• May 26, 2012

David Denby Finds Wonkette ‘Proudly Idiotic’

by Sara K. Smith  11:00 am January 6, 2009

Now that right there is a NEARSIGHTED manIt is always sad to learn that a respected public thinker has spent any time at all reading new modern trash like Wonkette. Doesn’t the famous New Yorker critic and Internet porn addict David Denby have something better to do, like have lunch at the Algonquin Round Table, or floss his cat?

Denby has written a new book about “snark,” a word that should just be fucking BANISHED from modern usage along with expressions of approval that involve shooting liquids from the nose and ruining keyboards/computer screens. UGH NOT FUNNY.

Anyhow, David Denby does not care for this “snark,” and for “snarky” publications such as Private Eye and Spy and basically anything funny. Wonkette is lumped in with this group and called “proudly idiotic.” AWWWWW.

[UPDATE: We just read the comments on this article and saw that our esteemed editor Ken Layne made basically the same two observations, which is surely evidence of Wonkette's idiot hive mind.]

Snark Attack [New York Magazine Book Review]

{ 81 comments }

NoWireHangers January 6, 2009 at 11:08 am

I mean, I could have written a serious rebuttal in the comments, but the Truck Nutz sirens were calling me.

Electric Zen January 6, 2009 at 11:08 am

Hey, whaddya know? Even al-Qaida likes the snark now:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090106/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_militants_bush_cat

jagorev January 6, 2009 at 11:08 am

Jack Shafer said the same thing as Denby, but in a funnier way, almost 5 years ago:

http://www.slate.com/id/2096976/

Doglessliberal January 6, 2009 at 11:09 am

Mr. Denby might be confusing snark with wit, but, then again, maybe we are proud idiots.

actor212 January 6, 2009 at 11:10 am

We are the Wonk. Prepare to be assimilated.

Canuckledragger January 6, 2009 at 11:11 am

Who?

This pompous fucktard is so wholly unimportant he hasn’t even been drawn to Dana Millbank’s attention. Whereas Billy Kristol has.

I rest my case.

hockeymom January 6, 2009 at 11:11 am

What’s up Ken….no love for Maureen Dowd as a fellow snarkster? Love her exclusion.

Bruno January 6, 2009 at 11:12 am

Is it me, or are there a bunch of flies swarming around his head? Must smell like poopie.

SayItWithWookies January 6, 2009 at 11:12 am

This is a follow-up to Denby’s earlier work, Throwing Spitballs When the Substitute Teacher Turns His Back: It’s Mean, It’s Immature, and I’m Telling.

V572625694 January 6, 2009 at 11:12 am

“Proudly idiotic.” Excellent! Right up there with Dame Peggy’s “dizzy children.”

BTW, that Nerve.com article about movie critics is news I can use!

magic titty January 6, 2009 at 11:12 am

He should masturbate. More.

Tommy Says Soooo January 6, 2009 at 11:13 am

Five years too late, Denby’s on his usual time. I think Malcolm Gladwell wrote about internet porn twenty years ago. You’re his bitch, Denby.

Sara K. Smith January 6, 2009 at 11:13 am

[re=209679]hockeymom[/re]: Maureen Dowd is not funny. The end.

Darehead January 6, 2009 at 11:16 am

David Dun Be a dumb arse.

V572625694 January 6, 2009 at 11:17 am

Thanks, [re=209684]magic titty[/re] for my first coffee on the keyboard moment.

Gopherit January 6, 2009 at 11:19 am

[re=209686]Sara K. Smith[/re]: She KILLS at DAR cocktail parties.

Gopherit January 6, 2009 at 11:21 am

Denby, you stupid bitch, lay not our brilliant snarkocity at the feet of that hack Denton. This is Layne’s world. Come and play, if you dare, you bloviating hack.

Gopherit January 6, 2009 at 11:22 am

[re=209684]magic titty[/re]: there is not enough lubrication in the world to help him.

Tommy Says Soooo January 6, 2009 at 11:22 am

Helen Thomas has chunks of female journos like MoDo in her stool. Either that or the Senior Special at the buffet needs more fiber.

hockeymom January 6, 2009 at 11:22 am

[re=209686]Sara K. Smith[/re]: Not only is she not funny…she is a lazy, mean writer who wastes her talents by casually dropping increasingly irrelevent bon mots into a bunch of paragraphs that she calls a column. She is the Dennis Miller of the print world.

sevenrepeat January 6, 2009 at 11:24 am

boo hoo. a world without being mean and funny? that’s like having a twinky without the filling.

Jobbotch January 6, 2009 at 11:24 am

There – an essay on the Wonkette Comma in the comments. Discourse = elevated

WIDTAP January 6, 2009 at 11:25 am

Now that the PUMAs and public thinkers are all picking on us, do we get some sort of professional victim prize, like a weblog award, or something.

hobospacejungle January 6, 2009 at 11:29 am

Denby looks like he wears briefs that are 20+ years-old. He also probably smells like sour milk.

His book is the literary equivalent of “get off my lawn, you meddling kids”!

I think that’s in the first paragraph of the review. Uh-oh. Well, if the shoe fits, throw it.

Doglessliberal January 6, 2009 at 11:29 am

[re=209704]Jobbotch[/re]: ooh, brilliant. This comment also was quite good:

MOAR TRUKC NUTZ

By AlanKeyes on 01/06/2009 at 11:07 am

Monsieur Grumpe January 6, 2009 at 11:30 am

A whole book? I hope it has a lot of pictures.

Tra January 6, 2009 at 11:31 am

Someone paid this guy to write this book. When codgers are available on every block to yell, “You kids get off my lawn” for free. The mind, it boggles.

DemmeFatale January 6, 2009 at 11:31 am

SPY?? I thought SPY was over! Short fingered vulgarians beware!
(Oh alright, I guess I’ll have to read the article…)

Tommy Says Soooo January 6, 2009 at 11:32 am

Denby looks like a guy who you stumble upon brushing his teeth in an interstate rest stop bathroom. You just really, really, rilly hope he’s into good oral hygiene. And alone.

FMA January 6, 2009 at 11:38 am

He says “proudly idiotic” like it’s a bad thing.

Anonymous Office Zombie January 6, 2009 at 11:42 am

O tempora, o mores! O, bite me, Denby.

grendel January 6, 2009 at 11:42 am

[re=209713]Tommy Says Soooo[/re]: You win the Royal Trucknutz Prize for snark…. The Grand Prize is an hour in an interstate rest stop bathroom with David Denby.

actor212 January 6, 2009 at 11:44 am

[re=209681]SayItWithWookies[/re]: Was that his follow up to his earlier earlier work, Lookit, Mommy! Lookit What I Did!: Thoughts On Crapping Under The Basement Stairs?

actor212 January 6, 2009 at 11:45 am

[re=209705]WIDTAP[/re]: There’s a Cabinet post in it.

the cold war makes me hot January 6, 2009 at 11:47 am

Ya know, people with who write entire books about their internet porn addiction and ability to fritter away their retirement account on teh stock markets should not throw stones. A man his age might get a hernia.

Darehead January 6, 2009 at 11:48 am

Chaucer, Shakespeare, Hiroshige.
They all loved snark.

knoxtheharpy January 6, 2009 at 11:49 am

Proud idiot, reporting for duty, ma’am.

liquiddaddy January 6, 2009 at 11:56 am

Recalling that irony died on 9/11, what was snark to do but soldier on?

Cape Clod January 6, 2009 at 11:59 am

“Did we simply transform overnight into a nation of venal assholes?”

No, that mostly started after World War II.

Seriously, when was the last time this pinhead had any relevence?

yorktronic January 6, 2009 at 12:00 pm

David Denby… a man ahead of his time.

SNARK.

NoYou'reWrong January 6, 2009 at 12:00 pm

Maureen Down is Lizard People.

Lascauxcaveman January 6, 2009 at 12:05 pm

[re=209681]SayItWithWookies[/re]: LOL – ROTFLAMAO!

[/shooting liquids from the nose and ruining keyboards/computer screens.]

Tawmn January 6, 2009 at 12:11 pm

I always thought that the Algonquin Pizza Hut was better.

TGY January 6, 2009 at 12:11 pm

Bah. Snark is merely what people have been saying throughout the ages, even in the ‘glorious’ ’30s and ’40s (NB: Tallulah Bankhead). Only now, thanks to teh Intarwebs, you can read it.

dougbob January 6, 2009 at 12:14 pm

i’ll go with his flossing the bushes dead cat.

randomsausage January 6, 2009 at 12:30 pm

What was that about Maureen Dowd flossing her pussy?

NoWireHangers January 6, 2009 at 12:30 pm

[re=209708]Doglessliberal[/re]: That was me! Hehehehehehehe!

tiger January 6, 2009 at 12:31 pm

Denby looks like a typical ivy-grad, fat dullard. Daddy, can i has the world?
Fuck you David.

Chet Kincaid January 6, 2009 at 12:32 pm

It’s worth mentioning that Sternbergh’s review of the book is a pretty good defense of snarkiness. Which doesn’t change the fact that Nick Denton is a douchebag.

Also, it seems to me that Denby has lumped a bunch of apples together with oranges. Spy had a sense of morality and judgement about what it mocked–a POV despising hypocrisy, vulgarity, and bad writing. Maybe Wonkette and say, Jezebel also have values, although you assholes would never come out and print some “credo” or “manifesto.” Gawker, not so much–it seems to be about chronicling the worthlessness of Media attempting to make money when everything wants to be free. Meanwhile, Denton slave-drives his crew to pack more and more posts onto the site every day in order to make more money picking at all the carcasses. Are those guys impervious to the irony of their own business plan?

Anyway, it was either Oscar Wilde or Graham Chapman who said, “the only thing worse than being snarked about is not being snarked about.”

undermedicated January 6, 2009 at 12:35 pm

[re=209681]SayItWithWookies[/re]: you win!

lumpenprole January 6, 2009 at 12:36 pm

You know, he’s right. I get a lot more out of reading serious articles and earnest posts regarding Sarah Palin’s bright future than I do out of coming here and seeing people call her a heap of human garbage. And it wasn’t snark that settled that very serious Schaivo thing, was it? There’s nothing funny at all about the totally true factual claim that Bush reads lots of books. Hmmm… suddenly I feel the need to participate in a very serious discussion on whether or not white trash mythology should be taught in science classrooms.

AnnieGetYourFun January 6, 2009 at 12:40 pm

I have to disagree. Snark is an awesome word. I’m just glad that it’s coming back into the common lexicon, as I was beginning to think that my mother had invented the term.

thefrontpage January 6, 2009 at 12:44 pm

This is a humor site, first and foremost. The site refers to other stories. The site don’t necessarily break stories, although, in a way, it does indeed either break stories or publicize stories that subsequently get national attention. The site gathers, collects, analyzes and comments on news stories of all types, often in a very entertaining, informative and funny way–in some small ways, that is still journalism. But the site is not and does not pretend to be The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times or The Chicago Tribune, which are still among the top news sources in the United States, even in January, 2009.

So if you don’t like or understand this great, humor satire site and what it does–don’t read it!

But don’t bash it if you don’t understand what it is–and that goes for this goofball Denby guy, too. And those morons at PUMA.

Again: If you don’t understand something, ask about it and research it, but don’t bash it until you’ve done your reseach.

Min January 6, 2009 at 12:46 pm

“We are the Idiot Hive Mind. Resistance is futile. You will be assinine.”

Mr Blifil January 6, 2009 at 12:59 pm

What’s the mystery? As stated he has a porn addiction. We reads Wonkette. ‘Nuff said.

Mr Blifil January 6, 2009 at 1:01 pm

[re=209947]Min[/re]: I think it’s “You will be Ass-sex-simulated.”

Lascauxcaveman January 6, 2009 at 1:07 pm

I’m actually OK with Denby, though he doesn’t seem to appreciate that snark is the more-ebullient first cousin of wit, which is odd, since he’s fairly witty guy in many of his film reviews.

But like his Great-Aunt (in spirit) Dorothy Parker, he sometimes seems a bit too enamored of his own wit.

yellowdogdem January 6, 2009 at 1:22 pm

[re=209918]AnnieGetYourFun[/re]: It’s a bit older than your mother. If Wikipedia is correct, it was invented by Lewis Carroll and first appeared in his poem “The Hunting of the Snark.” So Wonketteers should be proud of their snarky history.

randomsausage January 6, 2009 at 1:22 pm

fuckin’ beardies.

ladymacbeth January 6, 2009 at 1:29 pm

he should read the new yorker more:

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/01/03/050103crci_cinema

favorite movie review ever.

chascates January 6, 2009 at 1:34 pm

Denby’s had a hard time. He had to read all of those ‘Great Books’ for his book on Great Books, then his wife left him for another woman, and then he lost all of his money in the stock market. Irony, and it’s ugly sister snark, are lost on him now.

populucious January 6, 2009 at 1:39 pm

I have always believed that the purpose of Wonkette was to unmask and mock the “proudly idiotic”, of which I now consider David Denby one.

DustBowlBlues January 6, 2009 at 1:56 pm

Gee. I guess he just doesn’t get the point. I thought the wonkerrati were all about the idiocy. I toggle between wonkette and the Christian Science Monitor. This way, my brain balanced and when I quote an article, I seldom forget from which of my two news sources it came.

(And Denby: Please take note that I did not end that sentence with the preposition. Your welcome.)

DustBowlBlues January 6, 2009 at 2:02 pm

[re=209930]thefrontpage[/re]: Actually, between PUMA basing wonkette and now this guy, our cozy little community has gained several new members. Wait, on second thought, maybe it’s not a good thing that the more wonkette is called idiotic, the more readers wonkette attracts. What does this say about our society? I suppose I could read Denby’s article and find out but then, I’m too busy reading wonkette.

assistant/atlas January 6, 2009 at 2:44 pm

[re=209790]liquiddaddy[/re]: And NEVER FORGET!!!1!

ericblair January 6, 2009 at 2:49 pm

I think Wonkette is more like “idiotically proud.”

snideinplainsight January 6, 2009 at 2:53 pm

Just remember, snark is a moment, but snide is 4eva!

snideinplainsight January 6, 2009 at 2:59 pm

[re=210027]Lascauxcaveman[/re]: No, snark is the affectless teenage cousin of wit. Wit is the hottie aunt you only see over the holidays to humor. Humor is the nutty uncle stuck sitting in his recliner to comedy. Comedy is the drippy-nosed nephew to contempt.

A Geek Tragedy January 6, 2009 at 3:05 pm

Private Eye is a lot less funny than it thinks it is though.

IceCreamEmpress January 6, 2009 at 3:36 pm

Well, that’s only fair: David Denby is idiotically proud, when he should be cowering in shame. American Sucker indeed!

Lascauxcaveman January 6, 2009 at 3:49 pm

[re=210342]snideinplainsight[/re]: Clearly, you’ve thought this out more carefully than I.

I defer, Sir.

Mustang January 6, 2009 at 4:45 pm

As the proud PUMAs say, “Why snark when you can snack?” (You said we weren’t allowed to make fat jokes over on the other story, but you didn’t say that here.)

Bruno January 6, 2009 at 7:20 pm

[re=210356]A Geek Tragedy[/re]: I think it has to do something with the paper Private Eye is printed on. Newsprint is so un-snarky

wheelie January 6, 2009 at 8:29 pm

[re=210356]A Geek Tragedy[/re]: It’s humor may tend towards the formulaic by now, but it’s ongoing puncturing of the vast pretensions of British politics remains great. It’s the only magazine I’ve read consistently for the last 20 years. Hislop is a gifted editor and funny man who also has a genuine sense of responsibility (his early libel mistakes notwithstanding).

The Eye is still the most effective muckraker publication in Britain today, surely?

Lazy Media January 6, 2009 at 8:37 pm

[re=209679]hockeymom[/re]: Maureen Dowd is Perez Hilton without dick drawings.

Snarkfest January 6, 2009 at 11:03 pm

Hey there! Stop that shit now.

Boojum January 7, 2009 at 10:30 am

Denby’s claim that snark isn’t intelligent is FOS. For instance, I read a comment the other day that was both:

“Sarah Palin’s politics are like vector bosons in relativistic gauge theory, i.e., naively massless.”

That’s smart and, if you are a physics geek, probably funny. It is certainly snark.

mylesfromnowhere January 8, 2009 at 8:21 am

Reading Denby’s book is similar to reading Bush’s book on current history. Just doesn’t fucking get it and you can’t explain it to him.
[re=211518]Boojum[/re]: I’ve seen Sarah’s bosons and they are not massless!

robanybody January 16, 2009 at 1:13 pm

Etiology multiple choice:
a) Snide + bark
b) Snappy + dark
c) Skid + mark
d) Nonsense term coined by Louis Carroll
e) all or none of the above

bathalax January 16, 2009 at 2:34 pm

wonkette hates america

Captain Swing February 1, 2009 at 12:58 am

[re=211518]Boojum[/re]: Agreed. Denby has shown himself to be a complete buffoon.

True snark requires four elements:

1. Knowledge of subject
2. Awareness of its place in a larger cultural perspective
3. Zero tolerance for bullshit and hypocrisy
4. The wit (or a sufficiently warped mind, if you prefer) to effectively bring them all together

To imply that such people are unintelligent is something Dingbat does at his peril.

…And the fifth element? You, the reader. In order to appreciate snark, the reader must also possess the first four. Maybe that’s Dengleby’s problem- He just doesn’t get it.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: