• February 7, 2012
  • Hooray, the demon water main that plagued Bethesda with rapids of inconvenience has been fixed. It is hilariously located on River Road, which is also now re-opened. [DC Examiner]
  • More tragic news of journalism layoffs: The “U” has been fired from the sign atop the USA Today building. It will now blog for the Daily Beast.   [Fishbowl DC]
  • There’s been an increase in juvenile DC murderers this year, some as young as 16. But are they killing at a tenth-grade level? [Washington Post]
  • Nine MUSLIMS were removed from a flight to MUSLIM-dominated Florida out of National after some passengers heard them talking about airplanes, a highly suspicious, Muslim-y thing to do while on board an airplane. [WTOP]
  • Today is the deadline to apply for a prime spot as a member of Obama’s Inauguration team. You will be paid with a “commemorative volunteer credential,” which will soon out-value United States currency. [DCist]

{ 55 comments }

Neilist January 2, 2009 at 2:20 pm

Muslims should be removed from ALL flights.

Along with all those JEWS.

And don’t forget the Snakes-on-the-plane handling Protestants.

Those (*&^% Irish-Catholics, too.

The result: The Janists, Buddhists, Hind-doos and I will get a bit more leg room.

ManchuCandidate January 2, 2009 at 2:23 pm

The U hasn’t been fired. It was removed because the Letter U no longer can sponsor it thanks to the collapse of the Vowel Hedge Fund and the indictment of Fund Manager Y.

V572625694 January 2, 2009 at 2:24 pm

[re=208294]Neilist[/re]: I’m tired of all these muthafucking believers on this muthafucking plane!

daisy chain January 2, 2009 at 2:27 pm

But the U was holding the whole thing together! Oh, I get it. Symbolism.

rambone January 2, 2009 at 2:34 pm

[re=208294]Neilist[/re]: None of this would be necessary if we hadn’t pissed off God by learning to fly.

Have we learned nothing Daedalus? Or how about that Prometheus fellow?

I dunno about you guys, but no more flying or fire for me for the New Year.

slithytoves January 2, 2009 at 2:39 pm

I just flew back from a holiday trip with my family (after having a flight canceled and waiting two days at a crappy hotel), and as we were sitting by the gate, I offered my brother a Zotz candy. I said, “Remember these? They explode in your mouth.” Then I was arrested and cavity searched. Well, not really, but my brother did tell me to shut my fucking mouth because after all, times have changed. Goddamned Zotz almost got me put on the no-fly list. Hey, maybe that’s not such a bad idea…

V572625694 January 2, 2009 at 2:42 pm

[re=208302]rambone[/re]: Not to mention Zeus, who didn’t want us to have fire either. Just ask Prometheus!

rambone January 2, 2009 at 2:43 pm

[re=208305]slithytoves[/re]: Imagine how trying it must be for Larry Craig to fly without uttering the words “explode in [my] mouth.” It’s a wonder that he ever steps foot in an airport given all of the restrictions on his behavior.

Bruno January 2, 2009 at 2:53 pm

I would really like to put some of these overly scared Americans in the middle of Dubai airport during Hajj.

sanantonerose January 2, 2009 at 2:54 pm

No Murderer Left Behind.

Min January 2, 2009 at 3:09 pm

New security policy at Airtrans…no talking on the airplane, dammit! The pilot is a total wuss.

slithytoves January 2, 2009 at 3:09 pm

[re=208308]rambone[/re]: His, and apparently everyone else’s, too.

finallyhappy January 2, 2009 at 3:11 pm

I am going to Inaugural volunteer training- it is in a ballroom at the Convention Center. I really want that red hat – it will show up well as I move among the totally unmoving cars on the Beltway and tell people what is happening at the Inauguration that they have no chance of reaching.

magic titty January 2, 2009 at 3:13 pm

Missing word police: “Muslims were removed … out of National ‘Security’….”

hobospacejungle January 2, 2009 at 3:14 pm

Airlines could probably make a killing by offering Whites-Only flights.

No Muslins! Guaranteed!

Or, No Muslins or your money back!

Convert one of the restrooms into a mile-high chapel, paint Jesus Is My Co-pilot on the side of the plane…the possibilities are endless. Charge double the usual fare and no more airline bankruptcies.

jagorev January 2, 2009 at 3:19 pm

[re=208333]hobospacejungle[/re]: You know there are white Muslins, right, like that Cat Stevens fellow?

SayItWithWookies January 2, 2009 at 3:19 pm

U has been depressed ever since it realized the high point of its life was getting named Time’s Person of the Year in 2006.

Neilist January 2, 2009 at 3:34 pm

[re=208302]rambone[/re]: Technically, shouldn’t that be “pissed off the gods [plural; lower case] by learning how to fly”?

I mean, if you’re referencing Prometheus and Daedalus?

[Fowler's Grammar Police strike again!]

SayItWithWookies January 2, 2009 at 3:37 pm

[re=208343]The Wolf[/re]: It’s like you’re not even trying anymore. Has Wolfie wost hope? Awwww….

finallyhappy January 2, 2009 at 3:38 pm

While normally I wouldn’t let my puppy pee on the Examiner, how did Wonkette miss the article on today’s Page 9?? Jose Raul Moreno-Lopez of Tampa, Fla, started punching the ground, then took off hs shirt, exposed himself to 5 children and tried to have the sex with a tree.

hobospacejungle January 2, 2009 at 3:39 pm

[re=208336]jagorev[/re]: “You know there are white Muslins, right, like that Cat Stevens fellow?”

Cat Stevens isn’t white, he’s bearded. That’s a separate ethnic group, right?

I obviously didn’t think the whole thing through. That’s for the marketing guys. Wouldn’t want some blonde, blue-eyed Albanian getting on board and screaming “I’m a fucking Muslin motherfuckers! Your security will not save you now!”

Who knows, maybe Muslins will pay extra for flights devoid of Christians. I know I would.

P.T.T. January 2, 2009 at 3:47 pm

AirTrans going to wish they’d asked how many of the Muslins were lawyer Muslins before they gave them the boot. They’ll be serving Tortes per Stirpes to the whole dang fambly.

groove January 2, 2009 at 3:47 pm

Whenever I try to find the “safest place” on a plane when boarding, I try to remember where Jack was sitting in the first episode of Lost, season 1. But then I remember that 1) we’re not flying over the ocean, 2) there is no mysterious island presence that wants to keep me alive, and 3) if the plane goes down, you’re fucked either way, so hahaha at illusions of safety.

Chuckie Jesus January 2, 2009 at 3:53 pm

Chuckie’s husband has declared that he would walk out of that flight in protest. I said I would too, but we’d certainly be put on a list forever. You know, for being scared of flying with racists.

glamourdammerung January 2, 2009 at 3:56 pm

[re=208343]The Wolf[/re]: Welcome to the United States.

Now learn English.

daisy chain January 2, 2009 at 4:09 pm

[re=208343]The Wolf[/re]: Now we have to put up with the wit of laid-off morning radio jocks? When, oh when, will this miserable economy relent in tormenting us?

JadedDIssonance January 2, 2009 at 4:46 pm

[re=208302]rambone[/re]: Please do not forget Icarus! my goodness.

Mustang January 2, 2009 at 5:03 pm

I can understand those Muslins having a hard time figuring out the safest place to sit
because, Good Lorud — whatever seats they choose, there will be Muslins sitting there!!!!

S.Luggo January 2, 2009 at 5:25 pm

Just nine?? And what about the Armenians who snuck on bosrd? They’re almost like arabs.

Kev-O-Tron January 2, 2009 at 5:51 pm

[re=208343]The Wolf[/re]: Jebus I get a headache just reading your comments. You seem to struggle with things like syntax, structure and creating a cogent argument. It’s okay if you want to come here and stir up trouble. Really, you’re not going to offend anyone but you come off as incredibly stupid.

Kev-O-Tron January 2, 2009 at 6:00 pm

[re=208396]The Wolf[/re]: aye aye aye….. Listen guy: I’ve trolled Malkin’s site for the laughs and I “get” what it is you’re after. But please know that nobody here cares if you call me (or them) a cocksucker. It’s really quite funny that you would come to satirical blog with the notion that you’re going to somehow upset anyone. And yes, I do occasionally suck cock but I don’t do animals. sorry.

Editors? I can haz banning session soon?

Lascauxcaveman January 2, 2009 at 6:06 pm

[re=208399]Kev-O-Tron[/re]: He’s certainly no Barbara Billingsley, is he?

Neilist January 2, 2009 at 6:08 pm

[re=208385]Mustang[/re]: Okay, that was funny. Score.

Kev-O-Tron January 2, 2009 at 6:10 pm

[re=208400]Lascauxcaveman[/re]: Christ he’s not even Eddie Haskell. I picture him as some lonely frat boy at WSU wearing some stupid backwards baseball cap and playing grabass with his buddies in a cramped dorm room. The room is probably adorned with stolen bar swag and cheap bongs. He is fat and pimply. They are discussing the merits of bad, modern pop music and talking about how much ass they get.

Neilist January 2, 2009 at 6:13 pm

[re=208396]The Wolf[/re]: You should have a comma between “blow me” and “cocksucker,” e.g., “Blow me, cocksucker.”

Otherwise it could be Pirate-speak or something: “Arrrrrrgh, Jimbo! Blow me cocksuckers!”

(“Cocksucker” being Ye Olde English for the upper top foresail sheet brace, or something . . . .)

Pat Pending January 2, 2009 at 6:18 pm

I think the letter U is running away with the numeral 2.

(oh, ferpetessake, it’s an old reference to Negativland, ok?)

daisy chain January 2, 2009 at 6:36 pm

[re=208405]Neilist[/re]: Argh! Blow me cocksucker and finger me dyke, or walk the plank landlover!

Bruno January 2, 2009 at 6:45 pm

All this talk about private parts is getting me excited. Calm down everyone, this is just the democrats trying to divide us. As long as we all know we are here for a single purpose: to prevent any Muzzie from flying again, we can all be friends. This is all part of N0bama’s strategy to implement the fairness doctrine and divide our Grand Old Party forever. We must not forget we are good friends here, and good friends make the best lovers.

rambone January 2, 2009 at 7:13 pm

[re=208402]Neilist[/re]: I loves me the grammar discussions! [masturbating furiously]

[re=208411]The Wolf[/re]: And where exactly are you taking Neilist’s point?

mylesfromnowhere January 2, 2009 at 7:37 pm

I’m not understanding the issue. We’re talking about a vp candidate who shoots wolves (the wolf?) from helicopters, a real vp who shoots lawyers in the face, a pres who invades a country based on “bad intel”, and the righteous religious right is constantly buggering some kids or seeking teh oral and buttsecks in some public place…and someone is worried bout flying with some muslins? Great Googly Moogly… i’m scared of flying with politicians and Christians. I’ll take my chances on the all-muslin flight, please.

mylesfromnowhere January 2, 2009 at 7:40 pm

teh wolf haz healthcare

rambone January 2, 2009 at 7:44 pm

[re=208428]The Wolf[/re]: For the last time, just because you tasted shit on a guy’s cock doesn’t make him gay.

mylesfromnowhere January 2, 2009 at 8:13 pm

Is having the wolfie cocksucking cocksuckers cocksucking suggestions sort of like a foot tap in the airport? must be all that licking himself.
sheeeet. suck one cock and everyone calls you names

and if you have to google teh, you probably are on the wrong site.

S.Luggo January 2, 2009 at 8:32 pm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/02/AR2009010202047.html?hpid=topnews
Jan. 2, 2009
“Bush Condemns Hamas in Radio Address”
******
What a silly bunt.

Bruno January 2, 2009 at 9:13 pm

[re=208439]S.Luggo[/re]: Bush still does a radio address? Is this due to the excessive number of AM-radio listening members of his base?

P.T.T. January 2, 2009 at 10:06 pm

Query: does the Muslin god use his hands to hold the airplane up, even if Peggy Noonan is on board? Is on board the same as ennui? Oui? les aristocrates à lanterne! chop chop! Now there were some terrorists. . . .

S.Luggo January 2, 2009 at 10:29 pm

[re=208445]Bruno[/re]: Nope, it’s because he still has a crystal radio. Dick Cheney told him not to get sucked into leftist free-sex hippie “so-called” science, such as that proclaiming the usefulness of transistors and alternating current. Damn them bee-bop jazz beatniks and their Jesus-hating satanic ways. What’s next? Circuit boards? Evolution? Pennicilin? Shit.

rambone January 2, 2009 at 11:29 pm

[re=208465]Neilist[/re]: grammar! [masturbating furiously]

[re=208437]mylesfromnowhere[/re]: “cocksucker” is to “The Wolf” as “Smurf” is to “Smurf”

gurukalehuru January 3, 2009 at 4:02 am

Sorry, Neilist, for not reading all previous comments before posting.

Anyway, re the hyphen in cock-sucker, I vote no. Hyphens slow things down. There are times, of course, when it must be separated into two words. In those cases, a comma is usually appropriate. As in, “Johnny didn’t realize that his date was a transvestite until she put his hand down her panties and said ‘That’s a cock, sucker.’”

gurukalehuru January 3, 2009 at 4:04 am

So, it’s now “South America Today.” O.K.

Servo January 3, 2009 at 2:40 pm

[re=208458]S.Luggo[/re]:
Vacuum tubes and huge fuckin’ tuning caps are state-of-the-art to them.

[re=208489]The Wolf[/re]:
Since you so desire to be the resident expert on cocksucking:
In the name of God, St. Michael , and St. George, I give you the right to suck cocks and do part to us butt sex.

daisy chain January 3, 2009 at 2:56 pm

[re=208465]Neilist[/re]: My understanding is the cocksucker would be one word. It’s a compound noun, like dickhead. However, when used to describe certain members of Congress you must use a hyphen, as in cock-sucking Republican. That is to distinguish the fact that the word “cock” modifies the word “suck” and not the word “Republican.”

But I’m a little murky on it, I admit.

Neilist January 3, 2009 at 6:24 pm

[re=208500]daisy chain[/re]: [re=208481]gurukalehuru[/re]: [re=208466]rambone[/re]: As always, I am impressed by the amount of time, intellectual energy, and sheer intelligence that my Wonkette.com colleagues are willing to devote to such an important topic.

In my view, such a critical inquiry should be prefaced by Winston Churchill’s observation to Sir Edward Marsh: “I am in revolt about your hypens. One must regard the hypen as a blemish to be avoided wherever possible.”

[Winnie, after all, was one of "us": An expert on gin, sodomy and revolting behavior in general.]

According to Fowler’s Modern English Usage (2nd ed. 1965, not the lame “Americanized” 4th ed.): “The primary function of the hypen is to indicate that two or more words are to be read together as a single word with its own meaning.”

I defer to you, my esteemed colleagues: Does any Wonketteer seriously contend that “cock” and “sucker” NEEDS a hypen to indicate that they are to be read together? I think not . . . .

“Cock” and “sucking,” however, pose a slightly more complicated problem, given that one definition of “sucking” is “not yet weaned”/”very young.” Admittedly, in a GOP administration, that might be less of a problem. But we have a responsibility to think of the future.

Further, there is the issue of whether “sucking” in this context is a gerund or a participle. But I am reluctant to address that issue, given that risk that Rambone may wear a hole in his foreskin.

Boondock Saint January 4, 2009 at 6:43 pm

What’s with all the mavricky-Muslin-cock-sucking talk?

WIDTAP January 4, 2009 at 8:44 pm

I now understand the Library of Congress’s interest in Wonkette. Where else will future etomoligists discover the final removal of the hyphen from this word?

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: