MOONIE TIMES  3:08 pm August 19, 2008

Ha Ha, Lanny Davis’ Column Is Called, ‘Ted Stevens: An Innocent Man’

by Jim Newell

After Hillary Clinton lost, her annoying lawyer friend Lanny Davis had to find a new dumb job, even though he was never on staff to begin with. And so he became a columnist for where else, The Washington Times. Yesterday’s column did, in fact, have the comical headline quoted in this post’s headline. It’s some of that contrarian hot air you’d usually see nestled indiscreetly on the front page of Slate or TNR, linking to a boring article by some “legal correspondent” almost surely named “Jeffrey.” But this is different in some respects: it’s in the Moonie Times and it’s written by Lanny Davis, so somehow it manages to be even less edifying.

Lanny’s first sentence is: “Just the headline of this piece alone, I’ll bet, shocks a number of people.” Not when it comes from you, Lanny. Nor does this lame first sentence shock any number of people — whether it’s something they teach in journalism school or just one of those unofficial rules, when you compromise your opinion piece with a “wait, wait, just hear me out” sort of lede, it usually means you have little information or grand insight to offer. Having “Lanny Davis” in your byline also has this effect.

Lanny’s column has all of these problems:

Most people assume, or have concluded, that Sen. Ted Stevens is guilty. After all, didn’t a D.C. grand jury indict Mr. Stevens on seven felony counts? Haven’t the U.S. government and its federal prosecutors concluded that Mr. Stevens failed to disclose taking more than $250,000 worth of gifts on his Senate financial-disclosure forms?

Of course the media hype and Page One, above-the-fold headlines about these charges lead to the public impression that Sen. Stevens must be guilty of … well … something.

But just suppose all these media stories began with the following paragraph:

“Sen. Ted Stevens, who must be presumed to be an innocent man until he is proven guilty by the U.S. government beyond a reasonable doubt, today was indicted on charges of filing false statements in Senate financial-disclosure forms. As is normal, the grand jury voted the indictment based on one-sided evidence presented by prosecutors, without Sen. Stevens or his attorneys having an opportunity to be present, to cross-examine witnesses, or to present contrary evidence that could have created a reasonable doubt regarding his guilt.”

Most media people and government prosecutors would probably say such a lead would be naive and ridiculous. What they couldn’t say is that a single word of the above paragraph is untrue.

And that is the point of Lanny’s column: that indicted citizens in this country are innocent until proven guilty, so we should all lay off of Ted Stevens. Hmm! Because what if he is innocent in his trial (not gonna happen, unless he bribes the jury, which he will), then how will we feel?

Lanny Davis hates happiness & fun things.

DAVIS: Ted Stevens: An Innocent Man [Washington Times]

 
Related video

Hola wonkerados.

To improve site performance, we did a thing. It could be up to three minutes before your comment appears. DON'T KEEP RETRYING, OKAY?

Also, if you are a new commenter, your comment may never appear. This is probably because we hate you.

{ 42 comments }

ManchuCandidate August 19, 2008 at 3:13 pm

Lanny Davis, apologist for hire.

shortsshortsshorts August 19, 2008 at 3:13 pm

Lanny Davis has invented due process?
FUCKING GENIUS!
We should embrace this idea which is not obvious at all to anyone who is a U.S. citizen.

Ted is an exception, however. He should be burned at the stake before ever walking into a court room.

Nixon’s innocent to, by little Lanny’s standards.

mookworthjwilson August 19, 2008 at 3:16 pm

You know what else is true Lanny? No court in the land has ever proven that Lanny Davis does not fuck farm animals.

Strictly for the Tardcore August 19, 2008 at 3:17 pm

One wonders if Davis learned about this “Innocent Until Proven Guilty” theory from Ted’s Internet Tubes.

V572625694 August 19, 2008 at 3:18 pm

This is the same strategy Lanny used to save Bill Clinton from impeachment. Win!

NotUrEvryDayWEzl August 19, 2008 at 3:19 pm

Lanny, this is the Age of Bush. Indictments are as good as convictions.

SayItWithWookies August 19, 2008 at 3:20 pm

Ken Lay — an innocent man ’cause he died during his appeal. Geeze, with a mind like that helping out, how could Hillary possibly have lost the nomination?

ReverendGreen August 19, 2008 at 3:23 pm

If it’s a crime to love America, then I guess Ted Stevens is guilty.

And if it’s a crime to accept free repairs on your house, among certainly other, less-provable donations, then I guess Ted Stevens is guilty.

And if it’s a crime to bribe a jury, then I guess Ted Stevens will be guilty of that too!

God bless America!

On another note, Lanny Davis, please write a column about how unfairly OJ is treated.

Botswana Meat Commission FC August 19, 2008 at 3:24 pm

It’s some of that contrarian hot air you’d usually see nestled indiscreetly on the front page of Slate or TNR, linking to a boring article by some “legal correspondent” almost surely named “Jeffrey.”

Oh god, Newell you hilarious ginger-headed bastard.

Guppy06 August 19, 2008 at 3:26 pm

Is the same “innocent until proven guilty” nonsense standard also applied in Guantanamo? What about to pot-smokers and homosexuals?

AngryBlakGuy August 19, 2008 at 3:28 pm

…before, I have accused such HACK lawyers of getting their law degrees from a cereal box. However after reading this excerpt I have come to the conclusion that Lanny Davis must have stole his law degree from traveling carnival, that escaped from.

ReverendGreen August 19, 2008 at 3:29 pm

You know what they say: every failed presidential campaign launched by increasingly-irrelevant politicians needs the equivalent of an Internet Troll on board.

grendel August 19, 2008 at 3:32 pm

Apparently he has not been living in the USA for the last 7.5 years… Ted Stevens is lucky not to have electrodes connected to his balls in Guantanamo.

Larry McAwful August 19, 2008 at 3:34 pm

[re=63240]Guppy06[/re]: Well, those terrorists haven’t proven that they’re not terrorists, so they clearly are terrorists. Since that’s settled, there’s only about 300 million Americans who haven’t proven they’re innocent of terrorism. Guantanamo’s going to be awful busy, once the courts get it in gear!

botlrokit August 19, 2008 at 3:35 pm

[re=63219]shortsshortsshorts[/re]: He was born before his state became a member of the Union. I say that strips him of his rights.

Harvey Birdman August 19, 2008 at 3:37 pm

[re=63235]Botswana Meat Commission FC[/re]: fo’ realz.

ReelectTilden August 19, 2008 at 3:37 pm

If this gig doesn’t work out, he ought to write Larry Craig’s next appeal.

Scooter August 19, 2008 at 3:39 pm

We will never run out of smarm as long as Lanny Davis slithers the earth!

Da Derga August 19, 2008 at 3:41 pm

Something tells me that Davis didn’t do so well on his Criminal Procedure final. At least the Moonie Times keeps him out out of the court room, where he could do some real damage.

Nasara August 19, 2008 at 3:42 pm

What a puppy killer.

natoslug August 19, 2008 at 3:43 pm

Let’s go easy on the old guy. After all, not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime. It’s only a crime if you’re not Ted.

columnv August 19, 2008 at 3:46 pm

[re=63223]mookworthjwilson[/re]: not that they haven’t tried, mind you!

TGY August 19, 2008 at 3:48 pm

Isn’t Lanny Davis easy to ignore? He’s a fake writer writing for a fake paper.

snig August 19, 2008 at 3:58 pm

Possibilities:

Ted Stevens house doubled in size by lumber magically arriving through a series of tubes.

Lanny Davis visited Alaska, and Uncle Ted has 8 by 10 glossies of him doing something untoward with an Alaskan or with native Alaskan fauna.

Lanny Davis just hearts losers.

or possibly all three.

Tybalt August 19, 2008 at 3:59 pm

Lanny Davis ought to have his nuts ripped off with a plastic fork. This guy has done more to advance the cause of bullshit than anyone since the Nixon era. In the meantime, perhaps he should look up the meaning of “innocent” in the dictionary and go back to high school.

gurukalehuru August 19, 2008 at 4:03 pm

Does this mean we don’t get to torture the old coot? Damn.

magic titty August 19, 2008 at 4:24 pm

[re=63223]mookworthjwilson[/re]: are you sure??

johnbpt August 19, 2008 at 4:30 pm

Douchebags like Lanny Davis are precisely the reason I dropped out of law school — a decision I have never regretted.

GlennBecksTaint August 19, 2008 at 5:07 pm

Lanny the Tranny

Advocatus_Diaboli August 19, 2008 at 6:08 pm

By God, yes, Lanny’s right! Grand Jury indictments are the work of the Devil!

Hey Lanny, for your last few seconds of fame you should rail against the communist policy of Habeas Corpus.

LBOtomist August 19, 2008 at 6:10 pm

I love it when people apply this tired due process argument to totally irrelevant issues like media coverage of allegations or indefinite detention of foreign nationals on a Caribbean island. Duh, everyone knows that due process only protects us from action by the government (so long as such action has not been deemed legal by Alberto Gonzalez – in which case, never mind). Silly lanny davis.

HomoPolitico August 19, 2008 at 6:29 pm

[re=63368]GlennBecksTaint[/re]: Unfair…to trannies.

Oscar Folsom Cleveland August 19, 2008 at 7:15 pm

Trannies Protest Use of Lanny as Pejorative: Threaten to Walk Off the Job at Wash Times and UPI

Franklin Pierce & Pierce August 19, 2008 at 7:21 pm

Does Lanny Davis know (or care) that the Mooney King considers the Holocaust to God’s punishment to the Jews for rejecting Jesus?

Oops! Doesn’t matter!

Lionel Hutz Esq. August 19, 2008 at 7:40 pm

Is it true that if Lanny Davis and Bill Kristol were to ever meet, they would explode in a wild fit of self destruction leaving nothing but a large pile of steaming shit behind?

Cape Clod August 19, 2008 at 8:23 pm

Hey Lanny, thanks for explaining the Grand Jury process to stupid people, (Washington Times readers).
We’re familiar with it. It often leads to convictions for crooks like Stevens.

P.S.
Please prove Lionel Hurtz right. It will be your one significant contribution to life on Earth and might fertilize some plants in the process.

The 3-Legged Man August 19, 2008 at 9:11 pm

I understand the editors made him substitute “grand jury” for “kangaroo court”. How myopic.

salmonshark August 19, 2008 at 10:28 pm

I did not realize this goon Lanny Davis was a Clinton associate, but for me it goes to prove that the existance of the two party system is just a cooperative charade designed at screwing the little guy.

While many blame the GOP voters in Alaska for Ted being elected, well they have their reasons and one reason is the Democrats putting up equally dispicable characters.

In 2002 they ran Jim Duncan, who was at one time AK Senate president until the Senate had a coup to remove him in his position. After a few more years in the senate then Drifted into the Knowles Administration where backstabbed his way to Commissioner of Administration. He was the Other choice in Ted’s last race in 2002. His endeavors include running after hours political phone banks out of the State office Building.

He was canned as commissioner after Frank Murkowski was elected to the Governors office for a one term crash and burn. Jim moved from Commissioner of Administration to AFSCME Business Manager of the state’s employee union in violation of conflict of interest laws.

To resolve his conflict of interest, Jim agreed by signed stipulation that he would not represent any matter which arose under his position as commissioner, and a stipulation he subsequently violated. He could also work on no contract he had worked on as Commissioner. His representation of any grievance was a charade, and a fraud. This stipulation which neutered the Union, Left Frank Murkowski to unfettered ability to abuse contract and civil rights of state employees.

Many are looking for Alaska to beat the number of convictions associated with George Ryan’s tenure.

Point being again we now have two parties, two choices, one or the other bent on tyranny, and working together preserve their own power and to screw the little guy who has not given a donation. Apologetic comments by Lanny Davis are a perfect example of this symbiosis.

[URL=http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/JimDuncanAG.jpg][IMG]http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/th_JimDuncanAG.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/JimDuncanStip1-1.jpg][IMG]http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/th_JimDuncanStip1-1.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/JimDuncanStipp2-1.jpg][IMG]http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/th_JimDuncanStipp2-1.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/JimDuncanp3-1.jpg][IMG]http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/th_JimDuncanp3-1.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/jimDuncanStipp4-1.jpg][IMG]http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff191/salmonshark/th_jimDuncanStipp4-1.jpg[/IMG][/URL]

Lionel Hutz Esq. August 20, 2008 at 3:52 am

[re=63575]The 3-Legged Man[/re]: I understand the editors made him substitute actual words for the random scratches and thrown feces that he initially submitted.

James01 August 20, 2008 at 9:10 am

Hi guys this is James here.After Hillary Clinton lost, her annoying lawyer friend Lanny Davis had to find a new dumb job, even though he was never on staff to begin with. And so he became a columnist for where else, The Washington Times.
Thanks
James
New York Drug Treatment

salmonshark August 20, 2008 at 1:06 pm

[re=63565]Cape Clod[/re]: Steven’s lost his bid to move his trial to Alaska about an hour ago.

Now he will have to pay DC price to bribe Jurors.

salmonshark August 24, 2008 at 4:41 am

Hey All-

Avoid shootin from the hip, because innocent bystanders might be in danger.

A few of my facts are a little inaccurate about Duncan. He was the House speaker deposed in AK, not senator yer.

I was corrected in an e-maiil.

A couple of facts are incorrect here; Duncan has never been Senate President. He was deposed as Speaker of the Alaska House of Representatives in the early 1980s because he had promised everybody anything they wanted. According to my late BEST FRIEND, Hugh Malone (who was a former speaker of the House that brought us the PFD, and Commissioner of Revenue under Steve Cowper) when everybody realized Duncan’s duplicity they were revolted and the House has been held by a Republican majority ever since.

Later Duncan was elected to the Senate (by the political bumpkins in Juneau) where he accomplished very little, and lost by a wide margin to Don Young in 2002. At the time I worked for NEA-Alaska and participated actively in Duncan’s campaigns because he was a bought-and-paid-for boy of the teacher’s union. Knowles brought Duncan in as DOA special assistant to keep the unions down in their effort to gain increased pay and benefits while I was a business agent for ASEA, and after Knowles’ first commissioner Mark Boyer lost the Central Dupe Arbitration I brought against the state, and won.

Your statements about the likely results of Duncan’s settlement with Dept of Law are correct.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: