• February 14, 2012

Contraception fetishistCan you BELIEVE that terrible Nancy Pelosi, suggesting that contraception, i.e. the thwarting of God’s will through the use of hormones and latex derivatives, prevents babies, who generally cost more money than not having babies? It is verily a shameful sin unto the Lord! Sixteen bazillion Drudge sirens for this whore of Babylon and her radical leftist insinuations. The TRUE FACT is that babies fart out dollar bills for their first 6-9 months, more than compensating for their parents’ lost wages plus health care plus extra food and $700 strollers and car seats and whatever. A responsible fiscal stimulus package would compel every woman over the age of 14 to have ten babies before 2011. [Drudge Report]

{ 83 comments }

CankleBiter January 26, 2009 at 10:49 am

Since no self respecting woman will have sex with me, I refuse to be concerned about this story.

ManchuCandidate January 26, 2009 at 10:52 am

But if only the smart people listen to Pelousy then only the TruckNutz will have babies (and who wants that?)

Serolf Divad January 26, 2009 at 10:53 am

The whole matter of whether contraception helps or hurts the economy is irrelevant. The simple fact is that pregnancy is God’s punishment to little hussies for being little hussies. Nothing teaches a vile tramp the evil of her ways better than a kid she can’t afford to feed, growing up in poverty, with a series of abusive boyfriends/step-fathers who, winds up to a petty criminal and is sent to jail after being caught on tape robbing a 7/11.

Servo January 26, 2009 at 10:55 am

Thanks to the reinstatement of stem-cell research, Nancy just might get that new spine…if Obama doesn’t run her over with the Imperial Cruiser first.

Vanity Smurf January 26, 2009 at 10:55 am

Well, perhaps we should cut the proverbial baby in half. Since abortions cost more than condoms or pills they should become a default method of birth control. That way we get the most economic stimulus bang for our god-hating buck. Government funded abortions for all — or the economy gets it!

DoD January 26, 2009 at 10:55 am

She’s a goddess….just check her and rahm cuddling together here:

http://www.theweeklydonut.com/index.php/2009/01/23/rahm-n-nancy/

Vanity Smurf January 26, 2009 at 10:57 am

[re=228392]Serolf Divad[/re]: The shareholders of your local private prison thank you for your moral rectitude. Mandatory minimums 4EVAH!

Servo January 26, 2009 at 10:59 am

[re=228392]Serolf Divad[/re]:
Wow. Someone you know?

NoWireHangers January 26, 2009 at 10:59 am

[re=228397]DoD[/re]: Ah! Rahm-bone from behind!

Colander January 26, 2009 at 11:00 am

More poor American white babies means more hobos to fight in the HoboWarz*. Being able to afford to feed them will only make them LESS SAVAGE, and who wants that? This Polozi lady is TruckNutz incarnate.

*black people cant afford the primo abortions like Real People can

freakishlystrong January 26, 2009 at 11:00 am

Could Drudge have possibly found a less attractive picture? She looks like she’s she just ate babies in that shot…

NoWireHangers January 26, 2009 at 11:01 am

If Americans waited to have children until they could afford it, the population of the country would swiftly drop off by 95%. I always say I won’t have kids until I can afford it, and my mother cries for grandbabies knowing full well that my uterus will be dry before that happens.

Naked Bunny with a Whip January 26, 2009 at 11:06 am

I could listen to Pelosi better if she’d put some flesh on her skull, for fuck’s sake.

Darehead January 26, 2009 at 11:07 am

In the future, this will be known as the Pelosism vs. Palinism debate. To breed or not to breed, that is the great question of the New Depression.

Serolf Divad January 26, 2009 at 11:09 am

[re=228401]Servo[/re]:

Yeah… my mom.

Servo January 26, 2009 at 11:10 am

[re=228407]NoWireHangers[/re]:
A lot of problems would be quickly fixed with a reduction in births and letting old fucks just die.

Min January 26, 2009 at 11:10 am

Not having babies saves the consumer money. Having babies means the consumer buys more stuff like diapers, strained apricots, and Hummer-esque strollers. So, wouldn’t a stimulus package actually be contraception averse?

actor212 January 26, 2009 at 11:12 am

I remember changing my daughter’s first diaper ever, and finding a leprechaun’s gold in there that helped pay her college tuition, 18 years later.

Mr Blifil January 26, 2009 at 11:13 am

[re=228413]Serolf Divad[/re]: That’s a little unfair…when I fucked her she was still in her prime.

TGY January 26, 2009 at 11:14 am

Sure contraception is good, otherwise there’s a blogger born every minute.

Naked Bunny with a Whip January 26, 2009 at 11:14 am

So, wouldn’t a stimulus package actually be contraception averse?

You’d need to encourage people to use LOTS AND LOTS of condoms to make up for it. Oh, and the Republicans can make up the Papmpers shortfall by buying more diapers for themselves.

Delicious January 26, 2009 at 11:15 am

Give Drudge credit. He is doing his part by never participating in any activity that could lead to the production of a human child.

Naked Bunny with a Whip January 26, 2009 at 11:15 am

LOTS AND LOTS of condoms

Pizza and booze, also.

ph7 January 26, 2009 at 11:15 am

Sound economic policy. Condoms are made in America. Birth control pills are made in America. Strollers are made in China, or in Italy is you intend on pushing a white baby to Montessori.

Darehead January 26, 2009 at 11:16 am

[re=228416]Min[/re]: Also. Getting 14-year olds pregnant keeps them barefoot and off the street, so fewer shoes will be thrown, and fewer skin-tight $300 designer jeans will be sold.

NoWireHangers January 26, 2009 at 11:16 am

[re=228416]Min[/re]: Yeah, you do have a point. I think maybe this really is just the Dems slipping funding for contraception into the bill. Not that I have a problem with that, but you would think that more spending would be good. Actually, I think Pelosi’s point was that when po’ folks pop out brats the state pays for it through things like WIC, and kids healthcare and other stuff and the states are broke so po’ folks should wear rubbers. Now it makes sense.

SayItWithWookies January 26, 2009 at 11:17 am

To extend the Krugman analogy, if we taught pilots to fly the same way we teach kids about procreation, we’d sit them down in a classroom, tell them that flying is a mysterious and beautiful thing that they should only do it when God says they’re ready, and then put ‘em behind the yoke of a 747. And if they’re able to land the thing in one piece, give them a tax cut.

Yes You Can Own A Piece of History January 26, 2009 at 11:18 am

My eight month old has yet to fart out money. Am I doing something wrong? I could really use the cash right now.

An American in Toronto January 26, 2009 at 11:19 am

[re=228417]actor212[/re]: Not only that, my car runs on a mother’s love and my house is heated with the adorable coos and smiles of my 7 month old.

No wonder the Duggars have 18 kids and counting.

BadKitty January 26, 2009 at 11:19 am

[re=228416]Min[/re]: Not at all. Not having babies allows consumers to spend our money on American-produced porn and alcohol. Most of the shit we buy for babies is made in China. USA! USA!

ManchuCandidate January 26, 2009 at 11:21 am

[re=228432]SayItWithWookies[/re]:
LOL, but what does buttfucking represent in that analogy?

AngryBlakGuy January 26, 2009 at 11:21 am

…I wonder how long before kids can abortions in the school nurses office?!

Woodwards Friend January 26, 2009 at 11:21 am

Why does Nancy Pelosi hate my freedom to have 57 babies by 43 women. My meth lab makes more than enough to support them all. Plus, unlike San Fran values Pelosi, my babies are all good evalgelical Christians who will only have virginity perserving butt sex until they are married.

Lascauxcaveman January 26, 2009 at 11:23 am

[re=228392]Serolf Divad[/re]: Sometimes it all works out. Within my own circle of friends are four, count ‘em, four reasonably affluent and well-educated and infertile couples (OK, one of them is a lesbian couple, so, by default…)

Anyhoo, they have all adopted perfectly lovely little white babies (and one Korean baby) with all the correct parts and everything. So the trampy little tramps get to have their trampy sex and the nice infertile married and/or otherwise committed couples get their babies! Win-win. Hopefully, the adopted kids grow up in more nurturing environment, resulting in better reproductive choices than their moms, and reverse the atavistic slide that brought them into this world. In which case, Win-win-win.

Mr Blifil January 26, 2009 at 11:23 am

[re=228433]Yes You Can Own A Piece of History[/re]: Doing something wrong? I don’t know. You’re probably allowing your baby to still be breastfed. If so you are a Nazi.

Monsieur Grumpe January 26, 2009 at 11:24 am

Has anyone told Drudge that women can create eggs but they don’t lay them?

Naked Bunny with a Whip January 26, 2009 at 11:26 am

Am I doing something wrong?

It’s possible. Did you make sure one of the parents is fabulously wealthy? That’s an important step before leasing a baby.

Darehead January 26, 2009 at 11:27 am

[re=228432]SayItWithWookies[/re]: for Secretary of Transportation!

Mustang January 26, 2009 at 11:28 am

What a doofus. I think we should give Siren Boy and all the ugly old white men some babies to care for, then take away all their money, and maybe they’ll start to “get” abortion.

Eff them. Of course, abortion is another one of those bright shiny object issues to keep people distracted while greedy pigs rob us blind.

Luke Warm January 26, 2009 at 11:31 am

it is a patriotic duty to have a least five children (the last at an age where it is high risk of being downs syndrome) drag them out of school and around the country to use as political stage props, and give them sled dog names.

El Pinche January 26, 2009 at 11:32 am

A responsible fiscal stimulus package would compel every woman over the age of 14 to have ten babies before 2011.
And we call this the Palin Effect except the Palin’s dont need no stinkin stimulus check.

HMS Nerd January 26, 2009 at 11:33 am

Yes, a better economic plan vis-a-vis children is to go full-Duggar – that way we’ll have enough minimum wage hobos to be to satisfy China before it just straight buys Manhattan for 1 Yuan on the steps of the Supreme Court after the national debt comes due.

S.Luggo January 26, 2009 at 11:35 am

[re=228392]Serolf Divad[/re]: Contraception bad, libtard. Jails provide jobs.

Rodney Badger January 26, 2009 at 11:39 am

[re=228401]Servo[/re]: He speaks of someone we all know.

SayItWithWookies January 26, 2009 at 11:39 am

[re=228440]ManchuCandidate[/re]: That’s where you promise not to pilot a plane until God tells you to, then you tie fifty helium balloons to your lawnchair and float to Dubuque.

OffTheRecord January 26, 2009 at 11:43 am

[re=228460]HMS Nerd[/re]: The phrase go full-Duggar made me snort. However, the idea is something to which my vagina strongly objects.

actor212 January 26, 2009 at 11:43 am

[re=228436]An American in Toronto[/re]: My house has alternative energy sources. It’s heated by the smell of freshly baked tollhouse cookies.

Yes You Can Own A Piece of History January 26, 2009 at 11:43 am

[re=228445]Mr Blifil[/re]: Not still breastfeeding. She is raised on an American diet of Gerber’s Turkey Sticks for Tots and diet coke. She did poop out something green yesterday, but it wasn’t money.

Mr Blifil January 26, 2009 at 11:43 am

[re=228465]SayItWithWookies[/re]: Ugh, you just reminded me of the latest PIxar trailer. What the fuck happened over there?

PerhapsSo January 26, 2009 at 11:47 am

My biological clock has been shrieking at me for the past year or so, and now baby fever has followed me to Wonkette. Grr.

I’m cool with other people not having the bebes, but will someone, knock me up, please…?

Mr Blifil January 26, 2009 at 11:50 am

[re=228480]Yes You Can Own A Piece of History[/re]: In that case, carry on. You sound like a patriot.

Rodney Badger January 26, 2009 at 11:51 am

[re=228461]S.Luggo[/re]: Seriously, the Prison-Industrial complex FTW.

Terry January 26, 2009 at 11:52 am

[re=228446]Monsieur Grumpe[/re]:

Drudge’s last experience with a women’s reproductive system was seeing a filmstrip in health class in junior high school.

Naked Bunny with a Whip January 26, 2009 at 12:00 pm

will someone, knock me up, please…?

Sure, just sign the waiver.

DoD January 26, 2009 at 12:07 pm

[re=228402]NoWireHangers[/re]: Using clothing as protection is a cost effective way to block a baby blaster

chascates January 26, 2009 at 12:11 pm

Dudge & Coulter. Your source for knowledge of all things infant.

An American in Toronto January 26, 2009 at 12:13 pm

[re=228489]PerhapsSo[/re]: You can have my kid or $50 and a dozen boxes of those 100 calorie Twinkie packs I can’t get here in the Great White North.

An American in Toronto January 26, 2009 at 12:15 pm

[re=228528]An American in Toronto[/re]: Dammit, FOR $50, not or.

SayItWithWookies January 26, 2009 at 12:16 pm

[re=228522]chascates[/re]: No less reliable than getting your sex ed from the Pope, I guess.

[re=228482]Mr Blifil[/re]: They’re not doing a Lawn Chair Larry movie are they? Do they know the dude offed himself a few years later? The kids will love that.

shortsshortsshorts January 26, 2009 at 12:17 pm
Schadenfried January 26, 2009 at 12:18 pm

Don’t forget folks, having babies are free if you have more than 10 of them (a few of being “-tuplets” and get a reality show deal and sponsorships.

actor212 January 26, 2009 at 12:25 pm

[re=228536]Schadenfried[/re]: Personally, I think they ought to slap stickers on the kids like on the cars in NASCAR.

actor212 January 26, 2009 at 12:26 pm

[re=228481]Yes You Can Own A Piece of History[/re]: Gerber’s too healthy! How is she going to pump money into the healthcare system without a diet including melamine????

Naked Bunny with a Whip January 26, 2009 at 12:32 pm

without a diet including melamine????

Always buy your babies melamine supplements if you don’t hate America.

friendlyskies January 26, 2009 at 12:35 pm

Why do conservative gay men (the Catholic Church and Drudge) hate birth control? Are they jealous?

lawrenceofthedesert January 26, 2009 at 12:41 pm

[re=228386]CankleBiter[/re]: I find it touching that a Wonketeer would even mention the notion of sex with a “self-respecting” woman. Your comment should have been awarded a Blingie.

Hooray For Anything January 26, 2009 at 12:54 pm

I think Pelosi is just basing her statements on that well known anti-population tract, “Idiocracy.”

Mr Blifil January 26, 2009 at 12:56 pm

[re=228533]SayItWithWookies[/re]: No I’m talking about this cloying bullshit:

http://www.apple.com/trailers/disney/up/

Yes You Can Own A Piece of History January 26, 2009 at 12:59 pm

[re=228544]actor212[/re]: Have you seen the jars of turkey sticks floating in water? There’s got to be some melamine in there somewhere. That shit is evil.

PerhapsSo January 26, 2009 at 1:08 pm

[re=228532]An American in Toronto[/re]: Damn, dude, I thought you were offering me Twinkies. We have sort of a cream-filled theme going here.

suths January 26, 2009 at 1:09 pm

of course, if it were viagra included in the stimulus all the shitty republicans would have no problem voting it in….

only in america do we let dicks create policy

AnnieGetYourFun January 26, 2009 at 1:22 pm

[re=228576]Hooray For Anything[/re]: Unfortunately, it’s such a tried and true formula that it’s hard NOT to invoke it during Senate sessions.

AnnieGetYourFun January 26, 2009 at 1:36 pm

[re=228444]Lascauxcaveman[/re]: True, except nobody wants to adopt the little black, Hispanic, and mixed-race kids. Also, no kids of any color over two years of age who have been abused and are left with behavioral problems, learning disabilities, and emotional retardation, which is something like 88% of the kids currently in the American foster care system.

And yes, I realize that you weren’t being entirely serious, but this is one of my only soapboxes.

actor212 January 26, 2009 at 1:40 pm

[re=228593]Yes You Can Own A Piece of History[/re]: I’ll believe it when China bans it!

actor212 January 26, 2009 at 1:42 pm

[re=228595]suths[/re]: “I swear, I didn’t mean to policy all over her face, but I didn’t pull out fast enough.”

Sussemilch January 26, 2009 at 1:49 pm

Yes You Can Own A Piece of History – The baby is smarter than you think. A properly misfed toddler can fill an entire house full of methane each day, which is more valuable than that crazy paper currency.

denver_80203 January 26, 2009 at 2:20 pm

I’ve been making a TON of cash knocking up chicks and selling babies to arabs so shut the fuck up

actor212 January 26, 2009 at 2:31 pm

Well, children ARE our futures.

hobospacejungle January 26, 2009 at 2:32 pm

Impeachment is off the table.

ToeCramps January 26, 2009 at 4:03 pm

What’s more depressing than seeing some old hag at your work knocked up with her 1st child cuz now her and her viagra induced balding husband can now afford one? Yuck, get image of old ass preppies doing teh buttsecks out of my mind! Contraception for everyone!!!

Jukesgrrl January 26, 2009 at 5:00 pm

[re=228407]NoWireHangers[/re]: “…the population of the country would swiftly drop off by 95%.” And then we would be Italy. What’s wrong with that?

problemwithcaring January 26, 2009 at 5:12 pm

I wish my abortion clinic had a Starbucks…

ResidentEvil January 27, 2009 at 6:58 am

Your tax dollars, fucktards. I’ve got dual citizenship. You’re paying for forced Chinese abortions, too, which is precisely where this is going. One ugly baby is too many for you mutants.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: