WASHINGTON, DC, 11:59 PM, MON NOVEMBER 23 | Advertise on Wonkette | tips@wonkette.com | SUBMIT A TIP | RSS
THURSDAYS ARE FOR MAGAZINES

The Washington Monthly Recommends Books And Trains To Obama

Gather ye rosebuds everyone, it’s time to read a magazine, as is our long-standing Thursday afternoon tradition. Let’s see, let’s see. How about The Washington Monthly, which has proudly resisted becoming in any way trendy since its inception. Come now, let’s take a look inside and maybe figure out why. (Early guess: nearly every article title is a pun?)

“Back on Tracks”: Virginia is investing its time and money in the latest of fashionable technologies: a railroad automotive machine! These “trains” will solve the following problems: highway collisions, the recession, global warming, and what to do with all the dilapidated railroad tracks. But no fat cats in Washington are taking these trains seriously you see, even though back in olden times all the tycoons talked of nothing but trains. In conclusion, the public must be taxed heavily, so that they — and their goods — can ride in more of the trains they don’t bother to ride now. [Back on Track]

“What Obama Should Read”
: Here are 25 books that President Barry should read. Like the “25 things” forms on Facebook that, like many things, literally did not exist until the New York Times willed it to, with a trend-piece, the Monthly rounded up some intellectuals and writers, all of whom know just what our President should read. Such books range from wonky books about Africa to wonky books about the Middle East, and a Graham Greene novel. [What Obama Should Read]

“Bad Reactors”
: Ever heard of Finland? It’s like a Utopian hostel that decided to build itself a nuclear reactor, a decision that was beloved by the entirety of Earth. Eh, except turns out the reactor was actually kind of poorly made, oh and also it’s not really that good for the environment after all. This wouldn’t matter at all really, it being Finland, but this thing is a precedent-setting creation, and if it ever stops sucking, it could effect nuclear energy policy in the US. [Bad Reactors]

“The Little Unions That Couldn’t”: Despite Obama’s best efforts to make sure that everyone gets along (not red states or blue states, but United States, etc.), the thing that might actually put a wedge into his weird plan is this, the Employee Free Choice Act, which would make it easier for employees to unionize. And if there’s one thing that Republicans hate more than fact-checking or having sex with their wives, it’s unions. Oh, and the Clintons. And Nancy Pelosi. But we digress. Another mortal enemy of the EFCA is Rite-Aid, the innocuous-seeming beast that’s undoubtedly underneath your apartment building at the very moment. Caution, gentle readers. [The Little Unions That Couldn't]


4:25 PM on Thu February 12 2009
By Juli Weiner
1959 Views

  1. bitchincamaro says at 4:32 pm, February 12th, 2009

    Daughter of Wonkette. Beautiful. Coochie coo.

  2. norbizness says at 4:34 pm, February 12th, 2009

    Hey, if I actually wanted to be educated on the issues of the day, I wouldn’t come here, would I?

  3. Naturally, Polaks were to blame for the whole thing going sideways.

  4. Rite-Aid’s a union buster?!? Well, crap. Now I’m going to have to start getting my prescriptions filled somewhere else.

  5. AxmxZ: In Finland, I mean. Probably in the States, too, but that has not yet been documentarily proven.

  6. SayItWithWookies says at 4:57 pm, February 12th, 2009

    Ha ha, Debra Dickerson recommended Obama read A People’s History of the United States. Why does she think he hasn’t read that when it’s on every commie revolutionary reading list in the — oh — nothing, nevermind. How ’bout this weather — windy, huh?

  7. Mad Farmer Manifest says at 5:02 pm, February 12th, 2009

    Min: Yeah, no kidding. I just bought chocolate from them, apparently for the last time until they allow unionificating.

  8. Naked Bunny with a Whip says at 5:17 pm, February 12th, 2009

    Puns are the lowest form of humor, and I’m including jokes about buttsecks, which is a serious matter and should not be joked about. Mmm, buttsecks. ….What were we talking about again?

  9. Naked Bunny with a Whip says at 5:21 pm, February 12th, 2009

    Oh yeah, Rite-Aid. No more buttsecks in the back room there.

  10. Uncle Glenny says at 5:25 pm, February 12th, 2009

    Very sinister. I don’t think people recognize how Obama, Ayers, Annenberg, and trains are all connected. This is leading us to communism.

  11. chascates says at 5:40 pm, February 12th, 2009

    Hey, that Steven Benen guy has some snark. And we likes snark.

  12. josereyes.theroof says at 8:36 pm, February 12th, 2009

    chascates: Steve Benen & Hilzoy only think their & their friends’s snark don’t stink. Archetype hipsters, they. Can’t stand ‘em.

  13. Uh, Juli, you mean affect nuclear energy policy, not effect it. Even if Finland blew up, I don’t think that would effect any U.S. policy.

  14. Bearbloke says at 10:17 pm, February 12th, 2009

    Ya know, when the President smiles like he does on this magazine cover, he looks like a younger, somewhat darker-skinned version of Nelson Mandela… and since I’m a hot snarky libtard chick (just like you and every other Wonketteer, according to Dumfuk Denby), seeing That Smile from That One makes my muslin panties explode in a red white & baby-blue Hopegasm!!!11!!!!1!! Also.

  15. Brendan M. says at 4:01 pm, February 13th, 2009

    Well, getting the president to read books is fine and all, but it doesn’t mean much if they
    don’t understand them. Bush “read” Graham Greene’s The Quiet American and cited it in defense of his Iraq policies (to the BBC! people who’ve probably actually read it and not just seen the movie!). I’m sure Bush would also cite Camus’s The Stranger to defend his ban on stem cell research, as well.

    But reading comprehension probably isn’t a problem for our non-retarded current president, though, so my concern isn’t particularly relevant. I just wanted to express my disgust with Bush’s illiteracy. God, that guy is such an asshole, am I right?

Leave a Reply