• February 8, 2012

AMERICA TO BECOME SUPER RICH AGAIN WITH THIS THING: Today we are all Caulkers: “The president also recommended that Congress enact a new ‘cash for caulkers’ program, which would offer financial incentives for homeowners to weatherize their homes. Senior administration officials said the program, based on the successful ‘cash for clunkers’ automobile rebate program, would leverage hiring in construction and manufacturing — sectors especially hard hit by the recession — while promoting energy efficiency, resulting in long-term savings for homeowners.” Leverage! Long-term savings! Incentivizing! Welcome to the 21st century, America, where “home insulation” is Product A. [Washington Post]

{ 37 comments }

Suds McKenzie December 8, 2009 at 4:04 pm

Caulk is Dead they say ..

Long Live Caulk!!

Long Live Caulk!!

shortsshortsshorts December 8, 2009 at 4:06 pm

MY CAULK CANNOT HANDLE ALL THAT WEATHERIZING.

SkoalRebel December 8, 2009 at 4:06 pm

Congress will, as usually, gladly take free caulk.

Surprised_Still December 8, 2009 at 4:07 pm

Good idea, bad nomenclature. Just b/c it fits on a bumper sticker, don’t mean it’s the right way to sell it. Plus, anything that sounds that much like ‘cock’ doesn’t belong in public policy, especially when there is cash being offered for it. Too much like a male escort service.

Sussemilch December 8, 2009 at 4:08 pm

Wake me up when they pass Dollars for Drunkards.

V572625694 December 8, 2009 at 4:09 pm

So did they think up the “catchy” title, and then go back and imagine legislation that would somehow relate to it? Because it makes no fucking sense. How will caulking my windows shut — as recommended by DHS Secretary Ridge some years back — help the construction industry? And isn’t the problem now that there are too many houses anyway, because that’s why the prices are going down and coyotes are wandering the ruins of Riverside County?

Come here a minute December 8, 2009 at 4:10 pm

Questions to ask your contractor:

- Do you like the taste of caulk?
- Is your caulk hot?
- How big is your caulk?

SayItWithWookies December 8, 2009 at 4:11 pm

[re=474205]Sussemilch[/re]: Hell, I’d settle for Pennies for Potheads.

Extemporanus December 8, 2009 at 4:11 pm

The caulksuckers in the Republican cualkus are gonna caulk blaulk all this “Cash for Caulkers” taulk.

finallyhappy December 8, 2009 at 4:11 pm

ok, I’m going to recaulk my shower stall- how much do I get?

Extemporanus December 8, 2009 at 4:14 pm

[re=474210]Come here a minute[/re]: – Can you complete the job by next Caulktober?

Aquannissiwamissoo December 8, 2009 at 4:16 pm

Who is going to squeeze all those caulk guns until the cracks are filled?

Egregious December 8, 2009 at 4:16 pm

Cash for “Caulk” is that what the Republicans are calling it these days? Someone pass the word at all the popular cruising locations.

memzilla December 8, 2009 at 4:17 pm

Yeah, whenever I play Monopoly, I always choose the Caulk Gun token. Because Scottie Dog takes it up the a**.

snideinplainsight December 8, 2009 at 4:17 pm

Spackle me, Obama, spackle me!! Oh, YES!!!!

proudgrampa December 8, 2009 at 4:19 pm

WTF??

This is going to end badly. Very badly.

bureaucrap December 8, 2009 at 4:21 pm

Wouldn’t it make more sense to just be forthright and call it “Money for Gay Sex”?

SkoalRebel December 8, 2009 at 4:25 pm

[re=474224]bureaucrap[/re]: That’s the formal title.

Formerly Preferred December 8, 2009 at 4:28 pm

Don’t they already have this, in the form of a tax credit for installing insulation? Maybe they could combine this program with health care reform and get Insulin for Insulators.

Accordion-o-rama December 8, 2009 at 4:29 pm

The inevitable Republican counter-proposal (to remove all insulation from homes and businesses, because of freedom) will be called Caulk Blocker.

Harvey Birdman December 8, 2009 at 4:36 pm

I would totally take a subsidized half-bath and kitchen island.

I Am Not Your Gary Busey December 8, 2009 at 4:37 pm

I don’t know about y’all, but I just bought a 90 year old house that could use some insulation. It’s warmer in the attic than it is in the house right now.

Hooray For Anything December 8, 2009 at 4:40 pm

I hear Tiger Woods was a big fan of getting his caulk worked on.

(PS- I actually think it’s a good and somewhat clever idea. Which means it’ll never happen as DC most people in DC doesn’t do clever)

Prommie December 8, 2009 at 4:43 pm

“Handouts for Handjobs.” In the end, we have to get this back to the basics. We don’t make anything in the US anymore, the economy is based on writing POS accounting and inventory management software for fast food shops and mowing each other’s lawns. We are simply gonna have to stimulate the economy with some sin industry programs, we need to jumpstart the economy from the waist up, then everyone can take their whore-ing money and buy Kentucky Fried Chicken, con-agra will sell some more frying oil, Someone can program the POS system, and tghen everyone goes out and buys a handjob and its starts all over again.

The “multiplier effect” is amazing, you just get 100 people in a huge circle, and everyone jerk off the person to their right, for $10; by the time everyone comes, thats a $1,000 contribution to the GNP, just from the same $10 going around and around that circle.

The Circle Jerk economy, really, its basically all we got.

stolichnayaaa December 8, 2009 at 4:55 pm

Makes sense, terrible name. Kind of like Fareed Zakaria.

Lascauxcaveman December 8, 2009 at 5:09 pm

The wine industry, like construction, is in a terrible slump. Years of bumper crops have led to an oversupply of product, directly coinciding with a drastic decline in European drinking habits (the kids are favoring beer and spirits these days). Plus, the wine industry’s own marketing efforts promoting wine as an “upscale” way to tipple have worked against them, as now its seen as almost more chic to economize.

All this has led to fire-sale prices on even really good wines and the lower prices go, the lower consumers expect the prices to go and consequently wineries are laying off their employees at an alarming rate.

I think the government could use it’s leverage, incentivizing those wineries to keep their staffs intact by paying some or all their labor costs.

Lascauxcaveman December 8, 2009 at 5:10 pm

“Cash for Corkers,” as it were.

Lionel Hutz Esq. December 8, 2009 at 5:37 pm

Leverage! Long-term savings! Incentivizing! Welcome to the 21st century 1980s, America

Corrected.

proudgrampa December 8, 2009 at 5:48 pm

[re=474285]Lascauxcaveman[/re]: It would be better if the government had a Cash for Drinkers program. Incentivizing Americans to keep drinking in order to anaesthetize ourselves from the pain of a bad economy.

What could go wrong??

sati demise December 8, 2009 at 6:08 pm

actually, we should all be building houses out of straw bales. no caulk involved

Sharkey December 8, 2009 at 9:27 pm

Meh. Still gunning for “Cash for Sharkeys.”

CanadianBacon December 8, 2009 at 9:55 pm

Cash for putting caulk in a crack? A stimulating stimulus package to get America back to work on the Hershey Highway.

Whatever Blows Your Skirt December 8, 2009 at 10:07 pm

[re=474253]Prommie[/re]: WIN!!!!!!1!!

LowerdPeninsula December 9, 2009 at 1:18 am

Son: Are they really this oblivious, daddy?

Dad: Yes, Jimmy. But, where in the hell did you learn the word “oblivious”? From your damned socialist public school system? No more book-learnin’ for you; you’re going to be home schooled.

LowerdPeninsula December 9, 2009 at 1:31 am

[re=474253]Prommie[/re]: You want to see the ultimate fate of the Circle Jerk Economy, Prommie. One word: Michigan. Yep, my homestate played the circle jerk for decades, and even as it came crashing down we continued to play it. Everyone played it for the ultimate benefit of the auto industry, and look what happened.

You’ve been warned, America. Repent, bitches! Repent!

Jukesgrrl December 9, 2009 at 2:53 am

[re=474271]stolichnayaaa[/re]: “…terrible name. Kind of like Fareed Zakaria.”

And Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Egregious December 9, 2009 at 9:58 am

[re=474235]Accordion-o-rama[/re]:

Win!

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: