization for Indiscriminate Anonymous Unprotected Buttsex.

  24. Dear fReichtards,
    Yes, we’re picking up on all your increasingly desperate hints. No, we’re not going to meet you in the mens room near gate 12 at MSP. Quit calling us.

  25. [re=286636]2m4m[/re]: Great job with the site so far! In answering your question on how to reach Rachel Maddow, I suggest keep posting here. It seems Maddow & Stuart’s writers get a fair number of ideas from Wonkette, just give them 24-36 hours to catch up…

  26. Thanks for the kind words, everyone. Monday was incredible with the media coverage we got, and today I got a lot of requests for interviews later this week, so it looks like we’ll be able to keep the site in the cycle.

    That was the whole goal, of course – once we realized NOM failed to get the domain we wanted to make sure that we put good content on it and kept the wind out of NOM’s sails. More searches for “2M4M” are going to than any other site, and almost no results linking to NOM, themselves.

    Oops :-)

Comments are closed.

Previous article
Next article