• February 15, 2012

Prediction: He will quit the NYT and immediately be hired to run GM.Just now your editors were having a little talky about our secret boyfriend, the New York Times’ token cross-dressing felcher Bill Kristol. “His column is boring and moderate this week,” said our Jim Newell. “He probably has some solid shit-eating lines, though.” And WALLAH, just like that, we found a nugget of silliness embedded at the very end of this kind of dull review of different strains of conservatism.

Basically, Kristol says that small-government conservatives are fucked forever, so they better start loving big government, or at least start dreaming up new ways to spend the taxpayer dollars they are supposed to dislike spending so much. So here is an idea! In our new era of globalization, in which America no longer fights conventional wars but instead engages in long-term efforts that are a hybrid of nation-building and police action, and in which half of our fucking problems can be directly traced to our dependence on fossil fuels imported from unfriendly thugs in the Middle East and the Caucasus and Africa and Venezuela, Bill Kristol thinks we should spend MORE money on bombs and less on “fanciful” renewable energy projects.

[I]f you’re against big government, you’ll oppose a huge public works stimulus package. If you think some government action is inevitable, you might instead point out that the most unambiguous public good is national defense. You might then suggest spending a good chunk of the stimulus on national security — directing dollars to much-needed and underfunded defense procurement rather than to fanciful green technologies, making sure funds are available for the needed expansion of the Army and Marines before rushing to create make-work civilian jobs.

Clearly, our best hope for a national “project” to revive our economy and restore our standing in the world would be to incinerate a giant bag of one billion dinosaur dicks and then feed the remains to Bill Kristol.

Small Isn’t Beautiful [New York Times]

{ 48 comments }

actor212 December 8, 2008 at 3:17 pm

Errrr, isn’t the spending on the Iraq War been one of the main reasons the Bush tax cuts never really took hold until 2004?

4tehlulz December 8, 2008 at 3:17 pm

Just don’t spend it on veterans, because they failed to win Iraq for Bill Kristol.

queeraselvis v 2.0 December 8, 2008 at 3:20 pm

“Cross-dressing felcher” FTW.

ManchuCandidate December 8, 2008 at 3:21 pm

Hey Bill, Japan and Germany did exactly that during the Great Depression. Look how well that turned out for them.

Seriously, defense spending is the least productive government spending of all. The economic return on defenestration (sic) is usually between 0-100% while civilian capital spending returns in the range of 300-500%.

Jukesgrrl December 8, 2008 at 3:22 pm

Note to Billy: You’re not fooling me, Wanker, you just want your fellow Americans to send their kids into the military for a career, so they leave all the good private-sector jobs for YOUR kids.

sati demise December 8, 2008 at 3:22 pm

Just proves that Kristol is always wrong.
He must want to keep his score a perfecto 0-infinity.
wrong,wrong,wrong,wrong.

Mighty Rex December 8, 2008 at 3:23 pm

Make-work jobs for the civilian sector=public works, art, skill-building on-the-job training for displaced workers.

Make-work jobs for defense=make things that kill people, teach teenagers to kill people, so that teenagers don’t become displaced workers, and instead, kill people.

No brainer, Bill. O hai! Look at the Blackwater guys getting arraigned! For killin’ people!

Bill Kristol is a lumpy moist turd.

freakishlystrong December 8, 2008 at 3:24 pm

EEccchhh..speaking of Bold Fresh Pieces of Insanity…

actor212 December 8, 2008 at 3:25 pm

[re=193692]ManchuCandidate[/re]: Ah, but love runs in the door when money flies defenestro, Chu!

At least, that’s how it used to work on 42nd Street…

MoodProcessor December 8, 2008 at 3:26 pm

I say at least $15 billion each to perfecting the Microwave Blood-Boiler, and the Sonic Brown Wave.

Masorca December 8, 2008 at 3:27 pm

that desciption is a serious insult to hard working honest felchers everywhere

MarieDeGournay December 8, 2008 at 3:27 pm

Yes, yes, by all means, spending more money on equipment and training that’s sole purpose is to kill people will solve all our problems. I swear, I love these armchair generals and their grand schemes. Got a huge and complicated economic problem? Bomb people. Someone should revoke is licenes as a human being.

Serolf Divad December 8, 2008 at 3:28 pm

You can buy a whole lot of $100 hammers with $600 billion.

Sussemilch December 8, 2008 at 3:29 pm

It’s nice that politicians and pundits can hold peoples’ feet over the fire for fiscal mismanagement while the Federal debt eclipses 10 trillion dollars.

Doglessliberal December 8, 2008 at 3:31 pm

OK, so by his measure, investing in creating new ways of doing things is a waste, and new technology is fanciful. My suggestion is that he undergo a medical procedure with no anesthetic, no antiseptic, and a surgeon who doubles as a barber. Maybe, if he is nice, we can give him a bullet to bite on.

obfuscator December 8, 2008 at 3:32 pm

[re=193692]ManchuCandidate[/re]: Freedoms’ not free!!!!1!, moranz.

Servo December 8, 2008 at 3:32 pm

Who needs an infrastructure?

Monsieur Grumpe' December 8, 2008 at 3:32 pm

Wrong Bill! What we need is more wars. Specifically, more wars that we can win. How about Grenada? That went pretty good last time.

kimbongil December 8, 2008 at 3:36 pm

Clearly the Times keeps him employed because no one does more harm to the Republican Party that Kristol. One has to wonder what part of the military industrial complex is feeding him talking points, because he obviously does not possess enough intelligence to form ANY rational thought.

the truth is that the Pentagon knows that its splurge is coming to an end and are doing what ever they can to build public support to keep the cuts limited. so you get minions out there to try and build your case for you.

so they pick Kristol, again demonstrating the oxymoron that “military intelligence”

Truth is no one else is willing to carry their water for spending folly anymore

Hooray For Anything December 8, 2008 at 3:36 pm

So does this mean I’m going to be working in some fancy bomb-making factory instead of doing highway construction? I’m okay with that as at least it’ll be indoors.

hopebong December 8, 2008 at 3:43 pm

Krugman needs to come back now. Have Nobel shipped DHL, I mean, UPS

tiger December 8, 2008 at 3:44 pm

Where did this shit-eating bedbug come from? Typically conservative, his view has no long range whatsoever. It’s all about right now, even when it’s dead wrong. And yeah, his peeps will never have to fight in a war.
Can i have his head wrapped in butcher paper for Xmas?

NewSpence December 8, 2008 at 3:46 pm

Let’s see, our current Pentagon budget is higher then it was during the Cold War, we spend as much on defense as Every Other Nation on Earth Combined and military spending is a black hole of unaccountability and graft.
Puuuurfect!

Borat December 8, 2008 at 3:46 pm

“make work civilian jobs”

I always thought the military was about ‘make work jobs’. Let’s be clear. Money going into the military has no lasting value. It is just spent blowin’ shit up.

p-Sludge ofTheElves December 8, 2008 at 3:47 pm

Doesn’t matter how wrong I am if I can convince you someone else is wronger, and that you should kill them. Then, I’m a hero.

Lascauxcaveman December 8, 2008 at 3:49 pm

Well, I’ve always been for developing solar; y’know the whole basically-free-energy-forever thing being pretty attractive to me.

But now that I think about it, more bombs n’ guns for killing brown peoples is pretty sweet, too.

I – I can’t decide?

bluetom00 December 8, 2008 at 3:50 pm

Even better: earlier he suggests “big-government conservatives” are allowed to masturbate to the thought of lower taxes while still bailing out every big corporation that has ever existed. But only corporations.

kimbongil December 8, 2008 at 3:50 pm

[re=193723]Hooray For Anything[/re]: Actually you will be weatherizing the Pentagon with a caulk gun

WadISay December 8, 2008 at 3:52 pm

Are you reading this, Barry? Cause the lesson is pretty clear: max the US Government’s plastic on your watch, while we still have credit we can spend on good stuff. When the righties get back in power, they will just spend any remaining credit on on war and “tax incentives for the most productive members of society*.”

* An apparent reference to Paris Hilton

V572625694 December 8, 2008 at 3:54 pm

[re=193734]tiger[/re]: Kristo came from his daddy (Irving Kristol) and mommy (Midge Dicked-her), who were proto-neocons, and was raised to mature idiocy by — who else? — J Danforth Quayle.

Monsieur Grumpe’– Panama was another proud military triumph. We kicked their asses! Wow!

V572625694 December 8, 2008 at 3:54 pm

[re=193768]V572625694[/re]: “Kristol,” I meant to say….

tonehedge December 8, 2008 at 3:57 pm

A lump of coal in his stocking and drop a big fucking fuel air bomb on his ass.

joezoo December 8, 2008 at 4:00 pm

I would have never guessed to use “underfunded” as a descriptor of the American war machine, but then, that’s because I’m not a lightning-rod conservative on the payroll of the New York Times. (How’s that working out for them, by the way?)

Hooray For Anything December 8, 2008 at 4:06 pm

[re=193754]kimbongil[/re]: Since Obama promises to go green, I’m down with caulking the Pentagon just as long as it’ll help make it more enviro-friendly. Also not during the summer time as DC is awfully hot then.

actor212 December 8, 2008 at 4:07 pm

[re=193784]joezoo[/re]: They’re about to file bankruptcy, is how.

Neon Trotsky December 8, 2008 at 4:19 pm

See, conservatives can be Keynesians too, they just need that helpful word military inserted in front!

hobospacejungle December 8, 2008 at 4:27 pm

[re=193784]joezoo[/re]: “underfunded defense procurement” indeed! $650 billion defense budget signed into law with nary a peep from anyone, media included, right in the middle of the don’t ask/don’t tell financial bailout.

Why we need even $200 billion spent on defense is beyond me. Who the fuck is going to invade US America? Get green & shut down the ~200 military bases we have that aren’t in US America. Maybe then we can feed ourselves and provide health care for everyone. But really, that would just make too much goddamn sense.

groove December 8, 2008 at 4:28 pm

“Fanciful green technologies?” Haha, all you smug douchebags who bought Priuses are all just buying into a fad! Just like the internet and personal hygiene.

Naked Bunny with a Whip December 8, 2008 at 4:29 pm

[re=193715]Servo[/re]: Indeed, screw infrastructure. Who needs bridges when we can drop a couple dozen more bombs on brown people?

Come here a minute December 8, 2008 at 4:37 pm

Yeah, Bill, spend the money on fanciful defense thingies instead — yeah let’s deploy a missile shield, even though the best evidence is that it doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of working.

I’ve never heard of an interstate highway that doesn’t work. Even the approach road to the unbuilt bridge to nowhere got used for a 10k race.

bfstevie December 8, 2008 at 4:55 pm

[re=193734]tiger[/re]: How can you speak of Bill Kristol and say “even when he’s dead wrong”? He’s Bill Fucking Kristol. He’s ALWAYS dead wrong.

mdotsota December 8, 2008 at 5:36 pm

Please tell me that the inclusion of “WALLAH” is an ode to Jessica McBride.

davesnothere December 8, 2008 at 5:41 pm

He and Pooter Libby are interchangeable for mediocre buttseks.

tinkleberry December 8, 2008 at 6:31 pm

Wait, wait, what? Kristol isn’t being ironic? Are you guys sure? Like when he admitted that Reagan didn’t “particularly” slash government spending? Or when he said that our schools and bridges or whatever are just fine, but he has visited a few military bases that could use some TLC? No, you guys have Billy all wrong. If not, I’ve got to go back and re-read his columns with an entirely different mind-set.

Which would suck because I’d rather shoot myself.

chascates December 8, 2008 at 7:35 pm

So the past 7 years have proved that’s it is cheaper to fight for oil than to lessen the need for it? Since Dubya will start a ‘Freedom Institute’ Billy & pals should start some sort of “War Institute’. Situated in Israel please.

Gob December 8, 2008 at 9:24 pm

I think Sara K. Smith has been absorbing the Newell at a very rapid rate.

The image of Bill Kristol, in drag, sucking cum out of another man’s anus — and this being the kind of thing the NYT is obligated to keep at least one of around — is exactly the sort of idea I will always cherish and never ever be able to explain to society or my mother why I love it so.

feminista666 December 8, 2008 at 9:31 pm

It is obvious Bill has a massive fetish for all things military. His greatest fantasy it not to serve, but to service every man in uniform. Nothing else can explain his illogical lust for war.

Internally valid December 9, 2008 at 12:21 am

Most national-socialists at least pretend not to be warmongers. He’s not even trying anymore.

Does he really think that this is what people mean when they say they want a stimulus package? No want.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: