White House Hotties: The Women
It’s a tough job, but somebody had to do it. We sifted through your many nominations in our White House Hotties contest, winnowing the entries down to eight contenders on the women’s side. (The male hotties will square off in a separate poll.)
The female finalists, with photos, appear below. Additional information about the contestants, including job titles and testimonials, will follow. If you know any of these gorgeous gals and would like to chime in, please feel free to email us (subject line: White House Hotties). We may quote from your testimonial — but we’ll keep you anonymous, unless you state otherwise.
Let the games begin!
Update: Here are the male finalists.
Update: We’re advised that Dina Powell and Kristen Slaughter no longer work in the White House. We regret the error. But we’ll leave them in the competition, ‘coz it’s kinda too late to remove them now…
Further Update: White House Hotties: The Men
2005 White House Office Staff List [FROOMKIN!]
Earlier: White House Hotties: Nominations, Please
READ MORE: White House, contests, dina powell, emily house, frances townsend, heidi marquez smith, hotties, kristen slaughter, mary anne calamas, meghan o’sullivan, taylor hughes, top, white house hotties
| Sponsored Links | ||
what, no jewish chicks work at the white house? i thought they were "pro-israel". oh, right, pro-israel is different than pro-jewish.
by The Revolting Blob on 06/15/06 03:11 PM
I am concerned that this poll may be unfair to our fair Fran. She has to be giving away at least 15 years to the rest of the field. Perhaps we need an over-40 division?
by RUS on 06/15/06 03:15 PM
I still can't get over how hung up some of you were with Dustee and Stormie when we clearly have a much better selection. It's like going to Italy and having dinner at the Olive Garden.
by Cooper on 06/15/06 04:16 PM
She may not be the hottest, but who can ignore Taylor's come-hither, sideways glance.
by Larry Bird Flu on 06/15/06 04:27 PM
Taylor Hughes is the bomb! Too bad she works for such a soulless dickhead.
by MSM Hack on 06/15/06 04:38 PM
But really, if you got with one of these girls, you'd be getting with a girl that WORKS FOR THE BUSH WHITE HOUSE. I think the overwhelming stench of evil would take the fun out of it.
by Spit on 06/15/06 05:03 PM
I would also like to know if they are single or married. Could definately sway the vote one way or the other!
by PlatypusRex on 06/15/06 05:09 PM
We think Taylor by a mile, simply for the heat surrounding the company she keeps.
by stingo on 06/15/06 05:20 PM
looks like taylor hughes is running away with this. but since she kept karl rove from getting indicted, clearly winning a little beauty contest is a cake walk for her.
by Ben G. on 06/15/06 06:49 PM
Cooper, did you just steal from The Daily Show? That's cool. No one who watches that show reads this blog.
by JulianWells on 06/16/06 11:22 AM
I gotta vote for Mary Anne. She looks young, bright, and get a load on those cheeks!
by The Single Senator on 06/16/06 12:35 PM
Julian:
While I was not intending to rip off a line (get this: other people have actually used that line even BEFORE the Daily Show did... like all the way back in 2002! ), I did do so. But thank you so much for pointing that out. You must feel so empowered to have called someone out anonymously on the comments section of a blog. Now you'll have something to exciting to discuss in your Friday night chat room! Good job, Skippy!
by Cooper on 06/16/06 03:59 PM
To leave a comment, please login with your Wonkette comments username and password. (How can I become a commenter?)
Warning: include(floater.inc.php) [function.include]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /wk/web/wonkette_assets/wonkette/politics/white-house/white-house-hotties-the-women-180970.php on line 295
Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening 'floater.inc.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/share/php:/usr/share/pear:/wk/web/wordpress//inc/') in /wk/web/wonkette_assets/wonkette/politics/white-house/white-house-hotties-the-women-180970.php on line 295