Gather ye rosebuds everyone, it’s time to read a magazine, as is our long-standing Thursday afternoon tradition. Let’s see, let’s see. How about The Washington Monthly, which has proudly resisted becoming in any way trendy since its inception. Come now, let’s take a look inside and maybe figure out why. (Early guess: nearly every article title is a pun?) MORE »

Sometimes, we’re chuggin’ along, reading a pretty good think piece on this or that aspect of the political culture, and we get to a passage that just stops us in our tracks and causes us to reach for our first drink of the day. Earlier today, this, from a forthcoming Washington Monthly piece on whether Democrats will or won’t investigate the hell out of the administration should they win Congress back, was that passage: MORE »

CJR has put together a comparison between two profiles of Robert Novak, one by Sidney Blumenthal at Salon and the other by Amy Sullivan at the Washington Monthly. Sullivan’s appeared first — eight months ago. There are clear similarities between the two, arguments and turns of phrase that seem specifically modified to escape direct quotation, a slightly more sophisticated version of how we got through graduate school.

Suliivan: Swiveling in his chair, Novak went on the attack — “It looks like the ambassador [Wilson] really doesn’t know who leaked this to me”
Blumenthal: Swiveling back and forth in his chair, he engaged in a show of bravado. “It looks like the ambassador [Wilson] really doesn’t know who leaked this to me”

The biggest surprise here, of course, is that anyone reads the Washington Monthly. Second: Apparently that line about Novak and the “greasy pole” is all Blumenthal. Well, he did work for Clinton. While we hate to get in the way of any media-lanche that would bury Novak, this does look bad. We don’t know if there’s an appreciable legal difference between plagiarism and laziness, but Blumenthal should probably find out. MORE »