DOESN'T HURT TO ASK  4:12 pm April 2, 2009

Alaska Republicans Want Special Election, For Ted Stevens

by Jim Newell

Ha ha wasn’t it funny how Ted Stevens probably could have won back his Senate seat in Alaska if he hadn’t been found guilty in his corruption trial, but then he was found guilty, and he lost, and then Eric Holder threw the case away yesterday because the prosecution had mishandled it? Cool story. And now the Republican party of Alaska has called for Sen. Mark Begich to resign so that he can run against Stevens in a special election, for fairness. Hmm let’s think about that NO. [Fox News]

Related video

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.


Min April 2, 2009 at 4:13 pm

Too bad, so sad.

TGY April 2, 2009 at 4:14 pm

OH HELLS TO THE NO. It’s time for someone’s tubes to be tied.

MARCdMan April 2, 2009 at 4:15 pm

Yeah, I think we’ll pass on that one.

Mild Midwesterner April 2, 2009 at 4:16 pm

Stvens can see victory from his house.

The Cold Sea April 2, 2009 at 4:18 pm

Har! Teh answer to that stoooopidity begins with an N and ends with an O.

chascates April 2, 2009 at 4:19 pm

If Ted was still Senator he would have gotten at least a billion dollars for those independent, stand-up-for-themselves citizens of that great state that gives everyone money each year.

Texan Bulldoggette April 2, 2009 at 4:20 pm

Begich better watch his back; his dead body will probably be found face down with snowmobile tracks on it.

Scarab April 2, 2009 at 4:20 pm

Sorry he’ll just have to wait and run again when he’s 90.
Dead Stevens 2112

4tehlulz April 2, 2009 at 4:20 pm

Please kindly go eat the back of dicks, AKGOP.

queeraselvis v 2.0 April 2, 2009 at 4:21 pm

Riiiiiiiiiiiight, if by “Alaska Republican Party” you mean Snowmachine Barbie. And Stevens will no doubt be “encouraged” to hire Levi Johnson as his campaign manager. You betcha. Also.

V572625694 April 2, 2009 at 4:22 pm

This is a great idea. Barry should resign and run against Chimpy again, too. Or Hillz.

Our system has weakness, in that we’re stuck with a Bush or whatever incompetent until the end of the term — as opposed to the parliamentary system, where you can dump the PM on a vote of no-confidence. But the good thing about our system is when the election is over, it’s over. And the loser is the loser. I’m talking to you, Norm Coleman.

Stevens was a corrupt douchebag. All this “poor Ted” shit in DC or Anchorage is bullshit. Stop it, right now!

Fox n Fiends April 2, 2009 at 4:22 pm

The prosecution mishandled Jesus’ case too – and look what he got! Send Stevens to the CHAIR! hhahaahhhahahhahaha

2druk2phluq April 2, 2009 at 4:22 pm

The tube assault on Begich’s Porno Box will nao commence. His emails and messages and whatnot will be slowed to a snail’s pace by the sheer volume of Alaska-fail clogging the data arteries. Mortals do not understand the power of Meth-mouth Truck Nutz, Anchorage style!

queeraselvis v 2.0 April 2, 2009 at 4:23 pm

[re=279801]queeraselvis v 2.0[/re]: Erm, “Johnston.”

SayItWithWookies April 2, 2009 at 4:23 pm

As they’re so fond of saying whenever Obama mentions how the mess he was elected to handle got started: It’s time to stop living in the past. Stevens can look to the future and run again in six years. Until then I recommend he bury himself in the permafrost layer just to improve his chances.

Norbert April 2, 2009 at 4:25 pm

that was just one election that was totally unfair because our candidate had federal charges against him! so how about best 2 outta 3? 4 outta 7? hunh? plllleeeeeeeeeeaaaase?

NebraskashireGentry April 2, 2009 at 4:27 pm

this must be a section of the stimulus bill: employ people through the board of elections, justify by having special elections all the time. for “fairness”.

our democracy has never been about being fair. can you imagine Andrew Jackson doing this shit? no. and he’s on the $20.

Zadig April 2, 2009 at 4:27 pm

Why even fucking ask for this? I understand the desire to make Democrats look like assholes for refusing, but this is just a waste of everyone’s time.

Just think, at one point I would have been shocked and appalled that Republicans would beg for a humiliated corrupt motherfucker to be re-seated. Now I’m just thinking about what they would say if someone suggested we reinstate Blago after charges got dropped.

Rush April 2, 2009 at 4:28 pm

Can we sell AK back to Russia? We’ll throw in the Octo Mom for free, if they act in the next 15 minutes.

President Beeblebrox April 2, 2009 at 4:29 pm

This gets the LOL WUT pear for sure.

Irony, n. The situation which results when a state Republican party complains about the corruption in the prosecution of of a Republican Senator which was undertaken by a Republican administration, only to be reversed by a Democratic administration.

ManchuCandidate April 2, 2009 at 4:30 pm

I think we can go by the legal precedent of “winners keepers, losers weepers” aka Gore V Bush.

shortsshortsshorts April 2, 2009 at 4:33 pm

Election: No.
Suing the shit of the Department of Justice: Priceless. Literally.

tunamelt April 2, 2009 at 4:34 pm

This makes my face hurt.

NebraskashireGentry April 2, 2009 at 4:36 pm

weren’t the charges dropped because actions on the part of the prosecutors would probably result in the overturning of the conviction on appeal?

sure, lack of due process. shame on you, prosecutors.

as for Mr. Stevens: that’s not exactly proof of innocence…

Serolf Divad April 2, 2009 at 4:41 pm

Aaaaaaaahhhhhhhhyyyyeeeeeeeeeno. No. Oh, HELL NO.

AngryBlakGuy April 2, 2009 at 4:45 pm

…and I’m assuming they will do the same for Don Siegelman, right?!

AngryBlakGuy April 2, 2009 at 4:46 pm

Dear GOP

Suck my ballz

Sincerely AGB

I just got back from a 5k run!

El Pinche April 2, 2009 at 4:47 pm

I need a “all-things-Alaska” filter. I’d turn on “all-things-Texan” filter, but I live in it.

magic titty April 2, 2009 at 4:56 pm

Hey Jim, you know they refused Jesus too, dontcha?

AWOcoholic April 2, 2009 at 5:02 pm

I love how the capped “NO” is obviously a reference to the Bridge to Nowhere speech. )Or was it the “Series of Tubes” speech?)

Come here a minute April 2, 2009 at 5:02 pm

[re=279854]magic titty[/re]: Stevens is not Him.

Zadig April 2, 2009 at 5:05 pm

[re=279854]magic titty[/re]: And then he died.

Or were you going for “JEWS DID TED STEVENSGATE!1!!eleven!”?

Serolf Divad April 2, 2009 at 5:05 pm

BTW: these are the same douchebags who want Norm Coleman to tie up the Minnesota senate race that he’s destined to lose as looooooooooooong as he possibly can.

So fuck them. Fuck them in the ass with the trunk of a 1000 year old redwood. Stick the point end of the tree in their butts and don’t stop ’till you’ve pulled the whole damn thing through and out their left nostril.

Professor Proffy McProfalton, Prof. April 2, 2009 at 5:06 pm

I say let ‘em run, but only if instead of debates, they compete over remixes. Stevens’ entry:

Ball’s in your court, Begich.

shortsshortsshorts April 2, 2009 at 5:15 pm

You know, if Wonkette were fair it would have given away its Webblog award to the Confluence Blog. So would have ~synthesis~. The world is a very MEANIE place.

KilgoreTrout_XL April 2, 2009 at 5:17 pm

“Oh, wow, that sounds great, but I’m really trying to cut down on bags of dicks, thanks.”

President Beeblebrox April 2, 2009 at 5:17 pm

Meanwhile the spin over the NY-20 election is reaching epic lulz proportions. I have to hand it to Mr. “Chocolate Lightning” Steele – they figured out a way to spin the results both ways.

If Murphy wins, the GOP wins because they went toe to toe with the “Obama machine” and held Murphy to a RCH’s worth of victory. If Tabasco wins, the GOP still wins because they beat Obama’s candidate … in a R+3 district, of course, but who’s counting?

So using the AKGOP’s logic, I guess Murphy might as well resign now, right?

helzapoppn April 2, 2009 at 5:22 pm

[re=279839]AngryBlakGuy[/re]: Win.

DangerousLiberal April 2, 2009 at 5:24 pm

[re=279797]Texan Bulldoggette[/re]: My people call them “snowmachines” for some reason.

One Yield Regular April 2, 2009 at 5:33 pm

[re=279803]Fox n Fiends[/re]: “The prosecution mishandled Jesus’ case too – and look what he got.”

With your permission, of course, I’m sending that on a postcard to Alaskan Republican Party headquarters (and I have *just* the 3-D card already picked out)…

Unindicted Co-Conspirator April 2, 2009 at 5:39 pm

Ummm, Alaska Republitards: You do remember that it was the Bush Justice Dept. that went after Teddy Tubes, don’t ya?

grevillea April 2, 2009 at 5:47 pm

Oh go on, give him a ‘special election’ and let him win a ‘Special Senate seat’. The kind that plugs in.

sevenrepeat April 2, 2009 at 5:57 pm

what the f is wrong with alaska? also. microtrends.

Tomthebunny April 2, 2009 at 6:21 pm

So let’s put our thinking caps on, and try and imagine what our fabulous AK GOP crowd would do were the shoe on the other foot. I believe the answer would be, Fuck and No. So, up yours Ted and Friends.

smartypants April 2, 2009 at 7:27 pm

[re=279940]grevillea[/re]: Then..he can compete in ‘Special Olympics’? I’m for it.

Scandalabra April 2, 2009 at 7:37 pm

[re=279809]queeraselvis v 2.0[/re]: Understood. I get confused about the Johnson in my Levis too.

smellyal8r April 2, 2009 at 7:48 pm

Well, it was a REPUBLICAN Justice Department that convicted Stevens and a DEMOCRATIC Justice Department that cleared him. So, Uncle Ted won’t have to spend a day in jail, can vote in elections, enjoy his retirement, etc. Plus, if Ted Stevens wasn’t guilty of this, he was guilty of something else. Uhh, he probably was guilty of this, he just got off on a technicality.

Memo to AKGOP: Good luck with that plan.

VanArsdale April 2, 2009 at 9:35 pm

I’ll give “The Hulk” a do-over on the election if Holder gives the AG a do-over on the prosecution! That raises the stakes a bit; the very thin possibility of re-taking his Senate seat against the very real possibility of dying in a Federal Pen! Charges were dropped because of what the Conservatives love to lament; a LEGAL TECHNICALITY. No one says Stevens was innocent; just that there was prosecutorial misconduct. He did receive bribes, and failed to report it.

Lionel Hutz Esq. April 2, 2009 at 9:37 pm

Republicans do realize that, while the Bush Administration was more crooked, Stevens was still a crook, right?

jackson April 2, 2009 at 9:45 pm

Former Senator Stevens can do what anyone else could do: wait until the next election, run again Sarah “Look At Me, I’m God” Palin in the primary, then win the general election. Of course, Stevens will be older than dirt and as appealing, but it could happen. NOT.

OReillysVibrator April 3, 2009 at 9:14 am

I’d rather they re-do the trial.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: