SHARE


Whoa hey check out this guy. He is, let’s see, Alec Baldwin, we think. One of the Baldwins, anyway. The “funny one.” And really, have we proven Cheney didn’t personally do 9/11, with a Wii? Exactly. This is why Ron Paul has endorsed this fellow. Read the actual endorsement, after the jump.

So why did Doctor Congressman Paul finally decide to endorse somebody, even after that weird press conference with Cynthia McKinney and who knows, maybe Ralph Nader and Bono, at which Dr. Paul decided he wouldn’t really endorse anybody, because Bob Barr refused to even show up and kiss Ron Paul’s ring? Because that filthy little twerp Bob Barr later got all up in Ron Paul’s grill and the Good Doctor was all, “You want some of this, you fuckin’ two-foot-tall duck-faced motherfucker?” Or:

The Libertarian Party Candidate admonished me for “remaining neutral” in the presidential race and not stating whom I will vote for in November. It’s true; I have done exactly that due to my respect and friendship and support from both the Constitution and Libertarian Party members. I remain a lifetime member of the Libertarian Party and I’m a ten-term Republican Congressman. It is not against the law to participate in more then one political party. Chuck Baldwin has been a friend and was an active supporter in the presidential campaign.

I continue to wish the Libertarian and Constitution Parties well. The more votes they get, the better. I have attended Libertarian Party conventions frequently over the years.

In some states, one can be on the ballots of two parties, as they can in New York. This is good and attacks the monopoly control of politics by Republicans and Democrats. We need more states to permit this option. This will be a good project for the Campaign for Liberty, along with the alliance we are building to change the process.

I’ve thought about the unsolicited advice from the Libertarian Party candidate, and he has convinced me to reject my neutral stance in the November election. I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate.

There you have it: Chuck Baldwin, whoever he is, now has the full support of Ron Paul and the entire Clone Army of Paultards. This is not looking good for Barack Obama.

A New Alliance — by Dr. Ron Paul [Campaign for Liberty]
Ron Paul’s Presidential Endorsement. For Real, This Time [Reason Hit & Run]

$
Donate with CCDonate with CC
  • njdon

    ho really killed lincoln?

  • Delicious

    commenting via Twitter Mobile while sitting on a toilet.

    E-nerd <——

  • SayItWithWookies

    Chuck Baldwin — coming soon to a bookstore near you.

  • cal

    Begun, these Tard Wars have.

  • PoliTacky

    “Baldwintards” just doesn’t have the same ring to it.

  • facehead
  • SayItWithWookies

    [re=104117]njdon[/re]: I think it was actually Vo Nguyen Giap.

  • PoliTacky

    [re=104126]facehead[/re]: Oh, shit. That is a craptastic logo. And did you watch the fake Mac ad? If you’re feeling suicidal, but just needed that one final horrible thing to push you over the edge, give it a try.

  • CivicHoliday

    His website looks like a fourth-of-July TrimSpa™ ad

  • expatinOz

    [re=104125]PoliTacky[/re]: How about Baldwinos?

  • WagTehGod

    [re=104141]CivicHoliday[/re]: Seriously, did someone from Ron Paul’s Basement Brigades design this thing between bags of Cheetos?

  • grevillea

    Short version: “Um, OK, Basement-Dwelling-Conspiracy-Theory-Dude, I’ll give you permission to imagine me as imaginary president forming an imaginary 9/11 commission.”

  • PoliTacky

    [re=104143]expatinOz[/re]: BALDwinners! Or does that sound too much like a name for the Hair Club For Men bowling league?

  • magic titty

    [re=104194]PoliTacky[/re]: Baltards, people. Baltards.

  • Aurelio

    What’s the difference between the Libertarian and Constitution Parties? Aren’t they all basically Paultards?

  • Darehead

    One of your commenters has been telling yer Wonker-folks ’bout this love between Doctor Paul and Pastor Baldwin for many months now. (Hey Ken, you forgot to add ‘Pastor’) Let’s see, who was that commenter? Hint: begins with “D,” ends with “d,” and has some vowels and one ‘h’ in between.

    [re=104227]Aurelio[/re]: As for this very good question, yes there are very big differences. Libertarians want gummit off yer back as ya know.
    ..whereas the Constitution Party, now hear this, is the American version of Sharia, which means that they believe that the Constitution is divinely inspired and represents the will of Jesus Christ, and that observing the fundamentalism of scripture is the same thing as observing the fundamentalism of the Constitution. So gummit gets off your spine so you can more clearly feel what Pastor Baldwin claims to be divine. Yeah, you don’t believe this? Well, go to the Constitution Party homepage and look under ‘Preamble’ where you will find this:
    http://www.constitutionparty.com/

    The Constitution Party gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, aid, comfort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.

    This great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been and are afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.

    The goal of the Constitution Party is to restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal government to its Constitutional boundaries.

  • PoliTacky

    [re=104208]magic titty[/re]: Well, if you break it down like that, it has even more possibilities:

    Bal-Sacks
    Bal-Gags
    Blue-Bals
    Bal-Suckers

  • glamourdammerung

    Ron Paul is endorsing some far, far right-wing nutjob?!?!?!

    But that is so unlike him, except for that last 30 years or so.

  • Darehead

    [re=104259]glamourdammerung[/re]: Yep.

    BAIT = end war, pay attention to economy, care about government intrusion
    SWITCH = establish theocracy, end democracy; intrusion by religious leaders replaces intrusion by government

  • ProgHead777

    Seriously, are these people like, “oooh, he really might win”? What the fuck do they put in their Kool-aid?

    [re=104260]Darehead[/re]: “When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross.” -Sinclair Lewis

    That’s a quote that Americans ought to see and hear much more often. Because it’s terrifyingly true.

  • whatever_dc

    i’m still voting for alan keyes: the black man america should REALLY be scared of!!!

    http://www.alankeyes.com

  • Garrett3000

    Chuck Baldwin is batshit insane.

    Ron Paul…you’ve changed.

    Bob Barr it is.

    SUCKA

  • Garrett3000

    Chuck Baldwin is batshit insane and I want nothing to do with him.
    Pandering to the 9/11 Truth movement? Please.

    Sorry Ron, I’m voting for McCain or Bob Barr.

  • sezme

    Wake up, Ameritards!

  • sezme

    I’ve thought about the unsolicited advice from the Libertarian Party candidate, and he has convinced me to reject my neutral stance in the November election. I’m supporting Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate.

    So there you have it, Dr. Paul unashamedly grants his dedazo to Baldo The Great simply because he hates receiving unsolicited advice. That’s spite I can believe in.

  • Lazy Media

    That Castle guy who will be President Baldwin’s Veep? If Kansas City Chiefs assistant coach Chan Gailey and George Will had a son, he would look exactly like that guy.

Previous article
Next articleMake Hank Paulson Buy Your Crap, Too!